Common Core 3.0 Update Project Overview and Status Timeline for Completion Evaluation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PQF Induction: Small group delivery or 1-1 session.
Advertisements

Personalized Learning Update. Essential Questions  What is Personalized Learning and how is it aligned to our business plan?  Where are we now?
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Your Local School District District Team Orientation Date Time.
ASSURING THAT TRAINING HAS IMPACT: EVALUATING A LARGE AND COMPLEX TRAINING SYSTEM Child Welfare Evaluation Summit Washington, D.C. | August 30 th, 2011.
Mara Manson, Ed.D Adelphi University March 28, 2014.
Overview of District Self Study. Objectives To understand specific aspects of the District Self Study: A.Purpose and use B.Recommended Practices C.Content:
Statewide Overview Common CORE 3.0 (CC 3.0)
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning.
Web-based Transdisciplinary Training: Problem Solving and Response to Intervention Presented to Nebraska RtI Consortium February 23, 2007 Kathy L. Bradley-Klug,
project DATA. Agenda Entry task Welcome and introductions project DATA –Background –Purpose and.
Louisiana Reading Association Update April 21, 2012.
Common Core 3.0 Content Overview Stakeholder Feedback Seeking Your Input to Improve Child Welfare Training! For audio: call enter access.
Up-Date on Science and SS February 2015 Faculty Meeting.
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
Common Core 3.0 Executive Summary Stakeholder Feedback Seeking Your Input to Improve Child Welfare Training! For audio: call enter access.
Business Planning and Strategy Alignment Planning Process
Academy for Professional Excellence is a project of San Diego State University School of Social Work Spectrum of Learning RTA Regional Sharing July 31,
Instructional System Design
Service Planning Block Stakeholder feedback. Agenda Welcome Orientation Acknowledgements Overview of Common Core 3.0 Overview of Service Planning Block.
ADVANCED LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT FOR SUPERVISORS (ALDS) PROGRAM YEAR 1 IMPLEMENTATION MARCH 2010 – FEBRUARY 2011 PILOT PROGRAM.
NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,
Common Core 3.0 Learning Objectives for Stakeholder Feedback Seeking Your Input to Improve Child Welfare Training! For audio: call enter.
Updated Performance Management for Exempt Staff Fall 2009.
1 Adopting and Implementing a Shared Core Practice Framework A Briefing/Discussion Objectives: Provide a brief overview and context for: Practice Models.
Do it pro bono. Strategic Scorecard Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Strategic Scorecard Service.
Big Changes from UC about A-G Nina Costales High School Articulation Coordinator University of California | Office of the President California Charter.
Certificate IV in Project Management Introduction to Project Management Course Number Qualification Code BSB41507.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Quality Assurance. Identified Benefits that the Core Skills Programme is expected to Deliver 1.Increased efficiency in the delivery of Core Skills Training.
Measuring and Improving Practice and Results Practice and Results 2006 CSR Baseline Results Measuring and Improving Practice and Results Practice and Results.
September 14, 2015| 10:00 am to 3:00 pm 1.  Review of Previous Meeting Summary  Additions to Agenda  Action Items Follow up  Membership Updates 
The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education, #H323A However, these contents do not necessarily.
The Principles of Learning and Teaching P-12 Training Program
Katie A. Learning Collaborative For Audio, please call: Participant code: Please mute your phone Building Child Welfare and Mental.
Educational Solutions for Workforce Development Delivering a more mutual NHS and improving the quality of Scotland’s health care through education & workforce.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person, regardless of audience, of the following resources found on.
Kent ISD Collaborative Five Year Transition Plan to the Common Core State Standards Collaboration + Communication = Success!
COUNTY PARTNERSHIP TO MEET SKILL NEEDS & ENHANCE TRANSFER CLIMATE The Ohio Child Welfare Training Program.
Emergency Management Training and Education System Protection and National Preparedness National Preparedness Directorate National Training and Education.
Connected Vehicle Training and Education Implementation Plan T3 Webinar August 2015.
Intel ® Teach Program International Curriculum Roundtable Programs of the Intel ® Education Initiative are funded by the Intel Foundation and Intel Corporation.
Illinois Department of Children & Family Service/Chicago State University STEP Program - NHSTES May THE STEP PROGRAM Supervisory Training to Enhance.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Common Core 3.0 Online Learning Classroom Skill Building Field Activities.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
ITIL MALC Qualification - Managing Across the Lifecycle Complete Certification Kit - Study Guide and Online Course- Second Edition 1 Who Knew ITIL Certification.
Child Welfare Training Evaluation in California Update on the Strategic Planning Process RTA All Staff SPS | March
Leading Nottingham Programme update to ACOS 7 September 2010 Angela Probert Director of HR and Organisational Transformation Contributions from Lisa Sharples.
Program Assessment – an overview Karen E. Dennis O: sasoue.rutgers.edu.
2015/16 Staff Performance Appraisals Webinar for ANR Supervisors Spring 2016.
1 Update on Teacher Effectiveness July 25, 2011 Dr. Rebecca Garland Chief Academic Officer.
AGRO PARKS “The Policy Cycle” Alex Page Baku November 2014.
Summative Evaluation Shasta Davis. Dimension: Preparation (Score- 4) Plans for instructional strategies that encourage the development of critical thinking,
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
August 12, :00-3:30. Group Agreements  Be Collaborative  Ask Questions  Be Open  Be Respectful  Be willing to make mistakes  Start and end.
CHW Montana Training Program Curriculum Feedback Retreat
Technical Business Consultancy Project
Nancy Burstein Sue Sears California State University, Northridge
Common Core 3.0 Subcommittee Meeting
CPSL: Training, Transfer of Learning (TOL), and
Transforming Hidalgo County CSCD into an Evidence Based Agency
Network Team Institute July 8-12, 2013
Common Core 3.0 Subcommittee Meeting
CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
The Public Schools of Dover and Sherborn
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Presentation transcript:

