Nozzle Study Yan Zhan, Foluso Ladeinde April, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Boundary layer with pressure gradient in flow direction.
Advertisements

Outline Overview of Pipe Flow CFD Process ANSYS Workbench
ES 202 Fluid and Thermal Systems Lecture 28: Drag Analysis on Flat Plates and Cross-Flow Cylinders (2/17/2003)
Convection.
Elementary Mechanics of Fluids
University of Western Ontario
Estimation of Convective Heat Transfer Coefficient
Fluids Mechanics Carlos Silva December 2 nd 2009.
Turbulent Flow in Various Bent Pipes Yan Zhan, Foluso Ladeinde Feb. 8 th, 2011.
Output - Derived Variables Derived Variables are quantities evaluated from the primitive (or solved) variables by PHOENICS. It means, PHOENICS first solve.
An Analysis of Hiemenz Flow E. Kaufman and E. Gutierrez-Miravete Department of Engineering and Science Rensselaer at Hartford.
1 “CFD Analysis of Inlet and Outlet Regions of Coolant Channels in an Advanced Hydrocarbon Engine Nozzle” Dr. Kevin R. Anderson Associate Professor California.
Chapter 2: Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient
3D Hg Jet Simulations Yan Zhan June 13, Outline Hg Jet Inlet Condition – Case1: Outlet of the pipe without a bend and a weld – Case2: Outlet of.
Internal Flow: Heat Transfer Correlations
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Presentations.com POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Presentations.com Outlet Inlet n’=375 n=150 n φ =75 (dφ=1.2 ⁰ ) Extra Terms.
Lec 25: Viscosity, Bernoulli equation
CE 230-Engineering Fluid Mechanics Lecture # BERNOULLI EQUATION.
Flow over an Obstruction MECH 523 Applied Computational Fluid Dynamics Presented by Srinivasan C Rasipuram.
Design of Systems with INTERNAL CONVECTION P M V Subbarao Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering Department IIT Delhi An Essential Part of Exchanging.
Physics 151: Lecture 30 Today’s Agenda
Thermal Analysis of Helium- Cooled T-tube Divertor S. Shin, S. I. Abdel-Khalik, and M. Yoda ARIES Meeting, Madison (June 14-15, 2005) G. W. Woodruff School.
MECH 221 FLUID MECHANICS (Fall 06/07) Chapter 9: FLOWS IN PIPE
Reynolds Experiment Laminar Turbulent Reynolds Number
California State University, Chico
Pertemuan CLOSED CONDUIT FLOW 1
Forces Acting on a Control Volume Body forces: Act through the entire body of the control volume: gravity, electric, and magnetic forces. Surface forces:
Thermal Development of Internal Flows P M V Subbarao Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering Department IIT Delhi Concept for Precise Design ……
Correlations for INTERNAL CONVECTION P M V Subbarao Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering Department IIT Delhi An Essential Part of Exchanging Heat……..
Fluid mechanics 3.1 – key points
Convection Prepared by: Nimesh Gajjar. CONVECTIVE HEAT TRANSFER Convection heat transfer involves fluid motion heat conduction The fluid motion enhances.
Chilton and Colburn J-factor analogy
CHAPTER 7 ENERGY PRINCIPLE
Example Water at 95°C is flowing at a rate of 2.0 ft3/s through a 60° bend, in which there is a contraction from 4 to 3 inches internal diameter. Compute.
SURVIVAL MODE Quiz 3 –
ERT 209 HEAT & MASS TRANSFER Sem 2/ Prepared by; Miss Mismisuraya Meor Ahmad School of Bioprocess Engineering University Malaysia Perlis 17 February.
Fluid Properties: Liquid or Gas
Lesson 21 Laminar and Turbulent Flow
Improved Near Wall Treatment for CI Engine CFD Simulations Mika Nuutinen Helsinki University of Technology, Internal Combustion Engine Technology.
Neutrino Factory / Muon Collider Target Meeting Numerical Simulations for Jet-Proton Interaction Wurigen Bo, Roman Samulyak Department of Applied Mathematics.
Mass Transfer Coefficient
Reynolds Transport Theorem We need to relate time derivative of a property of a system to rate of change of that property within a certain region (C.V.)
Chapter 8: Flow in Pipes.
2D Jet Simulation Updates Jan.23 rd 2014 Yan Zhan SUNY Stony Brook 1.
Compressor Cascade Pressure Rise Prediction
Prepared by Dan Wu with the supervision under Prof. M. Kostic
Convection in Flat Plate Boundary Layers P M V Subbarao Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering Department IIT Delhi A Universal Similarity Law ……
One Minute Paper Statics; reply. Fluid dynamics  Fluids in motion Pumps Fans Compressors Turbines Heat exchangers.
Physics Section 8.3 Apply the properties of flowing fluids The flow of a fluid is laminar if every particle that passes a particular point moves along.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Jörg Wolters, Michael Butzek Focused Cross Flow LBE Target for ESS 4th HPTW, Malmö, 3 May 2011.
Internal Flow: Heat Transfer Correlations. Fully Developed Flow Laminar Flow in a Circular Tube: The local Nusselt number is a constant throughout the.
Turbulence Models Validation in a Ventilated Room by a Wall Jet Guangyu Cao Laboratory of Heating, Ventilating and Air-Conditioning,
Statika Fluida Section 3. Fluid Dynamics Objectives Introduce concepts necessary to analyse fluids in motion Identify differences between Steady/unsteady.
External flow over immersed bodies If a body is immersed in a flow, we call it an external flow. Some important external flows include airplanes, motor.
Convection Heat Transfer in Manufacturing Processes P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi Mode of Heat Transfer due to.
Heat Transfer by Convection
Heat Transfer Su Yongkang School of Mechanical Engineering # 1 HEAT TRANSFER CHAPTER 8 Internal flow.
Heat Transfer Su Yongkang School of Mechanical Engineering # 1 HEAT TRANSFER CHAPTER 7 External flow.
University of Wisconsin -- Engine Research Center slide 1 Flamelet Modeling for the Diffusion Combustion in OpenFOAM ME 769 Final Project Presentation.
CFD Simulation Investigation of Natural Gas Components through a Drilling Pipe RASEL A SULTAN HOUSSEMEDDINE LEULMI.
Chapter 8: Internal Forced Convection
Bernoulli and Flow Continuity.  U-Tube Manometer  Used to measure pressure of a fluid  Principles involved: ◦ The pressure is the same in equal elevations.
Theory of Turbine Cascades P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Its Group Performance, What Matters.……
2D Free Jet Simulations (FLUENT)
Internal Incompressible
Prepared BY: Helwan University Faculty Of Engineering
Flow Through a Pipe Elbow (Comsol)
Control volume approach (검사체적 방법)
FLUID MECHANICS REVIEW
Internal Flow: General Considerations
Presentation transcript:

