P-20 Longitudinal Data Systems What is the information we need, how do we get it, what do we do with it? Elizabeth Laird & Helene Stebbins.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Whats a P20, and why would I want one? Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Margaret Merlyn Ropp, Ph.D. Director.
Advertisements

ARRA Proposal Communications Campaign. Early Education and Care System Components Informed Families and Public (FS, C, I) Finance (Q, FS, WF, I) EEC Strategic.
ARRA Proposal Communications Campaign. Early Education and Care System Components Informed Families and Public (FS, C, I) Finance (Q, FS, WF, I) EEC Strategic.
GEAR UP Idaho  GEAR UP Idaho is a federal grant program that provides comprehensive, early intervention college access programming to selected Idaho.
@EdDataCampaign Harnessing the Power of Data: Building Coordinated, Longitudinal Early Care and Education Data Systems that Link with K-12 May 9, 2012.
A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE SCHOOL READINESS:. WHERE DID WE START? 1999 : KSDE began working with Kansas Action for Children to define School Readiness 2000:
Individualized Learning Plans A Study to Identify and Promote Promising Practices.
A Systemic Approach February, Two important changes in the Perkins Act of 2006 A requirement for the establishment of Programs of Study A new approach.
Using Data to Improve Student Achievement: November 17 th, 2011 A Conversation with members of the Montana Education and Local Government Interim Committee.
> Tom Corbett, Governor Ronald Tomalis, Secretary of Education | Beverly Mackereth, Acting Secretary of Public Welfare Early Learning in Pennsylvania Today.
Departments of Education and Public Welfare Office of Child Development and Early Learning Executive Budget
Using Strengthening Families to Meet the Goals of Race to the Top Early Learning Challenge.
Building and Using Coordinated State ECE Data Systems: Inaugural State Analysis Elizabeth Laird July 26, 2011.
Ready to Grow… Ready to Learn… Ready to Succeed Kentucky’s Plan for Kindergarten Readiness October 2012.
Building & Using State Early Childhood Data Systems Measuring Child & Family Outcomes Conference July 30,2010 Tom Schultz –
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Head Start National Research Conference Washington, DC July 9, 2014 Collaboration through Information.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Collaboration through Information Sharing: Building Early Childhood Integrated Data Systems (ECIDS) Head.
EEC’s Parental Consent Form Authorization to Collect and Use Child Data January 31, 2013 and February 1,
Speakers Dr. Blanca Enriquez, Director, Office of Head Start
Results of Pennsylvania’s early learning programs,
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
The Best First Step: How CDA Council Partnerships Transform Programs How Kentucky’s Professional Development Systems Support Improved Child Outcomes Terry.
Using Longitudinal Data to Improve Student Achievement US Chamber of Commerce Institute Aimee Rogstad Guidera February 23, 2010.
EEC Board Policy and Research Committee Meeting April 7, 2014 Race to the Top Early Learning Challenge Grant (RTT-ELC)
The Early Learning Challenge Fund: Metrics and Data Danielle Ewen February 22, 2010.
United Way of Greater Toledo - Framework for Education Priority community issue: Education – Prepare children to enter and graduate from school.
FROM DATA TO OUTCOMES How Standards and Measures Drive Quality 3/9/121FROM DATA TO OUTCOMES | NACCRRA Policy Symposium.
Leveraging Race to the Top to Maximize the Use of Data To Ensure College & Career Readiness Aimee R. Guidera Achieve ADP September 10, 2009.
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
Using Data to Improve Student Achievement Aimee R. Guidera Director, Data Quality Campaign National Center for Education Accountability April 23, 2007.
1 EARLY CHILDHOOD DATA SYSTEMS: ESTABLISHING A POLICY AND LEGISLATIVE CONTEXT October 2011.
States’ Plans for ECE Data Systems: Trends & Opportunities in RTTT-ELC October 28, 2012 Child & Families Outcomes Conference Albert Wat National Governors.
Bright from the Start: Georgia Department of Early Care and Learning
