Conceptual Design and The Entity-Relationship Model

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ER to Relational Mapping. Logical DB Design: ER to Relational Entity sets to tables. CREATE TABLE Employees (ssn CHAR (11), name CHAR (20), lot INTEGER,
Advertisements

Logical DB Design: ER to Relational Entity sets to tables. Employees ssn name lot CREATE TABLE Employees (ssn CHAR (11), name CHAR (20), lot INTEGER, PRIMARY.
The Entity-Relationship Model
Conceptual Design using the Entity-Relationship Model
Database Management Systems, R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke1 The Entity-Relationship Model Chapter 2.
The Entity-Relationship Model
Database Management Systems, R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke1 The Entity-Relationship Model Chapter 2.
Book Chapter 3 (part 2 ) From ER to Relational Model.
1 541: Database Systems S. Muthu Muthukrishnan. 2 Overview of Database Design  Conceptual design: (ER Model is used at this stage.)  What are the entities.
1 Key Constraints Consider Works_In: An employee can work in many departments; a dept can have many employees. In contrast, each dept has at most one manager,
The Entity-Relationship (ER) Model
Database Management Systems 3ed, R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke1 The Entity-Relationship Model Chapter 2.
The Entity-Relationship Model
Comp3300/fall021 The Entity-Relationship Model Chapter 2 What are the steps in designing a database ? Why is the ER model used to create an initial design?
The Entity-Relationship Model
The Entity-Relationship Model Jianlin Feng School of Software SUN YAT-SEN UNIVERSITY courtesy of Joe Hellerstein for some slides.
Database Management Systems 3ed, R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke1 The Entity-Relationship Model Chapter 2.
Database Management Systems 3ed, R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke1 The Entity-Relationship Model Chapter 2.
CMPT 354, Simon Fraser University, Fall 2008, Martin Ester 176 Database Systems I The Entity-Relationship Model.
1 The Entity-Relationship Model Chapter 2. 2 Overview of Database Design  Conceptual design: (ER Model is used at this stage.) –What are the entities.
SPRING 2004CENG 3521 The Relational Model Chapter 3.
Modeling Your Data Chapter 2. Overview of Database Design Conceptual design: –What are the entities and relationships in the enterprise? – What information.
The Entity-Relationship Model
Conceptual Design Using the Entity-Relationship (ER) Model
The Entity- Relationship Model CS 186 Fall 2002: Lecture 2 R &G - Chapter 2 A relationship, I think, is like a shark, you know? It has to constantly move.
The Entity-Relationship (ER) Model CS541 Computer Science Department Rutgers University.
Conceptual Design and The Entity- Relationship Model CS 186 Spring 2006 Lectures 19 & 20 R &G - Chapter 2 A relationship, I think, is like a shark, you.
1 Data Modeling Yanlei Diao UMass Amherst Feb 1, 2007 Slides Courtesy of R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke.
The Entity- Relationship Model R &G - Chapter 2 A relationship, I think, is like a shark, you know? It has to constantly move forward or it dies. And I.
Database Management Systems 3ed, R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke1 The Entity-Relationship Model Chapter 2.
ER continued, and ER to Relational Mappings R&G Chapters 2, 3 Lecture 22.
Modeling Your Data Chapter 2. Part II Discussion of the Model: Good Design/ Bad Design?
1 The Entity-Relationship Model Chapter 2. 2 Database Design Process  Requirement collection and analysis  DB requirements and functional requirements.
The Entity-Relationship Model. 421B: Database Systems - ER Model 2 Overview of Database Design q Conceptual Design -- A first model of the real world.
1 The Entity-Relationship Model Chapter 2. 2 Overview of Database Design  Conceptual design : (ER Model is used at this stage.)  What are the entities.
ER to Relational Mapping. Logical DB Design: ER to Relational Entity sets to tables. CREATE TABLE Employees (ssn CHAR (11), name CHAR (20), lot INTEGER,
Database Management Systems 3ed, R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke1 The Entity-Relationship Model Chapter 2.
Database Management Systems 3ed, R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke1 The Entity-Relationship Model Chapter 2.
Database Management Systems 3ed, R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke1 The Entity-Relationship Model Chapter 2.
Chapter 2.  Conceptual design: (ER Model is used at this stage.) ◦ What are the entities and relationships in the enterprise? ◦ What information about.
CMPT 258 Database Systems The Entity-Relationship Model Part II (Chapter 2)
Christoph F. Eick: Designing E/R Diagrams 1 The Entity-Relationship Model Chapter 3+4.
ICS 321 Fall 2009 The Relational Model (ii) Asst. Prof. Lipyeow Lim Information and Computer Science Department University of Hawaii at Manoa 9/10/20091Lipyeow.
LECTURE 1: Entity Relationship MODEL. Think before doing it! Like most of the software projects, you need to think before you do something. Before developing.
09/03/2009Lipyeow Lim -- University of Hawaii at Manoa 1 ICS 321 Fall 2009 Introduction to Database Design Asst. Prof. Lipyeow Lim Information & Computer.
Database Management Systems,1 Conceptual Design Using the Entity-Relationship (ER) Model.
1 Conceptual Design using the Entity- Relationship Model.
Lecture 3 Book Chapter 3 (part 2 ) From ER to Relational.
The Entity-Relationship (ER) Model. Overview of db design Requirement analysis – Data to be stored – Applications to be built – Operations (most frequent)
CSC 411/511: DBMS Design 1 1 Dr. Nan WangCSC411_L2_ER Model 1 The Entity-Relationship Model (Chapter 2)
ER & Relational: Digging Deeper R &G - Chapters 2 & 3.
Modeling Your Data Chapter 2 cs5421. Part II Discussion of the Model: Good Design/ Bad Design? cs5422.
LECTURE 1: Entity Relationship MODEL. Think before doing it! Like most of the software projects, you need to think before you do something. Before developing.
Database Management Systems 3ed, R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke1 The Entity-Relationship Model Chapter 2.
1 Introduction to Data Management Lecture #3 (Conceptual DB Design) Instructor: Chen Li.
Database Management Systems, R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke1 The Entity-Relationship Model Chapter 2.
COP Introduction to Database Structures
The Entity-Relationship Model
MODELS OF DATABASE AND DATABASE DESIGN
The Entity-Relationship Model
The Entity-Relationship Model
Instructor: Elke Rundensteiner
The Entity-Relationship (ER) Model
The Entity-Relationship Model
The Entity-Relationship Model
The Entity-Relationship Model
The Entity-Relationship Model
The Entity-Relationship Model
The Entity-Relationship (ER) Model
Presentation transcript:

Conceptual Design and The Entity-Relationship Model The slides for this text are organized into several modules. Each lecture contains about enough material for a 1.25 hour class period. (The time estimate is very approximate--it will vary with the instructor, and lectures also differ in length; so use this as a rough guideline.) This covers Lectures 1 and 2 (of 7) in Module (5). Module (1): Introduction (DBMS, Relational Model) Module (2): Storage and File Organizations (Disks, Buffering, Indexes) Module (3): Database Concepts (Relational Queries, DDL/ICs, Views and Security) Module (4): Relational Implementation (Query Evaluation, Optimization) Module (5): Database Design (ER Model, Normalization, Physical Design, Tuning) Module (6): Transaction Processing (Concurrency Control, Recovery) Module (7): Advanced Topics 1

Steps in Database Design Requirements Analysis user needs; what must database do? Conceptual Design high level descr (often done w/ER model) Logical Design translate ER into DBMS data model Schema Refinement consistency, normalization Physical Design - indexes, disk layout Security Design - who accesses what, and how

Databases Model the Real World “Data Model” allows us to translate real world things into structures computers can store Many models: Relational, E-R, O-O, Network, Hierarchical, etc. Relational Rows & Columns Keys & Foreign Keys to link Relations Enrolled Students

Conceptual Design What are the entities and relationships in the enterprise? What information about these entities and relationships should we store in the database? What are the integrity constraints or business rules that hold? A database `schema’ in the ER Model can be represented pictorially (ER diagrams). Can then map an ER diagram into a relational schema. 2

ER Model Basics Employees ssn name lot Entity: Real-world object, distinguishable from other objects. An entity is described using a set of attributes. Entity Set: A collection of similar entities. E.g., all employees. All entities in an entity set have the same set of attributes. (Until we consider hierarchies, anyway!) Each entity set has a key (underlined). Each attribute has a domain. The slides for this text are organized into several modules. Each lecture contains about enough material for a 1.25 hour class period. (The time estimate is very approximate--it will vary with the instructor, and lectures also differ in length; so use this as a rough guideline.) This covers Lectures 1 and 2 (of 6) in Module (5). Module (1): Introduction (DBMS, Relational Model) Module (2): Storage and File Organizations (Disks, Buffering, Indexes) Module (3): Database Concepts (Relational Queries, DDL/ICs, Views and Security) Module (4): Relational Implementation (Query Evaluation, Optimization) Module (5): Database Design (ER Model, Normalization, Physical Design, Tuning) Module (6): Transaction Processing (Concurrency Control, Recovery) Module (7): Advanced Topics 3

ER Model Basics (Contd.) since lot name Employees ssn dname budget did Departments Works_In Relationship: Association among two or more entities. E.g., Attishoo works in Pharmacy department. Relationships can have their own attributes Descriptive Attributes Binary relationship 4

ER Model Basics (Contd.) since lot name Employees ssn dname budget did Departments Works_In Suppose : Each department has offices in several locations & we want to record the locations at which each employee works Ternary relatinship lot name Employees ssn Works_In2 since dname budget did Departments City Capacity LOCATIONS 4

ER Model Basics (Contd.) lot name Employees ssn Works_In2 since dname budget did Departments LOCATIONS City Capacity CREATE TABLE Works_In2( ssn CHAR(1), did INTEGER, city CHAR(20), since DATE, PRIMARY KEY (ssn, did, address), FOREIGN KEY (ssn) REFERENCES Employees, FOREIGN KEY (did) REFERENCES Departments, FOREIGN KEY (city) REFERENCES Locations) 4

since Works_In dname budget did Departments lot name Employees ssn ER Model Basics (Cont.) Reports_To super-visor subor-dinate Same entity set can participate in different relationship sets, or in different “roles” in the same set. CREATE TABLE Reports_To ( supervisor_ssn CHAR(11), subordinate_ssn CHAR(11), PRIMARY KEY (supervisor_ssn, subordinate_ssn), FOREIGN KEY (supervisor_ssn) REFERENCES Employees(ssn), FOREIGN KEY (subordinate_ssn) REFERENCES Employees(ssn)) 4

since Manages dname budget did Departments since Works_In lot name ssn Employees Key Constraints An employee can work in many departments; a dept can have many employees. Many-to-Many 1-to Many 1-to-1 In contrast, each dept has at most one manager, according to the key constraint on Manages. 6

Key Constraints CREATE TABLE Manages( ssn CHAR(11), did INTEGER, since Manages lot name ssn dname Key Constraints did budget Employees Departments Approach 1 Approach 2 CREATE TABLE Manages( ssn CHAR(11), did INTEGER, since DATE, PRIMARY KEY (did), FOREIGN KEY (ssn) REFERENCES Employees, FOREIGN KEY (did) REFERENCES Departments) CREATE TABLE Dept_Mgr( did INTEGER, dname CHAR(20), budget REAL, mgr_ssn CHAR(11), since DATE, PRIMARY KEY (did), FOREIGN KEY (ssn) REFERENCES Employees) NOT NULL NOT NULL 6

Key Constraints CREATE TABLE Manages( ssn CHAR(11), did INTEGER, Approach 2 Approach 1 CREATE TABLE Manages( ssn CHAR(11), did INTEGER, since DATE, PRIMARY KEY (did), FOREIGN KEY (ssn) REFERENCES Employees, FOREIGN KEY (did) REFERENCES Departments) CREATE TABLE Dept_Mgr( did INTEGER, dname CHAR(20), budget REAL, mgr_ssn CHAR(11), since DATE, PRIMARY KEY (did), FOREIGN KEY (ssn) REFERENCES Employees) NOT NULL NOT NULL Queries related to a dept’s manager can be answered using just one relation in Approach 2 Approach 2 could lead to wastage of space (without participation constraint) if several depts have no managers Approach 1 avoids this efficiency Total participation constraint can not be captured in Approach 1 6

Participation Constraints Does every employee work in a department? If so, this is a participation constraint the participation of Employees in Works_In is said to be total (vs. partial) What if every department has an employee working in it? Basically means “at least one” since since name name dname dname ssn lot did did budget budget Employees Manages Departments Means: “exactly one” Works_In since 8

Participation Constraints lot name dname budget did since Manages Departments Employees ssn Works_In CREATE TABLE Dept_Mgr( did INTEGER, dname CHAR(20), budget REAL, mgr_ssn CHAR(11),NOT NULL since DATE, PRIMARY KEY (did), FOREIGN KEY (ssn) REFERENCES Employees ON DELETE RESRTICT) How to enforce total participation of Employees & Departments in Works_in? Every did value appearing in Departments appears in a tuple of Works_in. FK from Departments/Employees to Works_in? ASSERTIONS!! 8

Weak Entities A weak entity can be identified uniquely only by considering the primary key of another (owner) entity. Owner entity set and weak entity set must participate in a one-to-many relationship set (one owner, many weak entities). Weak entity set must have total participation in this identifying relationship set. lot name age pname Dependents Employees ssn Policy cost Weak entities have only a “partial key” (dashed underline) 10

Translating Weak Entity Sets Weak entity set and identifying relationship set are translated into a single table (Approach 2) When the owner entity is deleted, all owned weak entities must also be deleted. CREATE TABLE Dep_Policy ( pname CHAR(20), age INTEGER, cost REAL, ssn CHAR(11), PRIMARY KEY (pname, ssn), FOREIGN KEY (ssn) REFERENCES Employees, ON DELETE CASCADE) 11

Binary vs. Ternary Relationships Policies policyid cost age pname Dependents Covers name Employees ssn lot If each policy is owned by just 1 employee: Bad design Key constraint on Policies would mean policy can only cover 1 dependent! Beneficiary age pname Dependents policyid cost Policies Purchaser name Employees ssn lot Better design Think through all the constraints in the 2nd diagram! 7

Binary vs. Ternary Relationships (Contd.) Previous example illustrated a case when two binary relationships were better than one ternary. An example in the other direction: a ternary relation Contracts relates entity sets Parts, Departments and Suppliers, and has descriptive attribute quantity. No combination of binary relationships is an adequate substitute. quantity Parts Contract Departments Suppliers 9

Binary vs. Ternary Relationships (Contd.) quantity Parts Contract Departments VS. Suppliers Suppliers Departments deals-with Parts can-supply needs S “can-supply” P, D “needs” P, and D “deals-with” S does not imply that D has agreed to buy P from S. How do we record qty? 9

ISA (`is a’) Hierarchies name ssn lot As in C++, or other PLs, attributes are inherited. If we declare A ISA B, every A entity is also considered to be a B entity. Employees hourly_wages hours_worked ISA contractid Employees are SPECIALIZED into subclasses Identifying subsets of an entity set that share some distinguishing characteristic Hourly_emps & Contract_emps are GENERALIZED by Employees Overlap constraints: Can Simon be an Hourly_Emps as well as a Contract_Emps entity? (Allowed/disallowed) Covering constraints: Does every Employees entity also have to be an Hourly_Emps or a Contract_Emps entity? (Yes/no) 2 basic reasons for identifying subclasses (by specialization or generalization): We want to add descriptive attributes that apply only to entities in a subclass Identify the set of entities that participate in some relationship for eg. Only senior employees could be mangers Hourly_Emps Contract_Emps 12

Translating ISA Hierarchies to Relations General approach: 3 relations: Employees, Hourly_Emps and Contract_Emps. Hourly_Emps: Every employee is recorded in Employees. For hourly emps, extra info recorded in Hourly_Emps (hourly_wages, hours_worked, ssn); must delete Hourly_Emps tuple if referenced Employees tuple is deleted). Queries involving all employees easy, those involving just Hourly_Emps require a join to get some attributes. Alternative: Just Hourly_Emps and Contract_Emps. Hourly_Emps: ssn, name, lot, hourly_wages, hours_worked. Each employee must be in one of these two subclasses. 13

Translating ISA Hierarchies to Relations General approach: Always applicable A query that examine all employees & do not care about attributes specific to subclasses are answered using just one relation Full information about employees require joins Alternative: Just Hourly_Emps and Contract_Emps. Not applicable if we have employees that are neither Hourly_emps nor Contract_emps If an employee is both, his name & lot are stored twice A query that needs to examine all employees must join the two relations 13

Aggregation Used to model a relationship involving a relationship set. until Employees Monitors lot name ssn Used to model a relationship involving a relationship set. Allows us to treat a relationship set as an entity set for purposes of participation in (other) relationships. budget did pid started_on pbudget dname Departments Projects Sponsors since Aggregation vs. ternary relationship? Monitors is a distinct relationship, with a descriptive attribute. Also, can say that each sponsorship is monitored by at most one employee. 2

Review - Our Basic ER Model Entities and Entity Set (boxes) Relationships and Relationship sets (diamonds) binary n-ary Key constraints (1-1,1-M, M-M, arrows on 1 side) Participation constraints (bold for Total) Weak entities - require strong entity for key Aggregation - an alternative to n-ary relationships Isa hierarchies - abstraction and inheritance

Conceptual Design Using the ER Model ER modeling can get tricky! Design choices: Should a concept be modeled as an entity or an attribute? Should a concept be modeled as an entity or a relationship? Identifying relationships: Binary or ternary? Aggregation? Note constraints of the ER Model: A lot of data semantics can (and should) be captured. But some constraints cannot be captured in ER diagrams. We’ll refine things in our logical (relational) design 3

Entity vs. Attribute Should address be an attribute of Employees or an entity (related to Employees)? Depends upon how we want to use address information, and the semantics of the data: If we have several addresses per employee, address must be an entity (since attributes cannot be set-valued). If the structure (city, street, etc.) is important, address must be modeled as an entity (since attribute values are atomic).

Entity vs. Attribute (Cont.) from to name Employees ssn lot dname did Works_In2 does not allow an employee to work in a department for two or more periods. Similar to the problem of wanting to record several addresses for an employee: we want to record several values of the descriptive attributes for each instance of this relationship. budget Works_In2 Departments name dname budget did ssn lot Employees Works_In3 Departments Duration from to 5

Entity vs. Relationship OK as long as a manager gets a separate discretionary budget (dbudget) for each dept. What if manager’s dbudget covers all managed depts? (can repeat value, but such redundancy is problematic) since dbudget name dname ssn lot did budget Employees Manages2 Departments Employees since name dname budget did Departments ssn lot Mgr_Appts is_manager dbudget apptnum managed_by 6

These things get pretty hairy! Many E-R diagrams cover entire walls! A modest example:

A Cadastral E-R Diagram

A Cadastral E-R Diagram cadastral: showing or recording property boundaries, subdivision lines, buildings, and related details Source: US Dept. Interior Bureau of Land Management, Federal Geographic Data Committee Cadastral Subcommittee http://www.fairview-industries.com/standardmodule/cad-erd.htm

Now you try it University database: Courses, Students, Teachers Courses have Comp_codes, Course_nos, Titles, Units Courses have multiple sections that have time/room and exactly one teacher Must track students’ course schedules and transcripts including grades, semester taken, etc. Must track which classes a professor has taught Database should work over multiple semesters

Logical DB Design: ER to Relational Entity sets to tables. Employees ssn name lot CREATE TABLE Employees (ssn CHAR(11), name CHAR(20), lot INTEGER, PRIMARY KEY (ssn)) The slides for this text are organized into several modules. Each lecture contains about enough material for a 1.25 hour class period. (The time estimate is very approximate--it will vary with the instructor, and lectures also differ in length; so use this as a rough guideline.) This covers Lectures 1 and 2 (of 6) in Module (5). Module (1): Introduction (DBMS, Relational Model) Module (2): Storage and File Organizations (Disks, Buffering, Indexes) Module (3): Database Concepts (Relational Queries, DDL/ICs, Views and Security) Module (4): Relational Implementation (Query Evaluation, Optimization) Module (5): Database Design (ER Model, Normalization, Physical Design, Tuning) Module (6): Transaction Processing (Concurrency Control, Recovery) Module (7): Advanced Topics 3

Relationship Sets to Tables CREATE TABLE Works_In( ssn CHAR(1), did INTEGER, since DATE, PRIMARY KEY (ssn, did), FOREIGN KEY (ssn) REFERENCES Employees, FOREIGN KEY (did) REFERENCES Departments) In translating a many-to-many relationship set to a relation, attributes of the relation must include: 1) Keys for each participating entity set (as foreign keys). This set of attributes forms a superkey for the relation. 2) All descriptive attributes. 5

Review: Key Constraints Each dept has at most one manager, according to the key constraint on Manages. dname budget did since lot name ssn Manages Employees Departments Translation to relational model? 1-to-1 1-to Many Many-to-1 Many-to-Many 6

Review: Weak Entities A weak entity can be identified uniquely only by considering the primary key of another (owner) entity. Owner entity set and weak entity set must participate in a one-to-many relationship set (1 owner, many weak entities). Weak entity set must have total participation in this identifying relationship set. name cost ssn pname lot age Employees Policy Dependents 10

Review: ISA Hierarchies name ssn lot Review: ISA Hierarchies Employees hourly_wages hours_worked ISA As in C++, or other PLs, attributes are inherited. If we declare A ISA B, every A entity is also considered to be a B entity. contractid Hourly_Emps Contract_Emps Overlap constraints: Can Joe be an Hourly_Emps as well as a Contract_Emps entity? (Allowed/disallowed) Covering constraints: Does every Employees entity also have to be an Hourly_Emps or a Contract_Emps entity? (Yes/no) 12

Summary of Conceptual Design Conceptual design follows requirements analysis, Yields a high-level description of data to be stored ER model popular for conceptual design Constructs are expressive, close to the way people think about their applications. Note: There are many variations on ER model Both graphically and conceptually Basic constructs: entities, relationships, and attributes (of entities and relationships). Some additional constructs: weak entities, ISA hierarchies, and aggregation. 11

Summary of ER (Cont.) Several kinds of integrity constraints: key constraints participation constraints overlap/covering for ISA hierarchies. Some foreign key constraints are also implicit in the definition of a relationship set. Many other constraints (notably, functional dependencies) cannot be expressed. Constraints play an important role in determining the best database design for an enterprise. 12

Summary of ER (Cont.) ER design is subjective. There are often many ways to model a given scenario! Analyzing alternatives can be tricky, especially for a large enterprise. Common choices include: Entity vs. attribute, entity vs. relationship, binary or n-ary relationship, whether or not to use ISA hierarchies, aggregation. Ensuring good database design: resulting relational schema should be analyzed and refined further. Functional Dependency information and normalization techniques are especially useful. 13