Surgery vs Radiation Therapy in Ewing’s Sarcoma the Extremities: Experience of a Single Institution Surgery vs Radiation Therapy in Ewing’s Sarcoma the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Danny Indelicato, MD CTOS 2012 Ewing Sarcoma of the Axial Skeleton: Early Outcomes from the University of Florida Proton Therapy Program.
Advertisements

Evaluation of Femur Fracture Risk in Soft-Tissue Sarcoma of the Thigh Treated with Intensity- Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Michael R. Folkert, MD.
Value of local treatment in extrapulmonary metastatic Ewing sarcoma
Chondrosarcoma of the Pelvis Prognostic Factors and Survival Analysis at Years Matthew J. Seidel, MD Patrick P. Lin, MD Valerae O. Lewis, MD Christopher.
Controversies in Adjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer Parag Sanghvi M.D. Tasha McDonald M.D. Department of Radiation Medicine OHSU.
Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Predictors of Outcomes in Patients with Primary Retroperitoneal Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma Undergoing Surgery Emily.
GOS Paediatric Sarcoma Surgery Combined UCL Sarcoma Service GOS Oncology and London Bone and Soft Tissue Tumour Service UCLH.
IMRT vs. BRACHYTHERAPY FOR SOFT TISSUE SARCOMA. EXTERNAL RT IN STS NCI Trial (Yang JC et al, JCO 1998) Extremity / Superficial Trunk STS (n=141) LSS Alone.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Notice: Archived Document The content in this document is provided on the FDA’s website for reference purposes only.
Synovial sarcoma- which patients don’t need adjuvant treatment? Khan M, Rankin KS, Beckingsale TB, Todd R, Gerrand CH North of England Bone and Soft Tissue.
Clinical Relevance of HER2 Overexpression/Amplification in Patients with Small Tumor Size and Node-Negative Breast Cancer Curigliano G et al. J Clin Oncol.
Breast Cancer: Follow up and Management of recurrence Carol Marquez, M.D. Associate Professor Department of Radiation Medicine OHSU.
BIOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES OF BREAST CANCER TREAMENT Benjamin O. Anderson, M.D. Director, Breast Health Clinic Professor of Surgery and Global Health, University.
Pier Luigi Filosso, MD University of Torino, Department of Thoracic Surgery The Impact of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Pulmonary Large Cell Neuroendocrine.
Dr. LP Si Tseung Kwan O Hospital. Introduction CA stomach is the 4 th most commonly diagnosed malignancy worldwide 2 nd most common cause of cancer-related.
Neoadjuvant Adjuvant Curative Palliative Neoadjuvant Radiation therapy the results of a phase III study from Beijing demonstrated a survival benefit.
Thomas F. DeLaney MD, Aashish D. Bhatt MD, Alex Jacobson BS, Richard Y. Lee MD, PhD, Christine Giraud BS, Joseph H. Schwab MD, MS, Francis J. Hornicek.
PREOPERATIVE HYPOFRACTIONED RADIOTHERAPY IN LOCALIZED EXTREMITY/TRUNK WALL SOFT TISSUE SARCOMAS EARLY STUDY RESULTS Hanna Kosela; Milena Kolodziejczyk;
Pulmonary Metastasis From Osteosarcoma Multi-factorial analysis of survival at first lung involvement Ali Aljubran, Martin Blackstein for the University.
Outcome Following Limb Salvage Surgery and External Beam Radiotherapy for High Grade Soft Tissue Sarcomas of the Groin and Axilla Rapin Phimolsarnti M.D.
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Ca Breast CY Choi UCH.
Breast conservation in Locally advanced breast cancer Department of Endocrine Surgery College of Medicine Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences Kochi, Kerala.
Clinical Outcomes and Patterns of Failure in Pineoblastoma: A 30-year Single Institution Experience Benjamin Farnia, B.A. ASTRO Poster Discussion September.
Long-term follow-up of a prospective trial of pre-operative external-beam radiation and post-operative brachytherapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma LA Mikula,
SPINDLE CELL SARCOMA OF BONE AN ASSESSMENT OF OUTCOME
Multimodality therapy for locally advanced thymomas: a cohort study of prognostic factors from a European multicentric database Dr. GIOVANNI LEUZZI Department.
Discussion abstracts Alberto Sobrero MD Ospedale San Martino Genoa, Italy.
MANAGEMENT OF MANTLE CELL LYMPHOMA IN TUNISIA R BEN LAKHAL, L KAMMOUN, K ZAHRA, S KEFI Sousse 25 MAY 2012.
The Impact of Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin in the Preoperative Multimodality Treatment of Patients with Carcinoma of the Rectum: NSABP R-04 1 Capecitabine.
Quantitative Dosimetric Analysis Of Patterns Of Local Relapse After IMRT For Primary Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcomas Ryan M. Lanning, Sean L. Berry, Michael.
Multimodality Treatment of Mesenteric Desmoid Tumors Monica M. Bertagnolli, Jeffrey A. Morgan, Christopher D.M. Fletcher, Chandrajit P. Raut, Palma Dileo,
Adductor Compartment STS - Does method of treatment affect outcome? Anup Pradhan, Yiu-Chung Cheung Birmingham Medical School, UK Supervisors: Mr Robert.
HCI Sarcoma Services Sequential Dependency of Radiotherapy for Soft-Tissue Sarcoma S Sampath TE Schultheiss YJ Hitchcock RL Randall DC Shrieve JYC Wong.
Quantifying the Morbidity of the Unplanned Sarcoma Excision
HER2 POSITIVE BREAST CARCINOMA IN THE PRE AND POST ADJUVANT ANTI-HER-2 THERAPY ERA: A SINGLE ACADEMIC INSTITUTION EXPERIENCE IN THE SETTING OUTSIDE OF.
NHL13: A Multicenter, Randomized Phase III Study of Rituximab as Maintenance Treatment versus Observation Alone in Patients with Aggressive B ‐ Cell Lymphoma.
Connective Tissue Oncology Society 11th Annual Meeting NON METASTATIC EWING’ FAMILY TUMORS: HIGH DOSE CHEMOTHERAPY WITH PERIPHERAL BLOOD STEM CELL RESCUE.
EARLY PROGRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH-RISK SOFT TISSUE SARCOMAS AN ANALYSIS FROM A PHASE III RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE TRIAL (EORTC 62961/ESHO) OF NEOADJUVANT.
Per-Ulf Tunn, D. Andreou, S. Fehlberg, M. Werner, P. Reichardt
Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan Shintaro Iwata Tsukasa Yonemoto Yoko Hagiwara Takeshi Ishii Division of Orthopedic Surgery Akinobu Araki Dai Ikebe Division.
Accelerated hemithoracic radiation followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy for malignant pleural mesothelioma Marc de Perrot, Ronald Feld, Natasha B Leighl,
Clinical Case Nº2 Dr. Javier Martín-Broto. Case description 49-year-old man 1 st symptom/sign: Mild pain in right buttock 1 st diagnosis: Core-biopsy:
Evidence for a Survival Benefit Conferred by Adjuvant Radiotherapy in a Cohort of 608 Women with Early-stage Endometrial Cancer O. Kenneth Macdonald 1,
Adjuvant chemotherapy in Rectal Cancer?. What is the evidence for adjuvant chemotherapy? Do patients achieving a pathological complete response need chemotherapy?
THE EFFECT OF AGE ON OUTCOME OF SYNOVIAL SARCOMA PATIENTS A DUTCH POPULATION BASED STUDY Myrella Vlenterie, SEJ Kaal, VKY Ho, R Vlenterie, WTA van der.
Hormone treatment combined with radiotherapy
LOCAL CONTROL MODALITY AND OUTCOME IN EWING SARCOMA OF THE FEMUR: A REPORT FROM THE CHILDREN’S ONCOLOGY GROUP Najat C. Daw, Nadia N. Laack, Elizabeth J.
Radiation Therapy Connective Tissue Oncology Society 2005 Thomas F. DeLaney, M.D.
Malignancy Grade and Histologic Subtype of Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma (RPS) are Predictive of Pattern of Recurrence: a Large Retrospective Study from.
The Influence of Age on Morbidity in Primary High Grade Sarcoma of the Extremity K. Alektiar, M. Brennan, S. Singer Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.
French Guidelines (SOR): Any Impact Since 1995? BN Bui Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux FSG CETOS 2005.
Local Recurrence Growth Rate Predicts Outcome In Locally Recurrent Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma James Park, MD, Li-Xuan Qin, PhD, Francesco Prete, MD Murray.
Surgery of colorectal metastasis in the Optimox 1 study. A GERCOR Study. N. Perez-Staub, G. Lledo, F. Paye, B. Gayet, M. Flesch, A. Cervantes, A. Figer,
Identification of localized rectal cancer (RC) patients (pts) who may NOT require preoperative (preop) chemoradiation (CRT). D. Roda 1, M. Frasson 2, E.
Surgical Management of Pulmonary Metastases in Pediatric Patients with Ewing Sarcoma Kevin Hug.
What Factors Predict Outcome At Relapse After Previous Esophagectomy And Adjuvant Therapy in High-Risk Esophageal Cancer? Edward Yu 1, Patricia Tai 5,
Evaluating the Clinical Outcomes of Sixty-Three Patients Treated with Gamma Knife as Salvage Therapy for Glioblastoma Multiforme Erik W Larson, Halloran.
ABSTRACT Purpose This retrospective review was conducted to determine if delay in the start of radiotherapy after conservative breast surgery had any detrimental.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of NSCLC Department of Thoracic Oncology, University Hospital Ghent, Belgium Current Opinion in Oncology 2007,
Uterine serous carcinoma is more aggressive than high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma: a retrospective study H. Nagano1, Y. Tachibana1, M. Kawakami1, M.
Treatment With Continuous, Hyperfractionated, Accelerated Radiotherapy (CHART) For Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): The Weston Park Hospital Experience.
IMRT delivery of preoperative, high dose radiotherapy to a large volume, with Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) in retroperitoneal sarcomas: The Ottawa.
Tertiary cytoreductive surgery in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer:
What is the optimal pre-op therapy for esophagus and GE junction cancers?
Adjuvant Radiation is Required for Gastric Cancer
Neoadjuvant Adjuvant Curative Palliative
PRIMARY EXTREMITY STS: MULTIMODAL APPROACH MAY HAVE IMPROVED SURVIVAL
HISTOLOGY-SPECIFIC NOMOGRAM FOR PATIENTS AFFECTED BY PRIMARY RSTS
Rarer Bone Tumors Thomas F. DeLaney, M.D. Co-Director: Sarcoma Program
Presentation transcript:

Surgery vs Radiation Therapy in Ewing’s Sarcoma the Extremities: Experience of a Single Institution Surgery vs Radiation Therapy in Ewing’s Sarcoma the Extremities: Experience of a Single Institution N. Fabbri, G. Bacci, S. Ferrari, A. Longhi, D. Donati, M. Manfrini, E. Barbieri, M. Mercuri, F. Bertoni Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy

Surgery vs Radiation Therapy in Ewing’s Sarcoma Ewing’s Sarcoma in 21st Century. Outcome considerably improved from 70’s. Multiagent chemotherapy fundamental. Improved LC and survival with surgery. Retrospective data, bias Rxt worse cases

Surgery vs Radiation Therapy in Ewing’s Sarcoma Surgery vs Rxt: Literature. Pritchard et al., Cancer, pts, pre-Cht experience ( ) - Extremity & Surgery in survivors > 5 yrs. Rosen et al., Cancer, pts, multimodal management since pts, T6 + T2 & Surgery +/- Rxt, 85% at 3 yrs. Bacci et al., JBJS-B, pts, multimodal management since Surgery + Cht 90% vs Rxt + Cht 55% at 2 yrs

Surgery vs Radiation Therapy in Ewing’s Sarcoma F, 17 - Ewing’s sarcoma: pre-chemotherapy

Surgery vs Radiation Therapy in Ewing’s Sarcoma F, 17 - Ewing’s sarcoma: post-chemotherapy

Surgery vs Radiation Therapy in Ewing’s Sarcoma 3 yr FU

Disease-Free Survival 72% (91-97) 78% (91-97) 43% (83-87) Cum. Survival Months Surgery vs Radiation Therapy in Ewing’s Sarcoma

Surgery vs Rxt: Multicentric Studies. Jurgens et al., Cancer, 1988 (CESS). Burgert et al., J Clin Oncol, 1990 (IESS). Oberlin et al., J Clin Oncol, 1992 (FSPO). Craft et al., Eur J Cancer, 1997 (UKCCSG). Grier et al., N Eng J Med, 2003 (CCG-POG) More surgery, trend towards better survival

Surgery vs Radiation Therapy in Ewing’s Sarcoma Surgery vs Rxt: Monocentric Studies. Wilkins et al., Cancer, 1986 (Mayo Clinic). Ozaki et al., Cancer, 1996 (Munster). Bacci et al., J Clin Oncol, 2000 (Rizzoli). Sluga et al., CORR, 2001 (Vienna). Bacci et al., JBJS-B, 2003 (Rizzoli) Surgery better survival, statistical evidence

Surgery vs Radiation Therapy in Ewing’s Sarcoma Controversies in Local Management 1) Surgery vs Rxt to survival 2) Margin and local control to survival 3) Postoperative Rxt after inadequate margin 4) Histol. response and margin to local control

Surgery vs Radiation Therapy in Ewing’s Sarcoma Materials and Methods. Rizzoli series , retrospective. 512 pts. with nonmetastatic ES of bone. 4 different adjuvant (1) and neoadjuvant (3) studies. Surgery 196, Surgery+Rxt (45 Gy) 139: 335 pts. Full dose Rxt (61 Gy): 177 pts

Surgery vs Radiation Therapy in Ewing’s Sarcoma Materials and Methods. Evolving strategies for local control. Surgery initially only if no reconstruction needed. Postop Rxt individual basis (no risk, inad. margin). Full dose Rxt: nonoperable, refuse amputation. Initial target: 5 cm axial and 2 cm radial margins 45 Gy target volume + 16 Gy central boost

Surgery vs Radiation Therapy in Ewing’s Sarcoma. Evaluation of Surgical Margin Enneking et al., Chir Organi Mov, Assessment of Histologic Response Picci et al., J Clin Oncol, Grade I macroscopic viable tumor PR - Grade II microscopic viable tumor - Grade III no viable tumor Materials and Methods GR

Surgery vs Radiation Therapy in Ewing’s Sarcoma Materials and Methods. Pts traced from diagnosis to relapse or last FU. Local management and margin to EFS and LC. Cumulative EFS and LC by Kaplan-Meier. Statistics by chi-square test with Fisher’s correction. Cox regression multiv. analysis in factors significant at univ. analysis in neoadj. pts (90%)

Surgery vs Radiation Therapy in Ewing’s Sarcoma Results - Population. M 328 (64%), F 184 (36%); median age 17. Extremities 326 (64%), Axial 186 (36%). Femur 122, Tibia 80, Fibula 53, Humerus 44. Pelvis-Sacrum 109, Spine 20

Surgery vs Radiation Therapy in Ewing’s Sarcoma Results - Population. LDH: normal 68%, elevated 32% (499 pts). Volume: 150 ml 43% (454 pts). Cht: adjuvant 58 (11%), neoadjuv. 454 (89%)

Surgery vs Radiation Therapy in Ewing’s Sarcoma Results - Overall Treatment. Surgery/+Rxt 335 (65%); Rxt 177 (35%). Rxt 51% to 26% p < FU 5-22 years, median FU 12 years. EFS 271 pts (53%), Relapse 231 (45%) - 10 pts (2%) died of tmx complic. or 2nd tumor. 5 yr EFS 58%, 5 yr OS 66%

Surgery vs Radiation Therapy in Ewing’s Sarcoma Results - Patient / Tumor Variables. Gender: M 54% F 66% p <.005. Age: 14 yrs 56% p <.002. Site: Extremity 62% Axial 51% p <.02. Serum LDH: N 68% E 37% p <.001. Volume: 150 ml 54% p <.01

Surgery vs Radiation Therapy in Ewing’s Sarcoma Results - Treatment Variables. Local Tmx: Surgery 68% Rxt 47% p <.0003 Surgery + Rxt 58% ns. Surgery vs Rxt: Extremity p <.03 Axial ns. Margin: Adeq. 69% Inad. 47% p <.0003 Inadequate Surgery + Rxt ns

Surgery vs Radiation Therapy in Ewing’s Sarcoma Results - Treatment Variables. Response: GR 77% PR 38% p <.0001 GR: Grade II vs Grade III ns. Cht: Adjuvant 57% Neoadjuvant 58% ns

Surgery vs Radiation Therapy in Ewing’s Sarcoma Results - Treatment and LR. LR: Surgery 9% Rxt 19% p<.04. Surgery vs Rxt: Extremity p<.06 Axial ns. LR rate: Extremity 9% Axial 19% p<.003

Surgery vs Radiation Therapy in Ewing’s Sarcoma Results - Margin, LR and Response. LR rate: Adeq. 7% Inadeq. 19% p<.001 Inadequate Surgery + Rxt ns. Ad. Margin: Extremity 88% Axial 36% p<.001. GR (II+III): Adeq 79% Inadeq 67% p<.001. LR rate: GR 6% PR 21% p<.0002

Surgery vs Radiation Therapy in Ewing’s Sarcoma Results - Margin, LR and Response. LR, Margin and Response: - Adequate + G I 14% - Adequate + G II / III 5% - Inadequate + G I 22% - Inadequate + G II / III 13% p<.005

Surgery vs Radiation Therapy in Ewing’s Sarcoma Results - Multivariate Analysis. Histologic Response p< Local Management p<.01. Surgical Margin p<.04. Serum LDH p< Tumor Volume p< Age p<.003

Surgery vs Radiation Therapy in Ewing’s Sarcoma Conclusions. Overall better results with Surgery than Rxt. Significant in extremities, ns in axial. Reinforced role for Surgery in local management 1) Surgery vs Radiation Therapy to survival

Surgery vs Radiation Therapy in Ewing’s Sarcoma Conclusions. Reinforced importance for Surgical Margin. Adequate Margin always needed. Impact on Local Recurrence and Survival 2) Surgical margin, local control and survival

Surgery vs Radiation Therapy in Ewing’s Sarcoma Conclusions. No benefit from low-dose (45 Gy) postop Rxt. Different strategy needed (60 Gy, IBRT, IORT?) 3) Postoperative Rxt after inadequate margin

Surgery vs Radiation Therapy in Ewing’s Sarcoma Conclusions. Correlates with Local Recurrence and Survival. Good Response does not protect from LR. Always aiming for Adequate Margin 4) Histologic response and optimal margin

CTOS 2006, Venice, Italy November 2-4, 2006