Longitudinal Matching, or How to move things around by a hairs-width at the speed of light….

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Matching Injector To Linac. Caveats This is all loose and fuzzy – sort of religion We dont have real tight control over and knowledge of the machine –
Advertisements

FEL Beam Dynami cs FEL Beam Dynamics T. Limberg Short Bunches at FLASH.
The JLab IR/UV FEL Driver D. Douglas for the JLab FEL anarcho-syndicalist commune.
ILC Accelerator School Kyungpook National University
SPEAR3 short pulse development J. Safranek for the SSRL accelerator physics group* Outline: Timing mode fill patterns Short bunches –Low alpha Bunch length.
1 Bates XFEL Linac and Bunch Compressor Dynamics 1. Linac Layout and General Beam Parameter 2. Bunch Compressor –System Details (RF, Magnet Chicane) –Linear.
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Chris Tennant Jefferson Laboratory March 15, 2013 “Workshop to Explore Physics Opportunities with Intense, Polarized Electron Beams up to 300 MeV”
1 Preliminary Analysis of GTF Longitudinal Emittance Experiment D. Dowell SLAC July 18, 2001.
Driver Accelerator Design D. Douglas, G. Krafft, R. Li, L. Merminga, B. Yunn.
Bunch compressor design for eRHIC Yichao Jing and Vladimir Litvinenko FLS2012, Newport News, VA 3/8/2012.
The Jlab UV FEL Driver ERL
Longitudinal motion: The basic synchrotron equations. What is Transition ? RF systems. Motion of low & high energy particles. Acceleration. What are Adiabatic.
Recirculating pass optics V.Ptitsyn, D.Trbojevic, N.Tsoupas.
ERHIC Main Linac Design E. Pozdeyev + eRHIC team BNL.
Aperture Considerations in the FEL Upgrade Accepted design process –generate design  known –set aperture = N  + W N typically 4 to 6 W is “beam handling.
Cecile Limborg-Deprey Injector Commissioning September Injector Commissioning Plans C.Limborg-Deprey Gun exit measurements.
Introduction to ERLs C. Tennant USPAS - January 2011.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility 1 of 20 Distribution State A “Direct” Injection D. Douglas, C. Tennant, P. Evtushenko JLab.
FEL Beam Dynami cs FEL Beam Dynamics T. Limberg FEL driver linac operation with very short electron bunches.
Transverse emittance Two different techniques were used to measure the transverse emittance. The multislit mask in the injector 9 MeV Quadrupole scan for.
Longitudinal transfer function a.k.a. (M 55 ) measurements at the JLab FEL Pavel Evtushenko, JLab  Jlab IR/UV upgrade longitudinal phase space evolution.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility 1 of 35 Distribution State A “Operational” Beam Dynamics Issues D. Douglas, JLab.
The Overview of the ILC RTML Bunch Compressor Design Sergei Seletskiy LCWS 13 November, 2012.
ASTRA Injector Setup 2012 Julian McKenzie 17/02/2012.
High Current Electron Source for Cooling Jefferson Lab Internal MEIC Accelerator Design Review January 17, 2014 Riad Suleiman.
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Tom Powers LLRF Systems for Next Generation Light Sources LLRF Workshop October 2011 Authored by Jefferson Science Associates, LLC under U.S. DOE.
Design Requirements/Issues Source/Injector Performance -successful run of 135 pC -DC photocathode gun: cathode lifetime >600 C; GaAs wafer > 2 kC Delivery.
Overview of ERL MEIC Cooler Design Studies S.V. Benson, Y. Derbenev, D.R. Douglas, F. Hannon, F. Marhauser, R. A Rimmer, C.D. Tennant, H. Zhang, H. Wang,
DC Gun SRF Linac UV FEL Transport Line Dump IR Wiggler Bunching Chicane The Jlab UV FEL Driver ERL.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility 1 of 55 Distribution State A An Instrumentation Wish List for High Power/High Brightness ERLs D. Douglas,
Beam Modulation due to Longitudinal Space Charge Zhirong Huang, SLAC Berlin S2E Workshop 8/18/2003.
DC Gun SRF Linac UV FEL Transport Line Dump IR Wiggler Bunching Chicane The Jlab UV FEL Driver ERL.
Max Cornacchia, Paul Emma Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Max Cornacchia, Paul Emma Stanford Linear Accelerator Center  Proposed by M. Cornacchia (Nov.
FLASH II. The results from FLASH II tests Sven Ackermann FEL seminar Hamburg, April 23 th, 2013.
Beam Dynamics and FEL Simulations for FLASH Igor Zagorodnov and Martin Dohlus Beam Dynamics Meeting, DESY.
Electron Model for a 3-10 GeV, NFFAG Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
A bunch compressor design and several X-band FELs Yipeng Sun, ARD/SLAC , LCLS-II meeting.
DC Gun SRF Linac UV FEL Transport Line Dump IR Wiggler Bunching Chicane The Jlab UV FEL Driver ERL.
1 EMMA Tracking Studies Shinji Machida ASTeC/CCLRC/RAL 4 January, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Electron Sources for ERLs – Requirements and First Ideas Andrew Burrill FLS 2012 “The workshop is intended to discuss technologies appropriate for a next.
February 5, 2005D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c Status -Operations/Luminosity -Machine studies -Simulation and modeling -4.1GeV.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Jorg Kewisch, Dmitri Kayran Electron Beam Transport and System specifications.
The Next Generation Light Source Test Facility at Daresbury Jim Clarke ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory Ultra Bright Electron Sources Workshop, Daresbury,
Polarized Proton at RHIC: Status and Future Plan Mei Bai Collider Accelerator Dept. BNL A Special Beam Physics Symposium in Honor of Yaroslav Derbenev's.
1 Short Electron Pulses from RF Photoinjectors Massimo Ferrario INFN - LNF.
T. Atkinson*, A. Matveenko, A. Bondarenko, Y. Petenev Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie The Femto-Science Factory: A Multi-turn ERL.
Ultra-short electron bunches by Velocity Bunching as required for Plasma Wave Acceleration Alberto Bacci (Sparc Group, infn Milano) EAAC2013, 3-7 June,
Experience with Novosibirsk FEL Getmanov Yaroslav Budker INP, Russia Dec. 2012, Berlin, Germany Unwanted Beam Workshop.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz 1 Recirculating Linac Acceleration  End-to-end.
USPAS 2005 Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs1 CHESS / LEPP USPAS Course on Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs I. V. Bazarov Cornell University.
Svb[General files ‘01/Presentations]PAC 10 kW laser input.ppt Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Dept. of Energy.
LSC/CSR Instability Introduction (origin of the instability) CSR/LSC
Beam Commissioning Adam Bartnik.
Robert Bosch, Kevin Kleman and the WiFEL team
Sara Thorin, MAX IV Laboratory
Energy Recovered Linacs: The User Beam as RF Source
Plans of XFELO in Future ERL Facilities
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Tunable Electron Bunch Train Generation at Tsinghua University
The Strong RF Focusing:
The Cornell High Brightness Injector
Z. Huang LCLS Lehman Review May 14, 2009
Two-bunch self-seeding for narrow-bandwidth hard x-ray FELs
LCLS Tracking Studies CSR micro-bunching in compressors
Modified Beam Parameter Range
Physics 417/517 Introduction to Particle Accelerator Physics
New VUV-FEL Simulation results
Presentation transcript:

Longitudinal Matching, or How to move things around by a hairs-width at the speed of light….

DC Gun SRF Linac Dump IR Wiggler Bunching Chicane Longitudinal Matching Scenario Requirements on phase space: high peak current (short bunch) at FEL – bunch length compression at wiggler using quads and sextupoles to adjust compactions “small” energy spread at dump – energy compress while energy recovering – “short” RF wavelength/long bunch, large exhaust  p/p (~10%)  get slope, curvature, and torsion right (quads, sextupoles, octupoles) E  E  E  E  E  E 

Why a long bunch at injection? Space Charge… Longitudinal Space Charge…

Space Charge – Esp. LSC – Down Linac Had a number of issues in linac during commissioning: – Why was the bunch “too long” at the wiggler? bunch length at wiggler “too long” even when fully “optimized” (with good longitudinal emittance out of injector) – could only get fsec rms, needed 200 fsec – Why did the “properly tuned lattice” not fully compress the bunch? M 55 measurement showed proper injector-to-wiggler transfer function, but beam didn’t “cooperate”… minimum bunch length at “wrong” compaction – Why was the beam momentum spread asymmetric around crest? dp/p ahead of crest ~1.5 x smaller than after crest; average ~ PARMELA We blamed wakes, mis-phased cavities, fundamental design flaws, but in reality it was LSC… PARMELA simulation (C. Hernandez-Garcia) showed LSC-driven growth in correlated & uncorrelated dp/p; magnitudes consistent with observation Simulation showed uncorrelated momentum spread (which dictates compressed bunch length) tracks correlated (observable) momentum spread

