Development and validation of methods for integrated assessment of ecological status of rivers and lakes to support RBMP Lake macrophytes Oslo, 21-22 June.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Event, date: Reporting of SoE biology, Author: Jannicke Moe (NIVA) 1 Agenda item 2: Practical information for reporting of State-of-Environment.
Advertisements

Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund Estimation of uncertainty in status class assessment for Wel waterbodies Jannicke.
Development and validation of methods for integrated assessment of ecological status of rivers and lakes to support RBMP Lake macrophytes Warsaw, 9-10.
Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund PALEOLIMNOLOGICAL STUDIES IN THE WEL LAKES Sigrid Haande, NIVA DeWELopment workshop,
Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund DIATOM EPIPHYTON as a tool for assessment of ecological status of lakes in the.
Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund Revised Project Implementation Plan after prolongation of the Project Hanna Soszka,
Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund Integration of different metrics to a whole water body classification for all.
Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund Uncertainty studies for hydroacoustic estimate of fish DeWelopment workshop, Warsaw,
Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund WBs assessment AFTER DISCUSSION Expert views Warsaw,
Brian Hemsley- Flint B.Sc. C.Biol. M.I.Biol. Northeast Region Ecology Team Leader.
MULTIPLES OF 2 By Preston, Lincoln and Blake. 2 X 1 =2 XX 2X1=2 1+1=2.
The sampling and preparation of algae Maria Kahlert.
Chapter 17 Community Structure A community has attributes that differ from those of its components –Number of species –Relative abundance of species –Nature.
Invertebrate Standards in Rivers Paul Logan. Existing CEN standards relating to the ecological assessment of freshwaters - TG1 - invertebrates Quality.
Phytoplankton – element in ecological status assessment for lakes of the Wel river catchment area - published 2009 A. Krzebietke, A. Pasztaleniec, A. Hutorowicz.
Anne Lyche Solheim, Norwegian Institute for Water Research, Oslo, Norway Workshop on ”In situ trialing for ecological and chemical studies in support of.
ARROW: system for the evaluation of the status of waters in the Czech Republic Jiří Jarkovský 1) Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University,
Development and validation of models to assess the threat to freshwater fishes from environmental change and invasive species PIs: Craig Paukert Joanna.
Biological Assessment REFORM Summer School, Wageningen (NL), 28 June 2015 Christian Wolter Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries.
Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund Benthic invertebrates in lakes Małgorzata Gołub (IOŚ) Jacek Koszałka (UWM) Paweł.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE IN HUNGARY Eszter HAVAS-SZILÁGYI Ministry of Transport and Water Management Eszter HAVAS-SZILÁGYI Ministry.
Lecture 5 Model Evaluation. Elements of Model evaluation l Goodness of fit l Prediction Error l Bias l Outliers and patterns in residuals.
ECOSTAT meeting – Ispra (IT), July of 14 CBriv GIG Macrophyte Intercalibration.
Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund POST-INSPECTION INFORMATION FOLLOWING INSPECTION CARRIED OUT BY FUND OPERATOR.
Measurement of Biological Diversity: Shannon Diversity Index and Shannon’s Equitability Comparing the diversity found in two or more habitats.
The use of the Pinkham-Pearson index for the comparison of community structure in Biosim2 to identify statistically-valid sectors of taxa By Carlos Pinkham.
25 oktober nd phase intercalibration CBGIG Macrophytes Rob Portielje.
Biological methods to detect the effects of hydrological and morphological pressures Introduction and overview of questionnaire responses.
Water Bodies in Europe: Integrated Systems to assess Ecological Status and Recovery Funded under FP7, Theme 6: Environment (including Climate Change) Contract.
Intercalibration Guidance: update Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Presented by Sandra Poikane EC Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Biological indicators of lakes and rivers and the Intercalibration.
WG 2A ECOSTAT 7-8 July 2004 Task on Harmonisation of Freshwater Biological Methods Status Report AC Cardoso and A Solimini Harmonisation Task Team: JRC.
Management of the coastal and marine environment: The legal framework of the European Union from the first EEC Directives to the Water Framework Directive.
EFFECT OF AGGREGATION METHODS ON ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT Paul Latour Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management CIS WORKSHOP ON NATIONAL CLASSIFICATION.
RiverLife and Implementation of the WFD Satu Maaria Karjalainen North Ostrobothnia Regional Environment Centre PRB Workshop , Ghent.
Water Bodies in Europe: Integrated Systems to assess Ecological Status and Recovery Funded under FP7, Theme 6: Environment (including Climate Change) Contract.
Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund Pragmatic combination of BQE results into final WB assessment in Norway Anne Lyche.
Polish-Norwegian Research Fund Assessment of the ecological state of lakes based on ichthyofauna data. First attempt Witold Białokoz and Łucjan Chybowski.
Invertebrate Standards and Lakes Paul Logan. Existing CEN standards relating to the ecological assessment of freshwaters - TG1 - invertebrates Quality.
11 juni 2007 Ecological classification in the Netherlands1 Diederik van der Molen Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management CIS workshop.
Meeting of the Working Group 2A on Ecological Status (ECOSTAT) – 3+4 July 2006, Stresa (IT) Eastern Continental GIG Draft final report on the results of.
Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund Paweł Prus Inland Fisheries Institute BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES IN LAKES: PROFUNDAL.
Summary of progress of AGIG Summary by: Jim Bowman PARTICIPANTS: Bailie, R., Burns, C., Caroni, R., Davies, S., Donnelly,
Northern GIG Intercalibration of lake macrophytes Seppo Hellsten, Nigel Willby, Geoff Phillips, Frauke Ecke, Marit Mjelde, Deirdre Tierney.
Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment in Lapland1 Classification and monitoring of the surface waters of Finland National.
WISER Water bodies in Europe: Integrative Systems to assess Ecological status and Recovery.
Disentangling the effects of multiple stressors in lakes; should we use littoral benthic invertebrates? Rebeka ŠILING, Gorazd URBANIČ Institute for Water.
1 EUROPEAN TOPIC CENTRE ON WATER EUROWATERNET Towards an Index of Quality of the National Data in Waterbase.
Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund Third phase of deWELopment project Scope of the work Warsaw, 1st Feb
Agenda item 5: Discussion of next steps
Intercalibration progress: Central - Baltic GIG Rivers
Instructions and Examples Version 1.5
SoE Guidance – Biological reporting sheets
Developing a common approach for typology and classification of inland waters in the Nordic region Anders Hobæk Norwegian Institute for Water Research.
Lakes - Central GIG progress report July 2004
Workshop on using Water Quality Forecasting in Decision Making
Intercalibration : a “WFD compliant” boundary comparing procedure
Project 2.7 Guidance on Monitoring
Activities of WG A Ecological Status
CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT SCG Meeting in Brussels
WG 2.3 REFCOND Progress report for the SCG meeting 30 Sep-1 Oct 2002
EU Water Framework Directive
ECOSTAT meeting, June 28th, 2011
FITTING THE ITALIAN METHOD FOR EVALUATING LAKE ECOLOGICAL QUALITY FROM BENTHIC DIATOMS (EPI-L) IN THE “PHYTOBENTHOS CROSS-GIG” INTERCALIBRATION EXERCISE.
ASSIGNING WATER BODY TYPES IN THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION Wouter van de Bund EC Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and sustainability,
WG A ECOSTAT Draft Mandate
Milestone 6/Final report
Workshop WFD and Hydromorphology Brussels, June 2012
Defining Reference Conditions Setting Class Boundaries
Presentation transcript:

Development and validation of methods for integrated assessment of ecological status of rivers and lakes to support RBMP Lake macrophytes Oslo, June 2010 UWM:Hanna Ciecierska Joanna Ruszczyńska Jan Dziedzic Piotr Dynowski IEP: Agnieszka Kolada NIVA: Marit Mjelde Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund

Lakes of Wel river catchment: 1. Dąbrowa Wielka 2. Dąbrowa Mała 3. Kiełpińskie 4. Rumian 5. Lidzbarskie 6. Wlecz 7. Hartowieckie 8. Tarczyńskie 9. Grądy 10. Zarybinek 11. Zwiniarz 12. Neliwa stratified polymictic Study area

Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund To perform field survey of macrophytes in lakes of Wel river catchemnt by different surveyors and using different methods – COMPLETED To test and validatie different macrophyte methods used in Poland and European countries in lake ecological status assessment – RUNNING To test and validate the applicability of different macrophyte metrics describing taxonomic composition and abundance in lake ecological status assessment – RUNNING To estimate an uncertainty and risk of misclassification in lake assessment based on macrophytes concerning different surveyours and different methods – PLANNED FALL 2010 (after the WISER meeting in Dębe in September 2010) To combine macrophyte-based assessment with assessment based on other biological elements, physico-chemical parameters and hydromorphology Aims:

Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund Methods: Method: Dąbrow a Wlk. Dąbrow a Mała Rumi an Zarybi- nek Tarczy nskie Grądy Lidzba rskie Kiełpin -skie Hartow ieckie ZwiniarzNeliwaWlecz ESMI_trans XXXXXX XX XXXXXXXXXXX ESMI_sp XXX X XXXXXXXX ESMI_map XXXXX XX XXXXXX ESMI_sigma X XXXXXXXXXXX M MP XXXXXXX XXXX AMCI XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX WISER XXX MATRIX OF SURVEY METHODS AND NUMBER OF SURVEYORS PER LAKE

Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund All survey data compiled in EXCEL tables acc. to a common template (available: Database

Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund Metrics: For all the lakes several mactophyte metrics calculated: TAX. COMPOSITION METRICS: Simpson Diversity Index (D) Shannon Diversity Index (H) No of communities/species (S) No/area of sensitive species No/area of alien species Glyceria index ABUNDANCE METRICS: Colonisation index (Z) Max colonisation depth %phytolittoral area Proportion of: Characeans elodeids nymphaeids helophytes ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS: ESMI – Polish national method (Ciecierska et al. 2006) RI – German national method (Schaumburg et al. 2005) WSE M – alternative method (Kolada 2008) TIc – Norwegian method (Mjelde 2008) AMCI – American method (Nichols et al. 2000)

Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund All metrics calculated compiled in EXCEL tables and Access common database (available: Database

Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund POLISH METHOD ESMI vs ALTERNATIVE METHOD WSE M NON-STRATIFIED LAKESSTRATIFIED LAKES Method comparison

Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund NON-STRATIFIED LAKESSTRATIFIED LAKES Method comparison

Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund NON-STRATIFIED LAKESSTRATIFIED LAKES POLISH METHOD ESMI vs GERMAN METHOD RI Method comparison

Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund To test the pressure-biota relationships the set of the data from Wel catchment (12 lakes) is too limited! The use of external dataset is necessary!!! Macrophyte dataset extended with additional data from routine monitoring survey: lakes surveyed in , mainly 2008; lakes situated within a 100 km radius from the centre of Wel catchment area; only transect method; environmental data collected April-June-August Database completed with 25 additional lake-years: 15 stratified 10 non-stratified Metric testing

Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund Preliminary metric testing: 37 lake-years: - 21 stratified - 16 non-stratified TP used as pressure proxy limited set of metrics: - ESMI - H - Hmax - Z - Zmax all data log- transformed Metric testing

Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund Macrophyte metricR2R2 RpRegresion equation STRATIFIED LAKES (n=21) ESMI0,28-0,530,0130y = -0, , *x Shannon diversity index (H)ns Max diversity index (Hmax)0,21-0,460,0345y = 0, , *x Colonisation index (Z)0,28-0,530,0170y = -0, , *x Max colonisation depth (Zmax)0,46-0,680,0007y = -0, , *x R 2 =0,28 R 2 =0,46 Metric testing

Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund Macrophyte metricR2R2 RpRegresion equation NON-STRATIFIED LAKES (n=16) ESMIns Shannon diversity index (H)0,24-0,490,05y = 0, , *x Max diversity index (Hmax)ns Colonisation index (Z)ns Max colonisation depth (Zmax)ns R 2 =0,24 Metric testing

NORWEGIAN INDEX TIc Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund Metric testing

Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund Next steps To calculate the remaining/any other macrophyte metrics on extended datase (the use of the complete national monitoring database - app. 150 lakes - is still considered) - JULY 2010 To test all the metrics against pressure gradient, mainly TP but other alternative variables will be also considered (e.g. TN in shallow lakes) – JULY/AUGUST 2010 To select the best responding mascrophyte metrics – AUGUST 2010 To test the uncertainty of assessment and the risk of misclassification of existing macrophyte methods and metrics tested – AUTUMN 2010 (preferably after the uncertainty workshop with Ralph Clarke and Michael Dunbar during the WISER mid-term meeting in September 2010)

Thank you for your attention !!! Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund