2015 ND COUNTY ENGINEERS & HIGHWAY SUPERINTENDENTS CONVENTION.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COAL MINING & INDIANA BAT POPULATION TRENDS
Advertisements

Signed on December 1973 and provides for the conservation of species that are endangered or threatened throughout all or significant portion of their.
NRCS Policy and Endangered Species Act. How did we start down this path? Besides the law, a bat made us do it! The Indiana bat and favored roost tree.
MISSION: Working with others to conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people.
WETLAND REGULATORY PROGRAM Role of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Fish, Wildlife & Marine Resources Briefing on Proposed Amendments to Endangered Species Regulations.
Use of the Endangered Species Act in Alaska Doug Vincent-Lang, Special Assistant Alaska Department of Fish & Game 1.
Legal Issues Affecting Wind Energy Federal Nexus: Public Lands. On public land, Federal funding, Federal permit, Federal power grid. On public land, Federal.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Utah Field Office.
Module 3 Counterpart Regulations Standards of Review for Determining Project Effects.
Tim Morse, Andrew Carter, Garrett Bergey, and Erin Affronti ENSC 202
NAASF State Lands Management Committee Meeting November 4-6, 2014 Indianapolis, Indiana Northern Long-eared Bat: Conservation Challenges and Options for.
Endangered Species Act
Endangered Species US Fish and Wildlife Service. Endangered Species Endangered Species Act Passed in 1983 Purpose Conserve Endangered and Threatened Species.
2 Recognized by John C. Fremont as an area of interior drainage 145,546 square miles Precipitation, generally 7-12 inches annually Recognized by John.
Endangered Species Act Overview
Threatened and Endangered Species When Your Project Warrants Consultation.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Section 7(a)(1) of the Endangered Species Act—Supporting the Mission through Proactive Conservation Planning.
Provisions of the Spotted Owl CHU Rule: How Are We Interpreting What It Says? And How Does it Integrate with the NWFP? Bruce Hollen (BLM) and Brendan White.
Preventing Endangered Species Listings with the Tongass Conservation Strategy Steve Brockmann U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Other Environmental Issues U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Noise Endangered and Threatened Species Explosive/Flammable Hazards and Underground.
West Texas Legislative Summit ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Environmental Regulations Affecting Transportation Carlos Swonke Director, Environmental Affairs Division.
Preserving Earth’s Biological Diversity Chapter 17 Delisted - On August 8, 2007.
Fish and Wildlife Service Mission Conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American.
Endangered Species Act Section 7 Overview Endangered Species Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2001.
Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultations. The Endangered Species Act Sec. 2:Purpose Sec. 3:Definitions Sec. 4:Listing, Recovery, Monitoring Sec.
The Endangered Species Act 1973, 1982, 1985, 1988 (ESA) Larsen Schlachter Per. 3.
Trista Dillon THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT (1973, 1982, 1985, 1988)
Biological Opinions & Endangered Species Act Consultation – A “How To” Guide for Working with Agencies on ESA Issues MATTHEW A. LOVE Partner- Seattle,
ACEC-KY/FHWA/KYTC Partnering Conference The northern long-eared bat’s (Myotis septentrionalis) range includes much of the eastern and north central.
Chapter 10: Biodiversity Pennsylvania Endangered Species.
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
UNDERSTANDING THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT. What is the ESA? Federal Law : 1973 (USA), 1976 (Canada) protecting wildlife & plants Conserve & recover species.
WNS Concerns & Service Guidance for Myotis Conservation Bats & Fire Workshop Mammoth Cave National Park, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky April 30, 2014.
By: Helena Brantz Period 2 APES-Rall.  Draft Years: 1973, 1982, 1985, 1988  National Scope: First signed by Nixon in As of November 2011, there.
Morgan Kurz, Seth McCormick, and Andrew Barrass, The Center of Excellence for Field Biology, Austin Peay State University.
The Endangered Species Act 1973, 1982, 1985, 1988 By Tristan Armstrong.
Endangered Species Act of 1973, 1982, 1985, and 1988 By: Nicole Wypychowski Period 6 President Nixon signed the bill December 28, 1973 ESA is administered.
Environmental Considerations in Planning
Wildlife Protection Adapting to Change NASF Annual Meeting Lake Tahoe, California September 16, 2015 Lisa Allen Missouri State Forester.
Middle Fork Project TERR 6 - Special-Status Bat Technical Study Plan Report Overview March 3, 2008.
State Route 109 (Portland Bypass) Robertson & Sumner County, TN NEPA Public Hearing November 12, 2015.
Agriculture has an important role Well-managed livestock grazing and other traditional ranching practices are not considered major threats to sage-grouse.
NOAA’s National Marine Fisheries Service Biological Opinion for Water Supply, Flood Control Operations & Channel Maintenance by the Army Corps, SCWA, and.
Cave-Bat Population Trends and White-nose Syndrome in Vermont
TOWARDS A COMMON GOAL Coordinating actions under the Clean Water Act (FWPCA) and the Endangered Species Act (ESA)
Endangered Species Act Update: Bats and Crayfish Allyn G. Turner Steptoe & Johnson, PLLC January 28,
Roger W. Perry U.S. Forest Service Southern Research Station Hot Springs, Arkansas Roger W. Perry U.S. Forest Service Southern Research Station Hot Springs,
Oregon Chub (oregonichthys crameri) Critical Habitat Designation Chris Cusack Judith Dempsey Biao Huang Tae-Young Kim Caiwen Wu.
Biological Reviews, FAA Tower Lighting, and Northern Long-eared Bats JOELLE L. GEHRING, Ph.D. Federal Communications Commission.
Environmental Issues Update - Endangered Species 1.
Endangered Species Act (Section 7) Consultation In Federal Land Management Agencies American Chemical Society National Meeting Boston, Mass. August 2015.
1 Earth Day Award Presentation Utah Division of Wildlife Resources & ConocoPhillips Pinyon-Juniper Treatment Project.
Russian River Estuary Management.
Acoustic Monitoring Locations Overview Montana’s bat species face a wide array of conservation issues that threaten their long-term viability. A collaborative.
Endangered Species Act Application in New York State – What’s New? October 4, 2015 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Robyn A. Niver.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® DoD Mission-Sensitive Priority Bird Species Richard A. Fischer, Ph.D. U.S. Army Engineer R&D Center, Vicksburg,
FL Endangered Species Devils Hole Pupfish. FL Manatee atee-endangered-species-feat/
California WaterFix Aquatic Science Peer Review Sacramento, California April 5, 2016.
Indiana Bats, Fire, and the Endangered Species Act Sue Cameron US Fish & Wildlife Service April 16, 2013.
National Environmental Policy Act and Endangered Species Act Compliance in the Bureau of Land Management.
Endangered Species Act
Species at Risk.
The Endangered Species Act
The Endangered Species Act (ESA)
The Endangered Species Act 1973, 1982, 1985, 1988 (ESA)
The Endangered Species Act 1973 ,1982,1985,1988
Endangered Species Act of 1973
Endangered Species Act of 1973
Riparian Restoration in Yellow-billed Cuckoo Habitat
Presentation transcript:

2015 ND COUNTY ENGINEERS & HIGHWAY SUPERINTENDENTS CONVENTION

ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT ESA passed in 1973 The purpose of the ESA is to protect and recover imperiled species and the ecosystems upon which they depend Section 7 of the ESA requires federal agencies to effects of actions they authorize, fund, or carry out are not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of listed species US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) is responsible implementing the ESA for terrestrial and freshwater species

ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT FHWA must determine affect of proposed action: No effect May affect, not likely to adversely affect May affect, likely to adversely affect May affect, likely to adversely affect May affect, likely to adversely affect Likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the species Take

NO EFFECT “ No effect ” means ESA-listed species or critical habitat will not be affected, directly or indirectly. Generally, this means no ESA-listed species or critical habitat will be exposed to any potentially harmful/beneficial elements of the action Some examples of when a “no effect” conclusion would be: The species doesn’t occur in the project area The species occurs seasonally in the are, but the project will be timed to avoid their presence The species occurs in the area but there is no plausible way the species would be affected If no effect based on NDDOT table, no need to consult USFWS

MAY AFFECT, NOT LIKELY TO ADVERSELY AFFECT MAY AFFECT, LIKELY TO ADVERSELY AFFECT Means that all effects are beneficial, insignificant, or discountable. Beneficial effects have an immediate positive effect without any adverse effects to the species or habitat. Discountable effects are those that are extremely unlikely to occur. Insignificant effects relate to the size or severity of the impact and include those effects that are undetectable, not measurable, or so minor that they cannot be meaningfully evaluated. May affect, not likely – requires Biological Assessment and Concurrence from USFWS

