Cancer Registry Coding Changes for 2014 Presented by the Kentucky Cancer Registry February, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Instructions and Reporting Requirements Module 11 Electronic Reporting For Urology Physician Practices May 2013 North Carolina Central Cancer Registry.
Advertisements

Instructions and Reporting Requirements Module 2 Electronic Reporting For Facilities March 2014 North Carolina Central Cancer Registry State Center for.
STAGING MCR Staff Show Me Healthy Women March 27, 2008 Supported by a Cooperative Agreement between DHSS and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Esophagus, Esophagus GE Junction, Stomach
Nadya Dimitrova Marieta Petkova. 13 Regional cancer registries BNCR: -Established in 1952; cases a year; million population;
1 Renal Pelvis, Ureter, Bladder and Other Urinary.
AJCC Staging Moments AJCC TNM Staging 7th Edition Rectal Case #3 Contributors: J. Milburn Jessup, MD Cancer Diagnosis Program, DCTD, NCI, Rockville, Maryland.
Tumour Matching N.Ireland Experience Colin Fox (IT Manager) Richard Middleton (Data Manager)
CS Evaluation Fields Education and Training Team Collaborative Stage Data Collection System Version (Effective date: 1/1/2011)
Coding Pitfalls Jessica K. Dohler, BS, CTR. Objectives 0 Know how to code the Tumor/Ext Eval code when using intraoperative findings 0 Know when to code.
Jessica K. Dohler, BS, CTR. Need for Change  Complicated Site Specific Grading No easy conversion to available codes Need for special guidelines 
Collaborative Stage Version An Update From Martin Madera CS Program Administrator.
Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Neoplasm Project. Primary Site and Histology Rules Peggy Adamo, RHIT, CTR NCI SEER October 2009.
Bladder, Kidney Parenchyma and Testis
Cancer Staging. What is cancer staging? Staging describes the severity of a person’s cancer based on the extent of the original (primary) tumor and whether.
TRAM Educational Conference September 19, 2014 Meritus Medical Center 1.
Directly Coded Summary Stage
AJCC Staging Moments AJCC TNM Staging 7th Edition Breast Case #2 Contributors: Stephen B. Edge, MD Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York David.
Coding Factoids and Frequently Asked Questions Education & Training Team Collaborative Stage Data Collection System Version 1 (CSv2)
1 LUNG. 2 Equivalent Terms, Def, Charts, Tables, Illustrations.
1 MP/H Coding Rules General Instructions MP/H Task Force Multiple Primary Rules Histology Coding Rules 2007.
From Abstract to Audit and Back Again Nancy Rold Missouri Cancer Registry MoSTRA Annual Meeting 2010 This project was supported in part by a cooperative.
2010 Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Neoplasm Project Registry Operations and the SEER Program.
Cancer Staging.
Putting the Puzzle Together: Breast Collaborative Staging Melissa Riddle, RHIT, CTR October 6, 2012.
CSv2 101 Education & Training Team Collaborative Stage Data Collection System Lecture Version 1.0.
Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Neoplasm Project. Acknowledgments American College of Surgeons (ACOS) Commission on Cancer (COC) Canadian Cancer Registries.
Directly Coded Summary Stage Prostate Cancer National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Division of Cancer Prevention and Control,
EVALUATION OF LYMPH NODES & PATHOLOGIC EXAMINATION FOR BREAST CASES Tonya Brandenburg, MHA, CTR Kentucky Cancer Registry.
Data Quality Toolbox for Registrars MCSS Workshop December 9, 2003 Elaine Collins.
Background  Reports of long-term survivors (≥5 years) of locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC) have focused mainly on HRQL or GI symptoms  Only.
1 Myeloma Plasma Cell Disorders (Schema Name: MyelomaPlasmaCellDisorder) V0203.
What’s the Diff? Sue C. Vest, CTR Missouri Cancer Registry This project was supported in part by a cooperative agreement between the Centers for Disease.
AJCC 6 TH EDITION STAGING OF BREAST CARCINOMA. AJCC NODE STAGING -16 CATEGORIES pNX – 1 option pN0 – 5 options; null,(i-),(i+),(mol-),(mol+) pN1 – 4.
VS. CSv2 Changes CSv2 compared to CSv1 Part 1, Section 1.
KCR SPRING TRAINING 2014 New ICD-O-3 Terminology.
2015 CHANGES IN REPORTING REQUIREMENTS AND CANCER CODING INSTRUCTIONS KENTUCKY CANCER REGISTRY SPRING TRAINING 2015 PRESENTED BY FRANCES ROSS.
Agency/Standard Setter Updates OSCaR Fall Educational Workshop Claudia Cooksie, RHIT,CTR October 9, 2015 Portland, Oregon.
KCR 2014 Spring Training CHANGES IN CODING GRADE.
New Data Items MP/H Task Force Multiple Primary Rules Histology Coding Rules 2007.
ajcc TNM Staging: chapter 1, and Summary stage
Collaborative Staging for Colon Site Specific Factors Tonya Brandenburg, MHA, CTR QA Manager Abstracting and Coding Kentucky Cancer Registry.
Vicki LaRue, CTR KCR Abstractor’s Training February 12,
*Be brief, yet thorough enough to allow recoding of the data fields from the text only! * Use accepted abbreviations from Abstractor’s Manual Appendix.
CSv2 for the Hematopoietic Neoplasms 1. 2 This includes five schemas …. Hematopoietic, Reticuloendothelial, Immunopro-liferative and Myeloproliferative.
BY FRANCES ROSS, CTR PRESENTED AT THE NAACCR ANNUAL CONFERENCE JUNE, 2008 Record Consolidation Test with the 2007 Multiple Primary/Histology Rules.
1 Virginia Cancer Registrars Association and Virginia Cancer Registry Annual Meeting October 3, 2007.
Presented at the NAACCR Annual Conference Quebec City June 22, 2010.
Gary M. Levin, BA, CTR Florida Cancer Data System NAACCR 2008 Annual Conference 2007 Multiple Primary Rules: Impact on Tumor Counts.
Is Your Data Management System Flexible for Quality Control Activities? Winny Roshala, CTR Data Standards and Quality Control Unit NAACCR: June 13-19,
Using CDC Edits Metafile in the Registry to Support Clinical Trials Recruitment Alan R. Houser, MA, MPH C/NET Solutions Dennis Deapen, DrPH Los Angeles.
NPCR Data Completeness and Quality Audits Review of: Collaborative Stage and Surgery Data Mary Lewis, CTR NPCR Program Consultant.
2016 Edits.
Kentucky Cancer Registry
Collaborative Staging for Colon
2018 Solid Tumor Rules: What’s New- Working through the rules
Cancer Reporting Changes for 2017 and 2018
Creating the perfect text…
Tumor Grade.
Automated Consolidation of Collaborative Stage Data Items
Reda Wilson Qiming He Cheryll Thomas Jessica King
2018 Updates to ICD-O-3 Histology Coding
What’s New for 8th Edition
Colon AJCC Case Answers
SEER EOD and Summary Stage
Neoadjuvant Treatment Results – Only Part of the Story, The Missing Piece Donna M. Gress, RHIT, CTR.
The Progress of npcr audits What have we done, what have we learned, and where are we going now Click to edit subtitle Click to enter your Division Name.
Text Mining for Data Quality Analysis of Melanoma Tumor Depth
Presentation transcript:

Cancer Registry Coding Changes for 2014 Presented by the Kentucky Cancer Registry February, 2014

List of 2014 changes Conversion from CSv02.04 to CSv02.05 Discontinue Grade Path Value/System; move to Historic tab Tumor Grade coding instructions revised Some ICD-O-3 updates implemented (preferred terms and synonyms) Casefinding List based on ICD-10 codes added to CPDMS Manual Hematopoietic Database and Manual revised for 2014

Presentation Agenda CSv02.05 changes1 hourFrances Tumor Grade15 mins.Emily ICD-O-3 changes15 minsEmily Hematopoietic changes30 mins. Frances

Collaborative Stage v02.05 Involves a data conversion of all cases back to 2004 Must be used for initial data entry for all cases with a diagnosis date of Jan. 1, 2014 or later May be used for data entry of any cases with earlier diagnosis dates Some data items have been discontinued Grade Path System and Grade Path Value Some Site Specific Factors, which were never required Some coding instructions have been clarified Some corrections to the mapping algorithm for AJCC and Summary Stage values have been implemented

New look for CS web site

Click on Software tab

Click on Coding Instructions

Coding Instructions tab Contains links to - a list of changes in v02.05 called Release Notes - a list of requirements by each Standard Setter (CoC, SEER, NPCR) - CS Coding Instructions - For this release, only the HTML Help format is available for downloading: A desktop icon that reads CS Manual Online Help, when double clicked, will open the CS Coding Instructions software program. The program contains all schemas plus general and site specific instructions. Extra tables which are not used for coding but that may be helpful for data analyses are also included. Extra tables which are not used for coding but that may be helpful for data analyses are also included.

