Two-dimensional dam break flooding simulation: a GIS embedded approach. Massimiliano Cannata and Roberto Marzocchi IST-SUPSI, Institute of Earth Sciences.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
My First Fluid Project Ryan Schmidt. Outline MAC Method How far did I get? What went wrong? Future Work.
Advertisements

Phoenics User Conference on CFD May 2004 Vipac Engineers & Scientists Ltd COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS Simulation of Turbulent Flows and Pollutant Dispersion.
PARMA UNIVERSITY SIMULATIONS OF THE ISOLATED BUILDING TEST CASE F. AURELI, A. MARANZONI & P. MIGNOSA DICATeA, Parma University Parco Area delle Scienze.
A Model for Evaluating the Impacts of Spatial and Temporal Land Use Changes on Water Quality at Watershed Scale Jae-Pil Cho and Saied Mostaghimi 07/29/2003.
Basic Governing Differential Equations
Reinaldo Garcia, PhD A proposal for testing two-dimensional models to use in the National Flood Insurance Program.
Fluidyn FLOWCOAST FLOOIL 3D Fluid Dynamics Model to Simulate Oil slick movement in coastal waters or rivers FLOOIL.
Numerical Simulation of Benchmark Problem 2
Interlinked Modelling of Large Floods by combining one and two-dimensional diffusive wave-approaches P. Kamrath, N.P. Huber, M. Kufeld, H. Schüttrumpf.
Coupling Continuum Model and Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Methods for Reactive Transport Yilin Fang, Timothy D Scheibe and Alexandre M Tartakovsky Pacific.
* Finally, along the lines of predicting system behavior, researchers may want to know what conditions will lead to an optimal outcome of some property.
Monroe L. Weber-Shirk S chool of Civil and Environmental Engineering Basic Governing Differential Equations CEE 331 June 12, 2015.
Basic Governing Differential Equations
Modelling of pollution dispersion in natural stream during dry period Yvetta Velísková Institute of Hydrology SAS, Racianska 75, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Accurate Numerical Treatment of the Source Terms in the Non-linear Shallow Water Equations J.G. Zhou, C.G. Mingham, D.M. Causon and D.M. Ingram Centre.
Shallow water equations in 1D: Method of characteristics
Multi-Scale Finite-Volume (MSFV) method for elliptic problems Subsurface flow simulation Mark van Kraaij, CASA Seminar Wednesday 13 April 2005.
Modeling Fluid Phenomena -Vinay Bondhugula (25 th & 27 th April 2006)
© K.Fedra Integrating GIS and environmental models integrated tools for spatial environmental analysis.
Monroe L. Weber-Shirk S chool of Civil and Environmental Engineering Basic Governing Differential Equations CEE 331 July 14, 2015 CEE 331 July 14, 2015.
Numerical simulation of water erosion models and some physical models in image processing Gloria Haro Ortega December 2003 Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
A TWO-FLUID NUMERICAL MODEL OF THE LIMPET OWC CG Mingham, L Qian, DM Causon and DM Ingram Centre for Mathematical Modelling and Flow Analysis Manchester.
Juan Carlos Ortiz Royero Ph.D.
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
FUNDAMENTAL EQUATIONS, CONCEPTS AND IMPLEMENTATION
Hydraulic Routing in Rivers
Dynamic Characteristics of Break Debris Flow and its Numerical Simulation State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection Chengdu.
© Arturo S. Leon, BSU, Spring 2010
Fritz R. Fiedler University of Idaho Department of Civil Engineering Simulation of Shallow Discontinuous Flow over Complex Infiltrating Terrain.
1 Flood Hazard Analysis Session 1 Dr. Heiko Apel Risk Analysis Flood Hazard Assessment.
ICHS4, San Francisco, September E. Papanikolaou, D. Baraldi Joint Research Centre - Institute for Energy and Transport
C M C C Centro Euro-Mediterraneo per i Cambiamenti Climatici COSMO General Meeting - September 8th, 2009 COSMO WG 2 - CDC 1 An implicit solver based on.
Open Source GIS in Salmon Nation Equity, Ecology, and Economics Presented by Aaron Racicot – GIS Programmer November 16, 2005 A Citizen.
August 14 th, 2012 Comparison of compressible explicit density-based and implicit pressure-based CFD methods for the simulation of cavitating flows Romuald.
__________________________ SITES INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT for WATER RESOURCE SITE ANALYSIS COMPLEX WATERSHEDS SITES IN SERIES.
Using Open Source GIS Technology overview Presented by Aaron Racicot – GIS Programmer January 25, 2006 A Citizen of Salmon Nation.
CUDAM Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Trento Zaragoza, Nov 3 th -5 th 2004 IMPACT Investigation of Extreme Flood Processes.
The Governing Equations The hydrodynamic model adopted here is the one based on the hydrostatic pressure approximation and the boussinesq approximation,
Distributed Flow Routing Surface Water Hydrology, Spring 2005 Reading: 9.1, 9.2, 10.1, 10.2 Venkatesh Merwade, Center for Research in Water Resources.
Dynamic Channel Routing Preissmann Scheme. Dynamic Channel Routing Preissmann Scheme unconditionally stable for  >=0.5 second-order accurate if 
Mathematical Background
MIKE 11 IntroductionNovember 2002Part 1 Introduction to MIKE 11 Part 1 General Hydrodynamics within MIKE 11 –Basic Equations –Flow Types Numerical Scheme.
© Fluent Inc. 11/24/2015J1 Fluids Review TRN Overview of CFD Solution Methodologies.
Progress on Component-Based Subsurface Simulation I: Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics Bruce Palmer Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland, WA.
FREE CONVECTION 7.1 Introduction Solar collectors Pipes Ducts Electronic packages Walls and windows 7.2 Features and Parameters of Free Convection (1)
Basic Hydraulics: Channels Analysis and design – I
Discretization Methods Chapter 2. Training Manual May 15, 2001 Inventory # Discretization Methods Topics Equations and The Goal Brief overview.
Standardized Test Set for Nonhydrostatic Dynamical Cores of NWP Models
Governing Equations II
Environmental Hydrodynamics Lab. Yonsei University, KOREA RCEM D finite element modeling of bed elevation change in a curved channel S.-U. Choi,
A Fully Conservative 2D Model over Evolving Geometries Ricardo Canelas Master degree student IST Teton Dam 1976.
December 13, G raphical A symmetric P rocessing Prototype Presentation December 13, 2004.
The shallow water equations in geomorphic modeling
Modelling of Marine Systems. Shallow waters Equations.
Amro Elfeki, Hatem Ewea and Nassir Al-Amri Dept. of Hydrology and Water Resources Management, Faculty of Meteorology, Environment & Arid Land Agriculture,
CHAPTER 2 - EXPLICIT TRANSIENT DYNAMIC ANALYSYS
Enhancement of Wind Stress and Hurricane Waves Simulation
Transient Mixed Flow Modeling Capability in SRH-2D for Culverts and Bridges Yong G. Lai.
A TWO-FLUID NUMERICAL MODEL OF THE LIMPET OWC
Change in Flood Risk across Canada under Changing Climate
FTCS Explicit Finite Difference Method for Evaluating European Options
Distributed Flow Routing
Convergence in Computational Science
Modelling tools - MIKE11 Part1-Introduction
Surface Water Virtual Mission
Objective Numerical methods Finite volume.
E. Papanikolaou, D. Baraldi
Bogdan Rosa1, Marcin Kurowski1, Damian Wójcik1,
High Accuracy Schemes for Inviscid Traffic Models
GHOST (Generic Hydrologic Overland-Subsurface Toolkit)
Presentation transcript:

Two-dimensional dam break flooding simulation: a GIS embedded approach. Massimiliano Cannata and Roberto Marzocchi IST-SUPSI, Institute of Earth Sciences

Risk assessment GISs are invaluable in risk assessment due to their capability in solving the location issue – Where happens? – What are the extension? – Who and what is there? WHILE Models solve equations to simulate the phenomena (area and intensity of events)

GIS INTERFACE GIS-Model integration MODELGISMODELGIS CONVERSIONCONVERSION MODELGIS MODEL GIS Independent Loosely coupled Tightly coupled Embedded

Why another model? To take into account the location, models implement their own “spatial” functions and libraries, but these already exist within GISs at an highly specialized level (as a result of decades of development) CURRENTLY GISs lack of extensive environmental modelling capabilities and therefore risk assessment studies imply the usage of different software, systems and environments SO We decided to Improve GIS simulation capability developing GIS EMBEDDED MODELS

Open or Proprietary software? Software cost = $0 Source code is available and modifiable User and development communities flourish Development cycles are VERY fast Platform support (i.e. UNIX, Linux, Windows, Mac OS) Speed and efficiency Numerous data format support Standards for interoperability (OGC specs) Total cost is NOT = $0 Many applications are not as polished as the proprietary counterparts Compatibility with proprietary software and formats can be an issue Separate packages require multiple installation and maintenance Documentation is sometime poor Linkage with Proprietary software (can be hard) User Interfaces are often the last development

Open or Proprietary software? Software cost = $0 Source code is available and modifiable User and development communities flourish Development cycles are VERY fast Platform support (i.e. UNIX, Linux, Windows, Mac OS) Speed and efficiency Numerous data format support Standards for interoperability (OGC specs) Total cost is NOT = $0 Many applications are not as polished as the proprietary counterparts Compatibility with proprietary software and formats can be an issue Separate packages require multiple installation and maintainance Documentation is sometime poor Linkage with Proprietary software (can be hard) User Interfaces are often the last development GRASS GIS is a mature solution SMOTH INTERFACES ROBUST LIBRARY EXCELLENT FORMATS SUPPORT NATIVE PAKAGES GOOD DOCUMENTATION C source code

Flash floods due to dam failure Most of the dams were built in the 40s – 70s In many countries maintenance founds are poor High development in downstream valleys in the last decades Need for updated risk assessment and emergency plans Vajont, 9 October 1963

Example of dam failure risk Romania, Sacele Dam: Landslide threatening water outlet tower and likely generating impact wave causing overtopping and consequent dam erosion and failure

Approach: problem formulation Mathematical model that solves the conservative form of the 2D Shallow Water Equations (SWE) using a Finite Volume Method (FVM) and produce maximum intensity maps that can be directly used for risk assessment and emergency plans development.

