TRACS Toledo Review and Alternative Compensation System.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Advertisements

Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
How Can Using Data Lead to School Improvement?
Winchester School District In Need of Improvement Plan DINI Team: Mel Harrison, Valerie Wilber, Hannah Gagnon, Dee Salonen, Amanda Nordberg, Jane Cardinale,
“Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.” Accountability 2.0 and the World’s Best Workforce—What Does it Mean? World’s.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
RAPID CITY AREA SCHOOLS AUGUST 7, 2012 Denver ProComp Plan Summary.
The Status of the Teaching Profession 2003 The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning California State University, Office of the Chancellor Policy.
Read To Achieve Hickory Public Schools August 12, 2013
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Forsyth County Schools Overview of the Proposed IE 2 Partnership Contract.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Module 1: PERA Illinois Administrative Code Part 50
1 Professional Development Planning and Needs Assessment Regional Trainings Spring 2006.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
“Teachers do make a difference…” - Jere Brophy, 1979.
Module 4 TED 356 Curriculum in Sec. Ed.. Module 4 Explain the current official federal and state standards, including professional and accrediting groups.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Individual Professional Development Planning for Teachers
NEW TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS CONNECTING TEACHER PERFORMANCE to ACADEMIC PROGRESS.
Title One Program Evaluation Report to the CCSD Board of Education August 20, 2012 Bill Poock, Title One Coordinator.
Tallmadge High School TALLMADGE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN Initial Plan: February 1999 Revised: May 2003 Revised: September 30, 2004.
Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
Science Academic Content Standards and Standards-Based Education.
C.O.R.E Creating Opportunities that Result in Excellence.
Targeted Assistance Programs: Requirements and Implementation Spring Title I Statewide Conference May 15, 2014.
Collective Bargaining Retreat for Management Discussion of the Impact of Measuring Teacher and Leader Effectiveness on Collective Bargaining August 17,
Standards-Based Education Curriculum Alignment Project Elementary Principals’ Meeting October 21, 2010.
District Leadership Practices that Support Instructional Coach (TOSA) Implementation and Effectiveness Presented by Lea Curcio, Director of Curriculum.
IDAHO STATE TEACHER ADVANCEMENT AND RECOGNITION SYSTEM.
Clare-Gladwin RESD Fall 2013 Alignment for Career and College Readiness.
1 Update from ODE Cheryl Kleckner Oregon Department of Education Office of Educational Improvement and Innovation
Common Core State Standards Norman Public Schools Dr. Joe Siano, Superintendent.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 1 Where are We? Where do we want to be?
Minnesota FAED Project Survey Deaf Education Summit April 22, 2010.
Campus Improvement Plans Northwest ISD Presentation to the Board of Trustees October 14, 2013.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Program Introduction to Principal Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
“Developing an Implementation Map: Mapping / Mapping ” Dr. Ann Johnson
Los Angeles Unified School District Local District G Principals Meeting.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
ESEA, TAP, and Charter handouts-- 3 per page with notes and cover of one page.
Technology Action Plan By: Kaitlyn Sassone. What is Systemic Change? "Systemic change is a cyclical process in which the impact of change on all parts.
Chapter 6 Curriculum-Based Classroom Assessment Techniques.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
School and District Accountability Reports Implementing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) The New York State Education Department March 2004.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
CSDCDecember 8, “More questions than answers.” CSDC December 8, 2010.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
 The professional growth and development of teachers is the fundamental purpose of teacher assessment.
MSP Summary of First Year Annual Report FY 2004 Projects.
West Haven Next-Generation Accountability Report
Quarterly Meeting Focus
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
Bull Run Middle School School Advisory Meeting, 6:30 – 8:00 p.m. Library.
Pacing Guides, Assessments and Report Cards
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
State Examples and Follow-up Data Requests for SOQ Proposals
Presentation transcript:

TRACS Toledo Review and Alternative Compensation System

RESEARCH While research has proven that a quality teacher is one of the most important factors in student success, those students most in need of quality teachers are generally the least likely to get them. (Darling- Hammond, 1997; Taken from NCREL Viewpoints)

RESEARCH, CONTINUED Programs that attract high-quality teachers to high-poverty, high minority schools can help to close the gap in teacher quality and student achievement. (NCREL Viewpoints)

RESEARCH, CONTINUED In addition to attracting quality teachers into high poverty schools, it is critical to provide high-quality professional development so teachers can continue to support student achievement. (NCREL)

GOVERNOR’S COMMISSION ON TEACHING SUCCESS “Given our belief that improving the quality of teaching requires a new approach to compensation, the commission encourages…that teachers are rewarded for what they do and accomplish.” (page 24)

GOVERNOR’S COMMISSION ON TEACHING SUCCESS Factors, beyond student achievement, that could be included in new compensation models: Knowledge and Skills Professional Development Level of Difficulty, e.g., Hard-to-Staff and Low-Performing Schools Hard-to-Staff Subject Areas Level of Responsibility, e.g. Additional Responsibilities (pages 24, 25)

TRACS, INCEPTION TRACS, in concept, was agreed to as part of the 2001 negotiations between TFT and TPS. TRACS was designed and spelled out during the 2001/2002 school year. TRACS first year of implementation was the 2002/2003 school year.

