Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) Louisiana Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (LPDES) Pesticide General Permit (PGP) LAG870000.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jamie Petersen Administrative Assistant - Stormwater Front Desk: (402) Michael Crisco Program Specialist – Storm.
Advertisements

NDEQ Industrial Storm Water General Discharge Permit Presentation for: Nebraska Aviation Symposium January 27, 2011 By: Bill Imig, Environmental Scientist.
SW101 The NPDES Industrial Storm Water Program. What Does the Industrial Program Cover? F Storm Water Discharges Associated with Industrial Activity l.
NPDES NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM What SC private landowners should know before applying forestry pesticides Presented By: Joey Ferguson,
Division of Environmental Services Structural Branch Agricultural Branch Public Pest and Recycling Assistance Branch Regulates pesticide applications on.
Final Construction Stormwater General Permit Issued November 16, 2005 Jeff Killelea Department of Ecology.
WYOMING WATER & ENERGY LAW NPDES Permitting Issues Kara Brighton Hageman & Brighton, P.C. Cheyenne, WY.
Public Health Pesticides and the Clean Water Act: Current Status Joseph M Conlon Technical Advisor.
Clean Water Act Permitting and Operational Discharges from Vessels An Overview February 2007.
MT Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Water Protection Bureau February 12, 2014 Christine Weaver.
The Entergy facility is a boiling water reactor with a rated core thermal power level of 1912 MW, providing a gross electrical output of 620 MW. The facility.
PGP Scenario #2 You are automatically covered. You do not have to submit a NOI.
Pesticides General Permit Development Of Proposed Draft Permit To Provide Permit Coverage by April 2011 Water Quality Advisory Workgroup Aug. 3, 2010.
Understanding the NJ Fertilizer Law for Turf Applications Jim Murphy Extension Specialist in Turfgrass Management.
Nov Private Pesticide Applicator Certification.
1 Private Pesticide Applicator Certification Joe Educator Extension Office Any County Mary Weedperson Any County Weed & Pest Mark A. Ferrell Extension.
Your Name A + G or J Your Company’s Name MN PIE – City Your Legal Signature Today’s date All.
Utah Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (UPDES) Utah Sewer Management Program (USMP)
2009 ENVIRONMENTAL SEMINAR Boat Bottom Pressure Washing Requirements & General Permit for the Discharge of Stormwater Associated with Industrial Activity.
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permitting and Pesticides Jeff Fischer Permits Section Water Resources Division
National Cotton Council v. EPA. 2 Clean Water Act NPDES Permits CWA §301(a) makes it illegal to discharge a pollutant from a point source into jurisdictional.
Pesticide Container-Containment Regulations: FIFRA 19(f)(2) Determinations of Adequacy.
California’s New Onsite Wastewater Treatment System Policy Richard Sanchez, REHS, MPH President California Conference of Directors of Environmental Health.
Structural Pesticide Ordinance Development In A Tribal Community Presented At The 17th Annual Region 9 Tribal EPA Conference October 21-23, 2009 Barry.
WNV Pesticide Regulations Brian Rowe Pesticide Section Manager Michigan Department of Agriculture.
Forest Herbicides: Research and Demonstration IV December 6 - 7, 2005 Arthur Temple College of Forestry & Agriculture LAWS AND REGULATIONS Timothy J. Karczewski.
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permitting and Pesticides Jeff Fischer Permits Section Water Resources Division
Staying on Top of Permits & Public Comments Public Comments Policy Track: Sunday, February 28, :30 pm.
CUI Statistical: Collaborative Efforts of Federal Statistical Agencies Eve Powell-Griner National Center for Health Statistics.
New Ag Waiver for the San Diego Region (including Temecula Valley) Water Quality Workshop Rancho California Water District November 6, 2008 Presented by.
Water and Wastewater Certification 1 Water & Wastewater Reference Manual.
PGP Scenario #3 You are not automatically covered. You must submit a NOI.
Final Rule Setting Federal Standards for Conducting All Appropriate Inquiries U.S. EPA Brownfields Program.
 Why are we here?  Without regulations, rivers used to catch fire. Rules and Regulation.
Under what common law theories can polluters be held liable? Under what common law theories can polluters be held liable? What is an environmental impact.
Medical Waste Management Rulemaking Open Participation Meeting Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Waste Permits Division August 18, 2015, Austin.
Waste Management Overview & Land Disposal Restrictions.
SUMMARY OF INFORMAL COMMENTS Temporary Waiver of Terms Regulations May 2006.
Presented by: Yolanda Chavez, RN, BSN Policy Rules and Curriculum Development Unit DADS Regulatory Services 1 DADS REGULATORY UPDATE March 2013.
State Water Resources Control Board Division of Water Quality Industrial/Construction Storm Water Unit.
MS4 Remand Rule Intergovernmental Associations Briefing September 15, 2015.
SMALL CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER PERMITTING. STORMWATER GENERAL PERMIT FOR SMALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES Construction activities regulated under this permit.
Distinguishing: Clean Air Act, EPA Rules, Regulations and Guidance David Cole U.S. EPA, OAQPS Research Triangle Park, NC.
Storm Water: Federal Enforcement and Compliance for Phase II MS4.
VI. Developing a VSMP Program General Stormwater Training Workshop.
Presentation to the HELLENIC MEDITERRANEAN PANEL HELLENIC MEDITERRANEAN PANEL (Athens, Greece - 23 October 2008)On US DISCHARGE STANDARDS -The NPDES Program-
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permitting and Pesticides Jeff Fischer Permits Section Water Resources Division
 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)  All dischargers over 1-acre must develop a SWPPP  6 major portions of every SWPPP Site Evaluation and.
Revisions to Primacy State Underground Injection Control Programs Primacy State Implementation of the New Class V Rule.
Administrative Law The Enactment of Rules and Regulations.
PESTICIDE REGULATIONS AND ANTIFOULING PAINTS WISCONSIN MARINE ASSOCIATION MARCH 12, 2015 MIKE MURRAY DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, TRADE AND CONSUMER PROTECTION.
Introduction to FIFRA Federal Insecticide Fungicide Rodenticide Act Chapter 1 Section I of the Pest Bear & Affiliates Service Personnel Development Program.
Enforcement What to Expect From the Water Boards, and What to Look for Locally ENTS Workshop August Mark Bradley Office of Enforcement CA State.
Applicator Training April 2011 Elise Doucette. Legal Decisions 2008 The Nat’l Cotton Council of Am, et al. v. EPA. As a result, a NPDES permit is required.
Grant County Zoning Ordinance Review Public Comment Forum Todd Kays:Executive Director – 1 st District Association of Local Governments.
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
1 Staff Public Workshops Fall 2011 Policy for Siting, Design, Operation and Management of Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems San Luis Obispo: October.
Water Quality/Stormwater Seminar September House Bill 2031 Requires TCEQ to adopt an expedited permitting process for discharge permits for treated.
P ESTICIDE NPDES P ERMIT – D O Y OU N EED O NE ? Darin LeCrone & Leslie Lowry Illinois Environmental Protection Agency.
30 Texas Administrative Code Chapter 210, Subchapter E Presented by Kara Denney September 23, 2015.
Implementation of the NJ Fertilizer Law: What You Need to Know Jim Murphy Extension Specialist in Turfgrass Management.
2017 Environmental Trade Fair Shannon Gibson
Water Quality Credit Trading
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
Groundwater and Waste Management Committee November 9, 2016
John Tinger U.S. EPA Region IX
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
Enforcing the NAAQS Case Study Sean Taylor
General NPDES Permit for Pesticide Application Point Source Discharges
Indiana Department of Environmental Management Office of Water Quality
Presentation transcript:

Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) Louisiana Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (LPDES) Pesticide General Permit (PGP) LAG870000

Regulatory and Statutory Background to LDEQ’s Pesticide General Permit

Rule and Litigation 2006 Final CWA Pesticides Rule Rule published on November 27, 2006 Application of a pesticide to waters of the U.S. consistent with FIFRA does not require an NPDES permit in the following two circumstances: Application of pesticides directly to waters of the United States in order to control pests. Examples: applications to control mosquito larvae aquatic weeds

Rule and Litigation 2006 Final CWA Pesticides Rule, cont’d 2. Application of pesticides to control pests that are present over waters of the U.S., including near such waters, where a portion of the pesticides will unavoidably be deposited to waters of the U.S. Examples: Aerially applied insecticides to a forest canopy Pesticides applied over or near water for control of adult mosquitoes or other pests.

Rule and Litigation 2006 Final CWA Pesticides Rule, cont’d Louisiana regulation at LAC 33:IX.2315.A.8 which exempted pesticide application/discharges from LPDES permitting requirements is in the process of being removed.

Example: Direct Application to Water for Aquatic Pests (“To”) – Covered by 2006 Rule

Example: Aerial Mosquito Control (“Over”) – Covered by 2006 Rule

Example: Weed and Insect Control Near Water (“Near”) – Covered by 2006 Rule

EPA 2006 Rule Litigation on Rule In December, 2006 petitions for review were filed in 11 Circuit Courts. Petitions were consolidated in 6th Circuit. Environmental groups argued: Judicial review of rule belonged in district courts; EPA exceeded its authority under CWA; EPA may not exempt FIFRA-compliant applications of pesticides from the requirements of the CWA.

