IK/JJ May 6 th 2012 Slide 0 Results from EMMA Injection Line BPM-02 measurements on 25-04-12 May 6 th 2012 Ian Kirkman, James Jones.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Ian Kirkman and Graham Cox July 29 th EMMA commissioning shifts so far June 21 st, 22 nd, 23 rd and July 12 th, 13 th, 14 th, 15 th “Analogue” BPM.

Advertisements

IK March 1st 2012 Slide 0 EMMA: Update on BPM modelling and mapping March 1 st 2012 Ian Kirkman.

IK Slide 0 First look at the WCM data from July 2012 September 6 th 2012 Ian Kirkman.

Beam-based Measurements of HOMs in the HTC Adam Bartnik for ERL Team, Daniel Hall, John Dobbins, Mike Billing, Matthias Liepe, Ivan Bazarov.

Data analysis BTF 23 e 24 mag 05 T1 T2 500MeV electrons Repetition Rate 50 Hz Pulse Duration 1-10 ns Current/pulse 1 to 8 particles σ XY ~2mm Max Electronic.

Time-Series Analysis and Forecasting – Part III

The EMMA Turn-by-Turn BPM System A. Kalinin ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory STFC EMMA Commissioning Workshop Daresbury Laboratory, 21 May 2009.

FONT Meeting1 Calibrations over IP LO power scan N. Blaskovic.

Timepix Studies: Medipix Collaboration Summary and More Timewalk Plots Alessandra Borgia Marina Artuso Syracuse University Group Meeting – Thursday 20.

P. Emma, SLACLCLS FAC Meeting - April 29, 2004 Linac Physics, Diagnostics, and Commissioning Strategy P. Emma LCLS FAC Meeting April 29, 2004 LCLS.

12.18 report LIU Qian. Moon box test Purpose: Try to find the reason why the Q resolution is about 10%. Test: The stability of Ref-PMT test Ref-PMT voltage.

Tests of a 10cm by 10cm triple GEM detector

Analysis of ATF EXT/FF Orbit Jitter and extrapolation to IP (Data of ) ATF2 Project Meeting K. Kubo.

PI laser jitter measurements Data taken on 11 th April 2013.

UNRELIABLE DATA, SEE FIRST SLIDE WARNING!!! Data taken on these shifts had attenuation factors set incorrectly and problems with faraday cup bunch charge.

1 System Description (2-4) Gains from single photo-electrons in vacuum at room temperature (5-8) Linearity Test at V in vacuum at room temperature.

CAEN November 15, 2002 Vandelli W. 1 Test Conditions Prototype fed by CAEN Module 2527 through 100 m long cables From channels status page on generator.

Analogue BPM data analysis Calibration & resolution results.

Providing Beams for Power Production What has been done Problems and Boundary Conditions Future improvements and possibilities.

#3205 Summary Studying beam instabilities along bunch train 3 observables – INJ-BPM-01 fast bunch electronics – INJ FCUP-01 – Laser pulse power. Laser.

After last meeting Matt, Riad and I discussed January energy choice…  Focus on Physics paper measurements  Focus on 5 MeV systematics  Pick “final”

Advanced Accelerator Design/Development Proton Accelerator Research and Development at RAL Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 24 March 2011.

#3191, 14 Oct 2012 Cabling installed to allow fast BPM electronics on injector BPMs System is flexible enough to allow different INJ-BPMs to be used (not.

Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.

02/02/ S. Baron RF-Experiments Timing Meeting - Feb RF CMS ATLAS ALICE LHCb BTPX Status.

NA62 Gigatracker Working Group Meeting 23 March 2010 Massimiliano Fiorini CERN.

A. Fabich, CERN MERIT collaboration meeting, CERN, 7-8 February 2008 MERIT beam intensities, Feb 08A. Fabich, CERN1.

IP BPM Shift Report FONT Meeting: 22 December 2014 Talitha Bromwich.

1Ben Constance7 th January 2010 FONT5 December 2009 feedback results During the final shift we ran K1-to-P2 position feedback 151.2ns bunch spacing, quadrupoles.

The ATF Damping Ring BPM Upgrade Nathan Eddy, Eliana Gianfelice-Wendt Fermilab for the ATF Damping Ring BPM Team.

BPMs period General BPM Tasks/Projects New single bunch BPM electronics on ALICE AR1 + ST2 They had been tested already last year by Alex and Ian.

Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Extended ALICE Injector J.W. McKenzie, B.D. Muratori, Y.M. Saveliev STFC Daresbury Laboratory,

1 Franz-Josef Decker 1 Multi-Bunch Operation for LCLS Franz-Josef Decker March 17, Definitions and goals multi-bunch within.

Lesson 3.2. Parent Function General Formula We can write all parent functions in the following form:

#3205 Summary 6 th Nov 2012 Studying beam instabilities along bunch train 3 observables – INJ-BPM-01 fast bunch electronics – INJ FCUP-01 – Laser pulse.

N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 ATF November 2013 shift plan N. Blaskovic.

Jitter Monitor – Overview and Status Report Glenn Christian, Alexander Kalinin 30 May 2005.

G. Eigen, Paris, Introduction The SiPM response is non-linear and depends on operating voltage (V-V bd ) and temperature  SiPMs need monitoring.

Beam time structures 1 At any particular instance of time there will be only one kind of beam in the MI. It will be either protons or anti-protons. The.

#3205 Summary Studying beam instabilities along bunch train 3 observables – INJ-BPM-01 fast bunch electronics – INJ FCUP-01 – Laser pulse power. Laser.

CALICE, CERN June 29, 2004J. Zálešák, APDs for tileHCAL1 APDs for tileHCAL MiniCal studies with APDs in e-test beam J. Zálešák, Prague with different preamplifiers.

Beam-Based Calibration Screen calibration. Two screens with BPM in between. Scan beam position with upstream dipole/corrector. Absolute calibration. One.

Applications of transverse deflecting cavities in x-ray free-electron lasers Yuantao Ding SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory7/18/2012.

RF manipulations in SIS 18 and SIS 100 O. Chorniy.

Roundup of Week at ATF Mikey Davis 19 April /26.

Momentum and Momentum Spread Measurements

Further Tracking Studies and March Trip Plan

Alternative BPM Processing Scheme – May08 Demo

Wednesday :06 Dump fill 3533: interlock BPMS in IP6

cathode ray oscilloscope

Ultrasound Physics Image Formation ‘97.

Monitoring glitches in the frequency divider

Summary of experience with Tevatron synchrotron light diagnostics

AWAKE status and readiness for phase #2

MERIT beam intensities

BC2 Commissioning Parameters

Tuesday 22nd January - morning

G. Arduini, R. Calaga, E. Metral, G. Papotti, G. Rumolo, B. Salvant, R

Time-Resolved Images of Coherent Synchrotron Radiation Effects

LHC Morning Meeting - G. Arduini

Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML

VELA BPMs Alex Brynes.

VELA – CLARA AP (Draft) Goals Software Goals

High Level Physics Applications for LCLS Commissioning

Imperial laser system and analysis

Transverse size and distribution of FEL x-ray radiation of the LCLS

VELA Charge Measurements – Update

Linac Diagnostics Commissioning Experience

Presentation transcript:

IK/JJ May 6 th 2012 Slide 0 Results from EMMA Injection Line BPM-02 measurements on May 6 th 2012 Ian Kirkman, James Jones

Data taken quickly at end of the final shift of the April 2012 commissioning run (25 th / 26 th ) Initial aims: to demonstrate that the summed value of the 4 pickup voltages from a cylindrical BPM varies linearly with bunch charge; to examine beam position vs bunch charge. IK/JJ May 6 th 2012 Measurements Slide 1 Method: ALICE in SB mode at 5 Hz Switch off DIP-02, monitoring charge in Faraday cup DUMP-01 Set ALICE attenuation level (proportional to laser power?) View FC response on ‘scope, and save digitised data to file Issue multiple EPICS ‘caget’ commands at each attenuation level to read BPM-02, and save data to file

Oscilloscope screens for attenuation level at the 2 extreme values, 1.0 (left) and 0.3 (right) IK/JJ May 6 th 2012 Measurements Slide 2 For each attenuation value: points in each saved data file Determine background level from mean and σ of points Determine background subtracted peak height, and apply ± σ Note that below attenuation ~ 0.3, the pulse becomes hard to distinguish

IK/JJ May 6 th 2012 Variation of Bunch Charge from FC with Attenuation level Slide 3 The ‘threshold’ attenuation level required for non-zero bunch charge in EMMA is ~ 0.1

IK/JJ May 6 th 012 Details of data analysis at attenuation value = 0.3 Slide 4 Pedestal values v4 and v8 are nicely constant, with ~ 1mV jitter Apparent jitters on horizontal (Xm) and vertical (Ym) beam positions Apparent systematic variation of mean Xm and Ym with attenuation level (slides 6, 7, 8)

IK/JJ May 6 th 2012 Variation of 4 Summed Pickups with Attenuation Level Slide 5 Nicely linear with reasonable statistics Threshold attenuation level again ~ 0.1

IK/JJ May 6 th 2012 Horizontal bunch movement with bunch charge (IL-BPM02) Slide 6 Systematic narrowing of the horizontal spread of positions with increasing bunch charge Systematic mean movement outwards with increasing bunch charge

IK/JJ May 6 th 2012 Vertical bunch movement with bunch charge (IL-BPM02) Slide 7 Indication of downwards beam movement with increasing bunch charge (to Att. ~ 0.7) Some indication of vertical narrowing (again to Att. ~ 0.7)

IK/JJ May 6 th 2012 Beam positions at IL BPM-02 with bunch charge Slide 8 Summarises plots in slides 6 and 7