Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
(your state) Master Farmer Program
Advertisements

West Virginia Conservation Agency. Section 319 Non Point Source Program WVCA is the primary entity responsible for the implementation of the: Agriculture.
1 Watershed Planning: A Key to Integrated Planning FHWA Environmental Conference Ann Campbell Wetlands Division.
What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
When It Rains, It Drains An Overview of Our Community’s New Storm Water Management Program.
The Lake Allegan/Kalamazoo River Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Plan Implementation by Jeff Spoelstra, Coordinator, Kalamazoo River Watershed Council.
7:00 pmWelcome and introductions 7:05pmHLWD planning overview Plan update process 7:25 pmStakeholder involvement Watershed problems 7:40 pmPublic comment.
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management Commissions Third Generation Watershed Management Plan.
TMDL Implementation in the Calleguas Creek Watershed Ashli Desai Larry Walker Associates.
When It Rains, It Drains An Overview: The Lower Providence Township Storm Water Management Program.
NPDES Phase II Storm Water Regulations: WHAT MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS NEED TO KNOW.
IDEM TMDL 101 Everything you wanted to know about Total Maximum Daily Loads.
Indiana 6217 Coastal Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Program – What it is, and What it Means!
1 State Water Quality Assessments Under the Clean Water Act Charles Spooner Assessment and Watershed Protection Division Monitoring Branch National Water.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
L-THIA Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment Model ….provides relative estimates of change of runoff and non point source pollutants caused due to land.
Water Quality Monitoring The Role of the Clean Water Act.
Allen Berthold Texas Water Resources Institute. Review: Clean Water Act Goal of CWA is to restore and maintain water quality suitable for the “protection.
Approaches to Addressing Bacteria Impairments Kevin Wagner Texas Water Resources Institute.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Watershed Assessment 2015 Strategic Monitoring in the Florida Keys DEAR- Water Quality Assessment Program.
EPA Office of Water Source Water Protection Initiative Elizabeth Corr, Associate Director Drinking Water Protection Div. Office of Ground Water and Drinking.
City of Edmonton Strategic Approach to Environmental Management Office of the Environment.
Section 319 Grant Program Nonpoint Source Pollution Control
United States Department of Agriculture Cooperative State, Research, Education and Extension Service Impacts of Agriculture on Water Quality: The role.
Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management Commissions CAC Meeting #3 July 30, 2012.
Presentation to Contra Costa County Climate Leaders October 3, 2013.
Nutrient Management in the Urban Landscape Rebecca Kluckhohn, P.E. Watershed Engineer West Metro Water Alliance Forum, May 18 th 2011 W W e n c k Engineers.
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
1 ATTAINS: A Gateway to State-Reported Water Quality Information Webcast Sponsored by EPA’s Watershed Academy June 18, 2008, 11:30am-1:30pm EST Shera Bender,
Module 1: Stormwater Permit Program Robert Pitt Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Alabama Tuscaloosa, AL.
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program (SWQM)
Water Quality Reduction Trading Program Draft Rule Language Policy Forum January 29,
1 Sandra Spence EPA Region 8 TMDL Program EPA Region 8 TMDL Program Integrating Watershed Plans and TMDLs to Help Answer Watershed Planning Questions November.
Gulf of Mexico Alliance SIMOR Briefing June 9, 2009.
Taking the Next Step: Implementing the TMDL. What IDEM Provides to Help With Implementation  Compiling all the data in one place  Data-driven recommendations.
Regional Grant Funding Coordination for Implementation of Watershed Management Plans Project Clean Water Summit July 15, 2004 David W. Gibson SDRWQCB
Update on Wyoming Draft 303(d) List and Changes to Watershed Planning.
Amy Walkenbach Illinois EPA 217/
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Michigan Watershed Plan Reviews Presentation at the Michigan Watershed-Based Planning Workshop, Mt. Pleasant, Michigan
Who We Are What I Do Great Lakes Commission. Great Lakes Basin.
Western Lake Erie Basin Partnership Presented by: Name, Title Your Organization DATE YOU PRESENTED The Meeting you presented at.
EPA Chesapeake Bay Trading and Offsets Workplan June 1, 2012.
Region 2000 Local Government Council 828 Main Street, 12th Floor Lynchburg, VA March 4, :30 – 8:30 p.m.
Wisconsin’s Nutrient Reduction Strategy for Water Quality Wisconsin Crop Management Conference January 16, 2014 Ken Genskow, PhD Associate Professor, Department.
Freshwater and Society Module 1, part C. Developed by: Updated: U?-m1c-s2 Water quality degradation
SFEP/EPA Proposal Background- prior NBWA grant EPA Funds and Process SFEP Process EPA Approval and Schedule NBWA Proposal-$1.5 Million Other Funds.
KWWOA Annual Conference April 2014 Development of a Kentucky Nutrient Strategy Paulette Akers Kentucky Division of Water Frankfort, KY.
Michigan’s Nonpoint Source Program Pass Through Grant Funding Past, Present, and Future Outlook Bob Sweet Past Aquatic Biologist, Present Administrative.
Resourceful. naturally. Protecting Non-Impaired Resources West Metro Water Alliance September 21, 2011 Greg Wilson, Barr Engineering Company.
Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
76. The central U.S. law regulating water quality is the Clean Water Act (CWA), adopted in The Act initially focused on point sources, which it.
FY 2016 EAP Proposals 1.Groundwater Sampling at Coulee Creek 2.Deep & Coulee Straight to Implementation Project 3.Little Spokane DO/pH TMDL 4.Lake Spokane.
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.
JULIE MAWHORTER MID-ATLANTIC URBAN & COMMUNITY FORESTRY COORDINATOR CHESAPEAKE TREE CANOPY STRATEGY & WORKPLAN UPDATE CITIZEN’S ADVISORY.
CLEAN WATER ACT AND MUNICIPAL STORMWATER CALIFORNIA STORMWATER WORKSHOP David W. Smith, Manager NPDES Permits Section EPA/Region 9.
Nutrients and the Next Generation of Conservation Presented by: Tom Porta, P.E. Deputy Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection President,
Protecting Georgia’s Waters Jennifer Welte Program Manager Regulatory Development & Regional Water Planning Georgia EPD – Watershed Protection Branch.
IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE Rice County Local Water Management Plan BOARD PRESENTATION JUNE 16, 2015.
New Mexico’s Nonpoint Source Management Program and Plan Revision.
Ashley Wendt Texas State Soil & Water Conservation Board NPS Project Manager.
Using RMMS to Track & Report BMP Implementation
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
The Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program in Illinois
Watershed Literacy & Engagement
Integrated Reports Classified Use Support Evaluation
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Upper Clark Fork Watershed Restoration and TMDLs
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Presentation transcript:

Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality

Presentation Overview Background on Nonpoint Source Plan Update Process Plan Overview Next Steps/Current Challenges

Nonpoint Source Pollution Yes there is a point to nonpoint source pollution – it is the largest contributor to impairment of state waters Of assessed state waters, nonpoint source pollution is implicated in 90% of the impaired river and stream miles, and 70% of the lakes, reservoir and wetland acre impairments Nonpoint source pollutants can impact aquatic life, recreation, drinking water uses, etc.

What is Nonpoint Source Pollution? Water pollution from diffuse sources Nonpoint source pollutants include sediment, nutrients, temperature, and metals Originates from a variety of land uses, over generally large areas, and is transported to streams, lakes, wetlands and ground water via precipitation, snowmelt and stormwater runoff and infiltration Also comes from direct erosion into surface water and aerial transportation (wind and rain)

Nonpoint Source Management Plan Required by Section 319 of Clean Water Act Montana’s Plan last updated in 2001 Montana’s Plan last updated in EPA Guidance requires five-year review and update Directs State’s activities and funding for addressing NPS problems CWA Section 319 provides approximately $2.5 million for State and local activities in 2007

NPS Plan Purpose Inform Montana citizens about causes and water quality effects of NPS pollution Inform Montana citizens about causes and water quality effects of NPS pollution Set priorities for controlling NPS pollution on a statewide basis Set priorities for controlling NPS pollution on a statewide basis Identify long-term strategies for restoring water quality affected by NPS pollution Identify long-term strategies for restoring water quality affected by NPS pollution Describe a set of focused, short–term actions (five-year action plan) for attaining statewide NPS pollution control program goals Describe a set of focused, short–term actions (five-year action plan) for attaining statewide NPS pollution control program goals

NPS Plan Update Process Began in 2005 with internal identification of needed changes Began in 2005 with internal identification of needed changes Worked with Montana Watershed Coordination Council’s Water Activities Work Group, which provided a public forum for 2001 Plan development Held series of discussions on the Plan in 2005, 2006 with Water Activities Work Group Section staff also contacted numerous agencies, interest groups and cooperators on specific topics for plan update Section staff also contacted numerous agencies, interest groups and cooperators on specific topics for plan update

