March 22, 2011Mike Hildreth – ALCPG 2011, Beam Instrumentation Energy Spectrometer R&D; Plans for End Station A Test Beams Mike Hildreth University of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LCABD WP 4.2 Review, 24 th September Mark Slater Motivation Final Results from 2006 Upgrades for 2007 Conclusions The Collaboration LCABD WP 4.2.
Advertisements

Energy spectrometer cavity BPM Royal Holloway, University of London S. Boogert, G. Boorman University of Cambridge M. Slater, M. Thomson & D. Ward University.
BPM Energy spectrometry, status & future plans at ESA in SLAC Bino Maiheu University College London Yerevan Collaboration Meeting October 2006 Yerevan.
Progress report for the energy spectrometer test experiment at ESA at SLAC Bino Maiheu on behalf of the T474/T491 collaboration LCWS 2007, DESY Hamburg.
Fast and Precise Beam Energy Measurement at the International Linear Collider Michele Viti.
Friday 28 th April Review of the aims and recommendations from the workshop L. Rinolfi.
ILC Accelerator School Kyungpook National University
Chris Tennant Jefferson Laboratory March 15, 2013 “Workshop to Explore Physics Opportunities with Intense, Polarized Electron Beams up to 300 MeV”
October 1, 2009Mike Hildreth – ALCPG09 Energy Spectrometer R&D Progress and Plans Mike Hildreth University of Notre Dame representing SLAC T-474/491 &
Beam position monitors LCABD Plenary meeting Bristol, 24th March 2009 A. Aryshev, S. T. Boogert, G. Boorman, S. Molloy, N. Joshi JAI at Royal Holloway.
Welcome! Mauro Pivi SLAC, ESTB Workshop March 2011, SLAC.
Paul Emma LCLS FAC April 16, Initial Experience with Injector Commissioning P. Emma, et al. Facilities Advisory Committee.
P. Emma, SLACLCLS FAC Meeting - April 29, 2004 Linac Physics, Diagnostics, and Commissioning Strategy P. Emma LCLS FAC Meeting April 29, 2004 LCLS.
M. Woods (SLAC) BI Tests for the Linear Collider Turning the LOI into a Proposal SLAC ALCPG Meeting Jan. 9, 2004 M. Woods, SLAC LC-LEP Beam Tests at SLAC.
1 June 7, 2006M. Woods, SLAC Collimator design, wakefields (T-480) BPM energy spectrometer.
Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator Center LCLS Undulator Alignment.
March 17, 2011Mike Hildreth – SLAC ESA Testbeam Workshop Energy Spectrometer Tests at End Station A Mike Hildreth University of Notre Dame SLAC, March.
K. Moffeit 6 Jan 2005 WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at the International Linear Collider SLAC January 6-8, 2005 Polarimetry at the ILC Design issues.
E. Bong, SLACLCLS FAC Meeting - April 29, 2004 Linac Overview E. Bong LCLS FAC Meeting April 29, 2004 LCLS.
20 March 2005Ken Moffeit LCWS1 Highlights from the MDI workshop Spin Rotation System for 2 IR’s Downstream polarimetry Ken Moffeit.
IPBPM piezo-mover system and plans for in situ monitoring of calibration and stability Current status and plan for ATF2 Philip Bambade Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Stability Workshop April , 2007 NSLS-II Electrical Systems G. Ganetis NSLS-II Electrical Systems NSLS-II.
Analysis of ATF EXT/FF Orbit Jitter and extrapolation to IP (Data of ) ATF2 Project Meeting K. Kubo.
LCLS-II Transverse Tolerances Tor Raubenheimer May 29, 2013.
M. Woods (SLAC) Beam Diagnostics for test facilities of i)  ii) polarized e+ source January 9 –11, 2002.
AS Diagnostic Collaboration Mark Boland
Alignment and Beam Stability
Ground Motion + Vibration Transfer Function for Final QD0/SD0 Cryomodule System at ILC Glen White, SLAC ALCPG11, Eugene March 21, 2011.
1 July 19, 2006M. Woods, SLAC (S. Boogert, RHUL) Collimator design, wakefields (T-480) BPM.
12/12/04 1 Stewart Boogert (UCL) Second Mini-workshop Nano project at ATF UK plans for Energy spectrometer studies University College London Stewart Boogert.
___________________ Jürgen Schreiber, ECFA/DESY LC workshop, Amsterdam, April 1-4, 2003 BEAM ENERGY SPECTROMETER DESY – Dubna – TU Berlin Machine physicists,
WP9 : Cavity BPM spectrometry Royal Holloway S. Boogert & G. Boorman University College London D. Attree, A. Lyapin, B. Maiheu & M. Wing Cambridge University.
January 8, 2005Mike Hildreth – ILC-MDI Workshop A BPM-Based Energy Spectrometer Technical Considerations & Plans for the End Station A Test Beam Mike Hildreth.
