Summary of PCC guidelines for applying relationship designators in bibliographic and authority records TJ Kao, Yale University Library CEAL CTP RDA Workshop.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Update on LC Preparations for RDA CEAL Committee on Technical Processing Meeting : Session 4 March 14, 2012 Tom Yee LC Policy & Standards Division.
Advertisements

5: Related works, expressions, manifestations Relationship Designators in MARC 21 Citing linking relationships in MARC 21 Common serial relationships 1.
Serials/Integrating Resources Charlene Chou March 18 th,
RDA Test “Train the Trainer” Module 6: Identifying Families [Content as of Mar. 31, 2010]
MARC 21, FRBR, RDA Review terminology (especially for non-native English speakers) Conceptual models Elements Attributes Future: Probably not a bib record,
Microform/Reproduction Charlene Chou at the CEAL RDA Workshop March 19 th,
Christee Pascale Associate Head, Acquisitions & Discovery North Carolina State University Libraries North Carolina Serials Conference.
T ASK G ROUP TO F ORMULATE OR R ECOMMEND PCC/NACO RDA P OLICY ON A UTHORITY I SSUES : S UMMARY OF R ECOMMENDATIONS Kathy Glennan University of Maryland.
RDA & Serials. RDA Toolkit CONSER RDA Cataloging Checklist for Textual Serials (DRAFT) CONSER RDA Core Elements Where’s that Tool? CONSER RDA Cataloging.
Module B: Identifying works User task = identify.
Module 8 Series in AACR2 and RDA: What’s the same? What’s different?
Module 17 Describing Serials and Integrating Resources RDA Training University of Nevada, Reno February 2013.
Relationship Designators in RDA: Connecting the Dots 100 1# Schiff, Adam L., $e author Relationship designators in RDA : $b connecting the dots.
RDA: Resource Description and Access A New Cataloging Standard for a Digital Future Jennifer Bowen OLAC 2006 Conference October 27, 2006
RDA: Resource Description and Access A New Cataloging Standard for a Digital Future Jennifer Bowen Cornell University May 16, 2006
Module 5: Relationships -- in bibliographic records and in authority records.
RDA AND AUTHORITY CONTROL Name: Hester Marais Job Title: Authority Describer Tel: Your institution's logo.
RDA for Print Materials 5 June 2013 Vicki Sipe. Resource Description and Access Timeline Tested and analyzed during Implemented March 31, 2013.
RDA Test “Train the Trainer” Module 7: Identifying Corporate Bodies [Content as of Mar. 31, 2010]
4: Identifying works and expressions Authorized access points representing works Making additions to authorized access points Authorized access points.
Module C: Identifying expressions User task: identify.
7: Basics of RDA Relationships for Serials Relationships in RDA Relationship designators Creators and other corporate bodies related to works Corporate.
LC Training for RDA: Resource Description & Access Module 6: Authorities II Part 4: FRBR Group One and NARs Cooperative and Instructional Programs Division.
Descriptive Cataloging with RDA
PCC RDA POST- IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES Highlights of the Task Group Report PCC Participants Meeting January 27, 2013.
Module 5: Relationships -- in bibliographic records and in authority records LC RDA for NASIG - June 1, 2011.
Series Policy in RDA George Prager and Robert Maxwell Continuing Resources Cataloging Forum American Library Association 27 January 2014.
11 RDA & CJK Materials Workshop Session two—Comparison between AACR2 & RDA Part 4—MARC21 tags: changes Prepared by Charlene Chou.
CONSER RDA Bridge Training [date] Presenters : [names] 1.
RDA Toolkit With thanks to Lori Robare (University of Oregon) and Robert Maxwell (Brigham Young University) for most of these slides.
RDA in NACO Module 2.b MARC 21 in NACO RDA Authority Records: Old and New Fields.
RDA Test “Train the Trainer” Module 5: Identifying Persons [Content as of Mar. 31, 2010]
Module 8: Changes to RDA LC RDA for NASIG - June 1, in general and for serials.
