Fox vs. FCC. Legal Definition of “Indecency” “language that describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rules and Regulation Does a company that profits from the public airwaves have a responsibility to that same public?
Advertisements

1 Marketing Violent Entertainment to Children The FTC’s Reports on Self-Regulation and Industry Practices in the Motion Picture, Music Recording & Electronic.
FCC – Part 4 Law and Policy. Telephone Conversations Station must notify the outside party of its intention to air the conversation before broadcast.
STANDARD(S): 12.1 Students explain the fundamental principles and moral values of American democracy. LEARNING OBJECTIVES/ GOALS/ SWBAT 1.Explain the importance.
FEDERAL COMMUNCATIONS COMMISSION. ORIGIN AND BACKGROUND Instituted as part of the Communications Act of 1934.
Obscenity – is anything that treats sex or nudity in an offensive or lewd manner, violates recognized standards of decency, and lacks serious literary,
Chapter 13.4 Freedom of the Press Government Mr. Biggs.
INSTRUCTIONS Test your knowledge: Click on either the True or False box. To advance to the next screen: 1.Click on the red arrow at the right-hand, bottom.
Pacifica vs. FCC The dawn of Federal indecency enforcement.
Miller and Pacifica: From Obscenity to Indecency November 2, 2004 The beginning of the end or the end of the beginning?
1:6 Speech that is not protected by the First Amendment.
Chapter 8 Offenses Against Public Morality. Introduction Many people deal with sexual conduct – fornication and adultery, seduction, incest, bigamy, sodomy,
Freedom of Speech in Cyberspace 1. The U.S. Constitution - The 1 st Amendment: The 1 st Amendment Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment.
Obscenity and Indecency. Controlling / Regulating obscenity, pornography, indecency FCC regulations of broadcast Local, state, and federal governments’
Bethel School District v. Fraser (478 U.S. 675, 1986) Anthony Miller Summer 2011 Oakland University EL 620.
Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Assembly. The Purpose of Freedom of Speech 1 to guarantee to each person a right of free expression, in the spoken and.
Brandon Hall CSC 540.  The US Government first attempted to filter the Internet in the early 90’s.  This was an attempt to protect minors against the.
What’s up with the FCC? Robert Corn-Revere Davis Wright Tremaine LLP.
Regulating Indecency CS 340 Fall Regulating Indecency: regulating the sale of pornography A New York statute made it illegal to willfully sell material.
Free Speech: Obscenity and Regulation of Indecent Speech
 Administrative law is created by administrative agencies which regulate many areas of our government, community, and businesses.  A significant cost.
Cal Poly COM 360: FCC Rules. Broadcasting The transmission of radio / television signal for intended reception by the general public (over the air / not.
Bootcamp 2009 Porn, Predators, and the Pressure to Police Jennifer Stisa Granick, Civil Liberties Director.
Radio and Children Sex, violence, racism and the medium the provides it all…
Self-Regulation and Ethics Why is self-regulation so important to the television industry?
Chapter 19: Civil Liberties: First Amendment Freedoms Section 3
Rules and Regulations Adam Lundquist. Quote  “Best test of truth is in the power of thought to get accepted into the free market”  Justice Holmes 
Morally Offensive Content and the Juvenile. Morally offensive content  The World’s Most Lucrative Business The World’s Most Lucrative Business  Pornography.
Licensing A prospective licensee must meet these qualifications: The applicant must be a citizen of the United States or have less than 25% foreign ownership.
FCC Indecency Litigation Update Robert Corn-Revere Davis Wright Tremaine LLP First Amendment Lawyers Association February 2007.
Robert Corn-Revere First Amendment Lawyers Association San Diego, CA February 2012 WashingtonUpdate.
Freedom of Speech and Press. The Big Idea While the 1st and 14th Amendments gives Americans the right to express ideas freely, the Constitution and the.
Freedom of Speech and the Press Whatever happened to freedom of speech?
Freedom of Press. “The press was to serve the governed, not the governors.” – Justice Black (NYTimes vs. U.S.) What does this statement mean?
Broadcasting & Cable Communications: Greatly different from Print Media because of statutes & regulations.
Fleeting Images and Expletives. Legal Definition of “Indecency” “language that describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community.
January 24 Three definitions of “media” were mentioned in class. 1.An intervening substance through which something else is transmitted or carried on.
Slides prepared by Cyndi Chie and Sarah Frye A Gift of Fire Third edition Sara Baase Chapter 3: Freedom of Speech.
Which of these resulted in station sanctions? A.Bono B.Cher C.Saving Private Ryan D.All of !$#$%&!
Ch 6 Administrative Law.
Obscenity Indecency Profanity WTF? Regulation of Offensive Content.
Do You Know How to Protect Yourself from Copyright Penalties in the Classroom?
Censorship. What is Censorship? The suppression of speech or communication that may be considered “harmful”... Who determines what's “harmful?” Always.
Public Communications Law Lecture 11 Slide 1 Obscenity and Indecency For the most part, the rules of both of these, and when these materials can be disseminated,
Mass Media Law 18 th Edition Don Pember Clay Calvert Chapter 16 Telecommunications Regulation McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2013 McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights.
How It StartedHow It Started  October 30, 1973, WBAI broadcasted the late George Carlin’s monologue, Filthy Words  Father went straight to the Federal.
Obscenity By: Kong Her, Jon Colvin, Alex Lee, Humsab Moua & Vladimir Chernyy.
Obscenity By: Kong Her, Jon Colvin, Alex Lee, Humsab Moua & Vladimir Chernyy Made on October 16, 2015.
Media Ethics/Media Law/Consolidation A survey in 2005 shows 1/3 high school students thinks the press should be more restricted. 36% think newspapers should.
+ Censorship in New Zealand. + Firstly: A brief history of censorship in New Zealand.
BROADCAST LAW AND THE FCC. RULES AND REGULATION Does a company that profits from the public airwaves have a responsibility to that same public?
Obscenity. Defining Obscenity Obscenity = Indecent, Lewd, or Licentious Licentious =Lewd, Lascivious Lascivious =Lewd or Lustful Lewd =Indecent or obscene.
Case Basics The 1985 Supreme Court case of Bethel School District v. Fraser:  gave schools the right to regulate indecent speech that may be perceived.
Aristotle, a great thinker, once said: “We are what we repeatedly do.”
How to Watch TV News Neil Postman & Steve Powers.
 Democracy requires a free press.  The framers of the Bill of Rights based the concept of freedom of the press on libertarianism: The philosophy that.
Chapter 19: Civil Liberties: First Amendment Freedoms Section 3.
Broadcast Law and The FCC
Media Regulation GOVT 2305, Module 7.
Censorship.
The Law of Journalism & Mass Communication
Libel, Privacy, & Decency
Origins of Broadcast Regulation
Regulation of Broadcasting
Media Regulation October 19, 2017.
A Gift of Fire Third edition Sara Baase
Freedom of Speech in Cyberspace
Objective Describe the…
Judicial Branch Vocabulary
A Gift of Fire Third edition Sara Baase
Presentation transcript:

Fox vs. FCC

Legal Definition of “Indecency” “language that describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards for the broadcast medium, sexual or excretory activities or organs, at times of the day when there is a reasonable risk that children may be in the audience”

Making an Indecency Determination Full context –The “explicitness or graphic nature” of the material –The extent to which the material “dwells on or repeats the offensive material” –The extent to which the material was presented “to pander,” “titillate” or to “shock”

Fleeting Images

2004 CBS Super-bowl Halftime Jackson/Timberlake wardrobe malfunction Unexpected event in a live broadcast Duration of 9/16th of one second $550,000 fine imposed on CBS

Subsequent Legal Activity $550,000 overturned by a Federal Appeals Court In 2009 the Supreme Court asked the Federal Appeals Court to reconsider

Fleeting Expletives

2003 Golden Globes Awards Parents Television Council complained about Bono’s acceptance remarks for the award for “best original song” –“this is really, really, f***ing brilliant” The FCC concluded the material was not indecent because – in context, Bono’s language did not describe sexual/excretory organs/activities –the remark was fleeting and isolated

Reversal Five months later the FCC reversed the Bono decision –“any use of that word or a variation, in any context, inherently has a sexual connotation” –The word is “patently offensive”--”the use of the ‘F-word’ here, on a nationally telecast awards ceremony, was shocking and gratuitous”

2002 and 2003 Billboard Music Awards Fleeting expletives by Cher and Nicole Richie –Cher: “People have been telling me I’m on the way out every year, right? So f*** em” –Nicole: “Have you ever tried to get cow s*** out of a Prada purse? It’s not so f***ing simple”

2006 Federal Appeals Court Fox appealed the finding of indecency The court found the FCC reversal of policy to be “arbitrary and capricious” and vacated the FCC finding

Reasons for the Reversal--1 Both President Bush and Vice-President Cheney have been caught on tape using “fleeting expletives.” (reported in news broadcasts) –Bush to Tony Blair that the UN needed to “get Syria to get Hezbollah to stop doing this s***” –Cheney’s comment to Senator Patrick Leahy on the floor of the U.S. Senate: “F*** yourself.”

Reasons--continued These vulgar words are less about indecency than about frustration or excitement How can this be reconciled with the FCC decision to not impose fines on the broadcast of “Saving Private Ryan” (full of such words) –To delete the language “would have altered the nature of the artistic work and diminished the power, realism and immediacy of the film experience for viewers.”

2009 Supreme Court Decision Reversed the Appeals Court(5-4) The majority on Court did not consider the First Amendment issue, but upheld the FCC on the basis that their action was not “arbitrary and capricious” –Scalia: “the pervasiveness of foul language and the coarsening of public entertainment in other media such as cable justify more stringent regulation of broadcast programs so as to give conscientious parents a relatively safe haven for their children”

Stevens, dissenting “not all uses of expletives refer to sexual activity or excrement” (golf game) “It is ironic, to say the least, that while the FCC patrols the airwaves for words that have a tenuous relationship with sex or excrement, commercials broadcast during prime-time hours frequently ask viewers whether they are battling erectile dysfunction or having trouble going to the bathroom

On remand: Fox v. FCC (2d Cir 2010) This court addressed the 1A issue and found the indecency policy to be “impermissibly vague” –“a law or regulation is impermissibly vague if it does not ‘give the person of ordinary intelligence a reasonable opportunity to know what is prohibited”” [FAIR NOTICE]

The FCC policy neglects taking “patently offensive” into account –Explicitness/ graphic –Dwells on/ repeats at length –Intent to pander/titillate/shock

The FCC policy is not consistent as applied –F*** and S*** are automatically indecent –The FCC has accepted as NOT indecent “dick” “dickhead” “pissed off” “up yours” “kiss my ass”