Polarimetry at the LC Source Which type of polarimetry, at which energies for LC ? Sabine Riemann (DESY), LEPOL Group International Workshop on Linear.
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
BPM-Based Energy Spectrometer Contributors: A. Lyapin, B. Maiheu, F. Gournaris, D. Attree, M. Wing, D. Miller University College London (UCL) M. Slater,
Energy Spectrometer for the ILC Alexey Lyapin University College London.
ILC BDS Static Beam-Based Alignment and Tuning Glen White SLAC 1.Aims. 2.Error parameters and other assumptions. 3.Overview of alignment and tuning procedure.
Development of a Low-latency, High-precision, Intra-train Beam Feedback System Based on Cavity Beam Position Monitors N. Blaskovic Kraljevic, D. R. Bett,
The T506 Experiment: Electromagnetically-Induced Radiation Damage to Solid-State Sensors Test Facilities Users Workshop SLAC, September Bruce Schumm.
1 Plan and Opportunities for Migration and Integration of the Photoinjector into New Muon Lab Mike Church AAC Review - 12/5/06.
The End Station Test Beam (ESTB) at SLAC Carsten Hast For the everlasting never giving up SLAC Test Beam Gang R. Erickson, T. Fieguth, C. Hast, J. Jaros,
1 Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility M. Palmer & D.Rubin November 8, 2005.
A Short History of Nearly Everything Michele Viti.
Initial Results from the SLAC ESTB T-506 Irradiation Study International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders University of Tokyo, November 2013 Bruce.
The stabilisation of the final focus (StaFF) system Sun 12 th March 2006 MDI – LCWS06 at I I Sc Bangalore David Urner, Paul Coe, Armin Reichold.
1 Franz-Josef Decker 1 Multi-Bunch Operation for LCLS Franz-Josef Decker March 17, Definitions and goals multi-bunch within.
SABER, “maybe” a new facility in the South Arc (South Arc Beam Experimental Region) End Station A (ESA) in 2007 ILC Test Beams in 2008 Test Beams beyond.
July 15, 2009 Interferometer Installation Report Mike Hildreth, Kurt Jung, Mickey McDonald Université de Notre Dame du Lac.
IR/Backgrounds & Beam Instrumentation Summary Tom Markiewicz/SLAC ALCPG’09, UNM, Albuquerque 3 October 2009 Six Sessions, 20 talks Instrumentation: –WAB.
Kiyoshi Kubo Electron beam in undulators of e+ source - Emittance and orbit angle with quad misalignment and corrections - Effect of beam pipe.
SLAC ESA T-474 ILC BPM energy spectrometer prototype Bino Maiheu University College London on behalf of T-474 Vancouver Linear Collider.
Simulations - Beam dynamics in low emittance transport (LET: From the exit of Damping Ring) K. Kubo
ATF status M. Ross October 15, 2004 The ATF is the largest test facility built exclusively for linear collider RD –Utility not reduced by the selection.
May 31, 2005Mike Hildreth – ATF 2005 Energy Spectrometry and ATF Components of the nano-BPM Test Program and Plans for Future Tests Mike Hildreth University.
Tuning Techniques And Operator Diagnostics for FACET at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Chris Melton SLAC Accelerator Operations.
IoP HEPP/APP annual meeting 2010 Feedback on Nanosecond Timescales: maintaining luminosity at future linear colliders Ben Constance John Adams Institute,
The T506 Experiment: Electromagnetically-induced Radiation Damage to Solid-State Sensors Test Facilities Users Workshop SLAC, September Bruce Schumm.
Instrumentation at ATF / TTF Accelerator Test Facility (KEK) Tesla Test Facility – FLASH (DESY) ESA / LCLS (SLAC) Marc Ross, SLAC.
Proposal for the End Station Test Beam (ESTB) at SLAC John Jaros ALCPG09 Albuquerque September 30, 2009.
1 June 7, 2006M. Woods, SLAC Collimator design, wakefields (T-480) BPM energy spectrometer.
ESLS Workshop Nov 2015 MAX IV 3 GeV Ring Commissioning Pedro F. Tavares & Åke Andersson, on behalf of the whole MAX IV team.
LCABD WP 4.2 – Spectrometer and BPM Studies
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
IP Beam Instrumentation R&D and Testbeams for the ILC
Testbeam plans for LEP instrumentation
Beam Optics Set-Up at SLAC End Station A
End Station Test Beam (ESTB) at SLAC
Linac/BC1 Commissioning P
Linac Physics, Diagnostics, and Commissioning Strategy P
Presentation transcript:

March 22, 2011Mike Hildreth – ALCPG 2011, Beam Instrumentation Energy Spectrometer R&D; Plans for End Station A Test Beams Mike Hildreth University of Notre Dame ALCPG, March 22, 2011

March 22, 2011Mike Hildreth – ALCPG 2011, Beam Instrumentation Precision Beam Measurements Precision Physics Measurements require precise determination of beam parameters – How well do we have to do? Luminosity, Differential Luminosity Spectrum: –Total cross sections:  L/L ~ 0.1% –Lineshape scans (Giga-Z)  L/L ~ 0.02% –Threshold scans (e.g., m top )  L/L ~ 1%, but additional constraints: dL/dE core to 0.1%, tails to ~1% Energy: –top, higgs masses<100 ppm –W mass with threshold scan50 ppm (4 MeV) –A LR with Giga-Z200 ppm (comparable to 0.25% Pol) 50 ppm (if  P/P ~ 0.1%) Polarization: –Standard Model Asymmetries  P/P < 0.25% –A LR with Giga-Z  P/P < 0.1%

March 22, 2011Mike Hildreth – ALCPG 2011, Beam Instrumentation Energy Measurements A few words of Motivation... –Energy Calibration needs for Physics at a future Linear Collider will be similar to what we had at LEPII: Threshold Scans : Kinematic Fits:

March 22, 2011Mike Hildreth – ALCPG 2011, Beam Instrumentation Prototypical Energy Spectrometers “LEP-Type”: BPM based, bend angle measurement “SLC-Type”: SR stripe based, bend angle measurement BPMs p  “upstream”  “downstream” Aim for Energy Measurement

March 22, 2011Mike Hildreth – ALCPG 2011, Beam Instrumentation e.g.: “ILC” Upstream Energy Spectrometer Pure “Displacement” Strategy: Prototype Design –ILC design: total length of chicane = 54.4 m –dispersion at center = 5mm (~equal to beam displacement) so, 0.5  m BPM resolution gives 1x10 -4 measurement (per pulse) –CLIC Chicane requires 100nm resolution/stability –Designs incorporated into Accelerator Lattices Incoming Beam Central BPMs measure offset, offset difference between ±B (cancel some systematic errors) Outer BPMs required to constrain beam trajectory all magnets run to ±B 5 mm better resolution would allow intra-train bunch energy measurements M. Hildreth (Notre Dame), SLAC

March 22, 2011Mike Hildreth – ALCPG 2011, Beam Instrumentation History: ESA Test Beam Experiments 1.BPM Energy Spectrometer (T-474/491) PIs: M. Hildreth, Notre Dame, S. Boogert, Royal Holloway, Y. Kolomensky, Berkeley/LBNL Institutions: Cambridge, DESY, Dubna, Royal Holloway, Notre Dame, UCL, Berkeley, SLAC –Goals: Demonstrate mechanical and electrical stability at 100-nm level Perform energy measurement in 4-magnet chicane Develop calibration techniques, operational procedures –multiple BPM triplets to test overall stability, new BPM designs 2.Synchrotron stripe diagnostics (T-475) PI: E. Torrence, Oregon Institutions: Oregon, SLAC –Goals: test chicane scheme with wiggler magnet characterize detector (quartz fiber / other) performance and capabilities Overall Goal: perform cross-check of two energy measurements at the ~10 -4 level

March 22, 2011Mike Hildreth – ALCPG 2011, Beam Instrumentation T474 (T491), T475: Energy Spectrometers BPM-based and Synchrotron-Stripe Spectrometers can be evaluated in a common four-magnet chicane Dipole BPMs Wiggler Synchrotron Stripe Detector

March 22, 2011Mike Hildreth – ALCPG 2011, Beam Instrumentation FY07 Configuration Ran in 2006 with no dipole chicane Runs in March, July 2007 with chicane Simultaneous test of BPM and Synchrotron Stripe Spectrometers –first beam tests for Synchrotron Detector –compare measured energy, energy jitter at ppm level –tests of BPM movers –more elaborate mechanical stability monitoring Dipoles Wiggler BPMs Interf. Station Straightness Monitor

March 22, 2011Mike Hildreth – ALCPG 2011, Beam Instrumentation Energy Measurement with chicane (2007) Beam energy computed from spectrometer  Bdl and BPM offset measurement vs. time –energy variation from linac energy scan –large pulse-to-pulse jitter Residual between predicted and measured BPM position at chicane center gives a value  E ~16 MeV (  E/E ~ 5.5×10 -4 ) need higher-precision test A. Lyapin et al., “Results from a Prototype Chicane-Based Energy Spectrometer for a Linear Collider”, JINST 6 (2011) P02002.

March 22, 2011Mike Hildreth – ALCPG 2011, Beam Instrumentation Mechanical Stability Stability requirements determined by overall BPM resolution needed Mechanical support structure must be designed to limit vibration, and with minimal thermal expansion properties –Custom temperature regulation needed... Stability must be monitored: Interferometry-based system Zygo 4004 Measurement System –Design Specs: 0.3 nm single-bit resolution at up to 5 m/s velocity single measurement ~ 7nm BPM Local motion measurement Interferometer heads Long Baseline Monitoring

ATF2 Installation As of October 2010: three interferometers monitoring three BPMs March 22, 2011Mike Hildreth – ALCPG 2011, Beam Instrumentation QD10BQD10AQM11QM12QM13QM14 BPM BPM MFB2 Optical Path optical path uses clearance between mover rollers underneath quads BPMs MFB2 and QD10B are part of vertical steering feedback for beam stability at ATF2 IP. Need resolution  stability of ~ 50nm

Results from ATF2 March 22, 2011Mike Hildreth – ALCPG 2011, Beam Instrumentation data acquisition at 1 kHz vibration data on BPM QD10B. rms = 35nm 36-hour drift on BPM QD10B. scale is nm. one micron Time (sec) interferometer retroreflector CCD camera QD10B

Results from ATF2 March 22, 2011Mike Hildreth – ALCPG 2011, Beam Instrumentation 50 micron FFTB mover calibration step “Relaxation” of mechanical position of BPM MFB2 after calibration move, measured by interferometer No corresponding drift seen simultaneously on other BPM support with no mover motion analysis ongoing to trace relative beam/BPM motion to prove that this is a physical movement Time (sec) “Features” of FFTB mover stability: BPM MFB2 ZYGO MFB2 position (nm) position (  m) position (nm) 500nm (other studies ongoing: CCD camera stability, interferometer triplet stability/resolution, etc.)

End Station A Plans/Schedule News from ESTB (End Station Test Beam) Workshop at SLAC, March 17, 2011 –many participants: global interest in high-purity electron test beam March 22, 2011Mike Hildreth – ALCPG 2011, Beam Instrumentation 0.25 nC ParametersBSYESA Energy13.6 GeV Repetition Rate5 Hz Charge per pulse0.25 nC Energy spread,  E  /E 0.058% Bunch length rms 10  m280  m Emittance rms (  x  y ) (1.2, 0.7) m-rad(4, 1) m-rad Spot size at waist (  x,y  - < 10  m Drift Space available for experimental apparatus -60 m Transverse space available for experimental apparatus -5 x 5 m M. Pivi, SLAC

End Station A Plans/Schedule 4 new kicker magnets including power supplies and modulators and vacuum chambers are designed and components are being ordered and manufactured Build new PPS system and install new beam dump March 22, 2011Mike Hildreth – ALCPG 2011, Beam Instrumentation

End Station A Plans/Schedule The complete 4 kickers system will not be ready until the end-of- summer Short-term solution, installed ~now –1 Kicker magnet with stainless steel chamber –Beryllium target –System designed for 60 Hz, might work at 120 Hz –Capacity: 4 GeV full intensity LCLS beam into ESA GeV primary beam into target and generate secondary e- beam to ESA, 0.1/pulse to 10 9 /pulse. By November 2011: Installation of the full 4 kicker magnet system to direct the LCLS beam in ESA. –Full 14 GeV LCLS beam into ESA –Production of secondary electron beam down to 1 e- / pulse. –Future (unfunded) option: secondary hadron beams March 22, 2011Mike Hildreth – ALCPG 2011, Beam Instrumentation

