Introduction to Historical Resources and Section 106 Division of Historical Resources (DHR) NH Department of Cultural Resources State Historic Preservation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office & 106 Reviews
Advertisements

Environmental Assessment in Nova Scotia
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Environmental Project Commitments The Alberta Experience
FEMA Overview. FEMA overview Federal disaster contracting Emergency Preparedness 2.
Preservation Tax Incentives for Historic Buildings A Joint Program of the following agencies: Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service Department.
Section 106, Section 4(f) and You!: The Role of Consulting Parties in Transportation Projects Kevin Mock, Historic Preservation Specialist Pennsylvania.
NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT of 1966 as amended Garry J. Cantley Regional Archeologist Bureau of Indian Affairs.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Utah Field Office.
Cultural Resources Management in the USFWS. Overview of Laws & Regulations 1906 – Present.
November 22, 2011 Historical Commission Mission : To promote, preserve and protect Alachua County’s historic resources.
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
Environmental Review Todd Levine Architectural historian, environmental reviewer, Connecticut Freedom Trail coordinator, Washington- Rochambeau Revolutionary.
Federal Preservation Activities: Part 1. What did With Heritage So Rich (1965) and the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 provide to administer.
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Ryk Dunkelberg Barnard Dunkelberg & Company Roles Of Sponsor, Consultant and FAA During NEPA Process L O N G B E.
Sacred Sites. Documentation Documentation: Forest Supervisor or Ranger District Offices may document Sacred site (s) information in a variety of ways.
Driving Indiana’s Economic Growth. Management and Preservation of Indiana's Historic Bridges: A Programmatic Approach Thanks to Mead & Hunt & FHWA-IN.
THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: AN INTRODUCTION TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved.
COSCDA Workshop Renovation, Reconstruction and Renewal of Historic Properties and Neighborhoods Section 106 and Programmatic Agreements Overview.
Monroe Executed Programmatic Agreement The Army’s Responsibilities Include: Identify Significant Viewsheds (initiated)-18 Months =Oct 2010 Cultural Landscape.
Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultations. The Endangered Species Act Sec. 2:Purpose Sec. 3:Definitions Sec. 4:Listing, Recovery, Monitoring Sec.
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act ____________________ Review and Compliance for CDBG/CHIP Program Projects.
Saving places. WHY A CHAPTER ON HISTORICAL RESOURCES in the MASTER PLAN ?  A Master Plan is required by Zoning  A Historic Resources Chapter is to aid.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
Florida Cultural Resources and How They Relate to Your Public Works Project Presented by: Brent Handley, MA, RPA Archaeology Division Director.
Cultural Resource Management in the Department of Defense September 29, 2005 Maureen Sullivan Federal Preservation Officer.
Mitigation in the Section 106 Process Dave Berwick Army Program Manager Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division Working Through The S106 Process FY 2015 CDBG Applicant Workshop December 4 th, 2014Meg.
Procedures and Processes Phase II: Evaluation CRM Phases I-III This presentation uses materials taken from Ricardo Elia’s Cultural Resources Archaeology.
1 ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING CULTURAL RESOURCES LAWS AND REGULATIONS CH 5 CH 5 HO # 13, 13a, 13b
ENVIRONMENTAL OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS ARCHAEOLOGICAL - HISTORICAL INVESTIGATIONS PERMITTING FOR UNAVOIDABLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AREA ENDANGERED.
INTRODUCTION TO SECTION 4(f) Presented by Ian Chidister Environmental Program Manager FHWA – Wisconsin Division December 4, 2013.
Nadine Peterson Preservation Planner NH Division of Historical Resources Lynne E. Monroe Preservation Company Christopher W. Closs Christopher W. Closs.
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
Rabbanai T. Morgan Current as of 26 January 2006 Protests.
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF THE ACTIVITIES OF THE REMJA WORKING GROUP ON MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS AND EXTRADITION.
Section 106: Historic Preservation Review and Compliance as it relates to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 “How Can State Agencies Assist.
Tier 1 Module 4 CERCLA 128(a) Tribal Response Program Element 3: Public Participation.
Recreational Trails Program Federal Requirements.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
By Rachel Coleman.  “ The head of any federal agency having direct or indirect jurisdiction over a proposed federal or federally assisted undertaking.
Locally Administered Federal-Aid Project Initiation Workshop Prospectus Part 3 and NEPA Requirements Presenter: Howard Postovit; ODOT Region 5 Region Environmental.
Environmental Assessment Act – Overview Environmental Media Group.
Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division 1 Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act Review and Compliance for CDBG/CHIP.
Office of Affordable Housing ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR THE HOME PROGRAM BY: GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS OFFICE OF AFFORDABLE.
1. Land Conservation Act (LCA) * Public Agency Webinar Public Acquisition Notification Procedure – A Step by Step Guide * LCA, also known as the Williamson.
Categorical Exclusion Training Class
Historic Preservation Memoranda of Agreement. What is an MOA? As part of the Section 106 review process, it is an agreement among an agency official,
NEPA and Section 106: An Introduction WISDOT MEETING NOVEMBER 3-4, 2015.
South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office and the Nebraska National Forests and Grasslands July 24, 2013 National Grasslands Visitor Center.
Cultural Resources office — St. Louis Planning & Urban Design Agency an introduction.
Director’s Order 12 contains information concerning review of other agency proposals.
Suzanne Derrick Technical Director – Cultural Resources FCC Section 106 Process and the Archeology of Tower Siting Panelist Presentation May 4, 2016.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
The National Register. The National Register of Historic Places The National Register of Historic Places is authorized by Section 101 (a)(1)(A)of the.
Valuing Wealden’s heritage. National Planning Policy Framework Sets out the planning policies for England and how these are to be applied. “The purpose.
Welcome to the Public Comment Hearing on the Proposed Regulatory Update to the California Environmental Quality Act AB 52, Gatto (2014) Heather Baugh Assistant.
Anth January 2012.
National Treasures: Brownfields and the National Historic Preservation Act Brownfields 2006 Boston, MA.
101 New London Road Newark, Delaware
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project FERC Project No February 26, 2008.
Monte Mills Alexander Blewett III School of Law University of Montana
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
The Role of the SHPO John Pouley, Assistant State Archaeologist
Protecting What We Love Building What We Need – The “H” Factor
National Historic Preservation Act
National Historic Preservation Act
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to Historical Resources and Section 106 Division of Historical Resources (DHR) NH Department of Cultural Resources State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)