EPA 2006 Rule Litigation on Rule Industry petitioners argued final rule was arbitrary and capricious because it treats pesticides applied in violation of FIFRA as pollutants, while treating the same pesticides as non-pollutants when used in compliance with FIFRA.

Background: EPA 2006 Rule 6th Circuit’s Decision On January 7, 2009 the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the CWA pesticides rule, stating that the rule was not a reasonable interpretation of the CWA.

Background: EPA 2006 Rule EPA Response to Court’s Decision On April 8, 2009, EPA requested a two year stay of the mandate during which time EPA would: Develop general permits for areas where EPA is permitting authority. Work with NPDES-authorized states to develop their general permits. Provide education and outreach to stakeholders.

Background: EPA 2006 Rule Court Decision on Stay Request On June 8, 2009, the 6th Circuit granted EPA’s request and ordered a stay of the mandate until April 9, 2011. Industry petitioned for a rehearing en banc. On August 3, 2009 the Court rejected this request. It is unknown if Industry will petition the Supreme Court. Thus, EPA’s rule stating that NPDES permits are not required for pesticide applications applied to or over, including near waters of the U.S., remains in effect until April 9, 2011. As of April 10, 2011, discharges into a water of the U.S. from pesticide applications will require coverage under an NPDES permit.

Schedule: EPA Pesticide General Permit States Must Also Complete By April 2011 Propose Draft Permits (all use patterns) Discuss w/ States and stakeholders Court Grants 2-yr Stay Finalize Permits States Must Issue Final Permits 4-5 mo. 8 mo. 8 mo. 2 mo. Jun 2009 Apr 2010 Feb 2011 Apr 2011 Sep/Oct 2009

Stakeholder Involvement LDEQ has worked closely with the following in the development of the PGP: the Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry (LDAF), The Louisiana Farm Bureau, LSU Agricultural Extension Service Association of States Interstate Water Pollution Control Administrators (ASIWPCA) EPA Region 6 EPA Headquarters New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection LDEQ has written a Memorandum of Agreement with LDAF detailing the administration and the sharing of information under LDEQ’s PGP as of January 13, 2011.

Permitted Universe 13,012 certified applicators certified by LDAF to apply restricted use pesticides (7,671 private and 5,341 commercial) 1200 licensed pesticide application businesses with a license issued by LDAF 500 different pesticide active ingredients contained in approximately 3700 product labels Examples include: Restricted Use Pesticide (RUP) – (AATREX 4 LHERBICIDE) which contains the pesticide active ingredient, Atrazine Non-Restricted Use Pesticide – (ASSASSIN), which contains the pesticide active ingredient, Permethrin

Notice of Intent (NOI) submittals LDEQ’s PGP permit has no NOI requirements. LDAF has equivalent requirements in its regulations at: LAC 7:XXIII Subchapter F. Certification, and LAC 7:XXIII Subchapter H. Licensing Requirements. These requirements are incorporated by reference into LDEQ’s PGP under Section A. Applicability.

LDEQ’s Pesticide General Permit Contents

Applicability All dischargers of pesticides in accordance with state laws and regulations within the following 4 use categorizations: Mosquito and Other Flying Insect Pest Control Aquatic Weed and Algae Control Aquatic Nuisance Animal Control Forest Canopy Pest Control Additionally stormwater runoff from facilities which handle or use pesticides not covered under the Multi-Sector General Permit.

Applicability (cont’d) LDEQ’s PGP incorporates the following LDAF regulations by reference as fully enforceable conditions of LDEQ’s Permit: Subchapter F – Certifications Subchapter H – Licensing Requirements Subchapter I – Application of Pesticides Subchapter J – Bulk Pesticides Subchapter K – Mechanical Pesticide Equipment Subchapter L – Commercial Application Equipment Subchapter N – Record Keeping Subchapter P – Pesticide Wastes Subchapter Q – Spill Handling

Applicability (cont’d) LDEQ’s PGP incorporates the following LDAF regulations by reference as fully enforceable conditions of LDEQ’s Permit: Subchapter R – Pesticide Containment Subchapter S – Unused Pesticides Subchapter U – Impoundments of Hazardous Wastes Subchapter V – Impoundments by Commercial Applicators Subchapter W – Emergency Procedures Subchapter X – Water Protection Subchapter Y – Pesticide Wastes

Exemptions LDEQ’s PGP does not apply in areas which are exempt from LPDES permitting: Discharges associated with the normal operation of a vessel Discharges from agricultural and silvicultural activities including stormwater runoff from orchards, cultivated crops, pastures, range lands, and forest lands Return flows from irrigated agriculture Land applications without runoff

Exemptions (cont’d); Irrigation Return Flow

Exemptions (cont’d); Agricultural Stormwater

The PGP Shall Not Apply To Discharges which have limits assigned to them in the Louisiana Water Quality Management Plan. Discharges of restricted use pesticides to waterbodies which have impairments for the restricted use pesticide as identified on the 303(d) list. Discharges of pesticides to waterbodies which have impairments for that pesticide as identified on the 303(d) list.

