PM-2.5 FEM Requirements for Met One BAM Glenn Gehring, Technology Specialist Tribal Air Monitoring Support (TAMS) Center 541-223-1402

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE IMPACT OF THE NEW AIR MONITORING REGULATIONS ON TRIBAL AIR MONITORING A First Look.
Advertisements

Institute for Tribal Environmental Professionals, Tribal Air Monitoring Support Center Guest Speaker: Mike Papp, OAQPS.
QUAPAW TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA AIR QUALITY PROGRAM CRAIG KREMAN ASSISTANT ENVIRONMENTAL DIRECTOR QUAPAW TRIBE ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICE 2014 National Tribal Forum.
Ambient Air Monitoring for the Revised Lead NAAQS Daniel Garver US EPA Region 4.
1 Hydronic Heaters (HH) Program Update for WESTAR Biomass Workshop 3/18/09.
AQS & Monitoring. In This Section We Will Talk About Monitoring & AQS 2 In the field Before Monitoring QAPP – quality assurance project plan Annual monitoring.
QA Strategy Workgroup Ambient Air Quality System Training Ambient Air Monitoring Quality Systems Requirements Mike Papp- OAQPS.
Why do we lose analyzer data? Monitor malfunction DAS malfunction Power outages Environmental problems Wildlife damage Vandalism Operator error.
Contractor Safety Management
Establish Verification Procedures (Task 11 / Principle 6)
2025 Partisol Sequential Sampler
AMTAC April 12 th, 2011 Meredith Kurpius EPA R9 1.
Working together for clean air Approved Regional Method (ARM) Demonstration Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Mike Gilroy, Erik Saganic Puget Sound Clean Air.
Ozone and Ozone Monitoring 2015 National Tribal Forum Glenn Gehring, Technology Specialist III Tribal Air Monitoring Support (TAMS) Center Institute for.
1 AQS Ambient Monitoring Topics AQS Conference August 20, 2008 David Lutz.
1 Guest Speaker: Bill Frietsche US EPA.  April 7: QA Systems, EPA definitions, PQAOs and common sense – Mike Papp  April 14: Routine Quality Control.
Division of Air Quality -- Ambient Monitoring -- EMC Member Continuing Education Session Donnie Redmond Section Chief March 7, 2012.
Presented by: Mike Hamdan South Coast Air Quality Management District Diamond Bar, CA Presented at: The Tribal Air Monitoring Training, Pechanga Reservation,
Guest Speaker: Jeremy Howe Little River Band Of Ottawa Indians The Measuring Sticks of Air Monitoring.
What to compare against the validation templates (see templates in course webpage: Resources/Validation%20Templates%20from%20Red.
Ozone Monitoring Issues & Opportunities - II Ozone Transport Commission MANE-VU Fall Meeting November 19, 2014 Crystal City, VA Will Ollison 1220 L Street,
1 Key Monitoring Issues Status of PM 2.5 monitoring methodologies Criteria for acceptance of monitors and sites Special considerations for comparing ambient.
Introduction to BGI Instruments
Quality Assurance/ Quality Control
1 Dec. 8, 1997 LEADS Quality Assurance Summary Robert Brewer (512) Monitoring Operations Division Network QA Manager.
AMP255 – Precision and Bias Data Report 2008 AQS Conference The AMP255 Precision and Bias Data Report August 22, 2008 Presented by Jonathan Miller EPA.
Melinda Ronca-Battista, ITEP, TAMS Center Tribal Air Monitoring and QA Requirements for NAAQS- Comparable Data.
Nez Perce Tribe Woodstove Study & Changeout Johna Boulafentis Environmental Outreach Specialist Environmental Restoration and Waste Management.
1 Guest Speaker: Brandy Toft Leech Lake Ojibwe.  Overview of FRM/FEM/ARM status, requirements, and reporting  QC (routine checks, audits, and method-
 April 7: QA Systems, EPA definitions, PQAOs and common sense – Mike Papp  April 14: Routine Quality Control and Data Management (1-pt QC, flow rate,
Quality Control/ Quality Assurance Annabelle Allison ITEP/TAMS Center.
Proposed Revisions to Ambient Air Monitoring Regulations, and Proposed FY2007 Air Monitoring Guidance WESTAR Spring Business Meeting March 28, 2006.
Quality Control – Part II Tim Hanley EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
EPA Region 9 Meredith Kurpius August 19, Status of Tribal Air Monitoring Value of tribal monitoring Used to protect public health on tribal land.
Appendix A: Calculations for Data Quality Assessment QC check statistics Precision calcs Bias calcs PM stats Reporting: quarterly and annual.
CARB Continuous PM 2.5 Monitoring Activity (BAM’s) Reggie Smith California Air Resources Board.
Overview and Status of Lead NAAQS Review and Overview of Agency Technical Documents on Lead NAAQS Monitoring Issues Kevin Cavender and Joann Rice Presented.
1 Saxony-Anhalt EU Twinning RO 04/IB/EN/09 State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang GarcheBukarest National Reference Laboratory for Air.
PM 2.5 Continuous FEMs; Update and Assessments For AMTAC April 12, 2011 Kate Hoag – US EPA, Region 9.
All About Sanitary Surveys David Edmunds Environmental Program Specialist ADEC Drinking Water Program Sustained Compliance: What It Means to Public Water.
Designations for 24-Hour PM2.5 NAAQS: Overview and Guidance Amy Vasu PM2.5 Workshop June 20-21, 2007.
Air Quality Program Environmental Protection & Natural Resources Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Community Development Department (CDD) Environmental.
Title V Operating Permits: A Compliance and Enforcement Tool Candace Carraway US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
Ambient Monitoring Update NACAA Fall Meeting Chet Wayland, AQAD Division Director Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 1 October 3-5, 2011 Cleveland,
 April 7: QA Systems, EPA definitions, PQAOs and common sense – Mike Papp  April 14: Routine Quality Control and Data Management (1-pt QC, flow rate,
Federal Equivalent Methods and Federal Reference Methods Tim Hanley U.S. EPA OAQPS.
Division of Air Quality Ambient Monitoring Donnie Redmond Section Chief May 7, 2014.
LEADS/EMS DATA VALIDATION IPS MeteoStar December 11, 2006 WHAT IS VALIDATION? From The Dictionary: 1a. To Make Legally Valid 1b. To Grant Official.
NATIONAL TRIBAL FORUM ON AIR QUALITY 2013 Establishment of a PM 2.5 Monitoring Network on the Colville Reservation.
Measurement Quality Objectives = Data Validation Requirements Excerpted from EPA QA Handbook Volume II (aka “Redbook”)
Checking and Corrective Action EPA Regions 9 & 10 and The Federal Network for Sustainability 2005.
PM 2.5 Continuous FEMs; Update and Assessments For NESCAUM Monitoring Meeting April 29, 2011 Tim Hanley – US EPA, OAQPS 1.
PM Methods Update and Network Design Presentation for WESTAR San Diego, CA September 2005 Peter Tsirigotis Director Emissions, Monitoring, and Analysis.
WHAT IS THE CHEROKEE NATION? Cherokee Nation Air Quality Data Management Concepts for Quality Data Collection Ryan Callison.
Fresno NCore Monitoring Deployment Status Presentation April 12, 2011 by: Joe Cruz Air Pollution Specialist, CARB.
Module 11 Module I: Terminology— Data Quality Indicators (DQIs) Melinda Ronca-Battista ITEP Catherine Brown U.S. EPA.
Quality Management & Operations Support Branch Quality Assurance Section Presented By: Webster Tasat.
Ozone and Lead Monitoring Issues Under Revised NAAQS Monitoring Steering Committee June 21-22, 2007 Washington, DC Phil Lorang, OAQPS.
BACK TO BASICS Quality Assurance and Validation Gaseous NAAQS Pollutants (O3, NO2, SO2, CO) By Kendall Perkins May 17, 2006.
Annual Air Monitoring Data Certification and Concurrence Process 1.
Regional Air Grant Coordinators Meeting PM 2.5 Monitoring and Funding April 17, 2007.
Statewide Compliance Monitoring and Local Monitoring Projects
HOPI TRIBE-DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Hopi Environmental Protection Office (HEPO) Air Quality Program.
Clean Air Act (CAA) Purpose
Proposed Ozone Monitoring Revisions Ozone Season and Methods
Representative Measurements – AQ-Workshop Bucharest, July 2008
A New Tool for Evaluating Candidate PM FEM and PM2.5 ARM Monitors
Nate Herbst Southern Ute Indian Tribe
Precision, Bias, and Total Error (Accuracy)
Presentation transcript:

PM-2.5 FEM Requirements for Met One BAM Glenn Gehring, Technology Specialist Tribal Air Monitoring Support (TAMS) Center

To obtain a NAAQS designation FEM equipment must be operated in accordance with FEM certification PM-2.5 network collocation and siting requirements must be met You must follow your approved QAPP (the QAPP must comply with all relevant CFRs)

Zero calibration at deployment

Collocation Refer to: 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix A section % of PM-2.5 (FEM or FRM) sites must be collocated (round up) – must have at least 1 FRM collocation must be with same EPA FRM method designation FEM collocation - 50% of the 15% required collocations must be with FRMs and 50% with FEMs of the same EPA FEM designation – The first collocation MUST be with an FRM Must run FRM at least once every 12 days

[Most tribe will fall under the FEM (C) scenario where you have fewer than 7 sites and are only required to have one collocated site for your PM-2.5 network. In this situation, if you are using a FEM it must be collocated with a FRM. If your network needs two collocated sites the second collocation must be with another FEM that has the same EPA FEM designation number as the primary monitor. Basically, 50% of monitors used for collocation must be FRM and 50% FEM (If FEMs are used in the network), with the FRM being first. If you need three collocated sites the third monitor used for collocation must also be a FRM.]

PM-2.5 Probe Siting Refer to: 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix E Overall probe height: 2–15 Meters above ground level (Microscale is 2-7 meters) Horizontal distance from obstacles: must be at least twice the height the obstacle protrudes above the sampler inlet (two times the height difference away) with at least 270 degrees unobstructed. Rooftop - horizontal distance from obstacles: at least 2-meters - should be away from minor sources such as furnace, incineration or food service exhausts flues – you should also avoid areas too close to residential areas with wood burning stoves Horizontal distance from the dripline of a tree: must be at least 10- meters and should be at least 20-meters. Collocated horizontal separation (for low vols): within 4-meters of each other and at least 1-meter apart (you should also have a maximum of 1 meter vertical separation) Distance from road: 2-10 meters for microscale - see chart for other scales

PM probe distance from roads

Other PM-2.5 FEM Requirements Monthly flow verifications with NIST traceable standards 40CFR58 Appendix A, Section Semi-annual flow audits (at least every 6-months) 40CFR58 Appendix A, Section PEP audits - 5 per year, minimum 40CFR58 Appendix A, section % data completeness Data Certification Maintained in accordance with manual QAPP compliance and appropriate documentation

Always check with your EPA Region’s Quality Assurance folks AND Refer to the CFRs.