End Station A Plans/Schedule Critical (for Spectrometers and other tests): need precision BPMs –previous BPM sets no longer available –discussion with LCLS-II, other international sources ongoing LCLS-II and Korean FEL both need new precision BPMs maybe some joint venture that involves loaning BPMs to ESA for testing and commissioning before they are needed for light sources –would provide uniform high-precision installation, which would be very beneficial for understanding the analyses –time-early would be end of 2012 March 22, 2011Mike Hildreth – ALCPG 2011, Beam Instrumentation

Summary Termination of ESA program in 2008 limited the current level of precision for spectrometer testing to  E/E ~ 5.5×10 -4 –factor 5 larger than what is needed –will need to revitalize the End Station setup to improve on this ATF2 installation exploring stability issues at the 100nm level –50nm BPM resolution plus 7nm interferometer resolution plus ~100nm long-range stability monitoring is a powerful system to constrain mechanical motion –analysis needed! ESA Returns! –BPMs needed –probably 2012 before spectrometer tests can be mounted March 22, 2011Mike Hildreth – ALCPG 2011, Beam Instrumentation

March 22, 2011Mike Hildreth – ALCPG 2011, Beam Instrumentation Interferometer Data from End Station Vibrations with amplitudes close to or exceeding expected BPM resolution seen on support girder Synchronous data acquisition allows interferometer measurement of BPM position to be subtracted in later data analysis Resolution of central BPM improved by ~700nm (added in quadrature) after vibration subtraction BPM support girder clearly needs to be redesigned if we want to do any sort of stability testing nm condense

March 22, 2011Mike Hildreth – ALCPG 2011, Beam Instrumentation BPM Performance and Stability (2006)  ~ 350nm  ~ 700nm Stability of predicted position 100nm Residual  m

March 22, 2011Mike Hildreth – ALCPG 2011, Beam Instrumentation Upstream Energy Spectrometer Design Details: –Constrained by allowed emittance growth from Synchrotron Radiation hard bending at points of large dispersion gives large emittance growth  Any bend magnets inside chicane need to be “soft” –Constrained by available real estate in Beam Delivery Syst, overall size Relative positions of components need to be monitored –limits total size to ~50 m These constraints determine needed BPM resolution/stability –overall design for BPM resolution of ~0.5  m –can always average over many pulses if things are stable –if we do much better, bunch-by-bunch diagnostics possible –Other issues drive systematic errors, diagnostics  Complicated dependence on design parameters, options –Must be robust, invisible to luminosity M. Hildreth (Notre Dame), SLAC, Cambridge, UCL, Royal Holloway, LBNL/Berkeley, DESY-Zeuthen, Dubna

March 22, 2011Mike Hildreth – ALCPG 2011, Beam Instrumentation Interferometer Installation July 2006 March 2007

March 22, 2011Mike Hildreth – ALCPG 2011, Beam Instrumentation BPMs and Electronics Linac rf cavity BPM ILC Linac BPM SLAC Linac BPMs form main component of instrumentation –new electronics developed by Y. Kolomensky (Berkeley/LBNL)(LCRD Accelerator R&D) Also testing prototype ILC Linac BPMs developed at SLAC (C. Adolphsen) New BPMs, optimized for energy spectrometer, designed at University College London in collaboration with BPM experts at SLAC and KEK –custom electronics –mover system –July 2007

March 22, 2011Mike Hildreth – ALCPG 2011, Beam Instrumentation Beamline Components Dipoles: Measured in SLAC Magnet Lab prior to installation (SLAC/Dubna/Zeuthen) –RMS Reproducity of field integral: 60ppm –RMS Agreement across working points: 100ppm –Temperature coefficient: 5.7x10 -5 /°C –Excellent agreement between measured and simulated magnet properties –Also: measurements made of residual magnetic fields along entire beamline (  Bdl ~ 3 Gm) Wiggler refurbished – now installed

March 22, 2011Mike Hildreth – ALCPG 2011, Beam Instrumentation Interferometer Installations July 2006 March 2007 single BPM stationlink two BPM stations