The PGP Shall Not Apply To (cont’d) Discharges which are likely to have unauthorized adverse effects upon threatened or endangered species. Discharges which adversely affect properties listed or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. Discharges having evidence of causing or have the reasonable potential to cause or contribute to a violation of a water quality standard.

The PGP Shall Not Apply To (cont’d) Discharges covered under another LPDES permit Discharges of pesticides to Outstanding Natural Resource Waters. However, there may be unusual situations where pesticide application may be allowed in order to maintain use and status of the water body as indicated in paragraph 8 under the phrase, “This general permit shall not apply to:”, located in Section A. Applicability of the PGP.

The PGP Shall Not Apply To (cont’d) Coverage under this permit may also be denied under the following conditions: Poor compliance record Ambient water quality data Technical Data Revisions Changes to the Regulations Emerging National Restrictions and Constraints

Effluent Limitations; Water Quality and Technology Discharges shall not violate applicable state water quality standards. If a discharge causes or contributes to such a violation, then corrective action must be taken No person shall apply/discharge a pesticide unless in accordance with state laws, LDAF regulations, and FIFRA laws. This includes, but is not limited to: Registration and Certification with LDAF when applicable Compliance with FIFRA labeling

Effluent Limitations; Water Quality and Technology LDEQ expects that compliance with FIFRA in addition to compliance with the conditions in the permit will control discharges as necessary to meet applicable water quality standards.

Effluent Limitations; Water Quality and Technology BMP type requirements: No more than the optimal amount of pesticides shall be used Equipment shall be maintained in proper operating condition by calibrating, cleaning, and repairing in accordance with established operational, mechanical, and LDAF protocols All dischargers shall conduct spot checks in the area in and around pesticides application/discharge points

Effluent Limitations; Water Quality and Technology Adverse incident – means an incident that you have observed upon inspection or of which you become aware, in which: A person or non target organism may have been exposed to a pesticide residue. The person or non-target organism suffered a toxic or adverse effect.

Private Applicators Private Applicator – pesticide applicator who does not apply pesticides for a fee and does not fall into category requiring commercial applicator certification at LAC 7:XXIII.125.

Commercial Applicators Commercial Applicator – applicator of which certification is required who applies pesticides for fee and/or one that falls under the following categories (LAC 7:XXIII.125): Agricultural Pest Control Forest Pest Control Ornamental and Turf Pest Control Seed Treatment Aquatic Pest Control Right-of-Way and Industrial Pest Control Industrial, Institutional, and Health Related Pest Control Public Health Control

Commercial Applicators (cont’d) The 8 use categories under LDAF regulations are inclusive of the 4 use categories defined in LDEQ’s PGP. Equivalency is established below: Use Authorization under PGP: Commercial Categorization, LDAF: Mosquito and Other Flying Insect Pest Control Public Health Pest Control Aquatic Weed and Algae Control Right-of-Way and Industrial Pest Control; Public Health Pest Control Aquatic Nuisance Animal Control Forest Canopy Pest Control Forest Pest Control

Commercial Applicators (cont’d) Most of the discharges resulting from application of pesticides under the PGP lie under the commercial applicator category.

Monitoring of Commercial Applicators Commercial applicators are subject semi-annual monitoring. Monitoring shall include: Inspection of physical surroundings Inspection of records Take samples at any of the following locations: Any site where an application of pesticides has been made by the applicator Any base storage Any containment tank for pesticides, which upon disposal are classified as hazardous waste Any surface impoundment Any wash pad Any soils or water flowing or still at any location or adjacent to the base operation Any application equipment

Monitoring of Commercial Applicators Authorized representatives of LDEQ shall have the same monitoring (inspection) authority plus all rights of entry and inspection authority in accordance with the LA Environmental Quality Act.

