How can we relieve congestion in the I-95 corridor? I-95 Congestion Relief Study.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
I-95 HOT/HOV Lanes Project Fairfax County TAC August 16, 2011.
Advertisements

General Update March Background As the region grows, increased travel demand on our aging Metro Highway System will continue to create additional.
Getting Started with Congestion Pricing A Workshop for Local Partners Federal Highway Administration Office of Operations.
GIS and Transportation Planning
Route 17 Corridor Study Public Workshop II – November 29, 2012 Orange / Sullivan County 1.
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
CFEE Conference March 23 rd, 2007 By: Jim Madaffer State & Local Authority What We Have, and What We Need.
Transportation Data Palooza Washington, DC May 9, 2013 Steve Mortensen Federal Transit Administration Data for Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Analysis,
1 Interstate 405 Update. 2 Presentation Overview  Share public perceptions and provide information  Answer frequently asked questions related to express.
GE541 Economic Geography of Transport October 30th.
SR520 Urban Partnership Project 2008 ITS Washington Annual Meeting November 12th, 2008 – Seattle Jennifer Charlebois, P.E. Tolling and Systems Project.
Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration Department of Transportation Enabling Congestion Pricing in the.
Externalities on highways Today: We apply externalities to a real-life example.
Traffic Incident Management – a Strategic Focus Inspector Peter Baird National Adviser: Policy and Legislation: Road Policing.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lectures 8: The Performance and Condition of Transit in the United States.
Versatile Applications of EMME/2 and ENIF: Seattle Experience Madhavi Sanakkayala Heather Purdy & Sujay Davuluri Parsons Brinckerhoff, Seattle.
Less Stop More Go EXPRESS LANES Travel Choices and Strategies to Relieve Congestion Presentation to FDOT’s Annual ITS Working Group Meeting March 2008.
Jeffrey F. Paniati Executive Director Federal Highway Administration US Department of Transportation Washington, DC Reducing Congestion Tools of.
Program Update Baltimore MPO November 25, Internal Draft AGENDA  Program Overview  Alternatives Development  Stakeholder and Public Outreach.
Paul Roberts – TIF Technical Manager Presentation to the TPS – 3 June 2009.
Tolling and Congestion Pricing Patrick DeCorla-Souza Office of Innovative Program Delivery Federal Highway Administration Presentation to Transportation.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
May 7, 2013 Yagnesh Jarmarwala Phani Jammalamadaka Michael Copeland Maneesh Mahlawat 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
National Road Pricing Conference June 4, 2010 Jennifer Tsien, PBS&J Angela Jacobs, Federal Highway Administration.
National Road Pricing Conference June 4, 2010 Mark Burris, Texas Transportation Institute Jessie Yung, Federal Highway Administration.
Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Transportation Policy Board Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
Multimodal Corridor System Management – Incorporating Analysis of Transit, Demand Management Programs and Operational Strategies Presented by Bill Loudon,
Metrobus 30s Line Study Improving Your Customer’s Transit Experience Virginia Transit Association May 20,
Pat Bursaw, Minnesota DOT International Partnership Meeting Washington D.C. January 26, 2012.
 City of Hamilton – Transportation Sustainable Mobility Summit – October 27, 2013.
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
Urban Partnership Agreement Summary August 27, 2007.
Portland North Small Starts Alternatives Analysis Coordination Meeting June 16, 2009.
Urban Road Pricing: US DOT Congestion Initiative and Urban Partnerships 14 th World Congress on ITS IBEC Special Session October 10, 2007 Beijing Exhibition.
Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration US Department of Transportation Looking Forward to a High Performance.
North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department Summary Presentation January 2004 MOBILITY 2025: THE METROPOLITAN.
Project Information Brief project description Cairo, Egypt Bus Rapid Transit System with potential capacity of 45,000 people per person per direction Phase.
Imagine the Possibilities… Vision from the 2002 Rail Plan.
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
TRB Transportation Applications Conference Congestion-Free Freeways US Department of Transportation Establishing a Metropolitan.
Managed Lanes CE 550: Advanced Highway Design Damion Pregitzer.
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Overview of Metro’s Transportation Program Pam O’Connor Metro Chair July 25, 2007.
Creating the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan. Today’s Presentation Now Developing the Next RTP  Very Early Stages of Development  Website: 2040Plan.org.
3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC
US DOT Congestion Initiative Urban Partnership Agreements I-95 Corridor Coalition EPS Summit September 19, 2007 Boston, Massachusetts Jeffrey F. Paniati.
Rebecca Long November 9, Why is MTC interested in parking policies? 1.Land Use Impacts 2.Transportation Impacts 3.Other Regional Impacts.
SAFETEA-LU System Management and Operations Key Provisions Jeff Lindley Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
Weighing the Scenarios: The Costs and Benefits of Future Transit Service Produced for MTDB by The Mission Group © 2000 by The Mission Group. 1 Dave Schumacher.
Phase 2: Data Collection Findings and Future Steps.
US DOT Congestion Initiative Urban Partnership Agreements NTOC Summer Meeting September 7, 2007 Washington, DC Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator,
Review of the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) 2007 Urban Mobility Report By Ronald F. Kirby Daivamani Sivasailam TPB Technical Committee October 5,
Externalities on highways Today: We apply externalities to a real-life example.
TPB CLRP Aspirations Scenario 2012 CLRP and Version 2.3 Travel Forecasting Model Update Initial Results Ron Kirby Department of Transportation Planning.
Getting & Using Transit Data John Semmens Laissez Faire Institute & Arizona Transportation Institute.
Regional Transportation Council Mobility Plan Workshop North Central Texas Council of Governments November 12, 2015.
I-680 Value Pricing: A HOT Lane Demonstration Project of “Smart Carpool Lanes” Sponsor: Alameda County Congestion Management Agency 2003 Sponsor: Alameda.
Briefing for Transportation Finance Panel Nov 23, 2015 Economic Analysis Reports: 1.I-84 Viaduct in Hartford 2.I-84/Rt8 Mixmaster in Waterbury 3.New Haven.
The Current State-of-the-Practice in Modeling Road Pricing Bruce D. Spear Federal Highway Administration.
Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST Act) Association of MPOs 444 N Capitol St., NW Suite345 Washington, DC
The London Congestion Charge Past, present and future… Lauren Sager Weinstein Chief of Staff, Finance and Planning Transport for London.
IH-10 Managed Lanes Project: A “Public-Public” Partnership ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Presented at the Value Pricing Conference.
Garden State Parkway HOT Lanes By Matt Lawson October 14, 2010.
SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE MEASURES, RANKING AND PRIORITIZATION CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PLANS INCORPORATION INTO STIP & TIP STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION MONITOR.
North American Motorcoach Travel: A Green & Safe Alternative 5 th European Bus & Coach Forum International Road Union Kortrijk Xpo, Belgium October 2007.
ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION AND CONGESTION MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES DEPLOYMENT (ATCMTD) PROGRAM 1 Bob Arnold, Director Office of Transportation Management,
Public Transit & Transportation Network Companies
Integrating Transit and Highway Solutions In High Volume Corridors
“efficient movement of goods across the entire state of Oregon”
NVCOG Regional Transportation
Presentation transcript:

How can we relieve congestion in the I-95 corridor? I-95 Congestion Relief Study

CT Congestion Relief Study DOT conducting studies of CT’s 2 most congested corridors: I-95 corridor from NY to New Haven I-84 in Hartford Metropolitan Area Both studies: Funded with special federal grants –Value Pricing Pilot Program Will explore a variety of travel options to help provide congestion relief Will evaluate electronic tolling & pricing –As ‘one’ component of a broader strategy to reduce congestion 2

CT Congestion Relief Forums Purpose: to learn what congestion relief & congestion pricing methods have worked in other states Invited out-of-state panelists have experience with successful practices in other areas Opportunity: learn from others Hear about methods used & lessons learned Ask: what might work in Connecticut? 3

Three-hour forums tailored to each study area I-95 forum (NY- New Haven corridor) I-84 forum (Hartford area) Agenda Overview: problem & study Panel 1: out-of-state professionals & community leaders Panel 2: local panelists o bring local perspectives to the discussion Open session: questions from the audience CT Congestion Relief Forums: Format 4

Overview of I-95 Congestion Relief Study 5

New Jersey New York Connecticut Long Island Sound New Haven Bridgeport Stamford Danbury Waterbury Hudson River I-95 Merritt Pkwy. Metro North I Meriden 7 15 I-95 Corridor: New York/New Haven New Canaan also monitor impacts on Route 1 & I-84

I-95 is CT’s most congested corridor – 20-mile traffic jams common occurrence – 3-4 hours in duration Problem continues to get worse – increased by 19% between 2001 & Costly for residents & businesses – 41 million hours: total time of all people delayed in traffic in 2011 – $860 million: cost to residents & businesses Annual Urban Mobility Report, Texas Transportation Institute, 2011 data Congestion is a Serious Problem in Our Most Important Economic Corridor 7

