GUINEA-PIG: A tool for beam-beam effect study C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay Daresbury, 26-27 April 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Background effect to Vertex Detector and Impact parameter resolution T. Fujikawa(Tohoku Univ.) Feb LC Detector Meeting.
Advertisements

TESLA R&D: LCAL/LAT Achim Stahl DESY Zeuthen Cracow Tel Aviv Minsk Prague Colorado Protvino UCL London Dubna.
Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Status on an IR Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory.
L. Suszycki, Tel Aviv, Sept, 2005 LumiCal background studies Contents: Guinea Pig results Vermasseren results Remarks on energy reconstruction Conclusions.
Pair backgrounds for different crossing angles Machine-Detector Interface at the ILC SLAC 6th January 2005 Karsten Büßer.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project  IR background issues and plans for Snowmass Jeff Gronberg/LLNL Linear Collider Workshop October 25, 2000.
ILC Machine-Detector Interface Challenges Philip Bambade LAL-Orsay Workshop on the Future Linear Collider Gandia, Spain, December 1, 2005.
27 June 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit ILC BDS 27 June 06.
Backgrounds and Forward Region Backgrounds and Forward Region FCAL Collaboration Workshop TAU, September 18-19, 2005 Christian Grah.
Status of ongoing studies for comparing 2-mrad and 20-mrad IRs T. Maruyama SLAC.
Beamdiagnostics by Beamstrahlung Analysis C.Grah ILC ECFA 2006 Valencia, 9 th November 2006.
An Introduction to the Physics and Technology of e+e- Linear Colliders Lecture 7: Beam-Beam Effects Nick Walker (DESY) DESY Summer Student Lecture 31 st.
August 2005Snowmass Workshop IP Instrumentation Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY Measurement of: Luminosity (precise and fast) Energy Polarisation.
August 2005Snowmass Workshop Instrumentation of the Very Forward Region of a Linear Collider Detector Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY.
Karsten Büßer Beam Induced Backgrounds at TESLA for Different Mask Geometries with and w/o a 2*10 mrad Crossing Angle HH-Zeuthen-LC-Meeting Zeuthen September.
Jan MDI WS SLAC Electron Detection in the Very Forward Region V. Drugakov, W. Lohmann Motivation Talk given by Philip Detection of Electrons and.
Karsten Büßer Beam Induced Backgrounds at TESLA for Different Mask Geometries with and w/o a 2*10 mrad Crossing Angle LCWS 2004 Paris April 19 th 2004.
BeamCal Simulations with Mokka Madalina Stanescu-Bellu West University Timisoara, Romania Desy, Zeuthen 30 Jun 2009 – FCAL Meeting.
Analysis of Beamstrahlung Pairs ECFA Workshop Vienna, November 14-17, 2005 Christian Grah.
Impact parameter resolution study for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
ILC Meeting Vancouver July What Does Beam-strahlung Tell Us? William Morse - BNL.
Simulation of Beam-Beam Background at CLIC André Sailer (CERN-PH-LCD, HU Berlin) LCWS2010: BDS+MDI Joint Session 29 March, 2010, Beijing 1.
Page 1 Overview and Issues of the MEIC Interaction Region M. Sullivan MEIC Accelerator Design Review September 15-16, 2010.
LCWS2004 Paris 1 Beam background study for GLC Tsukasa Aso, Toyama College of Maritime Technology and GLC Vertex Group H.Aihara, K.Tanabe, Tokyo Univ.
1Frank Simon ALCPG11, 20/3/2011 ILD and SiD detectors for 1 TeV ILC some recommendations following experience from the CLIC detector study
19 July 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit (via Eric Torrence) VLCW06 19 July 06.
ILC-ECFA Workshop Valencia November 2006 Four-fermion processes as a background in the ILC luminosity calorimeter for the FCAL Collaboration I. Božović-Jelisavčić,
Hongbo Zhu, Qinglei Xiu, Xinchou Lou (IHEP) On behalf of the CEPC study group ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop: Higgs Factory (HF2014) 9-12 October.
Fast Beam Diagnostics at the ILC Using the Beam Calorimeter Christian Grah, Desy FCAL Workshop February Cracow.
Implementation and study of depolarizing effects in GUINEA-PIG++ beam-beam interaction simulation Advanced QED Methods for Future Accelerators 3 rd -4.
Electron Detection in the SiD BeamCal Jack Gill, Gleb Oleinik, Uriel Nauenberg, University of Colorado ALCPG Meeting ‘09 2 October 2009.
Impact parameter resolutions for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.
1 O. Napoly ECFA-DESY Amsterdam, April 2003 Machine – Detector Interface : what is new since the TDR ? O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
ILC EXTRACTION LINE TRACKING Y. Nosochkov, E. Marin September 10, 2013.
1 Calorimeters of the Very Forward Region Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University DESY Collaboration High precision design March 5 th 2008.
W. Morse GamCal1 GamCal: a Beam-strahlung Gamma Detector for Beam Diagnostics William M. Morse Brookhaven National Lab.
16 February 2009CLIC Physics & Detectors Konrad Elsener 1... some issues regarding the forward region... (“picking up” from Lucie Linssen, 29 Sept 2008)
The Luminosity Calorimeter Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University Desy ( On behalf of the FCAL collaboration ) June 11 th 2008.
Beam-Beam interaction SIMulation: GUINEA-PIG C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay CARE 05, Geneva, November 2005.
07/24/07 Francisco Carrion OPTIMIZING THE TRACK DETECTOR Francisco Javier Carrión Ruiz Mentor: Hans Wenzel 07/08/09 SID CONCEPT FOR THE INTERNATIONAL LINEAR.
Systematic limitations to luminosity determination in the LumiCal acceptance from beam-beam effects C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay LCWS06, Bangalore, 9-13 March.
Impact of electromagnetic deflection due to beam-beam effect on Bhabha scattering C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay Krakow, February
Fast and Precise Luminosity Measurement at the ILC Ch.Grah LCWS 2006 Bangalore.
Correction methods for counting losses induced by the beam-beam effects in luminosity measurement at ILC Ivan Smiljanić, Strahinja Lukić, Ivanka Božović.
GUINEA-PIG: Beam-beam interaction simulation status M. Alabau, P. Bambade, O. Dadoun, G. Le Meur, C. Rimbault, F. Touze LAL - Orsay D. Schulte CERN - Genève.
LumiCal background and systematics at CLIC energy I. Smiljanić, Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences.
G.R.White: F.O.N. T. From Ground Motion studies by A.Seryi et al. (SLAC) ‘Fast’ motion (> few Hz) dominated by cultural noise Concern for structures.
Performance Study of Pair-monitor 2009/06/30 Yutaro Sato Tohoku Univ.
1 LoI FCAL Takashi Maruyama SLAC SiD Workshop, SLAC, March 2-4, 2009 Contributors: SLAC M. BreidenbachFNALW. Cooper G. Haller K. Krempetz T. MarkiewiczBNLW.
1 Impact de l’effet faisceau-faisceau sur la precision de la mesure de la luminosité à l’ILC Cécile Rimbault, LAL Orsay SOCLE,19-20 Novembre 2007, Clermont-Ferrand.
Very Forward Instrumentation: BeamCal Ch. Grah FCAL Collaboration ILD Workshop, Zeuthen Tuesday 15/01/2008.
Luminosity at  collider Marco Zanetti (MIT) 1. Intro,  colliders basics Luminosity at  colliders Sapphire simulation Alternative approaches Luminosity.
E+/e- Backgrounds at BEPCII/BESIII JIN Dapeng Aug. 22, 2011.
1 Updated comparison of feedback implementation for e + e - and e - e - modes of operation with realistic errors in the BDS M. Alabau Pons, P. Bambade,
Beam-Beam interaction SIMulation: GUINEA-PIG
Summary of the FCAL Workshop Cracow, February 12-13
The MDI at CEPC Dou Wang, Hongbo Zhu, Huamin Qu, Jianli Wang, Manqi Ruan, Qinglei Xiu, Sha Bai, Shujin Li, Weichao Yao, Yanli Jin, Yin Xu, Yiwei Wang,
Other beam-induced background at the IP
GUINEA-PIG++ Workshop on Spin Simulation Tools, 9-11 Nov 2010, DESY
Beam Background and the SVT Protection Collimator
Tony Hill Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Beam beam simulations with disruption (work in progress...)
Hongbo Zhu (IHEP, Beijing) On behalf of the CEPC Study Group
Preliminary results on depolarization due to beam-beam interaction at SuperB Cecile Rimbault LAL - Orsay.
Study of e+ e- background due to beamstrahlung for different ILC parameter sets Stephan Gronenborn.
Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting Local double ring MDI Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting
Parameter Optimization in Higgs Factories Beam intensity, beam-beam parameters, by*, bunch length, number of bunches, bunch charge and emittance.
Depolarization due to beam-beam interaction at SuperB
CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ?
Presentation transcript:

GUINEA-PIG: A tool for beam-beam effect study C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay Daresbury, April 2006

GUINEA-PIG: A tool for beam-beam effect study Beam-Beam effect overview: why a beam-beam simulation tool is needed Examples of backgrounds studies how beam parameters influence detector design how detector design influences beam parameters

Beam-Beam effects overview When beams collide: mixing of classical and quantum effects Bunches are deformed by electromagnetic attraction: Disruption  enhancement of luminosity High beam-beam field (kT for ILC)  Energy loss in the form of synchrotron radiation: beamstrahlung (~3%)

Disruption & Luminosity Disruption describes effect of EM field surrounding each bunch during the collision  change in beam trajectory, each beam acting as a thin focusing lens D x ≈0.162, D y ≈18.5 for ILC at 250 GeV D x ≈1.7/0.9, D y ≈244/127 for SuperB at 4/7 GeV*  Angular divergence of the beams  0 ≈0.35mrad for ILC;  0 ≈10mrad for SuperB*  Coulomb attraction between electron and positron beams increases the luminosity : pinch effect Luminosity (1/cm 2 /s) : enhancement factor H D ≈ f(D) ~ 1.7 for ILC at 500 GeV ~ 1.07 for SuperB* geometrical lumi * no more available

Beamstrahlung Beamstrahlung occurs in the EM field of a charged bunch. When two charged bunches collide, the EM field surrounding each bunch bend the trajectories of the opposite bunch particles  energetic photon are emitted  energy and luminosity loss at IP. Characterisation of the beamstrahlung: Beamstrahlung parameter,  : measure of the field seen by a beam particle in its rest frame ~0.046 for ILC at 500 GeV; <10 -5 for SuperB Nb of photons radiated during a collision per electron, n  ~1,25 for ILC at 500 GeV; ~0.3 for SuperB Fractional beamstrahlung energy loss per bunch,  B ~0.022 for ILC at 500 GeV; <10 -5 for SuperB

Beam-Beam effects overview When beams collide: mixing of classical and quantum effects Bunches are deformed by electromagnetic attraction: Disruption  enhancement of luminosity High beam-beam field (kT for ILC)  Energy loss in the form of synchrotron radiation: beamstrahlung (~3%) Secondary backgrounds Electromagnetic : e + + e - →  → e + e - …  Coherent pair creation : photon turns into e + e - pair by interacting with collective field of oncoming beam. Dominant process at 0.5 ≤  ≤ 100  Incoherent pair creation : a photon of one beam interacts with a photon of the other beam (~60 mb at ILC)

Beam-Beam effects overview When beams collide: mixing of classical and quantum effects Bunches are deformed by electromagnetic attraction: Disruption  enhancement of luminosity High beam-beam field (kT for ILC)  Energy loss in the form of synchrotron radiation: beamstrahlung (~3%) Secondary backgrounds Electromagnetic : e + + e - →  → e + e - … Hadronic : e + + e - →  → hadrons Electromagnetic deflections Effect on backgrounds (pairs...) Effect on luminosity measurements ? (Bhabha scattering) e + e - spin depolarisation effects 2 nd order beam-beam effect on background...  GUINEA-PIG (D. Schulte) & CAIN (K. Yokoya): beam-beam simulation tools

GUINEA-PIG and background studies GP simulates the collision of two bunches (e - e + or e - e - ) for a given set of input parameters: bunches sizes, emittances, energy, offset + computation parameters...  luminosity, distributions of beam particles beam after collision... GP generates backgrounds (e + e - pairs, hadrons, minijets...) those backgrounds can hit the detectors... Most important background: electromagnetic pairs. ECAL LumiCAL BeamCAL HCAL K. Büsser ILC detector

+ for B=3T for B=4T for B=5T Pairs reaching the VD for an inner layer radius of 15 mm and different magnetic fields : Pt (GeV/c)  (rad) Pt (GeV/c) Nominal Pairs deflection limit for Nominal option, this limit changes with beam size and charge  (rad) Low Power + + Ex: Impact of beam parameter sets on Vertex Detector background for a first VD layer of 15 mm  b 59  b 39  b  b 77  b 50  b

Example of background study with GUINEA-PIG: incoherent e+ e- pairs beamstrahlung  e+e+ e-e- virtual  e+e+ e-e- e e+e+ e-e- e+e+ e-e- 3processes : Breit-Wheeler Bethe-Heitler Landau-Lifshitz LL process does not depend on beamstrahlung !!!

Example of background study with GUINEA-PIG: incoherent e+ e- pairs in Super B  ee : 22.5mb Energy Pt vs theta

Beam-beam effects on pairs Deflection of low energy pairs due to the field of the opposite beam. Pt   Before Deflection Pt After Deflection e-e- e+(0)e+(0) e-e- e+e+ e+e+ e - (  1 >  0 )

Beam-beam effects on pairs Comparison with ILC ILC Nominal SuperB More Deflections in Super B

Pairs reaching Vertex Detector in SuperB for r = 10 mm; B=4T  ee ~ 2.5mb Pairs reaching VD

GuineaPig used to study beam-beam effect on bhabha scattering at low angle at ILC Deflection of Bhabhas due to the field of the opposite beam e+e+ e-(0)e-(0) e-e- e+e+ e+e+ e - (  1 <  0 ) Bhabha focusing versus production angle   (mrad) Bhabha angular deflections are about few mrad error on theoritical bhabha cross section   Which precision is it possible to obtain on luminosity measurement ?

Summary Interaction Point: most important part of the machine and detector ! GUINEA-PIG is a nice tool to study backgrounds, beam-beam effects... GuineaPig improvement at LAL: C. Rimbault, P. Bambade, G. Le Meur, F. Touze. Main goals: Spin depolarization implementation Web documentation Version manager Code description... In progress