From AACR2 to RDA: An Evolution Kathy Glennan University of Maryland.
RDA in NACO Module 6.a RDA Chapter 11: Identifying Corporate Bodies—Overview Recording the Attributes.
RDA Toolkit is an integrated, browser-based, online product that allow user to interact with a collection of cataloging-related documents and resources.
Cambridge University Library RDA Toolkit Training session Adapted for Cambridge use by Janet Davis.
1 Making Changes to Personal Name and Corporate Body Authority Records Module 7. Making Changes to Existing Name and Work/Expression Authority Records.
RDA in NACO Module 4.a Module 4.b Module 4.c RDA Chapter 9: Identifying Persons— Overview Recording the Attributes.
Module 6: Preparing for RDA... LC RDA for NASIG - June 1, 2011.
Resource Description and Access Deirdre Kiorgaard ACOC Seminar, September 2007.
 Why do we catalog?  Why do we classify?  What aspects are important?  What aspects can we let go of?
APPLYING FRBR TO LIBRARY CATALOGUES A REVIEW OF EXISTING FRBRIZATION PROJECTS Martha M. Yee September 9, 2006 draft.
RDA Update MARC Change Summary Sally McCallum RDA Update Forum June 23, 2012 Library of Congress.
RDA DAY 1 – part 2 web version 1. 2 When you catalog a “book” in hand: You are working with a FRBR Group 1 Item The bibliographic record you create will.
OCLC-MARC Format Update 2014 Based on Adam Schiff’s PowerPoint presentation TJ Kao, Yale University Library CEAL CTP RDA Workshop March 23, 2015.
Rare Book Study Group Report Group Members: - Sarah Elman, Columbia University - Shuwen Cao, Princeton University CEAL CTP RDA Workshop March 23, 2015.
The world’s libraries. Connected. RDA & OCLC Cynthia M. Whitacre OCLC WorldCat Quality Management & Partner Content.
11 Ana Lupe Cristán Policy and Standards Division Library of Congress June 2012 Name Authorities - What’s New?
RDA Updates Since the Creation of LC RDA Training Material (May 2012) Annual Meeting of Council on East Asian Libraries March 19, 2013 Jessalyn Zoom Library.
RDA Training University of Nevada, Las Vegas May2013 Module 3 RDA Basics Using the RDA Toolkit.
Describing Persons Module 2 Module 2. Describing Persons1.
The British Library Guide to RDA Name Authority Records © The British Library Board 2014.
Strengthening Hybrid RDA/AACR2 Bibliographic Records La Donna Riddle Weber – November 2015.
Book Cataloging with RDA. RDA Instructions & Guidelines General things: – Core elements (required) – Alternative guidelines and instructions – Optional.
Relationship in RDA Section 6 : Recording Relationships to Persons, Families, & Corporate Bodies By: Habirah Binti Mohamad Pusat Bibliografi Negara Perpustakaan.
Relationship in RDA Section 8 : Recording Relationships between Works, Expressions, Manifestations, & Items By: Habirah Binti Mohamad Pusat Bibliografi.
RDA for Law Catalogers Cataloging New Editions of Monographs presented at the AALL Annual Meeting 2012 July 21, 2012 (revised July 31, 2012) George Prager.
RDA Training at EAL Session eight—Special topics, Serials, Integrating Resources & E-resources Charlene Chou May 7 th,
Building an improved resource discovery experience for users: a cataloger’s experience and perspective CEAL Conference Toronto, Canada, March, 2012 Jia.
Using Relationship Designators in RDA. Work Expression Manifestation Item realized through embodied in exemplified by Person Related Work author revision.
PCC Preparations for RDA Linda Barnhart RDA Forum -- ALA Annual June 23, 2012 Anaheim, California.
RDA for Law Catalogers Serials and Integrating Resources Melissa Beck UCLA Law Library.
RDA for Law Catalogers:
2016 CTP Cataloging Workshop Session one
Module 6: Preparing for RDA ...
NACO Updates Since April 2017
From Big Bang to beta An overview of the 3R Project
Recording the Attributes of Series MARC21 in NACO RDA Series Authority Records Welcome back, everyone. In this module, we are going to continue talking.
NACO Updates Since April 2018
Presentation transcript:

Summary of PCC guidelines for applying relationship designators in bibliographic and authority records TJ Kao, Yale University Library CEAL CTP RDA Workshop March, 23, 2015

Sources  For bibliographic records:  Training Manual for Applying Relationship Designators in Bibliographic Records (released on January 22, 2015)  For authority records:  PCC Guidelines for the Application of Relationship Designators in Authority Records (last draft released on February 24, 2014)

Training Manual for Applying Relationship Designators in Bibliographic Records  Statement of policy:  Include relationship designators for all creators, whether they are coded MARC 1XX or MARC 7XX.  Best practices:  Using relationship designators for other types of relationships (for example, contributor relationships) is strongly encouraged.  Include a relationship designator even if it repeats a term used as a qualifier to the name # ǂ a Zhang, Jingwei ǂ c (Director), ǂ e director.

Training Manual for Applying Relationship Designators in Bibliographic Records – Cont’d  When adding relationship designators for creators, consult RDA Appendix I.2.1 (Relationship Designators for Creators) not I.2.2 (Relationship Designators for Other Persons, Families, or Corporate Bodies Associated with a Work) or I.3.1 (Relationship Designators for Contributors) # ǂ a Jimi, ǂ e artist. NOT 100 0# ǂ a Jimi, ǂ e illustrator.  It is recommended that PCC catalogers use relationship designators from RDA Appendices. If the term needed is not there, use the Fast Track PCC relationship designator proposal form to propose a new term or request a revision of an existing term.PCC relationship designator proposal form

Training Manual for Applying Relationship Designators in Bibliographic Records – Cont’d General guidelines:  This guideline only applies to bibliographic records  Prefer a specific term to a general one if it is easily determined e.g. sculptor vs. artist; lyricist vs. author; illustrator vs. letterer  RDA element name as relationship designator e.g. creator, publisher  Don’t assign relationship designator when not clear

Training Manual for Applying Relationship Designators in Bibliographic Records – Cont’d  Add a relationship designator following an existing term and before existing codes Original: 700 1# ǂ a Imai, Miki, ǂ d ǂ 4 act After: 700 1# ǂ a Imai, Miki, ǂ d ǂ e actor. ǂ 4 act  Apply relationship designators in accordance with their definitions e.g. composer vs. composer (expression)

Training Manual for Applying Relationship Designators in Bibliographic Records – Cont’d  Guides for Appendix I Relationship Designators  Add relationship designators for all access points when certain  If more than one relationship designator is appropriate because of the multiple roles an entity has, preferably use repeating $e (or $j for MARC X11 fields). If necessary, multiple headings may be used instead. Add relationship designators in WEMI order # ǂ a Zuo, Shiqiang, ǂ e film director, ǂ e editor of moving image work. OR 700 1# ǂ a Zuo, Shiqiang, ǂ e film director # ǂ a Zuo, Shiqiang, ǂ e editor of moving image work.

Training Manual for Applying Relationship Designators in Bibliographic Records – Cont’d  Guides for Appendix I Relationship Designators – Cont’d  Applicable to families and corporate bodies as well as to individuals 100 3# ǂ a Liu (Family : ǂ g Liu, Yong, ), ǂ e author # ǂ a Korea (South). ǂ b Sanggongbu, ǂ e author # ǂ a Fudan, Princeton and Todai Conference ǂ n (1st : ǂ d 2011 : ǂ c Tōkyō Daigaku), ǂ j author.  Appendix I terms should not be used in a name/title access point or linking field # ǂ i Translation of: ǂ a Murakami, Haruki, ǂ d ǂ t Kangarū-biyori. NOT 700 1# ǂ i Translation of: ǂ a Murakami, Haruki, ǂ d ǂ e author. ǂ t Kangarū- biyori.