8 Southbound A.M. Bridgeport – Stamford Area 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 GreenwichStamford New HavenOrangeWest HavenMilfordStratfordBridgeportFairfieldWestportNorwalkDarien starts at 6:30 in Bridgeport expands towards Stamford 20 miles long at peak Travel speed data illustrates extent & duration of the problem Morning congestion is severe & focused in Bridgeport – Stamford section

9 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 Greenwich Stamford New HavenOrangeWest HavenMilfordStratfordBridgeportFairfieldWestportNorwalkDarien Duration = 4+ hours 6:30 – 10:30 am Southbound A.M. Bridgeport – Stamford area Morning congestion can last over 4 hours Travel speed data illustrates extent & duration of the problem

3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 GreenwichStamford New HavenOrangeWest HavenMilfordStratfordBridgeportFairfieldWestportNorwalkDarien 20+ miles long at peak Northbound P.M. period Bridgeport – Stamford area 10 Duration = 4+ hours 3:00 – 7:00 pm Travel speed data illustrates extent & duration of the problem Afternoon congestion is just as severe

electronic tolling & congestion pricing transportation improvements o highway improvements o rail & bus improvements expectation: need combination o No single method is sufficient o Combination of methods will be required to achieve congestion relief Will explore a variety of Congestion Relief Methods 11

What this is not: It is not a change in DOT’s commitment to transit o Transit is central to DOT’s strategy for corridor o Transit is essential for economic growth o Transit options & impacts will be part of study o DOT’s investments reflect its commitment $3.2 Billion in last decade $1 Billion in next 5 years 12

13 I-95 Value Pricing Study Overview Public involvement & information (special importance) – Engage residents, businesses, local officials, legislators in study – Meetings, focus groups, forums, surveys, website Collect data – Traffic counts, travel time data, travel patterns, – Surveys: including stated preference survey Develop special technical analysis tools – Travel demand models, traffic simulation models, transit model Identify alternatives – Toll/pricing options, highway improvements, transit improvements Test & evaluate alternatives – Level of congestion relief – Shifts to transit (& what is needed to accommodate new riders) – Diversions alternate routes – Cost to build, maintain, operate – Revenue potential

What is Electronic Tolling? vastly different from the old manned toll booths used in the past Tolling in CT circa 1980 Toll booths created traffic problems Congestion Accidents Air quality problems 14

New Electronic Methods do not create traffic problems no booths no stopping no need to slow down −no traffic delays −no safety problems Electronic sensors mounted overhead on special gantries – EZ Pass readers – Cameras for video tolling for drivers without EZ Pass 15

16 Congestion Pricing is a congestion relief method that works by managing demand during peak traffic periods Congestion pricing uses higher toll rates during peak periods to encourage drivers to: shift to less congested times shift to less congested routes shift to transit shift to other lanes −key factor for express toll lanes 16 Congestion pricing can provide sustainable relief by managing peak use even as travel demand grows demand

Most popular tolling method for new projects Gives drivers a choice pay a toll & bypass congestion most drivers value having a choice −across all income levels Congestion relief proven & effective tool for congestion management No tolls - free No toll - free Toll required general purpose lanes express toll lanes general purpose lanes Express Toll Lanes: one form of congestion pricing 17

18 Existing and Planned Managed Lanes

19 Miami: successful & effective express lane project ( Debora Rivera & Mayor Gilbert) 19

20 Shoulder HOV Lane General Purpose Lanes 12’12’ Lanes13’ 85’ BEFORE Shoulder Express Lanes General Purpose Lanes 10’ 8’ 1’ AFTER 11’ Lanes 85’ Shoulder 20 Key points about Miami’s project large reduction in congestion additional lane built largely within existing footprint of I-95

Transit plays a vital role in corridor & must be part of the solution What can be done to enhance its role? Rail service How will I-95 tolls affect rail ridership? How to address parking problems? How to serve growing # of ‘intrastate’ trips? Bus service What bus service improvements are needed? New opportunities: express toll lanes …. 21

Successful in other cities o Buses avoid congestion on highway Fast & reliable service Attract more riders o Flexible routing off the highway Serve wider market Serve more commuter lots Express Toll Lanes: present new opportunities 22

23 Concluding remarks Multimodal study assessing a variety of congestion relief options: highway, transit, & pricing o Pricing can provide sustainable relief It will assess whether pricing can help manage congestion in I-95 corridor Will be completed in early 2015