Nutrient and Pesticide Accounting in the Chipola River/Floridan Aquifer System By Christy Crandall A New Study Jointly Funded by U.S. Geological Survey and Florida Department of Environmental Protection
New Joint Project between FDEP and U.S. Geological Survey Scheduled to start in January but all of the papers are still being signedScheduled to start in January but all of the papers are still being signed Hope to start next monthHope to start next month
STUDY OBJECTIVES Identify significant nutrients and pesticides inputs to the Chipola River/Floridan aquifer system using existing informationIdentify significant nutrients and pesticides inputs to the Chipola River/Floridan aquifer system using existing information Characterize the hydrologic and geochemical processes occurring along flowpaths using a groundwater flow and tracking model and a geochemical model along flow paths.Characterize the hydrologic and geochemical processes occurring along flowpaths using a groundwater flow and tracking model and a geochemical model along flow paths. Test 1 or possibly 2 hypothetical scenarios—tracking nitrate and maybe an organic compound to the Jackson Blue Spring and the Chipola River.Test 1 or possibly 2 hypothetical scenarios—tracking nitrate and maybe an organic compound to the Jackson Blue Spring and the Chipola River.
BACKGROUND
Chipola Watershed Study Area Location
Vertically contiguous thick sequence of limestone and dolostone of late Paleocene to early Miocene ageVertically contiguous thick sequence of limestone and dolostone of late Paleocene to early Miocene age Highly potable--drinking water is derived from Floridan aquifer systemHighly potable--drinking water is derived from Floridan aquifer system Contains numerous springs, sinks and other karst features—highly vulnerable.Contains numerous springs, sinks and other karst features—highly vulnerable. Floridan Aquifer System
The Floridan aquifer and the Chipola River Basin Recharge occurs mainly in unconfined and semi-confined areas Potentiometric surface— flows southward from northern extent
Ground water makes up the majority of the Chipola River's discharge during low and medium flow conditions At least 63 springs identified(Barrios and Chellette, 2004) The Floridan aquifer and the Chipola River Basin
Why are we worried? Higher nitrate concentrations and more occurrances of nitrate and pesticides in the Chipola River and Floridan aquifer in this area than in other areas of the Floridan aquifer system (U.S. Geological Survey data).Higher nitrate concentrations and more occurrances of nitrate and pesticides in the Chipola River and Floridan aquifer in this area than in other areas of the Floridan aquifer system (U.S. Geological Survey data).
Concentrations were highest in ACFB NetworkMedian NO3 ACFB2.46 SANT0.05 GAFL20.54 GAFL30.05 GAFL40.06 Groundwater Nitrate
ACF Basin pesticide detections in wells & springs Number of Dectections
FDEP Basin Status Report 2002
Summary of SW Nutrients and Pesticides from 1995, USGS Cowarts Creek nr. Cottonwood AL Median nitrate concentration 0.5 mg/L as N Nitrogen, Ammonia + Organic, Dissolved 0.25 mg/L as N Phosphorus, Total 0.03 mg/L as P Metolachlor 0.03 ug/L Atrazine 0.02 ug/L Chipola River near Altha, FL Median nitrate concentration 0.5 mg/L Nitrogen, Ammonia + Organic, Dissolved 0.25 mg/L as N Phosphorus, Total 0.03 mg/L as P Metolachlor 0.05 ug/L
APPROACH
1. Acquire and compile existing data Water Quality Data FDEP USGS NWFWMD
Land use Aquifer Vulnerability Potentiometric Surface Stream Aquifer Thickness Maps
Population in 2005 Population Data
2. Use data to target top 30 source areas for nutrients and perform reconnaissance field sampling. Field Parameters Nitrate Bacteria Few Pesticides?
3. Use new data to target 10 most significant source areas of nutrients and sample--analyses to include major ions, trace elements?, age tracers, isotopes, pesticides, etc.,.
4. During this time a ground-water flow and particle-tracking model will be compiled and calibrated for the Floridan/Chipola aquifer/river system
Start with existing Recent Models Lyn Torak USGS, Atlanta Hal Davis USGS, Tallahassee
5. Track particles along flow lines and identify geochemical processes occurring along flowpaths.
Flowpaths to a Public Supply Well
6. Use the model to test hypothetical scenarios such as: –the effects of changing BMPs –or zoning changes on predicted concetrations to the Chipola River and Blue Springs (3 to 5 locations).
Summary and Conclusions New USGS MODFLOW CONDUIT FLOW PACKAGE can switch between laminar and turbulent flowNew USGS MODFLOW CONDUIT FLOW PACKAGE can switch between laminar and turbulent flow Project ends in 2009—I am hopeful that I may:Project ends in 2009—I am hopeful that I may: –be able to provide some insight on travel time from aquifer recharge to river –identify some major source areas and vulnerable areas –and potentially say something about land use protection.