Ch. 1 Introduction to Designing a Rehabilitation Program

Introduction Designing the program can be a challenge What is an appropriate starting point? ROM, strengthening, stretching? WHERE DO I START???????

Any good rehab program begins with a thorough EVALUATION This can be through the HOPS format: history, observation, palpation, special tests

Medical History Key component of the eval Must be comprehensive Past and current dysfunctions In an athletic setting, this is usually part of the pre-participation physical exam

Subjective History Most important part of initial eval Allows you to rule out many problems Onset of pain Location Mechanism of injury (MOI) Patient goals Previous treatments Activities that aggravate and alleviate pain Past history/social history

Keep patient focused on immediate problem No tangents Mechanism-guide to activities to avoid Avoid aggravating activities in early stages Activities that alleviate pain (modalities and meds) may be included as a part of the rehab process Past history-investigate additional contributors Social history – guides home program Previous treatments-what has and hasn’t worked Goals-importance of the patient

Objective -visual inspection Range of motion Strength testing Special tests Proprioceptive tests Neurological exam

Visual Inspection Postural assessment Gait biomechanics Functional performance biomechanics

Posture Assessed in all cases to determine abnormalities contributing to patient’s dysfunction Direct contributors- factors that cause the problem (forward head posture in a patient with cervical disk herniation) Indirect contributors-factors that contribute but are not the main contributor (rounded shoulders in a throwing athlete with impingement)

Gait and Functional Performance Biomechanics Overuse injuries of the lower extremity Based on patient’s activity

Additional Information Deformity Discoloration Swelling Atrophy Skin conditions Wounds scars

Palpation Determines involved tissues Soft and bony tissues Point tenderness Deformity Crepitus Rigidity Heat Muscle spasm

Range of Motion Active and Passive Quality and quantity Presence of pain, faulty mechanics, substitution patterns, muscle weakness Cyriax’s rule Measured with a goniometer

Flexibility Testing Information regarding the “cause of the cause”

Joint Mobility Testing Hypo versus hypermobility Addressed through taping and bracing or surgical repair Hypomobility – managed through ROM exercises, stretching, joint mobilization and dynamic splinting

Strength Testing Manual muscle testing MMT’s performed isometrically Ability to test a single muscle Disadvantage – you are only evaluating strength at one point

Strength Testing Resistive range of motion testing Allows patient to move through a portion of the range against an external resistance Tests are more functional However, pain can be generated by contractile or inert tissues Does not allow for isolation testing Helps assess muscle fatigue with repeated tesing Avoid if AROM causes pain

Special Tests Testing of joints or other structures Reveals pain, instability, tissue tightness or neurological symptoms Can determine the used of weight bearing or non-weight bearing activities in the early stages of rehab More helpful in providing the diagnosis than guiding the rehab program

Proprioceptive Testing Unconscious or conscious awareness of body or joint position “Where you are in space” Measured by balance testing Single leg stance, wobble boards, foam cushions, foam rollers

Neurological Examination CNS and PNS function Dermatome testing Myotome testing Reflex testing

Myotome Assessment MMT’s for specific muscles Focuses on weakness rather than pain Decreased strength in the absence of a muscle injury is an indicator of spinal nerve root or CNS dysfunction

Reflex Testing Spinal nerve root or CNS injury Measured using a 3-point scale 0- no reflex 1-hyporeflexive 2-normal 3- hyperreflexive

Joint Specific Testing Girth measurements Limb-length assessments

Girth Measurements Using a tape measure Comparing two joints Provides info regarding tissue edema, muscle hypertrophy and atrophy Edema – compression and elevation Hypertrophy – muscle imbalance Atrophy-need for strengthening in the plan

Limb-Length Measurements Small differences are common Differences greater than 7mm have been shown to alter gait mechanics and predispose athletes to overuse injuries Congenital abnormalities in bone growth Faulty bone healing Could lead to a heel lift or foot orthoses as a part of the treatment plan

Clinical Pearl of Wisdom Although the Diagnosis is one of the most important parts of the evaluative process, it does not describe the actual cause

Determining the Diagnosis Important for medical decoding and 3 rd party reimbursement ICD-9 code – developed by the World Health Organization, is used by insurance companies to reimburse (get paid) for rehabilitation services CPT codes-Current Procedural Terminology, must match with the diagnosis in order to be reimbursed

Documentation SOAP format Subjective Objective Assessment Plan

Subjective and Objective Paint a picture of the patient for other health professionals to follow

Assessment Made up of three parts – Diagnosis – Problem list – Treatment goals

Diagnosis Most difficult for students or inexperienced clinicians The result of all your questions and tests

Formulating a Problem Compilation of all the abnormal findings From the subjective and objective part of the eval Each one added to problem list within the assessment portion of the note Each one representing a “cause of the cause”

Treatment Goals Guides treatment plan Justification for continued treatment Based on problem list Divided into short term and long term

Formulating a Comprehensive Treatment and Rehabilitation Plan Each problem is paired with a goal Ex: Pain- modalities, rest, joint mobilization – Edema – modalities, compression, elevation – Postural problems-patient education, biofeedback Stretching Strengthening Muscular endurance Bracing and taping

Problems con’t Gait abnormalities – Orthotics – Taping and footwear modification – Stretching and strengthening

Problems Functional abnormalities – Patient education – Activity modification – Equipment modification – Biofeedback – Stretching and strengthening

Problems Decreased AROM and PROM – Thermotherapy modalities – Range of motion – Stretching – Joint mobilization

Problems Decreased AROM (normal PROM) – Neuromuscular stimulation – Active or active assistive range of motion – Strengthening – Muscular endurance Decreased flexibility – Thermal modalities – stretching

Problems Decreased joint play – Thermotherapy modalities – Range of motion – Stretching and joint mobilization Decreased muscular strength/atrophy – Neuromuscular stimulation – AROM and AAROM – Strengthening – Muscular endurance

Problems Excessive joint laxity/hypermobility – Immobility, bracing, taping – Strengthening and proprioception Decreased proprioception/balance – Proprioceptive exercise Neurological deficits – Address the cause of the neurological dysfunction

Problem True limb-length discrepancy – Heel lift, orthoses, footwear modification Apparent leg-length discrepancy – Stretching and strengthening – Muscle energy techniques – Grade III and IV joint mobilization

Incorporating Therapeutic Modalities Cryotherapy Thermotherapy Electrotherapy Ultrasound Iontophoresis Soft tissue mobilization

Re-evaluating the Patient Just as important as the initial eval Done at each appointment Multiple times during the session Don’t add more than two exercises per session

Critical Thinking How do your findings from the medical history impact the design of the treatment and rehabilitation plan?

Critical Thinking How will your goals and treatment plans change when rehabilitating a collegiate golfer with medial epicondylitis versus a factory worker with the same condition? How will your approach vary in motivating your patient to reach their goals?

Critical Thinking What other individuals will you include in the evaluation and rehabilitation process of the golfer and factory worker to identify the “cause of the cause”?

Critical Thinking A patient comes to you with a complaint of heel pain that increases with activity. Would your assessment of the patient differ according to age? If so, how? What could be some different conditions based on age (adolescent vs. senior)?