Institutional Course Evaluation Solution Faculty Senate Executive Committee September 12, 2012 Carol VanZile-Tamsen, Ph.D.; Associate Director, Office.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning for Academic Program Review Site Visits
Advertisements

University-Wide Course Evaluation Committee Peter Biehl, Chair, Department of Anthropology Krissy Costanzo, Committee Staff Support; Academic Affairs March.
Strategic Plan Briefing Session Progress and Challenges Spring
All-Campus Meeting of Faculty & Staff Monday, August 19, 2013 G. Michael Pratt, Ph.D Associate Provost, Miami University Dean, College of Professional.
Wayne Huebner, Chairman, MSE S&T Campus Project Leader Chris Weisbrook, Director of Academic Programs UM System Project Leader presented to: ITCC April.
OCTOBER 25, m-NET Mobilizing National Educator Talent (“m-NET”) is an innovative, nontraditional program to help special education teachers earn.
Orientation for Academic Program Reviews
New Web-Based Course Evaluation Services Available to Schools and Departments Presentation to Faculty Council November 6, 2009.
What’s it Like to be a Professor? REU July 7, 2009 Michael J. Lewis, Director Department of Computer Science Binghamton University (SUNY)
Program Review and General Education Assessment at the University at Albany: Past, Present and Future Barbara Wilkinson Assistant Director for Assessment.
Academic Media Videoconference Services Assessing your Students, your Course, and the Videoconference System Donald Dover Videoconference Operations Manager.
Monroe Community College 1 Assessment of General Education Social Sciences Knowledge and Skills Area Presenters Frances Dearing, Assessment Coordinator.
Improving the Online Evaluation Process and Response Rates SAIR 2011.
5 th AMICAL Conference 25 – 28 May 2008 Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria Open Source Applications at AUCA Learning, Teaching and Collaboration.
Using the UB Course Evaluation System A Guide for Staff The UB Course Evaluation System is powered by.
Minding your (Department) Business with Moodle Dana Bryant, Ph.D. Science Education Technology Specialist Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) Program.
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN STUDY ABROAD PROGRAMMES: THE CASE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF GHANA E. Kweku Osam Dean, Faculty of Arts University of Ghana.
Using the UB Course Evaluation System A Guide for Faculty The UB Course Evaluation System is powered by.
Professor Dolina Dowling
Prince George’s Community College Online Express Training Faculty to Teach Online Mary Wells Margo Chaires Andrew Habermacher.
Survey of American History Survey of European History.
04 March 2013 Provost's Report to College Senate.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
Engaging the Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky Working Together to Prepare Quality Educators.
NewTextbook Tools M-Pathways and Ctools. Background Fall 2006: Student concerns about rising textbook costs results in Provost’s Textbook Task Force.
University of Maryland Baltimore County Department of Psychology Psyc100: Introductory Psychology Eileen O’Brien, Ph.D.
CLU Online Course Evaluations Melinda Wright November 2009.
End of Course Evaluation Taimi Olsen, Ph.D., Director, Tennessee Teaching and Learning Center Jennifer Ann Morrow, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Evaluation,
Washington State University Strategic Plan Overview and Implementation Process On web site at
PERIODIC ASSESSMENT OF PROGRAMS AT UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL Office of the Provost Hélène David, associate vice-rector academic affairs Claude Mailhot, Professor.
Priorities of the Provost/VPAA Office for : Senate Forum September 17, 2015 Thomas M. DiLorenzo Provost and VP for Academic Affairs.
Bologna – a top-down and bottom-up process at the University of Helsinki? Markku Kivinen Director Aleksanteri-insitute.
NC STATE UNIVERSITY Campus Systems and Calendar Systems: a self assessment Sarah Noell, ITD, Project Coordinator Harry Nicholos, ITD, Technical co-chair.
AY Year  The administration period runs for two weeks in the 14 –weeks sessions (fall and spring) and six calendar days in other sessions. 
Don Dodson, Senior Vice Provost Diane Jonte-Pace, Vice Provost for Undergraduate Studies Carol Ann Gittens, Director, Office of Assessment Learning Assessment.
Students Course and Teacher Evaluation Please refer to notes at the bottom of this slide.
Online Course Evaluations Is there a perfect time? Presenters: Cassandra Jones, Ph.D., Director of Assessment Michael Anuszkiewicz, Research Associate.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
Development of an Online Masters Jim Flowers Ball State University
Curriculum at SCC and Role of the Senate Presented by Craig Rutan and Joyce Wagner SCC Academic Senate Fall 2013 Retreat.
Proposal Development by Faculty in an Academic Unit College, School, Department, or Program Proposal Preparation Office of Academic Programs, Assessment,
Interim Provost’s Report Faculty Senate November 11, 2014.
Workshop #1: Introduction to Graduation Project Wednesday September 2 nd at 10 am Capstone Committee Department of Computer Science.
05 December 2011 Provost's Report to College Senate.
Improving Campus IT Accessibility Dr. Jonathan Lazar Dept. of Computer and Information Sciences Towson University Copyright Jonathan Lazar This work.
Proposal Development by Faculty in an Academic Unit College, School, Department, or Program Proposal Preparation Office of Academic Programs, Assessment,
Student Success in Mathematics: Guiding Principles Shahla Peterman University of Missouri-St. Louis Math Technology Learning Center.
New Program Proposal Workflow Chart
Curriculum at SCC and Role of the Senate Presented by Craig Rutan and Joyce Wagner SCC Academic Senate Fall 2013 Retreat.
Student Evaluation of Teachers Committee Report
Student Evaluation of Teachers Committee Report
Institutional Program Review 2017 Update
Course Evaluation Committee
IDEA Course Evaluations
Course Evaluation Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations
Substantive Change Full Category I Proposal Workflow
The Academic Alert System: Fall 2007 Report
Extend an Existing Degree Program to a New Location
Extend an Existing Degree, Certificate, Minor, or Option Program:
New Certificate Program
Terminate an Academic Unit
Reorganize (Merge, Split, Move) an Academic Program or Academic Unit
New Degree (Undergraduate, First Professional, Graduate) Program
Establish a New Academic Unit
Suspend a Degree or Certificate Program
Rename an Academic Program (Degree or Certificate) or Academic Unit
Institutional Course Evaluation Solution
Fort Valley State University
Administrative Review Committee
Presentation transcript:

Institutional Course Evaluation Solution Faculty Senate Executive Committee September 12, 2012 Carol VanZile-Tamsen, Ph.D.; Associate Director, Office of University Accreditation and Assessment Joseph Mantione, Assistant Vice Provost, Institutional Analysis

Currently at UB: Five different course evaluation solutions are used across the 12 units Additional systems used by academic support units delivering instruction

Currently at UB: In some areas, preparation of evaluation forms for course offerings is an administrative nightmare Students enrolled in courses offered by different units do not have a single place in which they evaluate all of their courses In many areas, response rates are too low for any meaningful conclusions to be drawn

Currently at UB:

ConnectEdu in the College of Arts and Sciences UBCATS - “University at Buffalo Course and Teacher Survey” - A web-based software application that allows students to anonymously evaluate courses and instructors online. Data Upload Process Upload of Course, Enrollment, Faculty, Student, TA, and Supplemental Instructor tables to the site Fall ,658 Student Enrollment Records 17,095Student Import Records 2,350Course Import Records 1,212Faculty / Department Records 396Teaching Assistants Records Departmental Access Process (Dept. Chair, Assistants) Set up the survey – keep it open for a month – close it two days after the last day of final exams.

ConnectEdu in the College of Arts and Sciences Communication Process Place student announcement and survey link on myUB Send s (17,078 initial s) to Students to: Inform them that the evaluation site is open Invite them to log in and do the evaluation). Send s (1,137 initial s) to Faculty to: Inform them that the survey is open Ask them to monitor response rates (real time) Remind their students to do the evaluation Send follow-up weekly s/reminders to students with incomplete surveys (15,719, 14,072, 12,652, 11,733 s in Fall’11) Send final to Faculty at the close of the survey to let them know that they can log in and access the evaluation results the day after web grading closes for the semester. Reporting Process Distribute our own custom Summary Reports to Dept. Chair and Director of Graduate Studies.

ConnectEdu in the College of Arts and Sciences UBCATS Challenges 1 Data upload- creation of new HUB querying tools 2.Undeliverable s – students not using/checking their UB 3.Lack of Summary Reports 4.Departmental buy in – lack of ownership 5.Limited technical support 6.Confusion among students – not all UB courses are part of UBCATS 7.I can’t log in! 8.Reports are not accessible to students 9.Response rate 10. Survey fatigue To some degree, the other 11 schools, Athletics, MFC and EOC all do the same thing and incur the same PSR costs. They also have the same challenges.

The Benefit of A Single Solution: Uniformity in Administration leading to greater efficiency and more reliable results Greater transparency for students and one-stop evaluations may encourage greater response rates Availability of Data and Reports for Assessment Purposes: – Faculty review and development – Program Review – Accreditation Reporting

Course Evaluation Items: For comparability of ratings across courses and instructors, a core of common questions could be useful: – 3-5 questions – These would be developed jointly by Faculty Senate Executive Committee and Associate Deans Council Beyond that, we would promote the greatest flexibility possible for units in selecting questions

Vendors already on campus Campuslabshttp:// (cost proposal submitted) ConnectEduhttp:// evaluation-suite/college-course-evaluation.html (cost proposal submitted) evaluation-suite/college-course-evaluation.html Digital Measureshttp:// E*Valuehttps:// SmartEvalshttp://service.onlinecourseevaluations.com/ *Blackboardhttp:// (no course eval solution at present)

Conclusions Regardless of platform chosen, there are many good reasons to have an institutional course evaluation system We hope you will consider data use and reporting reasons, as well as fiscal reasons, as you consider this issue.