 Mike Radke, Lee Craft, and Margarita Frommert 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mt. Diablo Unified School District
Advertisements

Title I, Part A and Section 31a At Risk 101
Newport News Public Schools Information on Title I Funding
Dudley-Charlton Regional School District 2009 MCAS Information October 2009.
 MASFPS Fall Directors” Institute Mike Radke, Lee Craft, and Margarita Frommert 1.
Local Control Funding Formula & Local Control Accountability Plan A Basic Introduction Sacramento City Unified School District DELAC Meeting February 18,
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines Sheldon ISD.
Getting Organized for the Transition to the Common Core What You Need to Know.
Monthly Conference Call With Superintendents and Charter School Administrators.
1 Office of Field Services Office of Evaluation, Strategic Research and Accountability February 12, 2015.
1 Office of Field Services Office of Evaluation, Strategic Research and Accountability Presentation to MAS/FPS February 6, 2015.
Anamosa Community Schools Linda Mazunik Katy Kash February, 2012.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Title 22 - Education Chapter 4 Regulations Updates published March, 2014.
Los Angeles Unified School District Edgar Zazueta, Chief of Staff-External Affairs Valley Schools Task Force 1/29/14 Los Angeles Unified School District.
AT-RISK YOUTH: A DATA PORTRAIT Washtenaw County -- March 2014.
Highlights of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Waiver Renewal Application.
Title I Schoolwide Ray Draghi and Rasha Hetata October 2014.
LCFF and LCAPs Presented to the 4 th District PTA March 18, 2014.
Title III Notice of Proposed Interpretations Presentation for LEP SCASS/CCSSO May 7, 2008.
EXTENDED LEARNING PROGRAM (ELP) for Middle Schools EXTENDED LEARNING PROGRAM (ELP) for Middle Schools 1.
July 18, Glover Marietta, Georgia 1.  Federally funded program which provides resources to schools, based on the poverty percent at that school.
Creating a Good Title III Plan Title III & Migrant Directors’ Meeting Lansing, Michigan April 26, 2011 Shereen Tabrizi, Ph.D. Manager, Special Populations.
Federal Support for World-Class Schools Gwinnett County Public Schools 4/18/13.
NDTAC Jeopardy True or False?. $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500.
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
HAWLEMONT REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 2012 STATE OF THE DISTRICT ADDRESS Presented by: Michael A. Buoniconti Superintendent of Schools Hawlemont Regional.
Mitch Fowler School Data Consultant Calhoun ISD Identifying and Acting on At Risk Data.
January 15, Utilization of the Personal Curriculum.
Interrelationships: Plans + Funding = Student Proficiency Ingham ISD Curriculum Director’s Meeting November 4, 2015.
Building the Parent Voice
Fall SECTION 31a AT-RISK Office of Field Services Michelle Patton Fall 2010.
Achieving Classroom Excellence Act of 2005 Norman Public Schools Dr. Joseph Siano, Superintendent.
Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) & Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) School Board Meeting, March 20,
SECTION 31a AT-RISK Office of Field Services Revised 2012.
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents.
Accountability Overview Presented by Jennifer Stafford Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:pp: 12/11/2015.
Breakout Discussion: Every Student Succeeds Act - Scott Norton Council of Chief State School Officers.
Milestones Results August 2016 Bibb County School District P-1.
HB 4822 Third Grade Reading Summary
Section 31a and Accountability
Performance Wisconsin Student Assessment System
Source: The National Council of State Title III Directors
Millbrae Elementary School District
Advanced Placement & PARCC Results
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015: Highlights and
ACSP Presents FSA Night Welcome!
NHCS READY Report October 2016.
understanding LCFF & LCAP LCAP Priorities: Conditions of Learning
TESTING, RESEARCH & ACCOUNTABILITY
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review Plan Year 1/2
Erie 2 Regional Curriculum Council March 14, 2012
What it IS - What it means – What it Offers
ANNUAL TITLE Grants MEETING
Education Services October 3, 2017.
UNDERSTANDING LCFF & LCAP LCAP Priorities: PUPIL OUTCOMES
Welcome to <School Name> School
UNDERSTANDING LCFF & LCAP LCAP Priorities: Conditions of Learning
ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING NOBLE ACADEMY COLUMBUS.
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
At Risk Data: Identify, Collect, Analyze, and Act Today!
“Read by Grade Three” Law
Title I Annual Meeting Pinewood Elementary, August 30, 2018.
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review
EOG Retests Summer 2016 EOG Retest Administrations resume with the Summer 2016 Retest as follows: May 16 – July 22, 2016 For students requiring a retest.
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review
History of No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Slide Notes Learning Assistance Program New Director’s Workshop
Presentation transcript:

 Mike Radke, Lee Craft, and Margarita Frommert 1

 How were the changes made?  Read the law, it’s messy! a.amended, effective 10/1/2014  MDE will be working to make it clearer, more cohesive and consistent. 2

 New definition of “At-Risk Students”  Use the worksheets to “Identify” all At-Risk students in your district! 3

 Increased Flexibility!  Supplement-not-Supplant is gone – intentionally.  The only things not allowed are costs for administration at the district or school levels.  Everything else is allowable, if it is also in your school or district improvement plan … However… 4

 Public schools, public school academies, and the education achievement authority are accountable for: o All at-risk students proficient in reading at the end of 3 rd grade o All at-risk students career and college ready by the end of 11 th grade 5

About the fundamental principles? 6

 Using the Identification Worksheets  Understanding the new Section 31a law  Allowable Uses  On-site Review 7

 Use the Identification Worksheets o K-3 worksheet o _ ,00.html _ ,00.html o All students in Priority or Priority Successor Schools are at-risk students  Or… 8

 …is at risk for not meeting district core curricular objectives in ELA or mathematics, or  Is at risk for not being proficient on 2 or more state assessments, i.e. ELA reading and writing, math, social studies and science, or  Is a victim of child abuse or neglect, or  Has a family history of school failure, incarceration, or substance abuse, or  Elementary pupil in K-2 grades who failed 2 or more interim assessments (ELA, math, social studies or science ) 9

 …or in the absence of local or state assessments has at least 2 of the following risk factors: o Is absent more than 10% of enrolled days, or 10 school days during the school year o Is eligible for free breakfast, lunch or milk o Is migrant o Is an English language learner o Is an immigrant within the last 3 years o Is homeless 10

11

12

 Use the Identification Worksheets o 4-12 worksheet o _ ,00.html _ ,00.html  All students in Priority or Priority-Successor Schools are at-risk students  Or… 13

 Did not achieve a score of at least proficient on 2 or more state administered assessments for English language arts, mathematics, science or social studies, or 14

Using local assessments  9, 10, 12 th grade pupil who failed 2 or more end-of- course exams (ELA, math, science or social studies)  Middle school pupil who failed 2 or more semester/trimester exams (science or social studies) 15

 For pupils in the elementary grades in grades and subjects not assessed by the state, the pupil did not receive a satisfactory score or did not have a satisfactory outcome on 2 or more interim assessments in English language arts, mathematics, science or social studies. 16

 Is a victim of child abuse or neglect, or  Has a family history of school failure, incarceration, or substance abuse, or  Is a pregnant teen or teen parent, or 17

Or in the absence of state or local assessments, the student has 2 or more of the following risk factors o Absence > 10% of the enrolled days or 10 school days during school year, or o Eligible for free breakfast, lunch or milk, or o Is migrant, homeless, English language learner, Immigrant within past 3 years, or o Did not complete high school in 4 years and is still continuing in school 18

19

20

 Collect the information identifying at-risk students anytime after October 1, 2014  MDE is working with CEPI to develop the process for reporting Section 31a at-risk students and will provide guidance as soon as it is available but not before the winter data collection for MSDS. 21

