How well do environment- based models predict species abundances at a coarse scale? Volker Bahn and Brian McGill McGill University CSEE, Toronto, May,
Distribution Map Rose-breasted Grosbeak
Distribution Map Rose-breasted Grosbeak
Species Distributions Central to ecology –Krebs, C. J Ecology: The experimental analysis of distribution and abundance. –Andrewartha, H. G., and L. C. Birch The ecological web: More on the distribution and abundance of animals. Conservation of species
How does distribution modelling work? –Occurrence or abundance data at some locations –Record environmental conditions –Build statistical model relating sample data to environmental predictors –Predict occurrence for non-surveyed areas Distribution Modelling
Research Questions How well does niche-based distribution modelling work? How can one assess the predictive ability of distribution models? Which influence does the evaluation scheme have on the assessment of the models?
Methods Breeding Bird Survey locations species Environmental data Regression trees/ Random forests
Contagion
Results DependentIndependentR 2 * Bird abundanceEnvironment0.32 Bird abundanceContagion0.43 Sim. RangesEnvironment0.24 *Averaged over 190 species Bahn, V and McGill, B.J. (2007) Can niche-based distribution models outperform spatial interpolation? Global Ecology and Biogeography: online early.
Resubstitution – no split
Random split
Strips
Halves
Conclusion When training and test data are interspersed, interpolation does the job just as well as niche-based models Niche-based models predict poorly into new areas Evaluations are dependent on information content and testing scheme
Outlook If environmental conditions are not a good predictor then what are we missing? We don’t get the right information from remotely sensed data Processes are not stationary Spatial processes: dispersal and population dynamics
Acknowledgements Thousands of volunteers, CWS & USGS for BBS data Grad students, friends and collaborators in the lab and beyond Family Funding from NSERC
Discussion?
Species Peak at Optimum? Typically not Mueller-Dombois, D. & Ellenberg, H. (1974) Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. Wiley, New York. Rehfeldt, G.E., Ying, C.C., Spittlehouse, D.L. & Hamilton, D.A., Jr. (1999) Genetic responses to climate in Pinus contorta: Niche breadth, climate change, and reforestation. Ecological Monographs, 69(3),
Species Peak at Optimum? Wang et al Use of response functions in selecting lodgepole pine populations for future climates. J Global Change Biology 12(12): Frazier, M., R.B. Huey, and D. Berrigan Thermodynamics constrains the evolution of insect population growth rates: "warmer is better." American Naturalist 168:
Mueller-Dombois and Ellenberg (1974)
Dispersal Bahn, V., W.B. Krohn, and R.J. O'Connor. Under review. Dispersal leads to autocorrelation in animal distributions: a simulation model. Submitted to Journal of Applied Ecology.
Before/after Dispersal
Conditional Autoregressive Y = Xβ + ρC(Y – Xβ) + ε
Temp max ≥ 28.6 Yearly var precip ≥ 0.2 Seasonal var precip ≥ 0.3 Precip ≥ 66.1 Temp min ≥ n = n = n = n = n = n = 54