Western Wildlands Environmental Threat Assessment Center Wildfire Risk Analysis and Fuel Treatment Planning Alan Ager, Western Wildlands Environmental.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Managing Northern Spotted Owl Habitat in Dry Forest Ecosystems Presented By Cindy Donegan U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Advertisements

Forest Service Land Management Planning Three-step process 1.Assessment 2.Plan development 3.Monitoring Required Land Management Plan components: 1.Desired.
From Ignition to Spread Wildland Fire Forecasting and Color Maps Managing fire on populated forest landscapes October , 2013 Banff International.
Watershed Wildland Urban Interface Modeling Impacts of Potential Climate Change and Associated Wildfire Occurrences on the Levels of Sustainable Resources.
H EURISTIC S OLVER  Builds and tests alternative fuel treatment schedules (solutions) at each iteration  In each iteration:  Evaluates the effects of.
Carbon and Fire Risk: Alternative Treatments and the Probability of Fire USDA Symposium Greenhouse Gases in Agriculture and Forestry: Refining Knowledge.
Examining fire spread patterns across a managed forest-land mosaic in northern Wisconsin, USA using a modeling approach Jacob LaCroix, Daolan Zheng, Soung-Ryoul.
Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew.
Landscape Hazard Assessment Past Approaches and Current Modeling Tools.
Wildland Fire Decision Support Tools Managing Long Duration Wildfires Workshop Salt Lake City, UT April 30 – May 1, 2008 Missoula, MT May 6-7, 2008 Wildland.
Fire Growth Modelling at Multiple Scales
Forest Surveys and GIS Applications on the Nez Perce Reservation GIS on Fire! Worley - Plummer, Idaho May 11, 2005 Rich Botto, Nez Perce Tribe
Landscape Planning for Fuel Reduction and Forest Restoration Alan Ager, PNW Research Station, Western Wildlands Environmental Threat Assessment Center,
My Fuel Treatment Planner (MyFTP) – a financial analysis tool for fuel treatment planning Stephanie Rebain USFS Forest Management Service Center FVS Staff.
Raster models in GIS What is GIS modelingWhat is GIS modeling Why GIS modeling Why GIS modeling Raster models Raster models Binary models Binary models.
National Fire Danger Rating System. NFDRS Basics Indicator of worst case fire danger Five danger classes –Low, moderate, high, very high, extreme Describes.
F.O.F.E.M. 5 First Order Fire Effects Module Adapted from: Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory Systems for Environmental Management.
EXPECTATIONS -FS Training course for FARSITE is 60hrs long. -It's own software separate from ArcGIS with it's own quirks and limitations. -Two week lab.
COMP8130 and COMP4130 Adrian Marshall Verification and Validation Risk Management Adrian Marshall.
1 Spatially Explicit Burn Probability across A Landscape in Extreme Fire Weather Year Wenbin Cui, David L. Martell Faculty of Forestry, University of Toronto.
Using FEPF for a Go/No Go decision. Scenario Dixie National Forest East Fork FMU.
Mark Finney, Fire Sciences Lab, Missoula, MT.
W ildland F ire D ecision S upport S ystem Overview April, 2008.
Geographic Information Systems Applications in Natural Resource Management Chapter 7 Buffering Landscape Features Michael G. Wing & Pete Bettinger.
Components of a Long Term Implementation Plan Spring 2008.
West Virginia University Division of Forestry 3 rd Forest Vegetation Simulator Conference February 13-15, 2007 Fort Collins, Colorado.
An overview of a few of the methods used in landscape ecology studies.
Incorporating Landscape Fuel Treatment Modeling into the Forest Vegetation Simulator Robert C. Seli Alan A. Ager Nicholas L. Crookston Mark A. Finney Berni.
Communicating Fire Hazard Severity Zones and Wildland-Urban Interface Building Standards CAL FIRE Communications Office This presentation is for INTERNAL.
Oct-03FOFEM 5 Overview An Overview of FOFEM 5 Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory Systems for Environmental Management.
Bringing stand level fire risk to the landscape level: Fire risk assessment using FFE-FVS with the Landscape Management System. Kevin Ceder And James McCarter.
Centre for Non-Timber Resources Royal Roads University Victoria, BC Cost Benefit Analysis of Wildland Urban Interface Operations.
Long-Term Implementation Plan (LTIP) Building Decision and Operational Support of Appropriate Management Response (AMR)