NPS Plan update process Public comment period April 6 – May 6, 2007 Public comment period April 6 – May 6, 2007 Provided 3 presentations on draft plan during public comment period Provided 3 presentations on draft plan during public comment period Received 30 “formal” comment letters or s along with comments at presentations and several agencies and internal contacts Received 30 “formal” comment letters or s along with comments at presentations and several agencies and internal contacts

NPS Plan Overview – Highlights Reorganized Plan Reorganized Plan Provided Executive Summary Provided Executive Summary “Five-Year Action Plan Table” (including measurable outcomes) “Five-Year Action Plan Table” (including measurable outcomes) Long-term strategy based on resources and land uses Long-term strategy based on resources and land uses Much more information for public information and use Much more information for public information and use Separate section addressing NPS education and outreach Separate section addressing NPS education and outreach Ten appendices Ten appendices

NPS Plan Overview – Highlights (continued) Five-Year Actions grouped into resource, policy and education & outreach goals Have included Appendix with identified “Best Management Practices” for agriculture, forestry, urban, transportation land uses New ground-water quality strategy in Plan Focus on watershed-based planning and local implementation for impaired waters

NPS Plan – Next Steps Submit to EPA via Governor EPA approval (we hope) Issue 2008 “Call for Grant Applications” based on 2007 NPS Plan

Nonpoint Point Source Challenges Voluntary nature of program Declining funding when existing resources nowhere adequate (over $500,00 or 16% decrease in federal funding over last three years) Challenge of sustaining behavioral changes Getting people to care about doing things the “right way” (Best Management Practices)

WPCAC comments/questions? THANK YOU! For more information: contact Robert Ray or visit our website: wqinfo/nonpoint/NonpointSourceProgram

Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION MONTANA WATER RESOURCES ASSESSMENT Water Resources Inventory Nonpoint Source Problems and Causes Agriculture Forestry Diffuse Urban and Suburban Pollution Resource Extraction and Contaminated Sediment Hydrologic Modification Recreation Atmospheric Pollution MONTANA’S NPS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FRAMEWORK Montana’s Water Quality Management Process Water Quality Standards and Classification The 303(d) List and Water Quality Assessment The TMDL Process and Water Quality Planning Water Quality Restoration and TMDL Implementation DEQ Five Year Watershed Reviews and Adaptive Management Statewide Nonpoint Source Program Emphasis on Pollution Prevention.38

4.0 MONTANA’S NPS POLLUTION CONTROL STRATEGY Montana’s Nonpoint Source Goals and Objectives Water Resource-Specific Strategies Land Use-Specific Strategies Nonpoint Source Pollution Education and Outreach Strategy Interagency Coordination Nonpoint Source Enforceable Regulatory Programs Resources and Funding for Implementing Montana’s NPS Plan MONTANA’S NPS PRIORITIES AND ACTION PLAN Five-Year Action Plan and Priorities – MEASURING SUCCESS Water Quality Monitoring for Success Other Resource and Policy Measures of Success Education and Outreach Program Evaluation ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RESOURCES APPENDICES

Appendix A – Best Management Practices for Water Quality Protection Appendix B – Ground-Water Quality Strategy for the Montana NPS Plan Appendix C – Cooperators and Programs Addressing NPS Pollution Appendix D – DEQ-MWCB Priority Site List Appendix E – Montana Natural Resource Funding Programs Appendix F – List of MT DEQ NPS projects Appendix G – 2006 Impaired Waters, Completed TMDL Summary, and Schedule Map Appendix H – EPA’s Nine Key NPS Plan Elements and “Crosswalk” to Montana NPS Plan Appendix I – Response to Public Comment Appendix J – Glossary and Acronym List

Resource Specific Five-Year Goals for the State’s NPS Plan Five-Year Goal Measurable Outcome Complete Water Quality Plans and necessary TMDLs Number of Water Quality Plans and pollutant/waterbody TMDLs completed Conduct water quality assessments state-wide Number of updated water quality assessments for state waters Review/update Integrated Water Quality Report (305(b)/303(d)) Updated Integrated Reports – 2008, 2010, 2012 Reference site monitoring and assessment Number of reference sites monitored and assessed Increase internal monitoring support for TMDL program Water quality monitoring data for development of TMDLs Assist watershed groups with watershed restoration plans Number of watershed groups with watershed restoration plans Implement restoration identified in TMDLs Number of restoration projects implemented Monitor restoration activities for effectiveness Monitoring SAPs, water quality monitoring, estimates of load reductions