Nozzle Study Yan Zhan, Foluso Ladeinde April, 2011

Outlines Region of interests Bend Combinations without nozzle – Bend Combinations Without Nozzle – Turbulence Model Comparisons – Mercury Flow in Curved Pipes – Discussions Bend Combinations with Nozzle – Bend Combinations With Nozzle – Mercury Flow in Curved Nozzle Pipes – Discussions Appendix

Region of interests Hg delivery system at CERN Simulation Regime Interests: Influence of nozzle & nozzle upstream on the jet exit

Outlines Region of interests Bend Combinations without nozzle – Bend Combinations Without Nozzle – Turbulence Model Comparisons – Mercury Flow in Curved Pipes – Discussions Bend Combinations with Nozzle – Bend Combinations With Nozzle – Mercury Flow in Curved Nozzle Pipes – Discussions Appendix

Bend Combinations Without Nozzle (1) Geometry of bends with varying angles Nondimensionalized by pipe diameter (p.d.); φ range: 0⁰, 30⁰, 60⁰, 90⁰. Mesh at the cross-section n r × n θ =152×64 (the 1 st grid center at y + ≈1)

Geometries without nozzle: (a) 0⁰/0⁰ ; (b) 30⁰/30⁰; (c) 60⁰/60⁰; (d) 90⁰/90⁰ n x =40 +n φ +20+ n φ +100 where n φ depends on the bend angle φ Bend Combinations Without Nozzle (2) (a) (b) (c) (d)

