Strategizing with Safe Harbor Carissa Moffat Miller, PhD Deputy Superintendent, Assessment Roger Quarles Superintendent, Caldwell.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
No Child Left Behind Act January 2002 Revision of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Education is a state and local responsibility Insure.
Advertisements

Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
1 Test Data Review and Adequate Yearly Progress. 2.
Rex Elementary BOE Presentation AYP Report. Just the Facts.
School District of University City Jackson Park Elementary School SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Joylynn Wilson, Superintendent Monica Hudson, Principal.
Flexibility in Determining AYP for Students with Disabilities Background Information—Slides 2—4 School Eligibility Criteria—Slide 5 Calculation of the.
Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.
OCTORARA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT “CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES - MORE THAN PSSA AND AYP”
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) and Assessing California Standards Test (CST) Data.
Arizona’s Federal Accountability System 2011 David McNeil Director of Assessment, Accountability and Research.
Know the Rules Nancy E. Brito, NBCT, Accountability Specialist Department of Educational Data Warehouse, Accountability, and School Improvement
Maryland School Assessment (MSA) 2010 Results Leslie Wilson, Assistant State Superintendent Division of Accountability and Assessment July 20, 2010 State.
1 No Child Left Behind Critical Research Findings For School Boards Ronald Dietel UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center.
1 Differentiated Accountability. 2 Florida’s Differentiated Accountability Model On July 28, 2008, Florida was named one of six states to pilot a differentiated.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
A Closer Look at Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski Conference.
Report on Progress Board of Education Meeting September 13, 2011.
Adequate Yearly Progress
ESEA Flexibility: Gap Reduction Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 5 of 8.
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
Online Reporting System. Understand the role and purpose of the Performance Reports in supporting student success and achievement. Understand changes.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) and Analysis of the Mathematics Section of the California Standards Test (CST) Data Elementary.
No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Division of Performance Accountability Dr. Marc Baron, Chief Nancy E. Brito, Instructional.
The elements of the proposed accountability model are subject to change.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
NECAP Results and Accountability A Presentation to Superintendents March 22, 2006.
MCAS 2007 October 24, 2007 A Report to the Sharon School Committee and Dr. Barbara J. Dunham Superintendent of Schools Dr. George S. Anthony Director of.
Annual Measurable Objectives (trajectory targets).
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Growth Model: A Way to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) The Effective Use of Data to Make AYP AERA CCSSO April 13, 2007.
On the horizon: State Accountability Systems U.S. Department of Education Office of Elementary and Secondary Education October 2002 Archived Information.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
Report to Board of Education April 12, 2010 Trenton Public Schools.
University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Challenges for States and Schools in the No.
GEORGIA’S CRITERION-REFERENCED COMPETENCY TESTS (CRCT) Questions and Answers for Parents of Georgia Students February 11, 2009 Presented by: MCES.
C R E S S T / CU University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Measuring Adequate Yearly.
Annual Progress Report Summary September 12, 2011.
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
2007 – 2008 Assessment and Accountability Report LVUSD Report to the Board September 23, 2008 Presented by Mary Schillinger, Assistant Superintendent Education.
Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.
KHS PARCC/SCIENCE RESULTS Using the results to improve achievement Families can use the results to engage their child in conversations about.
2011 MEAP Results Board of Education Presentation | 07 May 2012 Romeo Community Schools | Office of Curriculum and Instruction.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
1 Testing Various Models in Support of Improving API Scores.
School Report Card and Identification Progression
PARCC Results Summary Report.
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Bridgewater-Raritan Regional School District
What is API? The Academic Performance Index (API) is the cornerstone of California's Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999 (PSAA). It is required.
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
STAR CST Reports and AYP Predictions
A Parent Information Presentation
Academic Achievement Report for Meadow Homes Elementary School
Academic Achievement Report for Washington Manor Middle School
Adequate Yearly Progress: What’s Old, What’s New, What’s Next?
Presentation transcript:

Strategizing with Safe Harbor Carissa Moffat Miller, PhD Deputy Superintendent, Assessment Roger Quarles Superintendent, Caldwell District

Overview Calculating safe harbor Safe harbor as your “saving grace” How to handle data to target safe harbor (or other appeals) District and school use of safe harbor Examples of schools making AYP with safe harbor How safe harbor has changed instruction/focus within schools

Calculating Safe Harbor  Two separate requirements -- each must be satisfied to meet AYP  First step: a 10% decrease in not proficient students over last year. % of not proficient students, year 1 - % of not proficient students, year 2 % of not proficient students, year 1  If first requirement is not made, group does not make AYP and 2 nd calculation is not required

Calculating Safe Harbor  Step 1 Example: White Reading = 60% not proficient White Reading = 50% not proficient 60% of not proficient students(08-09) - 50% of not proficient students (09-10) 60% of not proficient students (08-09) 16.67% decrease in not proficient students

Calculating Safe Harbor  Step 2:  Did subgroup make third Indicator (Language Usage) target?  If target is made, group makes AYP For Reading

Calculating Safe Harbor  Step 3 (if needed):  If Language Usage target is not made:  Was the % of students who are proficient or advanced equal to or higher than previous year?  Example: LU = 63% Proficient LU = 57% Proficient 63%-57% = 6% increase in Third Indicator  Safe Harbor satisfied = make AYP in Reading

Safe Harbor as your “saving grace” Indexing-Idaho’s Partial Proficiency Weighted Model Percent "Proficient or Higher" Required to Meet AYP Reading Mathematics Language Usage

Safe Harbor as your “saving grace” Text in slide

Safe Harbor as your “saving grace” Export to Excel function Use auto filter Sort students who are included in the proficiency calculations Sort by the category of student Ensuring the data is correct Viewing data for areas of concentration

District Perspective Caldwell School District

Safe Harbor as your “saving grace” 1. There is more than one way to make it 2. Gives districts an opportunity to improve 3. Focuses the conversation around continuous improvement and accountability

District and School Use of Safe Harbor Instructional coaches at each school track progress and goals. Caldwell High made AYP for the first time. Instructional coaches like Rose Rettig are in all 10 of our buildings.

Schools using Safe Harbor Five of eight Caldwell schools making AYP used Safe Harbor. Principals and teachers focused instruction on each child’s needs.

Safe Harbor and Instruction Van Buren Elementary teachers collaborate daily within grade levels and discuss each student’s needs and progress. Van Buren third graders have scored 100 percent proficient in math.

Know your kids Examine records to make sure all demographic information is accurate.

Know the rules, do the math and identify a “go-to” person Data flows from the district, to DRC, to the SDE and back. Make sure you replicate the math from your original data and compare it with what comes back to you. Appeal if the findings don’t match up.

Contact Us Carissa Miller Roger Quarles