TC1600 Appeals Practice Jean Witz, Appeals Specialist.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Final Office Action Practice
Advertisements

The Procedure for Amending the Application under § Presented by Margaret W. Stevens, Head Supervisory Legal Instruments Examiner ;
1 Pre-Appeal Brief Conference (with Demo) By: Bennett Celsa Jean Witz Kathleen Bragdon TC1600 Quality Assurance Specialists.
The Examination Process
1 NEW PRE-APPEAL BRIEF CONFERENCE PRACTICE OVERVIEW & TIPS FOR PRACTICE November Off. Gaz. Pat. Office, Vol. 2 (July 12, 2005)
Rules of Practice Before the BPAI in Ex Parte Appeals
The Appeals Process by Gina chandler
Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Meeting October 8, 2002 William F. Smith Administrative Patent Judge Board of Patent Appeals.
PROSECUTION APPEALS Presented at: Webb & Co. Rehovot, Israel Date: February 14, 2013 Presented by: Roy D. Gross Associate St. Onge Steward Johnston & Reens.
Appeal Practice Before Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
VETERANS BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION The Fully Developed Claims Program Compensation Service Training Staff November 2013.
Maine Board of Tax Appeals 1. What we are: An independent Board of three individuals appointed by the Governor to resolve controversies between Taxpayers.
Enhanced First Action Interview (EFAI) Pilot Program Wendy Garber Tech Center Director, 2100 United States Patent & Trademark Office.
Accelerated Examination Bennett Celsa (TC 1600: QAS)
Appellate Procedure and Petition Practice By: Michael A. Leonard II.
Patent Term Adjustment (Bio/Chem. Partnership) Kery Fries, Sr. Legal Advisor Phone: (571)
Green Technology Petition Pilot Robert W. Bahr. 2 Green Tech: Discussion Points 1. Authority and Overview: resources / overview 2.Petition Requirement:
Patent Quality Assurance Program. 2 Office of Patent Quality Assurance (OPQA) Deputy Commissioner for Patent Operations Office of Patent Quality Assurance.
Appeal Practice Refresher Office of Patent Training.
New Patent Office Appeals Rules 37 CFR Part 41
Full First Action Interview (FFAI) Pilot Program Wendy Garber Tech Center Director, 2100 United States Patent & Trademark Office.
July 18, Changes to Patent Fees Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (H.R. 4818/P.L ) Topic: Patent Fees Office of Patent Legal.
September 14, Final Rule Making on Practice Before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI) Robert Spar Director of the Office of Patent.
December 8, Changes to Patent Fees Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (H.R. 4818)(upon enactment) and 35 U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by.
February 19, Recent Changes and Developments in USPTO Practice Prepared by: Office of Patent Legal Administration (OPLA) Robert J. Spar, DirectorJoni.
Sequence Rule Compliance, PatentIn and Appeal Issues.
BCP Partnership Meeting March 15, Jeffrey V. Nase and Richard Torczon Administrative Patent Judges
1 AIPLA Biotech Committee Meeting Washington D.C., October 14, 2004 Anthony Caputa, Ph.D. Technology Center Practice Specialist TC 1600.
Contents of US Patent Applications & Filing Requirements
Accelerated Examination Program Andrew Faile Director, TC 2600.
1 1 Interview Practice Within the USPTO. 2 2 Topics Effective Interviews Reaching Agreement Requesting Interviews Issues Discussed Documenting Interviews.
Patent Lawyer's Club of Washington October 24, Michael R. Fleming Chief Administrative Patent Judge Changes.
1 AIPLA Biotech Committee Meeting Washington D.C., October 14, 2004 Jasemine C. Chambers, Ph.D., J.D. Director Technology Center 1600 USPTO (571)
November 29, Global Intellectual Property Academy Advanced Patents Program Kery Fries, Senior Legal Advisor Mark Polutta, Senior Legal Advisor Office.
1 LAW DIVISION PATENT DIVISION TRADEMARK & DESIGN DIVISION ACCOUNTING & AUDITING DIVISION YUASA AND HARA LAW, PATENT, TRADEMARK & DESIGN and ACCOUNTING.
MODES OF DISCOVERY, SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS Legal Forms Group 3 Summary.
Post-Grant & Inter Partes Review Procedures Presented to AIPPI, Italy February 10, 2012 By Joerg-Uwe Szipl Griffin & Szipl, P.C.
Practice Before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.
BEIJING BRUSSELS CHICAGO DALLAS FRANKFURT GENEVA HONG KONG LONDON LOS ANGELES NEW YORK SAN FRANCISCO SHANGHAI SINGAPORE SYDNEY TOKYO WASHINGTON, D.C. Patent.
1 Rules of Practice Before the BPAI in Ex Parte Appeals 73 Fed. Reg (June 10, 2008) Effective December 10, Fed. Reg (June 10, 2008)
Biotech Customer Partnership August 3, 2004 Jasemine C. Chambers, Ph.D., J.D. Director Technology Center 1600 USPTO (571)
After Final Practice Linda M. Saltiel June 2, 2015.
IFTA DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS AMENDMENT PROPOSALS Present by Rick LaRose, Chair Dispute Resolution Committee Annual IFTA Business Meeting July 18-19,
Reexamination at the USPTO Robert A. Clarke Deputy Director Office of Patent Legal Administration USPTO Robert A. Clarke Deputy Director Office of Patent.
Claims and Continuations Final Rule Overview Briefing for Examiners 1.
Towards improvement: Institution of appeal in public procurement – topical procedural and evidentiary issues Kyiv, April , 2012 Oleksandr Voznyuk.
Patent Prosecution May PCT- RCE Zombie 371 National Stage PCT Applications –Not Allowed to file an RCE until signed inventor oath/declaration is.
New Ex Parte Appeal Rules Patent and Trademark Practice Group Meeting January 26, 2012.
3 rd Party Participation Bennett Celsa TC 1600 QAS.
QualityDefinition.PPACMeeting AdlerDraft 1 1 Improving the Quality of Patents Marc Adler PPAC meeting June 18, 2009.
FY09 Restriction Petition Update; Comparison of US and National Stage Restriction Practice Julie Burke TC1600 Quality Assurance Specialist
Chris Fildes FILDES & OUTLAND, P.C. IP Practice in Japan Committee Pre-Meeting AIPLA Annual Meeting, October 20, 2015 USPTO PILOT PROGRAMS 1 © AIPLA 2015.
Prosecution Luncheon Patent October PDF’s Now Available on USPTO Website.
Double Patenting Deborah Reynolds SPE Art Unit 1632 Detailee, TC1600 Practice Specialist
AMENDMENTS TO THE PROGRAM COMPLIANCE REVIEW GUIDE July 2006 IFTA Annual Business Meeting.
1 Eleventh National HIPAA Summit The New HIPAA Enforcement Rule Gerald “Jud” E. DeLoss, Esq. General Counsel Fairmont Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, P.A.
Report to the AIPLA’s IP Practice in Japan Committee January 22, 2012 USPTO Appeal Process: Appeal Strategies and New Rules Presented by: Stephen S. Wentsler.
 If a employee has been paid a schedule award for a hearing loss claim, can that employee file a claim for an additional award? TIP OF THE WEEK - July.
Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Division of Immigration Health Services FY 2010.
The Hearing Process 1. 2 Notice of Claim Status Issued by Carrier Legally Binding Triggers Protest Period (usually 90 days)
1 FY08 Restriction Petition Update and Burden Julie Burke Quality Assurance Specialist Technology Center 1600.
US Patent Application Drafting Center Presentation ppt Patent Stats That Can Help Your Practice Electronic & Computer Law Committee Manny Schecter.
Prosecution Luncheon Patent July 2016
Prosecution Luncheon Patent August 2016
USPTO Appeal Process: Appeal Strategies and New Rules
Texas Secretary of State Elections Division
What to Expect at a Medicaid Fair Hearing
CHALLENGES TO VOTER REGISTRATION APPLICATIONS AND REGISTERED VOTERS
Biotech/Chem/Pharm Customer Partnership Meeting, March 15, 2005
Third Party Pre-Issuance Submissions Under AIA
Presentation transcript:

TC1600 Appeals Practice Jean Witz, Appeals Specialist

2 Pre-Appeal Brief Conference Offers applicants an avenue to request that a panel of examiners formally review the legal and factual basis of the rejections in their application prior to the filing of an appeal brief Intended to spare applicants the added time and expense of preparing an appeal brief if a panel review determines an application is not in condition for appeal Original Official Gazette Notice - 12 July 2005 Official Gazette Notice of Pilot Extension – 7 February 2006

3 Pre-Appeal Brief Conference Requests Filed with Notice of Appeal – Use Mail Stop AF Form PTO/SB/33 No more than five (5) total pages of argument (excludes title page or request form) Must point out clear deficiency in the prima facie case in support of rejection(s) May refer to arguments of record by paper number and page

4 Pre-Appeal Brief Conference Requests Filing of any of the following will result in dismissal of conference request — Appeal brief — RCE — Amendment — Affidavit or other evidence — Express abandonment — Request for an interference If request is dismissed, the period for filing the appeal brief will be the later of the two-month period from the filing of the Notice of Appeal or one month from the mail date of the decision

5 Pre-Appeal Brief Conferees Appeals Specialist or designate SPE Examiner Mentoring Examiner (if applicable)

6 Pre-Appeal Brief Conference Decision Decision should be mailed within 45 days of conference request Decision is limited to the following outcomes: — Application remains under appeal – brief is due - The time period will be reset to be one month from mailing of the decision, or the balance of the two- month notice of appeal time period, whichever is greater. This time is extendible under 37 CFR based upon the mail date of the decision on the request or the receipt date of the notice of appeal, as applicable. — Application is allowable — Prosecution is reopened — Conference request is dismissed

7 Appeal Brief Compliance Review – MPEP 1205 Appeals Center — Enters brief and reviews for proper format — Sends notice of non-compliance and forwards application to the Examiner Examiner — Reviews brief and any subsequent submissions — May send notice of non-compliance or may clarify issues in Examiner’s Answer Board of Appeals — Reviews brief and any subsequent submissions — May send notice of non-compliance and remand application to the Examiner

8 Common Appeal Brief Compliance Issues Status of the claims — The status of all claims, including canceled claims, must be identified Summary of the claimed subject matter — Each independent claim must be explained in detail and include reference to the specification by page and line numbers or paragraph numbers Appendices — Claims Appendix – Only claims on appeal are listed. No status identifiers are required. — Evidence Appendix and Related Proceedings Appendix - If Appellant does not identify any evidence or related proceedings, then these appendices should be present but indicate either “None” or “N/A” under the heading

9 Jean Witz, Appeals Specialist (571)