Introduction Work motivation can be described as „the desire to take action.“ Definition: „[…]psychological processes that direct, energize and maintain.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CHAPTER 13 MOTIVATION IN MULTINATIONAL COMPANIES.
Advertisements

Chapter 9 Motivation Explain what motivation is and why managers need to be concerned about it Describe from the perspectives of expectancy theory and.
Principles of Management Learning Session # 35 Dr. A. Rashid Kausar.
Chapter 13 Motivation MGMT6 © 2014 Cengage Learning.
Motivation 13 © 2012 Cengage Learning.
BZUPAGES.COM In the name of Allah,the most Merciful and The most Beneficial……
1 Motivation 2 What is Motivation? Motive – A motive is defined an inner state that energizes, activates (or moves), and directs (or channels) the behaviour.
Part 2 Motivating Employees.
P O L C A Leading.
Motivation II Need Theories
Chapter 10 Motivating Others.
Work Motivation.
Chapter 16 Motivating Employees.
Motivation Chapter Nine McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Theories of Employee Motivation Dionne Roberson Chapter 8.
Chapter 16 Motivating Employees.
Chapter 13 Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 1 Motivation Initiation Persistence Direction.
Chapter 17 Motivation.
Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 6-1 Chapter Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights.
Lecture 7 MOTIVATION PART 2: PROCESS THEORIES. Class Overview Lecture - process theories of motivation –expectancy theory –equity theory –Porter-Lawler.
Influences on Employee Behavior
Chapter 16 Motivating Employees.
Chapter 9 Motivation.
Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter 09 Motivation.
The Nature of Motivation
Path-Goal Theory Chapter 7.
Chapter One Theories of Learning
Chapter 5: Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Motivation Chapter Nine Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Motivation in Multinational Companies Chapter 13, part 2.
Chapter 13, Stephen P. Robbins, Mary Coulter, and Nancy Langton, Management, Ninth Canadian Edition Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education Canada Designing.
© 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Chapter 14 Work Motivation
1 Chapter 13 Motivation Designed & Prepared by B-books, Ltd. MGMT 2008 Chuck Williams.
Chapter 5: Motivation Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
6-1©2005 Prentice Hall Understanding and Managing Organizational Behavior 4th Edition 6: The Nature of Work Motivation Chapter 6: The Nature of Work Motivation.
Motivation Sung Jae Park, Ph.D.. Why is Motivation important  Under optimal conditions, effort can often be increased and sustained  Delegation without.
Leadership Chapter 7 – Path-Goal Theory.  Path-Goal Theory Perspective  Conditions of Leadership Motivation  Leader Behaviors & Subordinate Characteristics.
Introduction to Industrial/Organizational Psychology by Ronald Riggio
Chapter 15 ©2001 South-Western College Publishing Pamela S. Lewis Stephen H. Goodman Patricia M. Fandt Slides Prepared by Bruce R. Barringer University.
Motivation Mona Farid-Nejad. Design Challenge: Human Centered Design.
Les Affaires Français Chapter 7; Motivation II: Equity, Expectancy, and Goal Setting.
Organizational Behaviour The Individual
Motivation Through Equity, Expectancy, & Goal Setting
Equity Theory HRMOB 570. Basic Tenets Comparisons between self and others People balance what they put into a job with what they get out of it Am I receiving.
Chapter 13 Motivation MGMT7 © 2015 Cengage Learning.
Chapter 13 Motivation © 2014 Cengage Learning MGMT7.
Mgt 4310 Week 4. Motivation  An internal state  Manager’s motivate employees by creating an environment where motivation is aligned to organizational.
INTRODUCTION F Multinational managers need to motivate international employees F Need to understand – Why do people work? – What do people value in work?
Theories of Motivation. Work Motivation Definition –Internal State that directs individuals to certain goals and objectives Not directly observable.
Motivating Employees Chapter 12. Motivation The psychological processes that arouse and direct goal-directed behavior.
1 MGMT 505 Chapters 6 & 7: Motivation. 2 Motivation in Organizations ► In Organizational Behavior, motivation is defined as the force that drives an employee.
Chapter 13 Motivation © 2015 Cengage Learning MGMT7.
Chapter 6: Path-Goal Theory.  Path–Goal Theory Perspective  Conditions of Leadership Motivation  Leader Behaviors & Follower Characteristics  Task.
Chapter 5 Motivation at Work
Chapter 6 work motivation Michael A. Hitt C. Chet Miller
14 Motivation in Multinational Companies.
Influences on Employee Behavior
Motivation II: Equity, Expectancy, and Goal Setting
Motivation Copyright ©2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website,
Chapter 6: Path-Goal Theory
Chapter 16 Motivating Employees.
Chapter 13 Motivation MGMT7 © 2014 Cengage Learning.
Influences on Employee Behavior
Leadership Chapter 7 – Path-Goal Theory Northouse, 4th edition.
Two-Factor Theory (Frederick Herzberg)
Presentation transcript:

Introduction Work motivation can be described as „the desire to take action.“ Definition: „[…]psychological processes that direct, energize and maintain action towards a task, role or project.“

Core theoretical perspectives on work motivation Work Motivation Endogenous process theories Expectancy theory Equity Theory Exogenous cause theories Job design Goal setting theory Hybrid perspective Self-determination theory Endogenous Process Theories: psychological mechanisms explaining motivation inside epmloyees‘ heads Exogenous Cause Theories: contextual influences on work motivation that can be changed and altered Hybrid Perspective: equivalent emphasis on endogenous and exogenous causes

Expectancy Theory Employees choose to invest effort in courses of action by weighing their relative utilities  probabilities of achieving desired outcome influence on effort: if one of these beliefs is missing, course of action will not be seleceted! Effort: 1.) Expectancy Effort will lead to performance 2.) Instrumentality performance will lead to outcomes 3.) Valence outcomes are important or valued

Expectancy Theory Focus: within-person-decision that employees make about whether, where and how to invest their time and energy Controversies & unanswered questions: Expectancy, instrumentality and valence leave consinderable variance unexplained  Theory of planned behavior

Theory of planned behavior Planned actions are caused by intentions as a micro- mediator of the belief-behavior-relationship Intentions: function of perceived behavioral control over: 1.) behavior, 2.) attitudes towards behavior 3.) subjectives norms about behavior.

Comparison Planned behavior Theory and Expectancy Theory Perceived behavioral control  Expectancy beliefs (planned behavior) (expectancy theory) Employees‘ judgement about whether they are capable of performing if they expend effort Behavior evaluated favorably  instrumentality & valence beliefs Behavior will lead to favorable outcome

Comparison Planned behavior Theory and Expectancy Theory Planned behavior theory adds subjective norms or social expectations and pressure to engage in the behavior  Personal outcomes but also social reward (appproval, respect, community) or social punishment (disapproval, disrespect, alienation)

Limitations of Expectancy Theory Over calculative: caricature of how employees make decisions and experience motivation (Who actually calculates probablities?)  incorporation of „hot“ affective components which influence expectancy, instrumentality and valence judgements No specification of nature and source of variations in employees‘ beliefs and judgements (enjoying experience of expending effort; performance itself as reward even without external outcomes) No explanation of how employees update and change their beliefs over time

Conclusion Expectancy Theory Focus on identifying key psychological forces that guide decisions about effort and understanding their consequences Diagnosing and resolving motivational problems in organizations NOT focussing on specifying causes or fluctuations

Equity Theory Placing motivation in a social context Central assumption: employees are motivated, when their inputs (effort, knowledge, skill, loyalty..) are matched by outcomes (pay, bonuses, benefits, recogntion) which creates a sense of equity or fairness

Equity Theory Outcomes ≠ Input  Distress, perception of inequity  employee tries to reduce distress Feeling under-rewarded: reduction of input, attempting to reduce other‘s inputs, seeking to increase their outcomes, aiming to decrease coworkers outcomes Feeling over-rewarded: increasing inputs or reducing outcomes

Judgement of equity Evaluation of input-outcome ratios through comparisons Possible comparisons: 1.Outcome vs. Input (Input = effort, ability, seniority) 2.Input-outcome ratios and other input-outcome ratios (including my past i.-o. ratios and other people‘s i.-o. ratios) Social comparison  motivation suffers, when others are perceived to maintain more favorable i.-o. ratios

Over- and under-rewarding employees can be detrimental to motivation.  Negative motivational and behavioral effects of under-reward inequity  Mixed results about consequences of over-reward inequity

New approach: including understanding individual differences in equity sensivity Equity preferencesbenevolent Preferring a lower input-outcome ratio compared to others Under-reward inequity leads to higher motivation than for equity sensitive/entitled employees Equity sensitive Preferring an equal input- outcome ratio compared to others entitled Preferring a higher input- outcome ratio compared to others Perceiving distress when receiving lower outcomes than coworkers

Competing predictions between equity and expectancy theory Perceived under-reward inequity Equity Theory: high instrumentality  feeling under-rewarded  distress caused by perceived inequity  reduction of effort to create a more appropriate balance between input and outcome Expectancy Theory: high instrumentality  feeling under-rewarded  motivation to achieve higher performance  confidence, that higher performance will result in outcomes they feel they deserve

Competing predictions between equity and expectancy theory Equity Theory High instrumentalityFeeling under-rewarded Distress caused by perceived inequity Reduction of effort to create a more appropriate balance between input and outcomes Expectancy Theory High instrumentalityFeeling under-rewarded Motivation to achieve higher performance confidence, that higher performance will result in outcomes they feel they deserve