Training Manual for Applying Relationship Designators in Bibliographic Records – Cont’d  Guides for Appendix J Relationship Designators – Cont’d  Use of relationship designators for resource-to-resource relationship is encouraged ǂ i Revision of: ǂ a Miwa, Kentarō, ǂ t Manga to eiga no hikaku media-ron ǂ d 2010  Use $i even when the field coding already expresses a relationship ǂ i Container of (expression): ǂ a Mizoguchi, Yūzō, ǂ d ǂ t Chūgoku no shisō. ǂ l Chinese ǂ i Special issue of: ǂ t Zhongguo nong bao ǂ x ǂ w (DLC)sn ǂ w (OCoLC)

Training Manual for Applying Relationship Designators in Bibliographic Records – Cont’d  Guides for Appendix J Relationship Designators – Cont’d  When multiple relationships exist, provide separate access points, each with a single relationship designer in a single $i subfield. Alternatively identify one relationship as primary and record that relationship alone.  Except in the case of sequential work/expression relationships and equivalent manifestation relationships for serials, it is not necessary to provide reciprocal relationship fields. Do not use $i for MARC field 780/785.

Training Manual for Applying Relationship Designators in Bibliographic Records – Cont’d  Guides for Appendix J Relationship Designators – Cont’d  Catalogers may add a 7XX field with a relationship designators even when a 130/240 is already present implying they are versions of the same work # ǂ a Sunzi, ǂ d active 6th century B.C., ǂ e author ǂ a Sunzi bing fa. ǂ l English ǂ a Master Sun's Art of war / ǂ c Sun Tzu ; translated, with introduction, by Philip J. Ivanhoe # ǂ i Translation of: ǂ a Sunzi, ǂ d active 6th century B.C. ǂ t Sunzi bing fa.  Give a note when a relationship between resources is known but one resource cannot be identified. 500 ## ǂ a Translated based on the French Ostervald version.

Training Manual for Applying Relationship Designators in Bibliographic Records – Cont’d  Guides for Appendix J Relationship Designators – Cont’d  Use 700/710/711/730 instead of 740 when a related resource shares the same creator # ǂ a Card, Orson Scott, ǂ e author ǂ a Speaker for the dead. ǂ l Chinese ǂ a Ande de dai yan = ǂ b Speaker for the dead / ǂ c (Mei) Aosen SiketeKade (Orson Scott Card) zhu ; Duan Xian, Gao Ying yi # ǂ i Sequel: ǂ a Card, Orson Scott. ǂ t Xenocide. NOT 740 0# ǂ a Xenocide.  For unstructured descriptions, it is not necessary to indicate the WEMI level at which the relationship is asserted.

Training Manual for Applying Relationship Designators in Bibliographic Records – Cont’d  Punctuation and Capitalization  Relationship designators that follow authorized access points are not capitalized and are always preceded by a comma, unless the authorized access point ends in an open date # ǂ a Kang, Ch'ang-nyŏm, ǂ e composer # ǂ a Gao, Cen, ǂ d approximately 1686-approximately 1740, ǂ e author # ǂ a Zhang, Hongwei ǂ c (Law professor), ǂ e author # ǂ a Kudō, Rikio, ǂ d ǂ e author.

Training Manual for Applying Relationship Designators in Bibliographic Records – Cont’d  Punctuation and Capitalization – Cont’d  Relationship designators that precede authorized access points or that appear at the beginning of a field are capitalized and are followed by a colon # ǂ i Motion picture adaptation of (work): ǂ a Xiao, Lihong. ǂ t Gui hua xiang ǂ i Container of (work): ǂ a Shi jing ǂ i Reproduction of (manifestation): ǂ a Dokushōan Tatsuyoshi. ǂ t Chichibu junpai zue. ǂ d [1823?]

