POLICYMAKERS RUN AMOK WHAT’S A CLEC TO DO? POLICY & PRACTICE FOR THE NEW MARKET REALITIES November 20, 2002 Jon Canis Kelley Drye & Warren LLP 202-955-9664.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Telecom Antitrust After Trinko Waterloo or D-Day? NARUC Staff Subcomm. on Telecommunications Winter Meeting 2004 Washington, DC Glenn B. Manishin Kelley.
Advertisements

Different Types of Market Structures
Why is cost oriented pricing important Consumer Access to Services Efficient Network Access for Competitors and Service Providers Sustainable Market Expansion.
FCC to keep in mind... In determining what UNEs to make available, must consider whether –Access to proprietary elements is necessary –Failure to provide.
A Hippocratic Oath for Policy Makers Robert W. Hahn Executive Director AEI – Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies Robert W. Hahn Executive Director.
Earl Comstock President and CEO COMPTEL. The World Has Changed FCC adopts Cable Modem Order and Supreme Court upholds FCC in Brand X FCC adopts Wireline.
Wireline Competition Bureau 2004 Promoting Real Consumer Choice and Investment in Broadband Facilities.
Cash Flow Management For Growth By Ron Bernstein.
Straight Talk on Tough Infrastructure Access Issues Charles A. ZdebskiEric B. Langley Troutman Sanders LLPBalch & Bingham LLP Washington, DCBirmingham,
MOSS ADAMS LLP | 1 © Moss Adams LLP | April 2012 V2 Rural Telecom Revenues FCC Reform Spring 2012 Presented to ABC Communications.
SG Amicus Brief in Trinko *Views are the personal views of the presenter only and are not necessarily those of his employer.
Monopoly A monopoly is a single supplier to a market
Looking to the Future. Agenda Company Overview Sweden’s Economic Environment Ericsson’s Performance and Future Shift to Services Sony-Ericsson Joint Venture.
1 End of Regulation? Jerry Hausman Professor of Economics MIT July 2005
Policies for the Broadband Digital Migration Barbara A. Cherry Senior Counsel Office of Strategic Planning & Policy Analysis Federal Communications Commission.
The Framework for business.
CSE 5806 Telecommunications Management Group Two Group Assignment International Telecommunications - Structures & Regulation.
Overview on Broadband Mark Uncapher, Senior Vice President & Counsel, ITAA October 1, 2003.
1 Perspective on the Carrier Market: Is there light at the end of the tunnel? Sureel Choksi Level 3 Communications
Business Management Agenda: Tuesday, March 26 th – Chapter 6.1 Notes & Activity Thursday, March 28 th – Chapter 6.2 Notes & Activity Tuesday, April.
2004 Canadian telecom summit Darren Entwistle member of the TELUS Team.
Luiz Pinto, Matthias Sigrist, Daniel Packard.  Decrease SIM portfolio by 43 basis points to come in line with S&P 500  Reallocate funds within the Telecommunication.
AP Microeconomics Warm Up: Why will it be hard for a monopolistic competition firm to sustain profits?
The Free Enterprise System
Perfect Competition *MADE BY RACHEL STAND* :). I. Perfect Competition: A Model A. Basic Definitions 1. Perfect Competition: a model of the market based.
Questions about broadband What do we do about broadband services? –Why didn’t the ILECs deploy DSL faster? Could regulation be to blame? –How do we get.
Netgear, Inc April/03/2012 Presentors: Ryo-Seob(Joseph) Kim Jionghan(JD) Dai Han(Henry) Yang Pattharaporn (Pauline) Lertphaiboonsiri Yen-Hua(Gina) Huang.
An SAIC Company Steve Cohen Vice President Solutions Marketing (732) March 15, 2001 Operations Support Systems: Today’s and.
Testimony before the Florida House Committee on Utilities and Telecommunications Thomas M. Koutsky Co-Founder and Resident Scholar Phoenix Center March.
TA 96 on pricing Prices for interconnection and for UNEs to be based on cost, to be nondiscriminatory, and may include a reasonable profit –Cost to be.
ITS 302 Purposes of the course –Review the history of US telecommunications as a case study –Examine the basics of regulation, especially as they apply.
