Val Noronha University of California, Santa Barbara Transportation Centerlines: Case Studies from California and Iowa.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Company Established in 1969 Infrastructure Information Collection Staff of more than 130 Design and build ARAN ® Largest and longest standing company.
Advertisements

DIGITAL HIGHWAY MEASUREMENTS TURNER-FAIRBANK HIGHWAY RESEARCH CENTER David Gibson Milton (Pete) Mills Morton Oskard ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECT 1.
1 Civil GPS Service Interface Committee (CGSIC) Rudy Persaud U.S. DOT-FHWA APEC GNSS Implementation Team Seattle, WA June 23, 2010 State and Local Government.
1 CPSC 695 Data Quality Issues M. L. Gavrilova. 2 Decisions…
I see you… INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS AS A MEANS OF AUTOMATIC ROAD ENFORCEMENT BY: KEVIN NICOLI.
Oil Spill Detection and Tracking Technologies Aircraft and Autonomous Aircraft Detection Methods HF Radar Tracking Methods Autonomous Surface Vessel Tracking.
Val Noronha University of California, Santa Barbara NCRST-Infrastructure Research & Outreach.
Chapter 5. Database Aspects of Location-Based Services Lee Myong Soo Mobile Data Engineering Lab. Dept. of.
Finding faults with LIDAR in the Puget Lowland Ralph Haugerud, Craig Weaver U. S. Geological Survey Jerry Harless Puget Sound Regional Council and thanks.
Val Noronha University of California, Santa Barbara UCSB Centerline Research … Overview.
Remote Mapping of River Channel Morphology March 9, 2003 Carl J. Legleiter Geography Department University of California Santa Barbara.
Val Noronha University of California, Santa Barbara Integrating RS into Transportation Information Systems.
Val Noronha University of California, Santa Barbara NCRST — Infrastructure Management.
Measurement-Based GIS Michael F. Goodchild University of California Santa Barbara.
Concluding Comments Mike Goodchild University of California Santa Barbara.
Digitizing There are three primary methods for digitizing spatial information: Manual Methods include: Tablet Digitizing Heads-up Digitizing An Automated.
Mapping Roads and other Urban Materials using Hyperspectral Data Dar Roberts, Meg Gardner, Becky Powell, Phil Dennison, Val Noronha.
Identification of Access Elements for Safety Analysis Using Aerial Photography Srinivasa R. Veeramallu Dr. Reginald Souleyrette and Dr. Shauna Hallmark.
Comparison of LIDAR Derived Data to Traditional Photogrammetric Mapping David Veneziano Dr. Reginald Souleyrette Dr. Shauna Hallmark GIS-T 2002 August.
Data Acquisition Lecture 8. Data Sources  Data Transfer  Getting data from the internet and importing  Data Collection  One of the most expensive.
Microsimulation for Rural and Exurban Regions: Lake County, California David Gerstle (presenting) & Zheng Wei Caliper Corporation.
TAXISAT PROJECT Low Cost GNSS and Computer Vision based data fusion solution for driverless vehicles Marc POLLINA
1. The Promise of MEMS to LBS and Navigation Applications Dr. Naser El-Shiemy, CEO Trusted Positioning Inc. 2.
Seeing through the trees: LIDAR for the Puget Lowland Ralph Haugerud, Craig Weaver U. S. Geological Survey Jerry Harless Puget Sound Regional Council and.
Val Noronha University of California, Santa Barbara Centerline Extraction and Road Condition.
Ref: Geographic Information System and Science, By Hoeung Rathsokha, MSCIM GIS and Remote Sensing WHAT.
GPS in Sports and Recreation Presented by: Elizabeth Brocklehurst Christopher Cook Walter Sarabia.
Map Scale, Resolution and Data Models. Components of a GIS Map Maps can be displayed at various scales –Scale - the relationship between the size of features.
Complete High Speed Data Collection System
Remote Sensing of Urban Landscape Lecture 11 November 10, 2004.
ARSF Data Processing Consequences of the Airborne Processing Library Mark Warren Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, UK RSPSoc 2012 – Greenwich, London.