CS Data Conversion – some manual review and re-coding will be required … … in these schemas: Bile Ducts Intrahepatic and Bile Ducts Perihilar Bladder Head and Neck schemas Nasopharynx

Bile Ducts Intrahepatic and Perihilar Review SSF 10 (Tumor Growth Pattern) if coded 000 or 999 Explanation Prior instructions for coding SSF10 for BileDuctsIntrahepat indicated that the information should be coded based upon findings noted in the pathology report. Instructions have been modified to indicate that information can be obtained from radiology and surgery reports as well as from pathology reports. Review all cases coded in the BileDuctsIntrahepat schema with an SSF 10 code of 000 or 999 to determine if a code of 010 should be assigned, which could change the derived T and stage values. BileDuctsPerihilar should also be reviewed but it will not affect the derived T and stage values

Bladder Review cases with CS Lymph Nodes coded 400 or 450 and recode SSF2 (Size of Metastasis in Lymph Nodes) Explanation Prior instructions for coding SSF2 included coding the largest size of any regional node listed under CS Lymph Nodes. SSF 2 instructions have been modified to indicate common iliac nodes are excluded when determining size of metastasis in lymph nodes. Recode SSF 2 based on the size of lymph node metastasis in iliac (internal, external, NOS), obturator, pelvic, perivesical, sacral or regional nodes, NOS only. Do not include common iliac nodes.

Head and Neck schemas Review SSF1 if coded 988 Explanation Any head and neck cases with code 988 in SSF1 should be reviewed and recoded so that stage can be derived after conversion to v0205. KCR may not have any of these cases.

Nasopharynx Review cases with CS Lymph Nodes coded 130, 230, and 430 Explanation If any Level IV nodes were coded using these codes, then CS Lymph Nodes needs to be recoded. All level IV nodes should be recoded to code 650.

Reviewable Cases and New Edits When CPDMS.net is updated to CSv02.05, a list of the reviewable cases from each hospital’s database will be placed on FES, along with instructions regarding the type of review that is needed, based on the primary site. Additional cases may fail edit checks now implemented with the 2014 changes. You may encounter these as you edit old cases. You should run the report for COC Edits to identify and fix these new errors.

Clarifications in the General Instructions: Highlights

Neoadjuvant Therapy Neoadjuvant therapy affects coding of – Tumor Size and Extension Must be from the same time frame: clinical or y pathologic Remember, both data fields map to one T category – No response to therapy Infrequent that patient doesn’t respond to therapy Code CS Lymph Nodes from path report and eval 6 – Lymph-vascular invasion (LVI) special instructions LVI present after neoadjuvant can be coded LVI not present after neoadjuvant cannot be coded

Eval 3 - Pathologic Eval 3 – pathologic – Resection path info + clinical eval info – Resection path info + operative findings Example – Path report for resection has no tumor size – Use physical exam or imaging tumor size – Use eval 3 - pathologic

Physician Assignment T, N, M When to use physician assigned T, N, M – Doubt documentation in medical record is complete – Physician T, N or M category differs from medical record – Use “Stated as” code for physician T, N or M value – Do not code to different value from medical record info – Registrar documents rationale in abstract

Bone, Brain, Liver, & Lung Mets Code 8 is for hematopoietic diseases ( ) For Unknown Primary – Code 0, 1 or 9 for unknown primary sites Exception added to code 8 - Code 8 when CS Mets at DX is coded as 98 (not applicable)

Lymph Node Eval – new examples Eval 3 - pathologic – Diagnostic bx of lymph node – Subsequent primary resection – Rationale: part of workup, primary surgery meets criteria for pT, now meets pN definition Eval 3 – pathologic – Neck node dissection for treatment, no primary surgery – Rationale: part of treatment, meets pN definition

Pathologic Complete Response Pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant therapy – In situ disease only qualifies for complete response – Residual Burden Calculator Score is 0 for in situ disease only Therefore, only in situ disease can have pCR

Breast SSFs on Multiple Tumors Cases with in situ and invasive breast cancer, code the SSFs – with the results of invasive ca, not in situ – because treatment and outcomes based on the invasive tumor

Grade Collected in SSF Code highest grade prior to neoadjuvant – Neoadjuvant Rx could kill off highest grade tumor areas – Behavior is based on highest grade prior to Rx Breast, prostate, appendix carcinoid, soft tissue, sarcoma, kidney, renal pelvis, ureter, bladder, urethra

Melanoma & Merkel Cell ITC’s Melanoma and Merkel Cell carcinoma – Isolated tumor cells (ITC’s) – Considered positive nodes in these two sites – Include in regional nodes positive count – Include when coding positive nodes in CS Lymph Nodes data field

Discontinued Data Items Grade Path System and Grade Path Value have been discontinued by all standard setters. These items will move to the ‘Historic’ tab in CPMS.net Many defined but never required Site Specific Factors have been discontinued by all standard setters. They will continue to be displayed in CPDMS.net with the 988 default value. SEER has discontinued some formerly required SSFs, but CoC has not, so all required SSFs will be continued until CS is discontinued in 2016.

New Coding Instructions Format As mentioned earlier, for this release, only the HTML Help format is available. Download the Coding Instructions from the CS web site and install then on your computer. A desktop icon that reads CS Manual Online Help will open the CS Coding Instructions software program. The program contains all schemas plus general and site specific instructions. Extra tables which are not used for coding but that may be helpful for data analyses are also included.

CS Coding Instructions