Space-Charge Induced Degradation of Longitudinal Emittance Mechanism: self-fields cause bunch to “spread out” – Head of bunch accelerated, tail of bunch decelerated, causing correlated energy slew Ahead of crest (head at low energy, tail at high) observed momentum spread reduced After crest (head at high energy, tail at low) observed energy spread increased – “Intrinsic” momentum spread similarly aggravated (driving longer bunch) Simple estimates => imposed correlated momentum spread ~1/L b 2 and 1/r b 2 – The latter observed – bunch length clearly match-dependent – The former quickly checked…

Solution Additional PARMELA sims (C. Hernandez-Garcia) showed injected bunch length could be controlled by varying phase of the final injector cavity. – bunch length increased, uncorrelated momentum spread fell (but emittance increased) – reduced space charge driven effects – both correlated asymmetry across crest and uncorrelated induced momentum spread When implemented in accelerator: – final momentum spread increased from ~1% (full, ahead of crest) to ~2%; – bunch length of ~800–900 fsec FWHM reduced to ~500 fsec FWHM (now typically 350 fsec) – bunch compressed when “decorrelated” injector-to-wiggler transfer function used (“beam matched to lattice”)

Happek Scan

Key Points “Lengthen thy bunch at injection, lest space charge rise up to smite thee” (Pv. 32:1, or Hernandez-Garcia et al., Proc. FEL ’04) “best” injected emittance DOES NOT NECESSARILY produce best DELIVERED emittance! LSC effects visible with streak camera E t E t

Streak Camera Data from IR Upgrade -5 o -6 o 0o0o -1 o -2 o -3 o -4 o (t,E) vs. linac phase after crest (data by S. Zhang, v.g. from C. Tennant)

+5 o +6 o 0o0o +1 o +2 o +3 o +4 o Streak Camera Data from IR Upgrade (t,E) vs. linac phase, before crest asymmetry between + and - show effect of longitudinal space charge after 10 MeV (data by S. Zhang, v.g. from C. Tennant)

±4 and ±6 degrees off crest “+” on rising, “-” on falling part of waveform L bunch consistent with dp/p and M 56 from linac to observation point dp/p(-)>dp/p(+) on “-” side there are electrons at energy higher than max out of linac distribution evolves “hot spot” on “-” side (kinematic debunching, beam slides up toward crest…) => LSC a concern… +4 o -4 o -6 o +6 o

Longitudinal Matching: The Concept Basic idea: turn the long, low momentum spread bunch that comes out of the injector (maybe with chirp and curvature) into short bunch at the FEL How? Parallel-to-point image in longitudinal phase space – Low momentum spread/long => “parallel” beam – Put beam through lens (linac, off crest  longitudinal focusing) and then a longitudinal drift (beamline with compaction, M 56 ≠0 injected beam linac transport with nonzero compaction wiggler

Longitudinal Matching: The Math Injected beam – with chirp and curvature { Linac acts on injected beam { Recirculator acts on accelerated beam { E z zz E=Cz+Kz 2 EE eoeo t  E

Can expand E out -E o in powers of  z/ RF (small parameter) E out -E o =  E  z[C-  E(2  / RF ) sin  o ] +  z 2 [K-½  E(2  / RF ) 2 cos  o ] + … and shovel into z WIG, group by powers of  z and  E/E o (another small parameter) to get z WIG = M 56 (  E/E o ) + T 566 (  E/E o ) 2 +  z {1 + M 56 [(C/E o )-(  E/E o )(2  / RF ) sin  o ] +2 T 566 (  E/E o ) [(C/E o )-(  E/E o )(2  / RF ) sin  o ] } + (  z) 2 { [(K/E o )-½ (  E/E o ) (2  / RF ) 2 cos  o ][M T 566 (  E/E o )] + T 566 [(C/E o )-(  E/E o )(2  / RF ) sin  o ] 2 } + …

z WIG thus depends only on powers of (  E/E o ) – i.e. very small numbers - and a polynomial in  z. Proper choice of parameters (M 56, T 566,  o, C, K,…) can make those terms very small – or vanish – making z WIG independent of  z – i.e., all lengths at injection go to zero offset at the wiggler: the bunch is compressed, giving high peak current Simple Case Take C=0, K=0 and  E very small (i.e., make the injector designer’s life hard…) z WIG =  z {1 - M 56 [(  E/E o )(2  / RF ) sin  o ]} + (  z) 2 { [-½ (  E/E o ) (2  / RF ) 2 cos  o ]M 56 + T 566 [(  E/E o )(2  / RF ) sin  o ] 2 } + …