Turbulence Model Comparisons (2) Sudo’s Experiment (1998) for 90⁰ bend* K. Sudo, M. Sumida, H. Hibara, Experimental investigation on turbulent flow in a circular-sectioned 90-degrees bend, Experiments in Fluids. 25, u ave = 8.7 m/s; Re=6×10 4 ; ρ air = ; μ air = 1.983×10 -5 ; Pr= 0.712

Inlet Outlet Turbulence Model Comparisons (3) Mesh at the cross-section n r × n θ =80×50 (the 1 st grid center at y + ≈1) Mesh for the test pipe Upstream: n’=375 Downstream: n=150 n φ =75 (dφ=1.2⁰)

Turbulence Model Comparisons (4) Longitudinal distribution of wall static pressure C p pressure coefficient p ref reference value of p at z’/d=-17.6 RKε is the best of the three in simulating curved pipe flow

Mercury Flow in Curved Pipes (1) Steady incompressible turbulent flow Boundary Conditions – Inlet: Fully developed velocity; – Outlet: Outflow; – Wall: non-slip Schemes – 3 rd order MUSCL for momentum and turbulence equations – SIMPLE schemes for pressure linked equations Convergence Criterion – 10 -5

Mercury Flow in Curved Pipes (2) Turbulence Characteristics – Turbulence Level (Flutuating Velocity) – Momentum Thickness (Mean Velocity) Measure of the momentum loss within the boundary layer due to viscosity. Small I Big θ t

Mercury Flow in Curved Pipes (3) Turbulence Level (1) Fig. Two shown planes at the pipe outlet PipesI mean at outlet 90 ⁰ /90 ⁰ % 60 ⁰ /60 ⁰ % 30 ⁰ /30 ⁰ % 0 ⁰ /0 ⁰ % Table. Mean turbulence level at pipe outlet Mean I in = %

Mercury Flow in Curved Pipes (4) Turbulence Level (2) Turbulence intensity distribution at the pipe exit (a)Horizontal plane (from inner side to outer side ) (b)Vertical (from bottom to top ) (a)(b)

Mercury Flow in Curved Pipes (4) Momentum Thickness Momentum thickness distribution along the wall at the pipe exit (a) 0⁰/0 ⁰ bend (b)30⁰/30 ⁰ bend (c) 60⁰/60 ⁰ bend (d) 90⁰/90 ⁰ bend

Discussions Bend Effects – Bend and turbulence level Bend enhances the turbulence level but not too much; – The 0⁰/0⁰ bend has the lowest turbulence level; Symmetry I for the 90⁰/90⁰ bend; – Bend and θ t Bend effects θt not linearly with the increasing bends – The 60⁰/60⁰ bend seems like a turning point Less uniform θ t distribution in larger bend – θ t is bigger near the inner side and smaller near the outer side

Outlines Region of interests Bend Combinations without nozzle – Bend Combinations Without Nozzle – Turbulence Model Comparisons – Mercury Flow in Curved Pipes – Discussions Bend Combinations with Nozzle – Bend Combinations With Nozzle – Mercury Flow in Curved Nozzle Pipes – Discussions Appendix

Bend Combinations With Nozzle Geometry of bends with varying angles Nondimensionalized by pipe diameter (p.d.); φ range: 0⁰, 30⁰, 60⁰, 90⁰. Mesh at the cross-section (half model) n r × n θ =152×64 (the 1 st grid center at y + ≈1)

Mesh for bends (a) 0⁰/0⁰ ; (b) 30⁰/30⁰; (c) 60⁰/60⁰; (d) 90⁰/90⁰ n x =40 +n φ +20+ n φ where n φ depends on the bend angle φ (a) (b) (c) (d)

Mercury Flow in Curved Nozzle Pipes (1) Longitudinal distribution of static pressure for 90⁰/90⁰ Combination Velocity inlet condition P in 30bar; u in fully developed velocity profile; Outlet flow condition

Mercury Flow in Curved Nozzle Pipes (2) Main Loss Assume smooth pipe, thus P main =0 Minor Loss – Elbow Loss – Contraction Loss Total Loss