Changes in State and Federal Telecommunications Policies: How Do They Affect US All? SCAN NATOA 16 th Annual Spring Conference and Star Awards Long Beach,
Can Technology Save Competition in Telecommunications? John W. Mayo Georgetown University (202) Phoenix Center December.
Wireline Competition Bureau State of the Bureau Presentation January 20, 2006.
Telecommunications Act of 1996 Signed into law, February 8, 1996 “ An Act to promote competition and reduce regulation in order to secure lower prices.
Stock Pitch: 8x8, Inc. Finance & Investment Club Telecommunications Sector Kevin Ng – Investment Associate Arlind Hoxha – Investment Asscoiate Fall 2012.
Wireline Competition Bureau 2003 – 2004 Competition, Broadband, and Universal Service in a Dynamic Marketplace.
Lavendon Group plc 2006 Preliminary Results Presentation March 2007.
The Truth About Special Access Donna Epps Vice President – Federal Regulatory Verizon.
Financial Considerations in the New World!! GTA Annual Meeting Hilton Head, SC June 19, 2012 Leo Staurulakis – Executive Vice President.
Chapter 12 Imperfectly Competitive Markets.  There are three categories of imperfect competition among sellers Monopoly Monopolistic Competition Oligopoly.
Covad Confidential Broadband Technology and Policy – A Service Provider Perspective Anjali Joshi EVP, Engineering July 2002.
Implications of VoIP TC 310 May 28, Questions from Reviews Duty to Interconnect Reciprocal compensation Line of business v statutory line of business.
Forecasting Market Structure in U.S. Telecoms George S. Ford, PhD Chief Economist Phoenix Center.
Sureel Choksi President, Transport & Infrastructure Services © 2003 Level 3 Communications, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduced.
What the New FCC (and other regulators) Can Do To “ Get it Right” MARC - Traverse City, MI Jeff Gardner - President and CEO June 16, 2009.
Alameda Power & Telecom An Enterprise of the City of Alameda DESIGNING THE LAST MILE.
Phoenix Center Panel “Lessons Learned from the States” Iowa Utilities Board Commissioner Elliott Smith.
Applying the 1996 Act TC 310 May 21, Current Event FCC investigating cell phone contract termination  Cancel early  Reduce over time  Take state.
Managing Costs Strategically - A Road to Success By Manoj Misra Head of Regulatory(SP) Vodafone-India.
Monopoly. Intro video
Competitive Universal Service TC 310 June 5, 2008.
Network Neutrality: An Internet operating principle which ensures that all online users are entitled to access Internet content of their choice; run online.
Comparative Telecommunications Law Prof. Karl Manheim Spring, : Interconnection Copyright © 2007.
Structural Problems & Firms’ Observed Conduct: Economic Prescriptions for Future Growth or “Is it the Long Run Yet?” John W. Mayo Georgetown University.
Federal Communications Commission TC 310 May 14, 2008.
Constructing An Effective Statutory & Regulatory Framework for Broadband Networks Phoenix Center Symposium December 1, 2005 Disclaimer: Views presented.
Briefing on New Franchise Ordinances for Telecommunications & Video Services Applicant: Verizon.
MODULE VI GLOBALIZATION / MNC/TNC EXIM Globalization is a process of interaction and integration among the people, companies, and governments of different.
© Copyright 2005 Frost & Sullivan. All Rights Reserved. Trends in U.S. Small Business Telecom Services Markets Opportunities Arise for Telecom Service.
Competition Policy for the new U.S. Telecoms Market: Background and Outline Howard A. Shelanski, U.C. Berkeley Nanterre, Paris X November 9, 2006.
ITS 602 Purposes of the course
Lesson 1 Exploring the World of Business and Economics
Overview of the U.S. Economy
Manage Your Cash Flow Effectively….
R.O.C. Running over the competition
«Water Sector Reform in Kenya »
The University of Chicago
Competition in the Telecommunications Industry
Wireline Post 1996 TC 310 May 20, 2008.
Presentation transcript:

POLICYMAKERS RUN AMOK WHAT’S A CLEC TO DO? POLICY & PRACTICE FOR THE NEW MARKET REALITIES November 20, 2002 Jon Canis Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

AGENDA  A ROUGH TWO YEARS: THE STATE OF THE CLEC INDUSTRY  POLICYMAKERS RUN AMOK  THE FCC  THE D.C. CT. COURT OF APPEALS  THE SUPREME COURT & THE VOICE OF REASON  POLICY & PRACTICE FOR THE NEW MARKET REALITY  REAL BUSINESS PLANS  COHERENT PUBLIC POLICY 2

STATE OF THE CLEC INDUSTRY THE “PERFECT STORM” STARTED IN APRIL 2000 TO DATE, OVER 100 CLEC BANKRUPTCIES MUCH TALK ABOUT THE “PERFECT STORM”:  SUDDEN CLOSING OF CAPITAL MARKETS  RECESSION, GENERAL ECONOMIC DOWNTURN  UNREALISTIC CLEC BUSINESS PLANS, UNSUPPORTABLE EXPANSION 3

FCC RUN AMOK DON’T FORGET THE FCC TSUNAMI: OUTRIGHT HOSTILITY ACCESS CHARGES: APRIL 2001, CLECs REGULATED, RATES FLASH-CUT BY 40% RECIP. COMP.: APRIL 2001, FCC OVERTURNS 30 STATE DECISIONS, REDUCES RATES % GUARANTEES CLECs CAN’T MEET DEBT COVENANTS 4

FCC RUN AMOK (cont’d) THE FCC TSUNAMI: APATHY NET 2000 EEL COMPLAINT  IGNORED FOR 1½ YEARS, FINALLY REJECTED AFTER COMPANY GOES BANKRUPT IDT REQUEST FOR EMERGENCY RULING ON TURNOVER OF CUSTOMER BASE  IGNORED CLEC COMPLAINTS ON UNEs “NOT AVAILABLE”  DELAYED -- ROLLED INTO TRIENNIAL REVIEW IGNORED E.D.V.A. COURT REQUEST FOR RULING ON ACCESS CHARGES FOR MONTHS AFTER DEADLINE 5

COURTS RUN AMOK THE 8 TH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS THE SUPREME COURT’S ACTION OVERTURNING IOWA UTILITIES BOARD v. FCC SPEAKS FOR ITSELF THE DC CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS UNPRECEDENTED POLICY ACTIVISM  USTA DECISION IGNORES SUPREME COURT HOLDINGS & DEFERENCE IN VERIZON  TELRIC (BELOW COST), UNE-BASED COMPETITION (SYNTHETIC), ILEC MONOPOLY POWER (CATV)  REPEATS “SYNTHETIC COMPETITION” BELIEF IN OVERTURNING FCC DECLARATORY RULING ON ACCESS CHARGES  WHATEVER HAPPENDED TO CHEVRON DEFERENCE? 6

COURTS RUN AMOK (cont’d) THE SUPREME COURT & THE VOICE OF REASON CONSISTENT DEFERENCE ON POLICY MATTERS IN VERIZON v. FCC STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION FAITHFUL TO THE LANGUAGE OF THE 1996 COMMUNICATIONS ACT ONLY PROBLEM: SUPREME REVIEW TAKES TOO LONG 7

PRACTICE & POLICY FOR THE NEW TELECOM MARKET 8

THE NEW TELECOM MARKET THE BASIS FOR FACILITIES-BASED COMPETITION REMAINS STRONG BY END OF 2000, CLECs COLLECTED $45B IN REVENUES DEMAND REMAINS STRONG  LARGE USERS DEMANDING NETWORK & VENDOR REDUNDANCY  HOMELAND DEFENSE WILL INCREASE DEMAND  RBOCs CUTTING CAPEX  2001 – 10%; 2002 – 22%; 2003 – 1% (UBS WARBURG PROJECTIONS)  RBOC LAYOFFS WILL ADVERSELY AFFECT CUSTOMER CARE 9

THE NEW TELECOM MARKET (cont’d) BANKRUPTCIES PROVIDING BASIS FOR STRONG, LOW-DEBT CLECs IDT (WINSTAR); XSPEDIUS (E.SPIRE) FIBER CAN BE PURCHASED AT 1/5 OF GOING PRICE 2 YEARS AGO ENTERPRISE EQUIPMENT AVAILABLE AT PENNIES ON THE DOLLAR – EVEN FREE NEW TECHNOLOGIES (VoIP) OFFER ENORMOUS CAPEX/OPEX SAVINGS 10

COHERENT REGULATORY POLICY FIRST, DO NO MORE HARM TO EXISTING COMPETITORS DON’T MESS WITH THE UNE-P PLATFORM DON’T MESS WITH TELRIC MAKE EELs AVAILABLE AFTER 3 YEARS OF INACTION DON’T EXPAND UNIVERSAL SERVICE SUBSIDIES TO ILECs 11

COHERENT POLICY (cont’d) SECOND FACILITATE NEW ENTRY DON’T MESS WITH THE UNE-P PLATFORM  THE NEW CLEC ENTRY STRATEGY: PHASED IN, PROFITABLE BUSINESS FACILITIATE ACQUISITION OF ASSETS & CUSTOMER BASES OUT OF BANKRUPTCY  THE NEW CLEC: PHOENIX FROM THE ASHES DON’T REGULATE VoIP  SIP-BASED VoIP IS THE FUTURE  ILEC NUMBERING ISSUE: THE 1 ST SALVO 12