Take And get z WIG = 0 – a very compressed (and curvature corrected) bunch… Numerical Example (JLab UV FEL Driver) E o =135 MeV,  o =-10 o,  E=(135-9)/cos 10 o = 128 MeV, RF = 0.2 m M 56 = (0.2/2  )(135/128)(1/sin (-10 o )) = m T 566 = ½ (2  /0.2) 2 (128/135) cos(-10 o )( m) 3 = m

Summary: Longitudinal Match to FEL Inject long, low-energy-spread bunch to avoid LSC problems – need o rms with 1497 MHz 135 pC in our machine Chirp on the rising part of the RF waveform – counteracts LSC – phase set-point then determined by required momentum spread at wiggler Compress (to required order, including curvature/torsion compensation) using recirculator compactions M 56, T 566, W 5666,… Entire process generates a parallel-to-point longitudinal image from injector to wiggler

Energy Recovery Can do the same thing to compress energy spread from FEL during energy recovery. Bunch length compression: long bunch + small dp/p => chirped beam => compression by momentum compaction Energy compression: short bunch + large dp/p => decompress using momentum compaction => differential energy recovery to compress energy spread

Longitudinal Matching Schematic Longitudinal Matching for ERL-Driven FEL E  E  E  “oscillator” “amplifier” E  E  injector dump wiggler linac E 

Energy Recovery: Details Longitudinal Match to Wiggler Inject long, low-energy-spread bunch to avoid LSC problems – need o rms with 1497 MHz 135 pC in our machine Chirp on the rising part of the RF waveform – counteracts LSC – phase set-point then determined by required momentum spread at wiggler Compress (to required order, including curvature/torsion compensation) using recirculator compactions M 56, T 566, W 5666,… Entire process generates a parallel-to-point longitudinal image from injector to wiggler

Longitudinal Match to Dump FEL exhaust bunch is short & has very large energy spread (10-15%) => Must energy compress during energy recovery to avoid beam loss linac during energy recovery; this defines the longitudinal match to dump – Highest energy must be phase-synchronous with (or precede) trough of RF wave-form – Transport momentum compactions must match the slope (M 56 ), curvature (T 566 ), torsion (W 5666 ),… of the RF waveform Recovered bunch centroid usually not 180 o out of phase with accelerated centroid – Not all RF power recovered, but get as close as possible (recover ahead of trough), because… – Additional forward RF power required for field control, acceleration, FEL operation; more power needed for larger phase misalignments For specific longitudinal match, energy & energy spread at dump does not depend on lasing efficiency, exhaust energy, or exhaust energy spread – Only temporal centroid and bunch length change as lasing conditions change The match constitutes a point-to-parallel image from wiggler to dump

Energy Compression Beam central energy drops, beam energy spread grows Recirculator energy must be matched to beam central energy to maximize acceptance Beam rotated, curved, torqued to match shape of RF waveform Maximum energy can’t exceed peak deceleration available from linac – Corollary: entire bunch must preced trough of RF waveform E t E t All e - after trough go into high- energy tail at dump E t

Higher Order Corrections Without nonlinear corrections, phase space becomes distorted during deceleration Curvature, torsion,… can be compensated by nonlinear adjustments – differentially move phase space regions to match gradient required for energy compression E t Required phase bite is cos -1 (1-  E FEL /E); this is >25 o at the RF fundamental for 10% exhaust energy spread, >30 o for 15% –typically need 3 rd order corrections (octupoles) –also need a few extra degrees for tails, phase errors & drifts, irreproducible & varying path lengths, etc, so that system operates reliably In this context, harmonic RF very hard to use…

JLab IR Demo Dump core of beam off center, even though BLMs showed edges were centered (high energy tail)

Nonlinearity Control Validated By Measurement Figure 1: Inner sextupoles to g-cm and trim quads to -215 g Figure 2: trim quads at -185 g with same sextupoles Figure 3: trim quads at -245 g Figure 4: quads at -215, but sextupoles 3000 g below design, at g-cm Figure 5: where we left it: trim quads -215 g sextupoles at g-cm arrival  launch 

Injector to Wiggler Transport

If you do it right linac produces stable ultrashort pulses Can regularly achieve 300 fs FWHM electron pulses ~150 fsec rms

Injector to Reinjection Transport