Mercury Flow in Curved Nozzle Pipes (3) Bernoulli’s Law Comparison

Mercury Flow in Curved Nozzle Pipes (4) Turbulence Level (1) PipesI mean (Nozzle) I mean (No nozzle) 90 ⁰ /90 ⁰ % % 60 ⁰ /60 ⁰ % % 30 ⁰ /30 ⁰ % % 0 ⁰ /0 ⁰ % % Fig. Two shown planes at the pipe outletTable. Mean turbulence level at pipe outlet Mean I in = %

Mercury Flow in Curved Nozzle Pipes (5) Turbulence Level (2) Turbulence intensity distribution at the pipe exit (a)Horizontal plane ; (b) Vertical plane (a) (b)

Mercury Flow in Curved Pipes (6) Momentum Thickness Momentum thickness distribution along the wall at the pipe exit (a) 0⁰/0 ⁰ bend (b)30⁰/30 ⁰ bend (c) 60⁰/60 ⁰ bend (d) 90⁰/90 ⁰ bend

Discussions (1) Turbulence intensity distribution at the pipe exit (a)Horizontal plane (b)Vertical plane (a) (b)

Discussions (2) The comparison of momentum thickness distribution at the pipe exit between pipe with/without nozzle (a) 0⁰/0 ⁰ bend (b)30⁰/30 ⁰ bend (c) 60⁰/60 ⁰ bend (d) 90⁰/90 ⁰ bend Red: pipe without nozzle; Blue: pipe with nozzle.

Discussions (3) Nozzle Effects – Nozzle and turbulence level Nozzle reduces the turbulence level; – The 90⁰/90⁰ bend doesn’t change too much; I of the 90⁰/90⁰ bend is far different from other bends – Nozzle and θ t Nozzle decreases θt Very uniform and similar θ t distribution at the nozzle exit for all bend pipes

Outlines Region of interests Bend Combinations without nozzle – Bend Combinations Without Nozzle – Turbulence Model Comparisons – Mercury Flow in Curved Pipes – Discussions Bend Combinations with Nozzle – Bend Combinations With Nozzle – Mercury Flow in Curved Nozzle Pipes – Discussions Appendix

Appendix(1) Continuity Equation The two-phase model considers mixture comprising of liquid, vapor and non-condensable gas (NCG). Gas is compressible, the liquid and vapor are impressible. The mixture is modeled as incompressible. Momentum Equations

Appendix(2) Spalart-Allmaras Model

Appendix(3) Turbulent Viscosity (SA)

Appendix (4) Standard K-ε model

Appendix (5) Turbulent Viscosity (SKε)

Appendix (6) Realizable K-ε model

Appendix (7) Turbulent Viscosity (RKε)

Appendix(8) ModelsProsCons Spalart-Allmaras (SA) Low-cost; Aerospace applications involving wall-bounded flows and with mild separation; Can not predict the decay of homogeneous, isotropic turbulence; No claim is made regarding its applicability to all types of complex engineering flows; Standard K-ε (Skε) Robust and reasonably accurate; Most widely-used engineering model industrial applications; Contains submodels for buoyancy, compressibility, combustion, etc; Must use wall function for near wall calculation; Performs poorly for flows with strong separation, large streamline „curvature, and large pressure gradient; Realizable K-ε (Rkε) superior performance for flows involving rotation, „boundary layers under strong adverse pressure gradients, separation, and recirculation

Appendix (9) Properties of fluid Steady incompressible turbulent flow Variable Values Pipe ID0.884 inch Nozzle exit ID0.402 inch Driving pressure30 bar Frequency for Hg supply12 s Maximum Cycles100 Jet Velocity20 m/s Jet Diameter1 cm Jet Flow rate1.6 L/sec Environment1 atm air /vacuum Mercury Properties (25 ⁰ C ) Density kg/L Sound Speed1451 m/s Bulk Modulus2.67×10 10 Pa Dynamic Viscosity1.128×10 -7 m 2 /s Thermal Conductivity 8.69 W/m ⋅ K Electrical Conductivity 10 6 Siemens/m Specific Heat J/kg ⋅ K Prandtl Number0.025 Surface Tension465 dyne/cm