PCC Guidelines for the Application of Relationship Designators in Authority Records  Use relationship designators from Appendix I, J, or K only. If no appropriate term is available in Appendix I, J, or K, use the PCC relationship designator proposal form to propose a new term or request a revision of an existing term.PCC relationship designator proposal form  Use subfield $i with subfield $w r when giving relationships in 5XX. When updating an existing corporate body record that contains subfield $w values “a” or “b”, catalogers are encouraged to convert the subfield $w values to appropriate relationship designators from RDA Appendix K, using subfield $i and subfield $w value “r.” Old practice: 510 2# ǂ a Changchun shi yuan ǂ w b New practice: 510 2# ǂ i Successor: ǂ a Changchun shi yuan ǂ w r

PCC Guidelines for the Application of Relationship Designators in Authority Records – Cont’d  Relationship designators should only be used to relate authority records in LC NAF  Do not include a relationship designator as part of an access point 100 1# ǂ a Murakami, Haruki, ǂ d ǂ t Afutā dāku. ǂ l English. NOT 100 1# ǂ a Murakami, Haruki, ǂ d ǂ e author. ǂ t Afutā dāku. ǂ l English.  Do not use relationship designators in 4XX fields

PCC Guidelines for the Application of Relationship Designators in Authority Records – Cont’d  If a specific relationship cannot be determined, do not use a relationship designator. Instead, use simple 5XX. Consider adding a 667 field to indicate that research has been attempted # ǂ a Manshū Dengyō Kabushiki Kaisha 510 2# ǂ a Minami Manshū Denki Kabushiki Kaisha 667 ## ǂ a Unable to determine relationship with Minami Manshū Denki Kabushiki Kaisha, n

PCC Guidelines for the Application of Relationship Designators in Authority Records – Cont’d  Cataloger’s judgment about whether to make reciprocal 5XXs. However, the explicit recording of other reciprocal relationships is highly encouraged. Highly encouraged 510: 100 1# ǂ a Xu, Zhen, ǂ d # ǂ i Founded corporate body: ǂ a Mo ding gong si (Shanghai, China) ǂ w r Optional (but encouraged) 500: 110 2# ǂ a Mo ding gong si (Shanghai, China) 500 1# ǂ i Founder: ǂ a Xu, Zhen, ǂ d ǂ w r

PCC Guidelines for the Application of Relationship Designators in Authority Records – Cont’d  Use subfield $i and $w r when recording pseudonymous relationships for personal names in cases where a person uses one real name and one pseudonym. Hiromasa Kudō also publishes under the pen name, Hiroshi Iwai # ǂ a Kudō, Hiromasa, ǂ d # ǂ i Alternate identity: ǂ a Iwai, Hiroshi, ǂ d ǂ w r 100 1# ǂ a Iwai, Hiroshi, ǂ d # ǂ i Real identity: ǂ a Kudō, Hiromasa, ǂ d ǂ w r  In all other cases involving pseudonyms, follow the guidance provided in FAQ – LC/PCC RDA Practice for Creating NARs for Persons Who Use Pseudonyms.FAQ – LC/PCC RDA Practice for Creating NARs for Persons Who Use Pseudonyms

PCC Guidelines for the Application of Relationship Designators in Authority Records – Cont’d  Use subfield $i with $w r and appropriate relationship designators from RDA Appendix K when providing relationship links between corporate entities  Catalogers are strongly encouraged to record hierarchical superior corporate bodies using 510 $i Hierarchical superior with $r w when information is readily accessible and clear # ǂ a Sŏul Yŏja Taehak (Korea). ǂ b Yŏsŏng Yŏn ʼ guso 510 2# ǂ i Hierarchical superior: ǂ a Sŏul Yŏja Taehak (Korea) ǂ r w

PCC Guidelines for the Application of Relationship Designators in Authority Records – Cont’d  Catalogers are not required to record relationships to related works and expressions in 510s. Use judgment in making reciprocal 5XXs and relating persons, families, and corporate bodies to works/expressions # ǂ a Chua, Amy. ǂ t Battle hymn of the tiger mother. ǂ l Chinese 500 1# ǂ i Translation of: ǂ a Chua, Amy. ǂ t Battle hymn of the tiger mother ǂ w r 100 1# ǂ a Li, Qiao, ǂ d ǂ t Huang cun 500 1# ǂ i Sequel to: ǂ a Li, Qiao, ǂ d ǂ t Han ye ǂ w r  Do not use subfield $i with subfield $w “r” for place names (X51) until relationship designators for places are developed. (RDA Appendix L)

Questions and discussion