The Role of DHR in Federal Regulations  Any federally funded, licensed or permitted project requires consideration of historic resources under Section 106 of National Historic Preservation Act of Example for DES reviews: –Applies to minimum, minor and major projects. ("Look at General Requirement #7 on the SPGP Conditions")

General Conditions Related to National Concerns: (under the NH PGP) 7. Historic Properties. Any activity authorized by this PGP shall comply with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. Information on the location and existence of historic resources can be obtained from the New Hampshire Historic Preservation Office (See page 18) and the National Register of Historic Places. Project proponents shall apply to the Corps for all projects that would otherwise qualify for a Minimum Impact Project if there is the potential for an effect on a historic property within the permit area or any known historic property that may occur outside the permit area. Historic properties include those that are eligible for inclusion, but not necessarily listed on the National Register. If the permittee, during construction of work authorized herein, encounters a previously unidentified archaeological or other cultural resource within the area subject to Corps jurisdiction that might be eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, he/she shall stop work and immediately notify the Corps and the New Hampshire Historic Preservation Office.

Federal Agencies FUNDING OR PERMITTING HUD/CDBGUSDA/NRCS/WMNF EPAFCC FHWAFDIC FERCGSA DHSUSPS DOENHARNG DOJNHANG ACOELWCF FAANOAA/CZM FEMAUS FISH & WILDLIFE DOD

State Regulations RSA 227-C for state permitted or funded. Chapter 32, Laws of 1974 (RSA 227-C:1, ) Chapter 363, Laws of 1998 (RSA 227-C:1-a, 1998)  The legislature of New Hampshire has determined that the historical, archeological, architectural, engineering, and cultural heritage of New Hampshire is among the most important environmental assets of the state and that the rapid social and economic development of contemporary society threatens the remaining vestiges of this heritage; therefore, it is hereby declared to be public policy and in the public interest of this state to engage in a comprehensive program of historic preservation to promote the use and conservation of such property for the education, inspiration, pleasure, and enrichment of the citizens of New Hampshire.