 The only things not allowed are costs for administration at the district or school levels.  Anything direct instructional is allowable.  Anything non-direct instructional is allowable.  However, schools are accountable for reading proficiency by the end of 3 rd grade, and career and college readiness at the end of the 11 th grade. 22

 Expenses for central office or school administration are not allowable. These include expenditures in the following function codes: o 226 Supervision and Direction of Instructional Programs o 230 series - General Administration, o 240 series - School Administration, o 250 series - Business Services, o 280 series - Central Services and o 510 series - Long Term Debt Services  See the Michigan Public School Accounting ManualMichigan Public School Accounting Manual 23

Question: Is (fill in the blank) allowable? Answer: 1) If it is administrative, it is not allowable. 2) If it is not administrative, it is allowable. a. However, schools will be held accountable for reading proficiency by the end of 3 rd grade and career and college readiness in 11 th grade. b. It must be included in the continuous improvement plan. 24

Beginning in , a district, public school academy, or the education achievement (EAA)system must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the department that at least 50% of at-risk pupils are reading at grade level by the end of grade 3 as measured by the state assessment. 25

(a) The district, public school academy, or the education achievement authority (EAA) shall determine the proportion of total at-risk pupils that represents the number of pupils in grade 3 that are not reading at grade level by the end of grade 3. (continued) 26

(a) continued The district, public school academy, or the education achievement system shall expend that same proportion multiplied by 1/2 of its total at-risk funds under this section on tutoring and other methods of improving grade 3 reading levels. 27

(a) continued As an example, if 60% of grade 3 at-risk students are not proficient in reading, and the district received $1,000,000 in Section 31a funding, they must now expend 0.60 x 0.50 of their funds, or $300,000 on improving reading levels in the 3 rd grade. 28

b) Beginning in a district, public school academy or the EAA must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the department, improvement over 3 consecutive years in the percentage of at-risk pupils that are career- and college-ready as measured by the pupil's score on each of the 5 individual subject areas on the college entrance examination portion of the Michigan Merit Examination. 29

(b) Continued The district, public school academy, or the EAA shall determine the proportion of total at-risk pupils that represent the number of pupils in grade 11 that are not career- and college-ready as measured by the student's score on each of the individual subject areas on the college entrance examination portion of the Michigan merit examination under section 1279g(2)(a) of the revised school code, MCL g, and… 30

(b) continued The district, public school academy, or the education achievement system shall expend that same proportion multiplied by 1/2 of its total at-risk funds under this section on tutoring and other activities to improve scores on the college entrance examination portion of the Michigan merit examination. 31

(b) continued As an example, 41% of the at-risk pupils in grade 11 are not career and college ready. Your allocation for Section 31a funds is $48,000. How much must be allocated to improve proficiency? 32

Allocations 33

 Grant Application 34

PA 25/ESEA Schools are to fund initiatives, programs and strategies that are included in their continuous improvement plan. Districts are to fund programs and strategies that are included in their District Plan. 35

 Unobligated funds must be spent within the next school year. If the funds are not expended and reported in the July 15 th annual report, the funds are returned to the State’s School Aid budget. 36

Program Reports  Due Date  MEGS+ MEGS+  Changes 37

 District Study Guides and Explanations  MDE/OFS will study a few districts implementation of the new 31a law during to help us understand the issues. There will be no formal monitoring. 38

What are the three fundamental principles discussed at the beginning of the presentation? 39

 New definition of “At-Risk Students”  Use the worksheets to “Identify” all At- Risk students in your district!  Note: Schools identify At-Risk students only for accountability purposes. Schools may serve ANY students with 31a funds. 40

 Increased flexibility!  Supplement-not-Supplant is gone – intentionally.  The only things not allowed are costs for administration at the district or school levels.  Everything else is allowable if it is also in the SIP/DIP 41

 Public schools, public school academies, and the education achievement authority are accountable for: o All at-risk students proficient in reading at the end of 3 rd grade o All at-risk students career and college ready by the end of 11 th grade 42

Please Questions to: Lee Craft, Margarita Frommert, Mike Radke, 43