10 Good approximation to fluid motion equations when fluid density is homogenous and depth is small in comparison to characteristic horizontal distances: 1)component of velocities along the vertical direction is negligible if compared to the horizontal ones 2)the pressure distribution over the flow depth is nearly hydrostatic The 3D Navier – Stokes governing fluid dynamic equations are integrated on the depth and conduct to a 2D formulation of the problem Free surface hVh Vz Shallow Water Equations: assumptions

Shallow Water Equations: formulation U = vector of conserved variables F = x-direction flux vector G = y-direction flux vector S = source vector h = water depth [m], u = x-direction flow velocity [m/s], v = y-directions flow velocity [m/s], g = gravitational acceleration [m/s 2 ], Z = water level expressed in orthometric height [m a.s.l.] n = Manning’s roughness coefficient [s/m 1/3 ]

Shallow Water Equations: solution applying the Upwind Conservative Scheme by Ying et al. [2004] we get the solution With the one-sided upwind method we solves explicitly this equation in two separate steps: 1.the continuity equation is evaluated deriving the water depth at time t+1, 2.these values are used to solve the momentum equations that provide the flow velocities at time t+1

r.damflood Input options – elevation raster map (accounting for reservoir's bathymetry and dam elevation); – lake water depth raster map (easily obtained with r.lake GRASS GIS module); – dam breach width raster map (decreased dam height due to failure); – manning’s roughness coefficient raster map; – simulation time length. – simulation timestep Output options – time-lag for outputs generation; – additional instants for output map generation; – prefix for water depth output tseries raster maps; – prefix for water velocity output tseries raster maps; – maximum water depth and relative time output raster map; – maximum water velocity and relative time output raster map; – maximum intensity output and relative time raster map. Intensity = max(h,v·h) [>2,2-0.5,<0.5] (time series raster maps are coded as prefix + _ + elapsed seconds: e.g. mydepth_125)

Model verification (synthetic case 1) 2D Partial instantaneous dam-break: to evaluate the capability in modeling different severe hydrodynamic difficulties upstream water depth h u =10 m downstream water depth h d = 0 m timestep = 0.01 s t = 6 s upstream water depth h u =10 m downstream water depth h d = 0.1 m timestep = 0.01 s t = 6 s upstream water depth h u =10 m downstream water depth h d = 5 m timestep = 0.01 s t = 6 s

Model verification (synthetic case 2) 2D breaking of a circular dam in a rectangular domain: to evaluate the capability in modeling symmetric dam-break flow upstream water depth h u =10 m downstream water depth h d = 0 m timestep = s t = 0.69 s upstream water depth h u =10 m downstream water depth h d = 1 m timestep = s t = 0.69 s upstream water depth h u =10 m downstream water depth h d = 5 m timestep = s t = 0.69 s

Model verification (synthetic case 2) Model behavior at two different grid resolution

Model verification (synthetic case 2) Small perturbations in axis direction

Model validation Application to an existing Swiss dam: Verzasca The dam, that is one of the highest dam in the world (220 m), forms the Vogorno Lake, a wide artificial reservoir with a maximum water level of 469 m a.s.l., a volume of 105 Mio m P 3 P, a surface of 1,68 Mio m P 2 P and a length of 5.5 km [ UTH ].

Model validation: simulation run computational domain: – E-W size: 20,025 m – N-S size: 20,000 m – Resolution: 25 m – Total cells number: 640,000 simulation timestep: 0.01 s simulation length: 3600 s computational running time: 16 h 39’ 53’’ (on a 1.7 GiB memory, 2 Intel® Core™ 2 Duo CPU E 4500 computer)

Model validation: water depth Maximum water depth map (h[m])

Model validation: water velocity Maximum water velocity map (V [m/s])

Model validation: intensity Maximum intensity map (F [m 2 /s])

Model validation: flood extension hazard zone covered by simulation residual hazard zone covered by simulation residual hazard zone not covered by simulation simulation on no hazard zone

Model validation: timing 15 s30 s45 s Comparison between existent front wave vector map and obtained raster map

Future works Adaptive timestep length: like other explicit numerical schemes, the stability of proposed solution is driven by the Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy condition: practically there is a relationship between grid resolution, velocities, water depth and timestep: at equal resolution for higher velocities smaller timestep are required. We will develop an dynamic adaptive procedure setting timestep length to guarantee stability and minimize computational times. Overtopping: the model currently account for total or partial dam break, we are considering to extend the model to account for overtopping events too. Comparison with other models: compare simulation results, input requirements and computational times

Conclusions We have developed a GIS embedded module for dam break modeling that is suitable for risk assessment. We have validated this model proving the correctness of the simulation qualitatively and quantitatively We have shown how environmental models can be efficiently integrated in FOSS4G

Thank you for your attention Visit for more information