Student engaging. What’s that about? Colin Bryson, Daniel Ashall and Bethany Parker, Newcastle University

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The nature of student engagement and why it matters so much. Colin Bryson.
Advertisements

The curriculum – how inclusive is it?. Questions driving curriculum development Three key questions 3 How well are we achieving our aims? 1 What are we.
Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.
What does it mean to be an inspirational teacher? Andrew Middleton Caroline Heaton Nathaniel Pickering #SHULT14 Learning and Teaching Conference, Sheffield.
Enhancing Student Engagement – what are we talking about? Graham Gibbs Research Centre for Student Engaged Educational Development.
Strategies for Employer Engagement
Now That They Stay, What Next?: Using NSSE Results to Enhance the Impact of the Undergraduate Experience.
2008 National Survey of Student Engagement – SUNY Oneonta Patty Francis Steve Perry Fall 2008.
Maximizing Your NSSE & CCSSE Results
Kerri-Lee Krause (PhD) Director, Griffith Institute for Higher Education Griffith University, Australia Griffith Institute for.
1 Family-Centred Practice. What is family-centred practice? Family-centred practice is characterised by: mutual respect and trust reciprocity shared power.
Barry Spencer eLearning Barry Spencer eLearning Development Coordinator Bromley College.
Building partnership and community with students through fostering engagement Colin Bryson, Newcastle University
Linking the Fairs to the 2013 Ontario Curriculum Social Studies 1 to 6 and History and Geography 7 and 8.
Student Engagement and partnership in Combined Honours Ruth Furlonger, Hannah Lincoln, Fae Rinaldo-Langridge, Jenni Cannon and Colin Bryson.
Higher Education Academy Annual Conference Nottingham July 5-6th 2011
Clarifying the concept of student engagement: A fruitful approach to underpin policy and practice Colin Bryson and Christine Hardy.
Conceptualising student engagement in order to improve policy and practice Colin Bryson, Newcastle University
Engaging students through a partnership model Colin Bryson and Ruth Furlonger: Newcastle University
Promoting individualism and retaining identity in mass higher education: academic advising for the 21st Century Nicola Andrew and Ruth Whittaker.
Towards the ALF 10 Years annalindhfoundation.org.
Living Learning Communities (LLC) Edmond Ko Hong Kong University of Science and Technology 13 March 2009.
Increasing Student Academic Success Through Interactive Learning Presented by: Dr. Barbara M. Montgomery Colorado State University-Pueblo Colorado, USA.
The Class of 2012: engaged students or consumers? Christine Hardy, Nottingham Trent University.
Sustainability Education and Student Learning at the University of British Columbia Kshamta Hunter Teaching and Learning Office UBC Sustainability Initiative.
A big picture of the curriculum Adapted with thanks to colleagues at the Council for Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) Working draft: With.
Peer Assisted Learning (PAL)
Focusing on Diverse Young Learners in State Quality Rating and Improvement Systems Dan Haggard & Alejandra Rebolledo Rea New Mexico Department of Children,
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Future Directions Strategy Implementation Professor Liz Thomas Dr Helen May.
Home, school & community partnerships Leadership & co-ordination Strategies & targets Monitoring & assessment Classroom teaching strategies Professional.
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
Towards an Integrated Academy: A Teaching and Learning Framework for Carleton University
Asynchronous Discussions and Assessment in Online Learning Vonderwell, S., Liang, X., & Alderman, K. (2007). Asynchronous Discussions and Assessment in.
Creating Entrepreneurship: entrepreneurship education for the creative industries David Clews Subject Centre Manager Higher Education Academy Art | Design.
Making use of the concepts of student engagement to enhance learning and teaching Colin Bryson, Lucy Boden and Holly Maxey Newcastle University
A big picture for Outstanding Citizenship. Three key questions 3 How well are we achieving our aims? 1 What are we trying to achieve? 2 How do we organise.
The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia BELONGING, BEING & BECOMING Produced by the Australian Government Department of Education, Employment.
Engaging students through partnership
Active Learning Curriculum for Excellence Moira Lawson.
Creating a jigsaw for early learning: developing high quality teaching and learning programs for K-3 classrooms Jean Rice September 2008.
Raising standards, improving lives The use of assessment to improve learning: the evidence 15 September Jacqueline White HMI National Adviser for Assessment.
Making our curriculum world class Looking after learners, today and tomorrow Mike Rumble Curriculum Adviser.
"Can WE address the Issues surrounding Aboriginal Education?" "Yes We Can!!!! Together!" Sharon Cooke Peter Howard Catholic Schools Office, Armidale Australian.
Mentoring Mentoring embraces a philosophy about people and how important they are to educational institutions.
COLIN BRYSON AND FAE RINALDO NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY, UK EFYE Conference 2015 Pushing boundaries: developing student engagement and ‘students as partners’
Instructional Strategies Teacher Knowledge, Understanding, and Abilities The online teacher knows and understands the techniques and applications of online.
A big picture of the curriculum. Adapted with thanks to colleagues at the Council for Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) Working draft July.
LEARNER CENTERED APPROACH
PRESENTATION AT THE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITIES QUALITY FRAMEWORK Professor Sarah Moore, Chair, National Forum for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning.
The UQ student employability vision: The University of Queensland will develop highly sought after graduates who have engaged in a range of opportunities,
Transforming learning and student engagement through students as partners Colin Bryson and Fae Rinaldo- Langridge ALDHE Conference 2015.
Collaborative Learning Sullivan University Faculty Advance 2007 Dr. Marion H. Larson.
THE EARLY YEARS LEARNING FRAMEWORK FOR AUSTRALIA BELONGING, BEING & BECOMING Produced by the Australian Government Department of Education, Employment.
Christchurch New Zealand October 2009 Integrating new technologies to empower learning and transform leadership.
+ Major Event and Festival Impacts Lecture 6: Social and Cultural Impacts.
Developing our practice from a learner engagement perspective Frances Deepwell, University of Leicester.
Making Practice Visible: The Impact of the FdA in Early Years
Colin Bryson, Newcastle University
Assist. Prof.Dr. Seden Eraldemir Tuyan
Improving transition for Combined Honours students through a holistic engagement approach Colin Bryson, Alex Roper, Hannah Lyons, Stacey Duggan, Grace.
Christine Hardy, Colin Bryson and Len Hand
THE JOURNEY TO BECOMING
Realising the potential of student engagement
Staff-Student Partnerships in Learning Development
Dr Camille B. Kandiko Howson Academic Head of Student Engagement
Colin Bryson, Newcastle University
Bridging Perspectives A strategic approach for the internationalisation of curricula through Graduate attributes A case from Groningen University University.
Dr Camille B. Kandiko Howson Academic Head of Student Engagement
Partnership Principles and Mechanisms
Presentation transcript:

Student engaging. What’s that about? Colin Bryson, Daniel Ashall and Bethany Parker, Newcastle University

Goals  A shared understanding of the nature and meaning of student engagement  Look at the research and evidence  Consider how this should guide practice and policy and an example of that in action Students engaging

To meet regularly to discuss SE. An early goal is to develop a concept map and set of principles that underpin the promotion of SE To establish an annual conference drawing together leading edge work on SE - and to feed into publication through journals and books. (Next conference– Sept 13/14 th 2012, Southampton) To gain funding to support these events and activities. To create a bank of useful resources for us to share. To facilitate communication between us (web, network etc) Students engaging

Conceptions of engagement – the dominant paradigm - NSSE Roots (Becker, 1961: Pace, 1979: Astin, 1977: Chickering and Gamson, 1987: Pascarella and Terenzini, 1991, 2005) A focus in USA on active classroom behaviours - (National Student Survey on Engagement) – George Kuh Survey used very widely - Over 100 publications Now revising survey into NSSE 2.0 Australia – the FYE…convergence with US thinking Coates developed NSSE into the AUSSE (and now we have SASSE etc) Students engaging

NSSE used as a proxy of quality Student engagement is defined as students’ involvement in activities and conditions that are linked with high- quality learning. A key assumption is that learning outcomes are influenced by how much an individual participates in educationally purposeful activities. While students are seen to be responsible for constructing their own knowledge, learning is also seen to depend on institutions and staff generating conditions that stimulate student involvement. Is that better than the NSS? Students engaging

Australian perspectives Focus on first year experience – big surveys in 1994, 1999, 2004 and 2009 Connectedness (McInnis, 1995) Multi-dimensional engagement (Krause and Coates, 2008) -7 scales transition; academic; peer; staff; intellectual; online; beyond-class Students engaging

Problems with that paradigm SE is holistic and socially constructed  Every student is an individual and different (Haggis, 2004)  Engagement is a concept which encompasses the perceptions, expectations and experience of being a student and the construction of being a student in HE (Bryson and Hand, 2007).  Engagement underpins learning and is the glue that binds it together – both located in being and becoming. (Fromm, 1977)  More than about doing/behaving and quantity  Method, validity and reliability issues  SE is dynamic and fluid  SE is multidimensional, includes student’s whole lives and it is the interaction and pattern that matters not any specific variable – avoid reductionism  SE needs to sensitive to the local context  Closed question surveys do not allow student voice Students engaging