Moving to International Roughness Index Measured By Inertial Profilers for Acceptance of New Asphalt Construction in Ontario By John A. Blair, Bituminous.
Autonomous Vehicles By: Rotha Aing. What makes a vehicle autonomous ? “Driverless” Different from remote controlled 3 D’s –Detection –Delivery –Data-Gathering.
GIS Data Quality.
Topology Cleanup Evaluating MicroStation GeoGraphics GIS Prepared using support of U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-76SF00515 by the.
UAV LANDING SYSTEM Submitted by: SHAKTI SINGH SHEKHAWAT SHRISH KUMAR SHUKLA RISHI KUMAR YADAV VINEET AGRAWAL.
Remote Sensing for Asset Management Shauna Hallmark Kamesh Mantravadi David Veneziano Reginald Souleyrette September 23, 2001 Madison, WI.
W.D.M. Limited North View, Staple Hill, Bristol BS16 4NX Telephone: Web: IMPROVED LOCATIONAL ACCURACY OF SCRIM DATA USING GPS.
Evaluating Remotely Sensed Images For Use In Inventorying Roadway Infrastructure Features N C R S T INFRASTRUCTURE.
Geospatial Data Production NSF Workshop on GeoSpatial and GeoTemporal Informatics Jan 8-9, 2009 J. Chris McGlone SAIC, Inc Lee Rd Chantilly, VA
NCRST – Environment (NCRST-E) focuses research on the goal of providing cost effective corridor assessment and planning tools. The NCRST-E research partners.
GIS in Egypt Can GIS Industry Meet Its Expected Objectives? Speaker: Mohamed Elshayal Chairman: Dr. Mohamed Hassan 10 February
Surveying for Architectural Engineers Introduction.
Applications of Remote Sensing in Transportation.
GPS Aided INS for Mobile Mapping in Precision Agriculture Khurram Niaz Shaikh Supervised by: Dr. Abdul Rashid bin Mohammad Shariff Dept. of Biological.
Lower Adirondack GIS Users Group Meeting Warren County Street Centerline Project December 1, 2004.
Roadway Intersection Inventory and Remote Sensing David Veneziano Dr. Shauna Hallmark and Dr. Reginald Souleyrette GIS-T 2001 April 11, 2001.
Commuting time for every employed: combining traffic sensors and many other data sources for population statistics Pasi Piela EFGS Krakow.
Blood Vessel Modeling using 2D/3D Level Set Method
OBJECTIVES Routable Road Centreline What do users want ? Road knowledge-base Intelligent Transport System Intelligent Access System (Roads) Consistent.
Kun-chan Lan and Chien-Ming Chou National Cheng Kung University
INTEGRATION OF THE NATIONAL MAP 21 July 2004 Michael P. Finn E. Lynn Usery Michael Starbuck Bryan Weaver Gregory M. Jaromack U.S. Department.
SGM as an Affordable Alternative to LiDAR
Integration of PASER & GIS WLIA March 4, 2004 Presentation Outline Road Centerlines –Overview –Creating –Attribute –Uses –Paser Geocoding Process –Overview.
SAMCEF Field, Integrating CAE towards Professional Solutions.
Mapping of Traffic Conditions at Downtown Thessaloniki with the Help of GPS Technology P. D. Savvaidis and K. Lakakis Aristotle University of Thessaloniki,
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey INTEGRATION OF THE NATIONAL MAP : DATA LAYERS AND FEATURES 27 May 2004 Michael P. Finn E. Lynn Usery.
Data Collection for HDM Christopher R. Bennett EASTE.
© Skymeter Corp Skymeter Corp Preet Khalsa, CTO
ParkNet: Drive-by Sensing of Road-Side Parking Statistics Irfan Ullah Department of Information and Communication Engineering Myongji university, Yongin,
Roadway Center Line and Feature Extraction Remote Sensing in Transportation August 2001 HSA Consulting Group, Inc. Presentation to the National Consortium.
Crash rate per hundred-million Vehicle Kilometers
What is NCRST Funded under TEA-21, 1998
Automatically Collect Ground Control Points from Online Aerial Maps
Data Queries Raster & Vector Data Models
CE 3500 Transportation Engineering Saturation flow and signal LOS
What measurements do we use to describe the world around us?
DIGITAL PHOTOGRAMMETRY
The Use Of Hard Shoulders As A Turning Lane: A Safety Evaluation
Reduced Datasets from Roadway Information Database (RID)
Presentation transcript:

Val Noronha University of California, Santa Barbara Transportation Centerlines: Case Studies from California and Iowa

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #2 © University of California. All rights reserved. Structure U.S. DOT — NASA Partnership Transportation Legislation “TEA-21” EnvironmentFlowsHazardsInfrastructure  4 universities 4 TAPs

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #3 © University of California. All rights reserved. Outline  What is a centerline? Applications, requirements, status  Survey Methods Remote sensing: eyeball, analytical GPS: high-end, low-end Photogrammetry  Tomorrow’s precision standards

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #4 © University of California. All rights reserved.

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #5 © University of California. All rights reserved.

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #6 © University of California. All rights reserved. The Grapevine Northbound and southbound carriageways of I-5 switch places for 6 km along the San Andreas Fault

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #7 © University of California. All rights reserved.

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #8 © University of California. All rights reserved. Where is the Gore point?

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #9 © University of California. All rights reserved. Centerline Applications Who’s paying?

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #12 © University of California. All rights reserved. Centerline databases — families Producers Users ITS State, local DOT USGS 1:24K State, local Engineering Design CAD Mapquest TIGER GDT Navtech CVO/Logistics RS

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #13 © University of California. All rights reserved. Facets of centerline data  Existence: omission/commission  Geometric accuracy (2-D)  Linear accuracy  Attributes name and address range, speed limit lane width, shoulder width …  Topology  Data model

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #14 © University of California. All rights reserved.

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #15 © University of California. All rights reserved.

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #16 © University of California. All rights reserved.

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #17 © University of California. All rights reserved.

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #18 © University of California. All rights reserved.

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #19 © University of California. All rights reserved.

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #20 © University of California. All rights reserved.

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #21 © University of California. All rights reserved.

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #22 © University of California. All rights reserved.

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #23 © University of California. All rights reserved.

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #24 © University of California. All rights reserved.

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #25 © University of California. All rights reserved.

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #26 © University of California. All rights reserved.

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #27 © University of California. All rights reserved. Name Discrepancies

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #28 © University of California. All rights reserved. Solutions—Geometry  Remote sensing  GPS high-end dedicated multiple vehicles?  Photogrammetry  Mosaic engineering drawings

R E M O T E S E N S I N G

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #31 © University of California. All rights reserved. Hyperspectral process 1 MESMA (Dar) Q-treeVectorize Additional steps: clean, conflate

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #32 © University of California. All rights reserved. MESMA (Dar) Thinning, Filters Comparison Additional steps: clean, conflate Hyperspectral process 2

T H E G P S C H A L L E N G E

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #34 © University of California. All rights reserved. High end (“SOP”) GPS  ARAN  Output: GPS every 10 m — not topological centerlines  Cost: x 10 4 (service) Roadware Inc

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #35 © University of California. All rights reserved.

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #36 © University of California. All rights reserved. ARAN output

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #37 © University of California. All rights reserved. Problems w/ Dedicated GPS  Need to get it right the first time  Verification?  IMU helps ($$$)

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #38 © University of California. All rights reserved. The Consumer-GPS Challenge

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #39 © University of California. All rights reserved. GPS Results — lane resolution

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #40 © University of California. All rights reserved. The one to beat … $150 at Staples  Convenience  Price

T H E G R E A T G P S - L I N E A R COMPATIBILITY C H A L L E N G E ?

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #42 © University of California. All rights reserved. LX for professionals  DMI: accurate to 1 m  Linear referencing: “US101 — 20.25”

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #43 © University of California. All rights reserved. A 7075 C 7472 E 7330 DMI 7477 GPS 7446

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #44 © University of California. All rights reserved. A Myth about Linear vs 2D  Distance over the hill is greater: need to correct for elevation Difference = 0.25% (on a 7% grade)  

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #45 © University of California. All rights reserved. What Really Happens on the Hill Inaccurate (x,y) geometry shortchanges length up to 20%

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #46 © University of California. All rights reserved. Linear Accuracy Tests — Setting

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #47 © University of California. All rights reserved. Linear Accuracy Tests — Setting  ~10 km road, rises 800m, average 8% grade  Numerous hairpins  Some dense tree canopy and partial GPS occlusion  Remote sensing would have difficulty with this

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #48 © University of California. All rights reserved. Linear Accuracy Test — Results  $150-GPS length close to DMI uphill: 1 ~ 1.5% downhill: 0.5%  Uphill/downhill difference Simulated: opposing lane geometry: % GPS: 0.2% (higher downhill speed?) DMI: 1.5% (affected by engine rev?)  Conclusion (provisional, more study needed) GPS just as accurate (±0.5%), more consistent

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #49 © University of California. All rights reserved.

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #50 © University of California. All rights reserved. Will GPS replace LR?

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #51 © University of California. All rights reserved. Big Picture

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #52 © University of California. All rights reserved. Manual Softcopy

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #53 © University of California. All rights reserved. UNETRANS

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #55 © University of California. All rights reserved. The Future  ITS lane departure warning autonomous control and platooning  Sub-decimeter accuracy  Millions of sensors

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #56 © University of California. All rights reserved. Tomorrow’s Centerlines Car navigation system automatically updates local map while you gas up

N C R S T RSPA/FDOT #57 © University of California. All rights reserved. Conclusions  No single solution to all requirements  Showing promise Remote sensing GPS Photogrammetry  Attribution, conflation, modeling … and data exchange

1