GOAL of TRACS “The overriding goal of TRACS is to promote teacher quality while improving the academic performance of students.” (page 3 of the TRACS booklet)

TRACS GOVERNANCE Professional Assignment and Compensation Committee (PAC) appointed by the TFT President and the TPS Superintendent PAC composed of teachers and administrators Chair annually rotates between management and TFT TFT President and TPS Chief Academic Officer serve as advisors.

THREE TRACS COMPONENTS Professional Development (TRACS A) School Performance (TRACS B) Teacher Performance (TRACS C)

TRACS A: REQUIRED PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Required Professional Development Targets identified student academic needs Targets subject matter knowledge and skills Reflects research Reflects Ohio Content Standards Reflects best classroom instructional practices Fosters collaboration and reflection Requires follow-up to document implementation and effectiveness TFT and Board mutually agree to professional development content, presentation, and implementation

TRACS B: SCHOOL PERFORMANCE School Performance Annual determination of significant academic and related goals for each district building Frequent assessment of participating school’s progress toward meeting set goals Reward and recognition to school teaching staffs that meet or exceed set goals

TRACS C: TEACHER PERFORMANCE Supports district’s continuous improvement process by recognizing, rewarding, and utilizing, in special projects and assignments, teachers who demonstrate excellence in classroom teaching. Provides an annual reward for teachers who accomplish one or more of the following: Demonstrate excellence in the classroom, including high levels of student academic success (Career Status) Accept additional responsibilities (Accomplished Status); and/or Accept a difficult to fill teaching assignment (Distinguished Status)

TRACS C: TEACHER PERFORMANCE Qualification Year Status Five years of successful teaching, three in TPS Application: documentation of continuous professional growth Peer Review Ratings (attachment 1) Observation/Evaluation of Teaching Performance (attachment 2) Portfolio (attachment 3) Writing Sample (attachment 4) Seven teachers are currently completing their qualification year

TRACS C: TEACHER PERFORMANCE Career Status Level: TRACS-1 Must remain in the classroom Annually select one area of student accountability and annually report results to the Professional Assignment and Compensation Committee (PAC) e.g., raising student achievement in math; identify standards, benchmarks, indicators; identify and implement instructional and/or intervention strategies; administer appropriate assessment measure. 24 teachers currently on TRACS-1 Career Status Level Earn an annual stipend equal to five percent of teacher’s basic salary

TRACS C: TEACHER PERFORMANCE Accomplished Status Level: TRACS-2 Must remain in the classroom Professional Assignment and Compensation Committee makes placements in TRACS-2 based on district’s needs and expertise of the applying teacher. Current assignments Develop and implement standards-based thematic lessons targeting the mathematics measurement standard and grade level indicators for grades K-7; design and provide district-wide professional development Develop computerized grade cards for grades K-6 utilizing standards, benchmarks, and grade level indicators; align district grade books to the State Standards and the district report card; and design and provide district-wide professional development Develop lesson plans and activities related to targeted weak standards identified from previous OGT testing results; design and deliver professional development and on-site support during the summer OGT camps that utilize the developed curriculum 12 teachers on TRACS-C Accomplished Status Level. Earn an annual stipend equal to ten percent of teacher’s base salary.

TRACS C: TEACHER PERFORMANCE Distinguished Status: TRACS-3 Teacher must accept difficult to fill teaching assignments as mutually agreed to by the Board and Federation Teachers may be required to perform peer evaluations of teachers applying for TRACS Qualification Year, teachers who are on their renewal year evaluation cycle, or teachers who qualify for district evaluation

TRACS C: TEACHER PERFORMANCE Distinguished Status Level: TRACS-3, Continued Must remain in the classroom. Accept teaching assignments at a school identified as high needs or other difficult to fill teaching assignments as mutually agreed to by the Federation and the Board. Remain at assignments for not less than three years. After three years, first right to return to previous assignment when opening occurs. Current Distinguished Status Level Assignments: Two science positions at high needs, high poverty inner-city high school. One music position at a high needs, high poverty inner-city high school. Earn an annual stipend equal to fifteen percent of the teacher’s base salary.

TRACS C: TEACHER PERFORMANCE What Influences Teachers to Accept a TRACS-3 Placement? Right to return to previous teaching assignment Placement as part of a TRACS-3 team Welcome by faculty at the high needs school Administrative support Greater monetary compensation

TRACS Presenters: Craig Cotner Joan Kuchcinski Pamela Downour Roxanne Drone