Oct-03Learning to Use FOFEM 5: Advanced Lesson Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory Systems for Environmental Management Learning to Use FOFEM 5 Volume II:
Fire Prevention as a GHG Mitigation Strategy Presented by Robert Beach, RTI International Brent Sohngen, The Ohio State University Presented at Forestry.
Geospatial Decision Support Tools: A Geographic Area Coordination Center (GACC) Perspective Kim Kelly Northwest Wildland Fire Coordination Center & BIA.
Modification of Interagency Strategy for the Implementation of Federal Wildland Fire Management Policy December 2008 Modification of Interagency Strategy.
Southern Lakes Wildfire Threat Assessment Model November 2014.
SIMULATING THE IMPACT OF AREA BURNED ON GOALS FOR SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT Jimmie Chew, RMRS Christine Stalling, RMRS Barry Bollenbacher, Region One.
Wildland Fire Management RD&A National Interagency Fire Center Boise, Idaho Wildland Fire Management RD&A National Interagency Fire Center Boise, Idaho.
Generic Approaches to Model Validation Presented at Growth Model User’s Group August 10, 2005 David K. Walters.
Discrete Distributions The values generated for a random variable must be from a finite distinct set of individual values. For example, based on past observations,
Northeastern Research Station Southern Research Station The University of Georgia Artificial Intelligence Center An Intelligent Information System for.
GIS Applications in Interagency Fire Management Planning EastFIRE 2005 Michael A. da Luz – ESRI Jeff Baranyi - ESRI EastFIRE 2005 Michael A. da Luz – ESRI.
Gradient Modeling Spatial layers of environmental gradients (predictor variables) known to govern rust propagation were compared to percent rust infection.
Wildland Fire Management RD&A National Interagency Fire Center Boise, Idaho Wildland Fire Management RD&A National Interagency Fire Center Boise, Idaho.
Fuel Treatment Making a Difference Steve Harbert Tim Rich Burn Boss Refresher February Burn Boss Refresher 2009.
Assessing the Effectiveness of Landscape Fuel Treatments on Fire Growth and Behavior Rick D. Stratton Presented by Jacob J. LaCroix.
Modeling the effects of forest succession on fire behavior potential in southeastern British Columbia S.W. Taylor, G.J. Baxter and B.C. Hawkes Natural.
Treatments and methods to manipulate stand structure suitable for fuel reduction.
Fuel reduction and defensible space activities among private landowners Jeff Kline Christine Olsen Eric White Paige Fischer Alan Ager.
A Brief Look at Federal Wildland Fire Policy & WFDSS One Approach to Successful Implementation Dan O’Brien NWCC Fire Analyst March 31, 2008.
Fire Effects Tradeoff Model (FETM) Mark D. Schaaf, Air Sciences Inc. Portland, Oregon.
Fuel Treatment Effectiveness Fairbanks-North Star Borough CWPP Risk Assessment Update And Plan Evaluation.
Landscape Treatment Prioritization to Reduce Northern Spotted Owl Habitat Loss from Wildfire: A Test Case Using Fire Regime and Condition Class on the.
Wildfire Risk Assessment: Western Travis County, Texas Integrating GIS and Fire Modeling Jennifer Perry CE 394K GIS.
Decision support for strategic forest-fuels management in the Pacific Northwest Keith Reynolds, Paul Hessburg, James Dickinson, Brion Salter USDA-Forest.
Central Sierra Interagency Resource Advisor Training Wildland Fire Implementation Plan Mike Beasley Fire Use Manager Yosemite National Park
New Millenium Wildfires: Paradigm Shifts for the 21 st Century: Assessing the Home Ignition Zone February 13, 2013 Austin, Texas Hank Blackwell Wildfire.
The Effect of Fuel Treatments on the Invasion of Nonnative Plants Kyle E. Merriam 1, Jon E. Keeley 1, and Jan L. Beyers 2. [1] USGS Western Ecological.
Introduction to FFI: Why and how FFI was developed Introduction to FFI: Why and how FFI was developed 04/02/2013.
Recap from the 2005 workshop, “Managing Northern Spotted Owl Habitat in Dry Forest Ecosystems” Silvicultural Practices Supporting Northern Spotted Owl.
Crown Fire Methods LaWen Hollingsworth Rocky Mountain Research Station Fire Modeling Institute Missoula, MT Sharing Fire Behavior Practices and Lessons.
Large Fire Simulator (FSIM)
Achievements in Wildland Fire Risk Mapping
ECOSYSTEM MODEL EVALUATION TEMPLATE
Southwestern Region Wildfire Risk Assessment – USDA Forest Service
Cold Springs Fire Project
Keith Reynolds Pacific Northwest Research Station USDA Forest Service
Keith Reynolds, Paul Hessburg, James Dickinson, Brion Salter
Presentation transcript:

Western Wildlands Environmental Threat Assessment Center Wildfire Risk Analysis and Fuel Treatment Planning Alan Ager, Western Wildlands Environmental Threat Assessment Center, Prineville Oregon, OR USA Mark Finney, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula MT John Anderson, BalanceTech Inc., Missoula, MT Helen Maffei, Deschutes National Forest, Bend, OR

Western Wildlands Environmental Threat Assessment Center The Problem Landscape fuel treatment planning is a complex process –Multiple scales –Multiple models –Data and model integration is weak –Wildfire occurrence is highly stochastic – we cannot predict future wildfire likelihood with any certainty –We don’t have a well established analysis process and performance metrics

Western Wildlands Environmental Threat Assessment Center Risk analysis as a framework for fuel treatment planning Simple case, only consider losses: Expected Loss = probability of event * loss For multiple loss events of different intensities and probabilities Expected loss = Σ (probability j * loss j ) Consider both benefits and losses of multiple events (also present and future) Expected Net Value Change = (probability j * net value change j ) Definition of Risk:

Western Wildlands Environmental Threat Assessment Center Umatilla National Forest Fire History The majority of acres burned are from a few large fires that escape initial attack and spread over long distances Wildfire probability is largely a function of wildfire spread

Western Wildlands Environmental Threat Assessment Center Loss Functions are required to link fire intensity with loss

Western Wildlands Environmental Threat Assessment Center Mitigate Risk by: Reducing wildfire probability Reducing fire intensity Change the loss function

Western Wildlands Environmental Threat Assessment Center Wildfire Risk Analysis Process for Fuels Planning Design stand fuel treatments (FVS, FFE, SVS) Design landscape treatment package (ArcGIS) Simulate treatments (PPE) and generate FlamMap landscape files Calculate Burn probabilities by simulating lots of wildfires (FlamMap) Calculate loss functions (FVS-FFE) Calculate expected loss (Access queries) Compare treatment alternatives

Western Wildlands Environmental Threat Assessment Center Emily Ager Five Buttes Oregon Case Studies

Western Wildlands Environmental Threat Assessment Center Five Buttes Study Area, Deschutes National Forest

Western Wildlands Environmental Threat Assessment Center Burn Probability - No treatments, 2000 wildfires, 24 hour burn periods > 0.045

Western Wildlands Environmental Threat Assessment Center 17,000 acre fires Size of fires generated from random ignitions 2500 acre fires

Western Wildlands Environmental Threat Assessment Center Stands selected for fuel treatment, 20% of landscape treated Owl habitat stands treatments

Western Wildlands Environmental Threat Assessment Center 0% treatment 10% treatment 20% treatment 50% treatment

Western Wildlands Environmental Threat Assessment Center Burn probability does not indicate loss Need to calculate expected loss, the probability of a fire and loss of habitat

Western Wildlands Environmental Threat Assessment Center Out of 1000 simulated fires on pixel X,Y, how many eliminate owl habitat? Lethal flame length ~100 fires have flame lengths that exceed the lethal flame length Expected loss = 100/10000 = 0.01

Western Wildlands Environmental Threat Assessment Center Calculate the lethal flame length for owl habitat stands Simulated fire in each stand with flame lengths ranging from meters, 0.5 meter increments [ FLAMEADJ ] Determine the flame length when the stand at no longer meets habitat requirements Query these results against the FlamMap output table

Western Wildlands Environmental Threat Assessment Center

Expected Loss of Spotted Owl Habitat for 6 Treatment Intensities

Western Wildlands Environmental Threat Assessment Center Summary: Risk Analysis in Fuel Treatment Planning Provides a quantitative measure of fuel treatment performance Accounts for fire spread, intensity, and loss Can incorporate multiple future and present losses and benefits

Western Wildlands Environmental Threat Assessment Center The WO-SPOT and R5 Fireshed Assessment Process Quantitative Framework for Wildfire Risk WWETAC, JFSP (Miller, Ager, Finney, Parisien) ArcFuels FVS, FFE, PPE FlamMap, Behave, FOFEM, Nexus,

Western Wildlands Environmental Threat Assessment Center ArcFuels VBA macros in ArcMap Implemented on 2 toolbars ArcObjects library allows full GIS functionality Distributed in an.MXD project file Macro errors do not crash ArcMap Hooks to Excell, Access, FVS, FlamMap, Farsite, Nexus, SVS, Behave Interface