Record Keeping Records shall be maintained for period of 3 years in accordance with the PGP. This is different than what is specified in LDAF regulations, which specifies a period of 2 years at LAC 7:XXIII.167.A and LAC 7:XXIII.167.B. The 3 year record retention requirement supersedes LDAF regulations

Record Keeping (cont’d) The following information is required to be retained: Owner/operator name, address, and license number Certified applicator, name, address, and certification number Customer name and address Product/brand name EPA registration number Restricted/general use pesticide Application date

Record Keeping (cont’d) Crop/type of application Location of application Size of area treated (acres, square feet, or minutes of spraying) Rate of application Total amount of product (concentrate) applied Applicator Certification number of applicator (if applicable) Records shall be maintained within 3 days of application for a commercial applicator and 7 days for a non-fee commercial applicator.

Reporting Routine reporting is not required by the PGP. All uncontained spills of more than 1 gallon liquid or 4 pounds dry weight must be reported to the director of Pesticides and Environmental Programs of LDAF within 24 hours by telephone and by written notice within 3 days.

Emergency Conditions LAC 7.XXIII.191, 193, 195, and 197 specify identification, declaration, response (including remediation activities), and termination of the emergency condition.

Penalties Under “Other Conditions” Section D.1.a, Negligent Violations, a permitted entity can be charged up to $25,000 per day. Under LAC 7:XXIII.173.A, a permitted entity can be charged up to $5,000 per day. Permitted entities may be held liable for penalties from both LDEQ and LDAF.

Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) and Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry (LDAF)

MOA LDEQ and LDAF LDEQ and LDAF have entered into a MOA to: Outline responsibilities in the administration of the PGP. Determine compliance program responsibilities Establish the basis for an outreach program relative to the LPDES PGP. Set up effective information exchange between the 2 agencies regarding administration and enforcement of the PGP

Administration of the PGP LDAF regulates all activities associated with the application/discharge, and use in accordance with the applicable requirements of the prescribed pesticide laws, rules and regulations. This includes: Registration and certification of all applicable pesticide applicators/dischargers

Administration of the PGP (cont’d) LDAF may solicit input from LDEQ regarding the application/discharge of pesticides into or near the waters of the state of Louisiana if needed LDEQ will provide LDAF with a copy of any final permit decision for discharges of pesticides into an Outstanding Natural Resource Waters (ONRW) or a waterbody which is impaired for applicable pesticides within 14 days after the permit decision is made

Compliance LDAF and LDEQ will jointly evaluate and assess limitations, operations, maintenance and other activities for compliance with the PGP. LDEQ will maintain enforcement of the PGP. LDEQ will take appropriate action against violations of the PGP, including assessment and collection of penalties.

Outreach LDEQ and LDAF will conduct a joint outreach program to: Private individuals Public Parish and Municipal Governments

Outreach (cont’d) LDEQ proposes to hold a series of outreach sessions in the spring and summer of 2011 as detailed in the MOA discussed earlier. LDEQ will also present information about the permit at conferences such as the Environmental Regulatory Compliance Conference (ERCC) conference in Alexandria, January 26 2011, LVMA conference in Marksville February 1, 2011, LSWA conference in Lafayette March 24-25. Other outreach sessions are also being planned at this time.

Information Sharing LDAF will share with LDEQ information conducted on registered and certified applicators/dischargers in violation of the PGP. This information shall include: Name of the applicator/dischargers Mailing, physical and email address Phone number LDAF certification and registration number as applicable

Information Sharing (cont’d) Description of location and identification of water body or source of water Pesticide applicator/discharge points if known LDAF will, upon completion of the inspection, submit this information to LDEQ electronically or by mail.

Joint Activities LDAF and LDEQ shall participate in joint efforts to address the following activities: Surveillance, inspection, responses, and enforcement actions. Compliance response actions. Permit issues related to impaired water bodies. Meetings and discussions with governmental bodies. Issues relating to pesticide usage, regulation and discharges.

LDEQ’s PGP Status and Proposed Milestones LDEQ’s Preliminary Draft PGP received approval from EPA Region 6 on December 17, 2010. LDEQ public noticed the draft permit on January 10, 2010. Upon completion of the public comment period, 2/16/11, LDEQ will coordinate internally and issue a final permit by 4/10/11.

PGP Speaker Contact Information Bruce Fielding Environmental Scientist Senior Office of Environmental Services Water Permits Division (225)219-3189 bruce.fielding@la.gov Customer Service Center 225-219-LDEQ (5337) Toll Free 1-866-896-LDEQ (5337) Hours 8-4:30 M-F

PGP Speaker Contact Information Melvin “Mitch” Mitchell Administrator Office of Environmental Services Water Permits Division (225)219-9371 mitch.mitchell@la.gov

Questions?