SPECIES LISTED IN ND SpeciesListing Interior Least Tern Endangered Whooping Crane Endangered Black-footed Ferret Endangered Pallid Sturgeon Endangered Gray Wolf Endangered Poweshiek Skipperling Endangered Piping Plover Threatened Western Prairie Fringed Orchid Threatened Dakota Skipper Threatened Northern Long-Eared Bat Proposed Rufa Red Knot Proposed Greater Sage Grouse Candidate Sprague’s Pipit Candidate Piping Plover Critical Habitat Designated Poweshiek Skipperling Critical Habitat Proposed Dakota Skipper Critical Habitat Proposed

NORTHERN LONG-EARED BAT Myotis septentrionalis

NLEB White-nose syndrome Final decision on proposal due on April 2, 2015 No know winter hibernacula in ND Projects involving tree removal and work on structures Need to determine if suitable summer habitat exists in project area Unsuitable Habitat

Day roosts are used for extended rest periods and rearing young, while night roosts are used briefly for resting during foraging Need to inspect structures for signs of bat usage If tree removal on project, need to determine if trees are suitable habitat

NDDOT Threatened, Endangered, Proposed, Candidate Species and Critical Habitat Affect Determination Table Project: PCN: Location: County: SpeciesListingGuidance FHWA Review Required? Determination Additional Documentation Included YesNo Not Present No Effect Interior Least Tern E FHWA Review required for work in or along the shoreline of the Missouri River System including reservoirs from April 15 through August 1. Whooping Crane E FHWA Review required for work involving above ground utilities or towers, or new guy wires unless lines are buried. Black-footed Ferret E FHWA Review required for ground disturbing activities within 100 feet of prairie dog towns of at least 80 acres in size. Projects within the existing right-of-way will not require FHWA review. Pallid Sturgeon E FHWA Review required for work in or along the shoreline of the Missouri River (including reservoirs) and Yellowstone River Systems. Gray Wolf E Listed West of US 83; Delisted East of US 83 Poweshiek Skipperling E FHWA Review required for work occurring outside of the right of way in undisturbed native tall grass prairie and wet swales Piping Plover T FHWA Review required for ground disturbing activities within ½ mile of designated piping plover critical habitat or known nesting sites. See link for piping plover designated critical habitat maps: Western Prairie Fringed Orchid T FHWA Review required for all ground disturbing activities on non-flooded, undisturbed ground, known habitat, and native prairie. High probability of species in or near the Sheyenne National Grassland. Dakota Skipper T FHWA Review required for work occurring outside of the right of way in high quality native prairie containing a high diversity of wildflowers and grasses. Northern Long-Eared Bat P FHWA Review required for work involving the removal of trees or buildings, ground disturbance in areas with caves, mines, and rock crevices, or work on structures. See NLEB Guidance for NDDOT Projects for further assistance. Rufa Red Knot P FHWA Review required for work activities impacting Piping Plover Critical Habitat or sewage lagoons. See link for piping plover designated critical habitat maps: Greater Sage Grouse C FHWA Review Required for work activities occurring outside the right of way in native sagebrush grasslands where big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) is present. Sprague’s Pipit C FHWA Review Required for work activities occurring outside the right of way in large native short-to-mixed grass prairie patches of approximately 72 acres or greater. Piping Plover Critical Habitat D FHWA Review required for ground disturbing activities within ½ mile of designated piping plover critical habitat or known nesting sites. See link for piping plover designated critical habitat maps: Poweshiek Skipperling Critical Habitat P FHWA Review required for ground disturbing activities within 0.6 mile of proposed Poweshiek Skipperling critical habitat. See link for Poweshiek Skipperling proposed critical habitat maps: Dakota Skipper Critical Habitat P FHWA Review required for ground disturbing activities within 0.6 mile of proposed Dakota Skipper critical habitat. See link for Dakota Skipper proposed critical habitat maps:

NLEB CONSERVATION MEASURES Avoid removal of potential habitat during Summer Maternity Season (May 1 – Sep 30) If your project area contains only suitable night roosting habitat, limit work to daylight hours Waiting for additional guidance from USFWS

QUESTIONS?