THE WISCONSIN EARLY CHILDHOOD LONGITUDINAL DATA SYSTEM (WI EC-LDS) PROJECT Briefing for Department of Children and Families December 12, 2011.
A collaborative venture among state agencies, the Governor’s Office, and state and local organizations.
GSC – Saginaw County Update P-20 Efforts: “Metrics, Dashboards and Accountability” March 17, 2011.
Maryland Public Schools: #1 in the Nation AGAIN in 2012 Kindergarten Entry Assessment as the Fulcrum of the Birth-Grade 3 Continuum NGA – Policy Institute.
Hans P. L’Orange State Higher Education Executive Officers October 20, 2009.
@EdDataCampaign Mining the Data: What States Have and Where to Find It February 7, 2012 Elizabeth Laird Director, Communications and External Affairs Data.
OCTEO October 24, Ohio Confederation of Teacher Education Organizations Facing the Challenges of Change in Teacher Education Highly Skilled Early.
National Consortium On Deaf-Blindness Families Technical Assistance Information Services and Dissemination Personnel Training State Projects.
Moving Beyond Compliance: Four Ways States Can Support Districts and Local Data Use 2012 MIS Conference Dan Domagala, Colorado Department of Education.
National Governors Association Policy Academy Building a Foundation for Student Success: State Strategies to Improve Learning Outcomes from Early Childhood.
NAZ as a Promise Neighborhood….. Where opportunities rise to meet their promising future! NAZ Family Academy Graduates.
Longitudinal Data Systems: What Can They Do for Me? Nancy J. Smith, Ph.D. Deputy Director Data Quality Campaign November 30, 2007.
Massachusetts State Advisory Council (SAC) on Early Childhood Education and Care Review of Grant and Work Plan December
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
P-20 Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS) Update Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI)
EEC Annual Legislative Report February Context Legislative language that requires EEC to submit an annual report on Universal Pre- Kindergarten.
Maryland Public Schools: #1 in the Nation AGAIN in 2011 Data-Driven Decision Making: Building Early Care and Education Systems September 20, 2011.
1 Early Learning Vision Planning & Policy Questions Tuesday, November 15, 2011 Teresa Whiting & John Brandt (UT) Carol Eichinger (WI) Reyna Hernandez (IL)
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Reshaping Early Childhood Systems in Kentucky Terry Tolan Executive Director Governor’s Office of Early Childhood The Women’s Network 10 th Statewide Issues.
ARRA Proposal Proposed Unified Information Technology System: Concepts for the Next Stage of Data Development Board of Early Education and Care April 6,
National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center Connecting TA for Part B Indicators 1, 2, 13, & 14: Working Together to Support States OSEP Project.
K-12 And Early Childhood Data Connections NCES Forum February 2011 Presented by: Kathy Gosa Kansas State Department of Education.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
CAREER PATHWAYS THE NEW WAY OF DOING BUSINESS. Agenda for our Discussion Today we’ll discuss: Career Pathways Systems and Programs Where we’ve been and.
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
Kansas Education Longitudinal Data System Update to Kansas Commission on Graduation and Dropout Prevention and Recovery December 2010 Kathy Gosa Director,
1 Commonwealth of Massachusetts STEM Advisory Council Moving the STEM Agenda Forward CONFIDENTIAL DRAFT FOR POLICY DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES ONLY STEM Advisory.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts STEM Advisory Council
Policy & Advocacy Platform April 24, 2017
The State of States’ ECE Data Systems Efforts
Aimee Rogstad Guidera April 7, 2010
The State of States’ ECE Data Systems Efforts
Using Data to Improve Student Achievement Aimee R. Guidera
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
Data on Child and Family Outcomes: Tools for Improving State Systems
Hans P. L’Orange State Higher Education Executive Officers
Presentation transcript:

P-20 Longitudinal Data Systems What is the information we need, how do we get it, what do we do with it? Elizabeth Laird & Helene Stebbins

Why Data? Why Now? Head Start Act of 2007 “ The State Advisory Council shall…develop recommendations regarding the establishment of a unified data collection system for public early childhood education and development programs and services throughout the state.” HR 3221: Early Learning Challenge Grant A coordinated data infrastructure that facilitates— uniform data collection about the quality of early learning programs, essential information about the children and families that participate in such programs, and the qualifications and compensation of the early learning workforce in such programs; and alignment and interoperability between the data system for early learning programs for children and data systems for elementary and secondary education.” State progress demonstrated by: increasing the percentage of disadvantaged children in each age group (infants, toddlers, and preschoolers) who participate in high-quality early learning programs; increasing the number of high-quality early learning programs in low- income communities;

Early Childhood Data Collaborative  Center for the Study of Child Care Employment at UC Berkeley  Council of Chief State School Officers  Data Quality Campaign  National Center for Children in Poverty  National Governors Association  National Council of State Legislatures  Pre-K Now

ECDC Goals:  Document current state early childhood data efforts, and the priorities of state policymakers and other key audiences for improving early childhood data systems and data use;  Generate a template of key policy questions, essential elements or capabilities of exemplary state early childhood data system, and actions to promote data- based decision making;  Create policy tools, resources, and services that build political will and support states to develop and use comprehensive early childhood data systems that link with K-12.

Theory of Action  Based on the DQC model with K-12 data  Start with the policy questions: design data systems to answer key “killer questions”: Resonate with policy leaders Illustrate the power of data  Identify essential elements necessary to answer the questions  Track state progress in collecting the essential data elements

Moving along the Accountability Spectrum Compliance Reporting Accountability (rearview mirror view—what we did well/not so well) Continuous Improvement (looking out the front window)

Opportunity to Leverage Federal Funding Source: Leveraging Federal Funding: A Roadmap for StatesLeveraging Federal Funding: A Roadmap for States Source: Leveraging Federal Funding: A Roadmap for StatesLeveraging Federal Funding: A Roadmap for States

Partnership Achieve, Inc.National Center for Educational Achievement Alliance for Excellent EducationNational Center for Higher Education Management Systems Council of Chief State School Officers NGA Center for Best Practices Education Commission of the States Schools Interoperability Framework Association The Education TrustNational Conference of State Legislatures National Association of States Boards of Education State Educational Technology Directors Association National Association of System Heads State Higher Education Executive Officers

Killer Policy Questions Which schools produce the strongest academic growth for their students? What achievement levels in middle school indicate that a student is on track to succeed in rigorous courses in high school? What is the state’s graduation rate, according to the 2005 National Governor's Association graduation compact? Which high school performance indicators (e.g., enrollment in rigorous courses or performance on state tests) are the best predictors of students' success in college or the workplace? What percentage of high school graduates who go on to college take remedial courses? Which teacher preparation programs produce the graduates whose students have the strongest academic growth?

10 Essential Elements 1. Unique statewide student identifier 2. Student-level enrollment, demographic and program participation information 3. Ability to match individual students’ test records from year to year to measure growth 4. Information on untested students 5. Teacher identifier system with ability to match teachers to students 6. Student-level transcript information, including information on courses completed and grades earned 7. Student-level college readiness test scores 8. Student-level graduation and dropout data 9. Ability to match student records between the P-12 and postsecondary systems 10. State data audit system assessing data quality, validity, and reliability

Policy Questions and Elements Which schools produce the strongest academic growth for their students? 1, 3, 4 What achievement levels in middle school indicate that a student is on track to succeed in rigorous courses in high school? 1, 3, 6, 7 What is the state’s graduation rate, according to the 2005 National Governor's Association graduation compact? 1, 2, 8, 10 Which high school performance indicators (e.g., enrollment in rigorous courses or performance on state tests) are the best predictors of students' success in college or the workplace? 1, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9 What percentage of high school graduates who go on to college take remedial courses? 1, 8, 9 Which teacher preparation programs produce the graduates whose students have the strongest academic growth? 1, 3, 4, 5