A different form of student evidence….my own work  Drawn from seven studies since 2003, mainly qualitative  Includes two longitudinal studies  And one of these was the staff perspective on SE  Identified both levels and influences – and the dynamic nature and fragility of engagement Students engaging

Key influences on engagement 1. Student expectations and perceptions – match to the ‘personal project’ and interest in subject 2. Balances between challenge and appropriate workload 3. Degrees of choice, autonomy, risk, and opportunities for growth and enjoyment 4. Trust relationships 5. Communication and discourse 6. A sense of belonging and community Students engaging

A wider exploration of the lit Strong evidence base and critical perspective from schools SE research (Fredricks et al; Zyngier; Gibbs & Posskitt; Harris) Metaconstruct (includes emotional) Pattern rather than variable centred Critical take on SE Students engaging

More perspectives Professional formation and authentic learning (identity projects) (Holmes; Reid and Solomonides) – an ‘ontological turn’ Inclusivity (Hockings) Ways of being a student (and SOMUL) (Dubet; Brennan et al) Students engaging

Engagement to (and for) what? Engagement to and with different levels (Bryson and Hand) Collective SE – but also participation and partnership (Little et al: Bovill: Healey et al) Integration, belonging and community (Tinto: Kember: Wenger and several others) Intellectual development (Perry: Baxter Magolda: Belenky) Students engaging

The value of engagement after HE (my most recent research) Integrated development of the whole person (and ‘disposition’)  Graduateness and graduate attributes (Barrie, 2007)  Graduate identity (Holmes, 2001) and USEM (Yorke and Knight, 2006) The whole HE experience – thus the extracurricular is vital – authentic experiences The engaged student tends to take up more opportunities AND is better able to join them up in their thinking Students engaging

The flipside of SE Alienation, inertia/anomie and disengagement (Mann: Krause)  Performativity  Being ‘other’  Disciplinary power  Inertia  Battle between cultures and values Students engaging

A revised definition of SE Student engagement is about what a student brings to Higher Education in terms of goals, aspirations, value and beliefs and how these are shaped and mediated by their experience whilst a student. SE is constructed and reconstructed through the lenses of the perceptions and identities held by students and the meaning and sense a student makes of their experiences and interactions. As players and shapers of the educational context, educators need to foster educational, purposeful SE to support and enable students to learn in constructive and powerful ways and realise their potential in education and society. Students engaging

To aid clarity -separate the dual Engaging students Students engaging

Engaging students - principles We should: 1. Foster student’s willingness and readiness to engage by enhancing their self-belief 2. Embrace the point that students have diverse backgrounds, expectations, orientations and aspirations – thus different ‘ways of being a student’, and to welcome, respect and accommodate all of these in an inclusive way 3. Enable and facilitate trust relationships (between staff:students and students:students) in order to develop a discourse with each and all students and to show solidarity with them 4. Create opportunities for learning (in its broadest sense) communities so that students can develop a sense of competence and belonging within these communities Students engaging

5. Teach in ways to make learning participatory, dialogic, collaborative, authentic, active and critical 6. Foster autonomy and creativity, and offer choice and opportunities for growth and enriching experiences in a low risk and safe setting 7. Recognise the impact on learning of non-institutional influences and accommodate these 8. Design and implement assessment for learning with the aim to enable students to develop their ability to evaluate critically the quality and impact of their own work 9. Seek to negotiate and reach a mutual consensus with students on managing workload, challenge, curriculum and assessment for their educational enrichment – through a partnership model – without diluting high expectations and educational attainment 10. Enable students to become active citizens and develop their social and cultural capital Students engaging

So what works? Kuh (2008) i. First year seminars (e.g. SI and PAL) ii. Learning communities – cross module iii. Service learning – experiential iv. Common intellectual experiences v. Writing intensive courses vi. Collaborative projects vii. Undergraduate research viii. Diversity learning ix. Internships x. Capstone courses Students engaging

A holistic approach to a degree programme % One of the best results at Newcastle 1/8 comparable courses at other institutions  Combined Honours at Newcastle  Unique degree  Missing sense of identity/ belonging  Curriculum opportunities % lowest of all programmes at Newcastle 7/ 8 comparable courses at other universities.

Enhancing engagement in Combined Honours Student representation:  Empowerment- Student led, working groups  Partnership  Active agenda Success stories  Combined Honours Week  Curriculum co-design  Redesign of transition Students engaging

Enhancing engagement in Combined Honours Building community:  Facilities  shared spaces  social events Students engaging

Enhancing engagement in Combined Honours Peer mentoring – social integration PASS scheme – academic integration Students engaging