RSA 227 C:9 I.All state agencies, departments, commissions, and institutions shall fully cooperate with the division in the location, identification, evaluation and management of historic resources, and to that end shall provide the division with appropriate information on all state licensed, assisted, or contracted projects, activities, or programs so that the division may determine the effect of such undertakings on historic resources. II.Upon a recommendation of the division that historic resources may be adversely affected, the commissioner shall conduct, or cause to be conducted, any necessary field investigations, subject to personnel and budgetary limitations. State agencies, departments, commissions, and institutions are authorized and encouraged to expend project funds or appropriated moneys for these field investigations. III.When preparing to sell or transfer real property……

Section 106 Process SHPO, Federal Agency and Project Proponent Involvement  Initiation-defining the undertaking  Identification-identify listed NR properties or determine if surveys are necessary –Section 106 gives equal consideration to eligible or listed NR Properties

Identifying Historical Resources  Using the DHR archaeological data base, the DHR checks the location of proposed development projects against the potential for an identified archaeological site.  Applicants are required to complete file research for the architectural resources/standing structures that may be present.  The DHR does not have a comprehensive inventory of all that exists in the state-above or below ground.  The DHR assesses site potential to yield historical resources (archaeological and/or standing structure).

Survey Documents  Phase I/II/III Archaeological Survey  Individual Inventory Form  Project Area Form  Town-Wide Area Form  Historic District Area Form

Section 106 Process SHPO and Federal Agency Involvement  Evaluation of Historic Properties-preparing documentation for potentially eligible properties and making determinations of eligibility  Determination of Effect-considers whether proposed undertaking would have an effect or an impact –Alter qualities of resource –Lead to neglect, deterioration, destruction or cause or result in transfer, lease or sale without preservation conditions.

Evaluation of Effects SHPO and Federal Agency Involvement  DHR reviews findings of surveys conducted.  Archaeological surveys are conducted in Phases (Ia/Ib, II, and III) if necessary.  Inventory Forms are reviewed at a twice monthly Determination of Eligibility Meeting. Meetings are held on the second and fourth Wednesdays of the month.

Section 106 Process SHPO and Federal Agency Involvement with Project Proponent  Resolution of Adverse Effects –If adverse effects are identified, consultation continues to identify ways to achieve the project purpose and to avoid, minimize, or mitigate the effects, taking into consideration the values/significance/integrity of the property. –Mitigation may include avoidance, redesign, relocation, data recovery, documentation, public education or interpretation.  Completion-MOA –If consultation is successful an MOA is prepared-a legally binding document with stipulations that describe measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate effects. Project sponsor and/or lead agency create document

Section 106 Process Federal Agency Responsibility  Consulting Parties- –One of the most important provisions within the regulations Individuals with demonstrated interest in undertaking, local governments, tribes, applicants. –Regulations call for earlier and broader general public participation in the review process –This is intended to insure that people and entities most affected by federal projects have a stronger voice in decisions relating to them

What Is a Historical Resource?  A district, site, building, structure or object that is significant in the history, architecture, engineering, archaeology or culture of this state, its communities, or the nation.

Canterbury Shaker Village Landscape

Historic Archaeological Site

Property in Laconia

Class VI Road, Somewhere, NH

Homestead Woolen Mill Dam (Gone now)

Mill Complex reuse

Archaeological Mill Site in Pawtuckaway State Park

Historic Cemeteries

Historic Bridges

So, now what? In order for the DHR to uphold our review responsibilities we request that an applicant submit a Request for Project Review (RPR) Form. That form and a manual can be found on the Division’s website:

What happens next?  After information is presented to DHR, the review process begins.  The DHR has 30 days to respond.  If the DHR does not have enough information to make an informed decision, a request will be made to provide additional documentation on the proposed undertaking and or project area.

Remember !

Historical Resources are non-renewable and endangered resources. When they are lost, they are lost forever!

Information  Request for Project Review (RPR) Form  NH DHR Inventory and Area forms for standing structures  Information needed for Federal and State project review  Edna Feighner-Review and Compliance Coordinator –(603)  Nadine Peterson-Preservation Planner –(603)  Chris StLouis-Program Assistant –(603)