Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) Governance/Implementation September 4, 2013 Presentation Jonathan Garcia Senior Planner.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Endangered Species Act (ESA)
Advertisements

Need for Revision to the New York State Endangered Species Regulations
Public Workshop Implementation and Enforcement of Nutrient TMDLs for Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake CA Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Water.
FORA’s Role in Land Use Decisions September 13, 2013 FORA Board Meeting Jon Giffen Authority Counsel.
Preserving our open space heritage Protecting our economy Building our future Habitat Conservation Plans - Landscape Level Conservation in a Rapidly Developing.
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Fish, Wildlife & Marine Resources Amendments to Part 182: Endangered Species Regulations.
Beyond Fish and the Federal ESA Chris Maguire Terrestrial Biology Program Coordinator Oregon Department of Transportation Local Government Environmental.
Protecting Oak Woodlands with Conservation Easements Mike Spiess.
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Fish, Wildlife & Marine Resources Briefing on Proposed Amendments to Endangered Species Regulations.
Introduction to CESA Incidental Take Permits and Consistency Determinations Developed by Jennifer Deleon, Staff Environmental Scientist CESA Permitting.
Protected Areas. The implementation of protected areas is an extension to the concept of protection if biodiversity IUCN (international Union for Conservation.
Use of the Endangered Species Act in Alaska Doug Vincent-Lang, Special Assistant Alaska Department of Fish & Game 1.
Presented by: Terri Gaines DWR FESSRO February 28, 2014 Regional Permitting for the CVFPP.
May 17 th,  Overview of endangered species regulations  Purpose of Habitat Conservation Plans  Review Balcones Canyonlands Conservation Plan.
THE ACTS What you need to know about MBTA, BGEPA, & ESA.
What is an In Lieu Fee Program ? Clean Water Act - Section 404 : “no overall net loss” of wetland acreage and functions. One mechanism for providing Compensatory.
Impacts of the Endangered Species Act Roundtable U.S. Chamber of Commerce Energy, Clean Air & Natural Resources Committee W. Parker Moore Beveridge & Diamond,
THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT of 1973 Cornell Scientific Inquiry Partnership Cornell University.
Endangered Species Act
Endangered Species US Fish and Wildlife Service. Endangered Species Endangered Species Act Passed in 1983 Purpose Conserve Endangered and Threatened Species.
Endangered Species Act Overview
THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT (ESA) Draft Year: 1973 Amendment Years: 1982, 1985, 1988 National (in conjunction with International Treaties) Regulated by.
Endangered Species Act GOALS: Prevent species extinctions Increase numbers to the point where a species has recovered and can be delisted.
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING Charles J. Randel, 1 III, Howard O. Clark, Jr., 2 Darren P. Newman, 2 and Thomas P. Dixon 3 1 Randel Wildlife Consulting,
INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW NATURE PROTECTION.
Fish and Wildlife Service Mission Conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American.
 “ Wildlife conservation is the practice of protecting endangered plant and animal species and their habitats. Among the goals of wildlife conservation.
Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultations. The Endangered Species Act Sec. 2:Purpose Sec. 3:Definitions Sec. 4:Listing, Recovery, Monitoring Sec.
The Endangered Species Act 1973, 1982, 1985, 1988 (ESA) Larsen Schlachter Per. 3.
Northern California Conservation Planning Partners Eleventh Annual Habitat Conservation Planning From Tahoe to the Bay Workshop John Kopchik East Contra.
The Lesser Prairie Chicken Has Been Listed As Threatened: Now What!? The Lesser Prairie Chicken Has Been Listed As Threatened: Now What!? Jim Jones Power.
UNDERSTANDING THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT. What is the ESA? Federal Law : 1973 (USA), 1976 (Canada) protecting wildlife & plants Conserve & recover species.
PRESENTATION TO THE FORT ORD REUSE AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS MAY 16, 2014 Capital Improvement Program FY 2014/15.
The Endangered Species Act 1973, 1982, 1985, 1988 By Tristan Armstrong.
Wednesday March 4, 2014 OBJ: SWBAT Demonstrate their understanding of how executive agencies have positive and negative components by comparing two perspectives.
Draft HCP Review Primer.  Manages 2.6 million acres of aquatic lands for the benefit of all citizens of the state - a unique, distinct role among governments.
Solano Habitat Conservation Plan 580,000 Acres 36 Covered Species; 4 Natural Communities 17,500 acres of Urban Development; 1,280 acres of other New Facilities.
Endangered Species Act 2005 Legislative Action. House of Representatives  On Sept. 29, 2005 the House passed H.R. 3824: Threatened and Endangered Species.
Program Implementation Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program.
The science of conservation planning Course objective: a free-ranging examination of some key scientific principles and research needs pertaining to conservation.
Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Overview and Progress Marci Henson, Program Manager August 22, 2013.
THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT & THE FLORIDA BEACHES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN.
Take & Incidental Take Permit Take: means to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, collect or attempt to engage in such conduct.
PRESENTATION TO THE FORT ORD REUSE AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS JULY 12, 2013 Capital Improvement Program FY 2013/14.
Renewable Energy in California: Implementing the Governors Renewable Energy Executive Order California Energy Commission Department of Fish and Game Fish.
Pacific Gas and Electric Company Scientific Collecting Permit Presentation to the Fish and Game Commission September 24, 2012 Brian Owens, Marine Region.
CVFPB Executive Committee Meeting – Agenda Item No. 4C Central Valley Flood Protection Board.
The Fish and Game Commission has designated the states portion of the South Bay Salt Ponds an Ecological Reserve. Planning for the management of Ecological.
This file is part of the FS Resources section at:
National Flood Insurance Program ESA Consultation for Online Information Sessions May 11 th and 12 th 2016 Oregon.
San Joaquin County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation & Open Space Plan (SJMSCP) Presented by: Steve Dial – Deputy Executive Director/CFO Steven Mayo –
Environmental Issues Update - Endangered Species 1.
Mitigation Transactions Rebecca Payne Gregoria Ponce.
CITY OF STOCKTON CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM: DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT: PRESENTOR: AGENDA ITEM: DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT: PRESENTOR: 9.02Public Facilities.
Habitat Conservation Planning In Collier County: Challenges and Opportunities Trust Resources South Florida Ecological Services Office - Vero Beach Spencer.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife Wolf Plan Status DRAFT Gray Wolf Conservation Plan December 2015 Karen Kovacs Wildlife Program Manager Northern.
Endangered Species Act Application in New York State – What’s New? October 4, 2015 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Robyn A. Niver.
Oil Spill Response and the Endangered Species Act RRT IX Meeting Oakland, California June 28, 2012 Elizabeth Petras- National Marine Fisheries Service,
California WaterFix Aquatic Science Peer Review Sacramento, California April 5, 2016.
NO NET LOSS of PUBLIC HUNTING LANDS in FLORIDA June 2008 Update.
Overview of Everything You Need to Know About Mitigation.
Western Riverside Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan California Department of Fish and Game Inland Deserts Region Bobcat photo by Gerald and Buff.
Endangered Species Act
Regional Habitat Conservation Plan Tom Hornseth, Comal County Engineer
The Endangered Species Act (ESA)
The Endangered Species Act (ESA)
The Endangered Species Act of 1973
The Endangered Species Act-1988 Amendment
Law Office of Alfred F. Jahns
CMR NWR history and Authorities
Presentation transcript:

Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) Governance/Implementation September 4, 2013 Presentation Jonathan Garcia Senior Planner

What is an HCP?  Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) prohibits importing, exporting, taking, transporting, or selling fish and wildlife species listed as endangered (“Take” is the action of or attempt to hunt, harm, harass, pursue, shoot, wound, capture, kill, trap, or collect a species).  Section 10(a)(2)(A) of the ESA allows take of listed species provided certain conditions are met, such as habitat conservation plan, etc.  An HCP is required to secure Section 10 Incidental Take Permit (covers take of listed species)

Regional HCP Structure US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) issue Incidental Take Permits (ITPs) ITPs issued to 12 local agencies and 1 JPA Agencies receive take authorization for covered activities: Habitat Management, projects, etc. Private projects receive “certificates of inclusion” take authorization

Draft Fort Ord HCP  Provides conservation and enhancement framework for 19 special status plant and animal species (HCP species) and their natural communities.  Serves as basis for federal and state Incidental Take Permit (ITP) issuance.  Establishes “covered activities” for three general land use categories: Designated development areas Borderlands Habitat Management Areas

HCP Implementing Agreement  Draft agreement among 13 Permittees, 2 Wildlife Agencies, and Bureau of Land Management (BLM)  Identifies Parties’ obligations  Permittees fund and implement HCP (including habitat preservation, habitat management, habitat restoration, monitoring, reporting, adaptive management).  BLM funds and implements habitat management activities on its property (as HCP cooperating entity).  Wildlife Agencies provide take coverage to Permittees for “covered activities.”

Joint Powers Authority (JPA)  Draft Agreement among 12 Permittees and BLM to create the Fort Ord Regional Habitat Cooperative (Cooperative) to implement the Fort Ord HCP  Cooperative’s purpose  Fullfill HCP/Implementing Agreement obligations  Secure, manage, and expend funds to implement HCP  Oversee, monitor, and report on HCP implementation  Manage Habitat Reserve System defined  Provide HCP public information and outreach  Exercise enforcement & implementation powers (Section 6 of JPA agreement)

Cooperative Governing Board  Consists of 13 voting members and 3 non-voting members  Non-voting members include FORA, MPRPD, and BLM  JPA agreement reserves acreage of take for non-voting members (except for BLM) until all habitat acres transfer from Army to recipients

Mitigation/Trust/Recipient Agreement  SB 1094 (Kehoe) became effective in January 2013, clarifying CDFW’s financial assurances requirements  Assurances agreements define relationships among: habitat management area (HMA) land owners, habitat managers, HCP endowment holders, and financial institutions  Our HCP proposes multiple HMA land owners, two endowment holders (UC and Cooperative), and two financial institutions  Agreement drafted by FORA special counsel

Draft HCP Ordinance/Policy  Provides for FORA Community Facilities District (CFD) Special Tax collection to fund HCP endowments  Describes certificate of inclusion procedures for Permittees to extend take to third-parties

HCP Documents/Operational Relationships USFWS/ CDFW Take Authorization/ Certificate of Inclusion Permittees HCP Implementation HCP JPA Agreement Findings HCP Implementing Agreement Implementing Ordinance/Policy Mitigation/ Trust/Recip. Agreement Section 10 & 2081 ITPs

Questions?