Common Core 3.0 Update Project Overview and Status Timeline for Completion Evaluation

Why Revise Core? Improved flexibility Improved learning experience Better use of technology Reflecting shift to emerging practice model

Revision Process Meetings – August 2012 – October 2012 – January 2013 – June 2013 Participants – RTAs – CWDA – CDSS – County Staff Development – CalSWEC

Revision Concepts Stakeholder driven Improved learning experience Supports shift to integrate current practices Better use of technology Improved flexibility

Goals of the Revision Streamlining content in Common Core Identifying alternative modalities for delivery of material Sharpening the focus of Common Core to build key skills that are critical to practice. Identifying areas of the Core that would best be reinforced with on-the-job training and/or coaching

Goals of the Revision Aligning Core to practice, including: – Supporting implementation of a practice model – Sequencing of topics – Grouping content into areas of practice Making the curriculum revision process more responsive to practice changes. Identifying methods to support the key knowledge and skills in the Common Core for existing staff and other audiences.

Principles of the Revision Support evidence-based practice Reflect the knowledge and skills needed for beginning social workers. Use the modality that most efficiently conveys the information and allows application to practice.

Principles of the Revision Ensure all training is accessible to all newly hired social workers in the state Provide content that is appropriate for all counties Satisfy the federal requirements as outlined in the CFSR and the Program Improvement Plans completed by California in 2004 and 2009.

CC 3.0 Content – Content identification process – Content development process – Content overview

Foundation

Engagement

Assessment

Service Planning

Monitoring and Adapting

Transition

Timeline for Content Development

Timeline for Pilots and Revision

Training Evaluation Update CCv3.0: Key Points for evaluation While CCv3.0 is being developed… A CCv3.0 evaluation proposal: Evaluation Portfolio Once CCv3.0 revision plan is finalized… Next Macro Eval Meeting & Webinar

 The Common Core 3.0 workgroup has identified some key points for evaluation: Knowledge tests will continue for select areas The primary focus will be on collecting data to evaluate acquisition of key skills The group identified a key skill to begin evaluating (developing strength-based, achievable case plan activities grounded in assessment of strengths and needs), but stakeholders identified a different priority (critical thinking and assessment) CCv3.0: Key Points for Evaluation

Continue to administer: – Demographic forms (Line and Supes) – CYD knowledge test (pre post) – PP knowledge test (pre post) – CMI1 embedded eval – CMI2 embedded eval – Casework Supervision embedded eval Supervisor Core (Casework Supervision embedded eval): in process of scoring practice round of tests While CCv3.0 is being developed…

Where we want to go: – Regions want to provide valuable info to their counties; counties want to use the info to prove their CWWs are getting effective training. Goal: – Move into eval of Transfer of Learning (TOL) – how learning is applied in the field. Macro Eval Team initially requested TOL eval of writing Case Plan objectives; then CCv3.0 stakeholders requested TOL eval of Safety & Risk Assessments (linked to Case Plans). 22 CCV3.0: TOL is where we want to Go

Possible combination that meets county needs, looks at TOL Eval, and can link training to supervision: an Evaluation Portfolio. Portfolio consists of 3 mtgs w/ Supes/Coaches/ Mentors: – 1 st mtg – Prep trainees for Core learning and eval – 2 nd mtg – Check in re: training & test results thus far, and prep for field-based/TOL activities & eval (& link to supervision) – 3 rd mtg – Check in re: training & test results overall, ID further needs & supports (& again link to supervision) 23 Proposal for Training Evaluation in CCv3.0: Evaluation Portfolio

Prep for learning Checkpoint #1 Assess status of training & eval Prep for FBT & TOL Eval Checkpoint #2 Assess status of training & eval ID further needs and supports Checkpoint #3 24 Evaluation Portfolio: Process Map Some time during Core training (in class, online & in the field), Supe/Coach/Mentor meets with trainees to… *Note: We will need to prepare people to be field advisors/coaches.

Evaluation Portfolio Recommendations (from June 2013 CCv3.0 mtg) Clarify the purpose of training evaluation of TOL Clarify the purpose of three meetings/checkpoints Avoid use of individual raw scores and other numeric test data Use of evaluation during E-learning modules Identify first the skills that are considered the most essential Focus on skill development in the evaluation portfolio Link to supervisor & unit Ideal timing of 3 checkpoints Vetting

Work together to develop TOL evaluation plan (part of agenda for 11/7/13 Macro Eval Team mtg), Develop formative (course level) assessment forms for each module as they’re being prepared for piloting Develop and pilot next generation of testing materials on a rolling basis Once CCv3.0 revision plan finalized:

Supe Core (Emb Eval) Scoring Webinar: Weds, 9/11/13, 1-3pm Pacific Macro Eval Webinar: Friday, 11/1/13, 1-3pm Pacific (demographics and test results) Macro Eval Meeting: Thursday, 11/7/13, 10am-3pm in Sacramento (possible edits to strategic plan based on finalization of CCv3.0 revision plan, including TOL evaluation design, test results, etc.) Next Macro Eval Mtgs/Webinars:

CC 3.0 Next Steps – LO development – CDOG review of LOs – Stakeholder review of LOs