Annual Survey—Data Systems Source: 2009 Annual Progress Report on State Data Systems2009 Annual Progress Report on State Data Systems Source: 2009 Annual Progress Report on State Data Systems2009 Annual Progress Report on State Data Systems

Ensure Data Use

Annual Survey—Data Use

Next Steps for Questions, Elements, and Actions  Vet draft killer questions and essential data elements with stakeholders  Finalize questions, elements, and actions  Survey states on data collection and use  Build momentum to improve state data collection on young children

DRAFT ECDC Killer Questions 1.Are children, birth to age five, on track to succeed at school entry and beyond? 2.Which children have access to high quality early care and education programs? 3.Is the quality of programs improving? 4.What are the characteristics of effective programs? 5.What is the cost per child of a high quality program? 6.What policies and investments lead to a skilled and stable early childhood workforce? 7.How prepared is the workforce to provide effective education and care for all children?

DRAFT ECDC Essential Elements Child-Level Data 1.Unique statewide child identifier that links across programs and key databases 2.Child-level demographics, risk(s) exposure, enrollment, and attendance 3.Child-level assessment data across multiple domains matched over time to measure growth 4.Ability to match child-level early childhood data with K-12 and beyond

DRAFT ECDC Essential Elements Program-Level Data 5.Unique site/program identifier with the ability to link to individual children served 6.Site-level structural, staffing, and quality information 7.Site-level revenue and cost data Workforce/Teacher-Level Data 8.Unique teacher/provider identifier with ability to link to individual children served 9.Teacher-level demographics, education and training, and workplace characteristics 10.Inform on education and training supports and content available to teachers/providers

Draft ECDC Actions for Use EXPAND the ability of state early childhood data systems to link across systems and agencies and across the P-20/W education pipeline. 1.Link state early childhood data systems with other agencies like health and social services and with K-12, postsecondary education, and the workforce. 2.Create stable, sustained support for robust state early childhood data systems. 3.Develop governance structures to guide data collection, sharing and use. 4.Build interoperable state data repositories (e.g., data warehouses) that integrate child, program, workforce, financial and facility data.

Draft ECDC Actions for Use ENSURE that data can be accessed, analyzed and used, and communicate data to all stakeholders to promote continuous improvement. 4.Implement systems to provide all stakeholders timely access to the information they need while protecting individual privacy. 5.Create developmental progress reports with individual child data that provide information teachers, providers, and parents can use to improve child outcomes. 6.Create reports that include aggregate longitudinal statistics on early childhood systems linked with K-12 and groups of children to guide program- and state-level improvement efforts.

Draft ECDC Actions for Use BUILD the capacity of all stakeholders to use longitudinal data for effective decisionmaking. 8.Develop a purposeful research agenda and collaborate with universities, researchers and intermediary groups to explore the data for useful information. 9.Implement policies and promote practices, including professional development and credentialing, to ensure that teachers and providers know how to access, analyze and use data appropriately. 10.Promote strategies to raise awareness of available data and ensure that all key stakeholders, including state policymakers, know how to access, analyze and use the information.

Outstanding Questions 1.Which children and programs are included in the state data system(s)? 2.How can we measure progress towards states collecting data on program quality without defining quality for states? 3.How do we convey the importance of protecting privacy of individual children while promoting data use? 4.How do we address the validity of child assessments? 5.Should individual teachers be linked to individual sites and/or individual children?

Future ECDC Activities  Build partnerships among stakeholders  Communicate policy questions and data elements, and track state progress  Provide state-based policy and advocacy assistance  Conduct state and federal advocacy work to improve coordination and alignment

Contact the ECDC: 5/11/ CSCCEMarcy Whitebook, Fran Kipnis, CCSSOTom Schultz, DQCElizabeth Laird, NCCPHelene Stebbins, NGARachel Demma, NCSLJennifer Stedron, Pre-K NowAlbert Wat,