Design Considerations LHC hadron beams: E p =7 TeV E A =E e  Z/A Luminosity O (10 33 ) cm -2 s -1 with Beam Power 100 MW (wall plug) Integrated e ± p.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Linac-LHC ep Collider Options F. Zimmermann, F. Bordry, H.-H. Braun, O.S. Bruning, H. Burkhardt, A. de Roeck, R. Garoby, T. Linnecar, K.-H. Mess, J. Osborne,
Advertisements

Accelerator R&D towards eRHIC Yue Hao, C-AD For the eRHIC Team.
Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider.
Study of the Luminosity of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel CERN June F. Willeke, DESY.
Merminga, LRP2007, Jan e + p/A Facilities Lia Merminga Center for Advanced Studies of Accelerators Jefferson Laboratory January 12-14, 2007.
CERN & the High Energy Frontier Emmanuel Tsesmelis CERN Directorate Office Hellenic High Energy Physics Society Chios 27 April 2013.
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #8.
Quark *) Distributions with the LHeC 1 Max Klein DESY, Meeting on QCD at the LHeC Project Scenarios Statistics Systematics Light Quarks Heavy.
1 LHeC Considerations for a Lepton Hadron Collider Option for the LHC F. Willeke, BNL The 4th Electron Ion Collider Workshop Hampton University,
LHeC : Linac-Ring Option Hans-H. Braun / CERN  General consideration  Proton ring issues  70 GeV  140 GeV  Polarisation and Positrons  Comparison.
The Large Hadron electron Collider (LHeC) at the LHC F. Zimmermann, F. Bordry, H.-H. Braun, O.S. Brüning, H. Burkhardt, A. Eide, A. de Roeck, R. Garoby,
ERHIC design status V.Ptitsyn for the eRHIC design team.
Luminosity Prospects of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel DESY Colloquium May F. Willeke, DESY.
MeRHIC Design V.Ptitsyn on behalf of MeRHIC Design team: M. Bai, J. Beebe-Wang, I. Ben-Zvi, M. Blaskiewicz, A. Burrill, R. Calaga, X. Chang, A. Fedotov,
Thomas Roser RHIC Open Planning Meeting December 3-4, 2003 RHIC II machine plans Electron cooling at RHIC Luminosity upgrade parameters.
LEP3 RF System: gradient and power considerations Andy Butterworth BE/RF Thanks to R. Calaga, E. Ciapala.
Brain Gestorme: Status of the LHeC Ring-Ring / Linac- Ring Basic Parameters I appologise to talk about things you already know...
Photon Collider at CLIC Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk LCWS 2001, Granada, Spain, September 25-30,2011.
PST05 Workshop, Nov 14-17, 2005 M. Farkhondeh 1 Polarized Electron Sources for Future Electron Ion Colliders M. Farkhondeh, Bill Franklin and E. Tsentalovich.
The LHC: an Accelerated Overview Jonathan Walsh May 2, 2006.
Peter Paul 12/16/06e-A Collider concept1 Brief History of the e-A Collider Concept Peter Paul BNL/SBU.
1 QM2006 D.I.Lowenstein RHIC : The Path Forward Presented to Quark Matter 2006 Shanghai, PRC Derek I. Lowenstein Brookhaven National Laboratory November.
18 th International Spin Physics Symposium Polarized Beams at EIC V. Ptitsyn.
Thomas Roser EIC collaboration workshop MIT, April 6, 2007 eRHIC Design eRHIC Schemes R&D Items Cost and Schedule.
Road beyond Standard Model At the energy frontier through synergy of hadron - hadron colliders (LHC, (V)HE-LHC?) lepton - hadron colliders (LHeC ??) lepton.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
Eric Prebys, FNAL Snowmass 2013 Community Planning Meeting Fermilab, October 11-13, 2012 Minneapolis.
Accelerator Group for LHeC LHeC Meeting at CERN; October Questions raised by Max  does the e-ring fit into the tunnel?  can one bypass ATLAS and.
2015 LHeC Coordination Group meeting 2 nd October 2015 Oliver Brüning, CERN1 ERL Demonstrator for LHeC: Critical issues -Choice of multi-turn ERL configuration.
ERHIC Conceptual Design V.Ptitsyn, J.Beebe-Wang, I.Ben-Zvi, A.Fedotov, W.Fischer, Y.Hao, V.N. Litvinenko, C.Montag, E.Pozdeyev, T.Roser, D.Trbojevic.
UMass Amherst Christine Aidala Jacksonville, FL Measuring the Gluon Helicity Distribution at a Polarized Electron-Proton Collider APS April Meeting 2007.
Summary of the Accelerator Working Group 1st ECFA LHeC Workshop; 1-3 September 2008, Divonne 1 First discussions started at CERN at the end of last year.
ERHIC design status V.Ptitsyn for the eRHIC design team.
1 BINP Tau-Charm Project 3 February 2010, KEK, Tsukuba E.Levichev For the BINP C-Tau team.
Design Optimization of MEIC Ion Linac & Pre-Booster B. Mustapha, Z. Conway, B. Erdelyi and P. Ostroumov ANL & NIU MEIC Collaboration Meeting JLab, October.
Thomas Roser EIC AC meeting November 3-4, 2009 EIC Accelerator R&D Strategy and Programs Thomas Roser/Andrew Hutton BNL / Jefferson Lab R&D program is.
LER Workshop, October 11, 2006LER & Transfer Line Lattice Design - J.A. Johnstone1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Introduction The.
10 th January rd EuCARD TLEP3 workshop L. Rinolfi Review of the LEP Injector complex L.Rinolfi.
F. Willeke, Snowmass Luminosity Limitations of e-p Colliders Extrapolation from HERA Experience Examples for IR Layout LINAC-Ring Limitations HERA.
Already time to think of upgrading the machine Two options presently discussed/studied Higher luminosity ~10 35 cm -2 s -1 (SLHC) –Needs changes in.
MeRHIC Internal Cost Review October, Dmitry Kayran for injector group MeRHIC Internal Cost Review October 7-8, 2009 MeRHIC: Injection System Gun.
1 RHIC II – Ion Operation Wolfram Fischer RHIC II Workshop, BNL – Working Group: Equation of State 27 April 2005.
Future Circular Collider Study Kickoff Meeting CERN ERL TEST FACILITY STAGES AND OPTICS 12–15 February 2014, University of Geneva Alessandra Valloni.
P OSSIBILITIES FOR MAINTAINING AA AND PP CAPABILITIES IN PARALLEL WITH E RHIC V. Ptitsyn Collider-Accelerator Department BNL RHIC and AGS Users Meeting,
Lecture 11 Luminosity & Colliders Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
BINP tau charm plans and other projects in Turkey/China A. Bogomyagkov BINP SB RAS, Novosibirsk.
FCC-ee injector complex including Booster Yannis Papaphilippou, CERN Thanks to: M.Aiba (PSI), Ö.Etisken (Ankara Un.), K.Oide (KEK), L.Rinolfi (ESI-JUAS),
WG1: Overall Design personal highlights report by Nick Walker First project meeting 2/12/2004 conveners: Kiyoshi Kubo (KEK) Tor Raubenheimer (SLAC)
J. Osborne LHeC Linac Design Issues Frank Zimmermann 10 December 2010.
LHeC Sources Rinolfi CERN Thanks to:
Possible EIC-relevant tests at CERN’s ERL TF
ILC - Upgrades Nick Walker – 100th meeting
Progress in the Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design
LHeC interaction region
Frank Zimmermann LHC-CC’10, Geneva, 16 December 2010
R&D Topics for FOA Funding Proposals
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Future Collider Projects at CERN
Injection facility for Novosibirsk Super Charm Tau Factory
Status of the VEPP-2000 Collider Project at Novosibirsk
CEPC Booster Design Dou Wang, Chenghui Yu, Tianjian Bian, Xiaohao Cui, Chuang Zhang, Yudong Liu, Na Wang, Daheng Ji, Jiyuan Zhai, Wen Kang, Cai Meng, Jie.
CEPC-SppC Accelerator CDR Copmpletion at the end of 2017
A brief Introduction of eRHIC
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
CSP Meeting CERN CERN Accelerators in th November 2010
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Status of CTC activities for the Damping rings
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
MEIC New Baseline: Performance and Accelerator R&D
Presentation transcript:

Design Considerations LHC hadron beams: E p =7 TeV E A =E e  Z/A Luminosity O (10 33 ) cm -2 s -1 with Beam Power 100 MW (wall plug) Integrated e ± p : O(100) fb -1 ≈ 100 * L(HERA)  synchronous ep and pp operation Two solutions e Ring in the LHC tunnel (Ring-Ring - RR) Superconducting ERL (Linac-Ring -LR)

Physics and Range New Physics High precision partons in plateau of the LHC Nuclear Structure & dynamics High Density Matter Large x eQ states GUT (δα s =0.1%) Excited fermions Hot/cold spots Single top Higgs PDFs Multi-Jets DVCS Unintegrated partons Saturation Vector Mesons IP - graviton Odderons NC couplings sin 2 Θ Beauty Charm Partons in nuclei Shadowing …. Q 2 = 4momentum transfer 2 x = Bjorken x: fraction of p’s momentum Physics

TOBB ETU KEK LHeC - Participating Institutes

Accelerator: Ring - Ring Baseline Parameters and Installation Scenarios Lattice Design [Optics, Magnets, Bypasses] IR for high Luminosity and large Acceptance rf Design [Installation in bypasses, Crabs?] Injector Complex [Sources, Injector] Injection and Dump Cryogenics – work in progress Beam-beam effects Impedance and Collective Effects Vacuum and Beam Pipe Integration into LHC e Beam Polarization Deuteron and Ion Beams 5.3m long (35 cm) 2 slim + light(er) 3080 magnets Prototypes: BINP-CERN LHeC Ring Dipole Magnet.12-.8T 1.3kA 0.8MW Workpackages as formulated in 2008, now in the draft CDR

Novosibirsk dipole prototype measured field reproducible to the required CERN prototype under test 3080 dipoles F+D Injector to Ring – similar to Linac design [R+D] Magnets

Bypassing CMS RF

Bypassing ATLAS For the CDR the bypass concepts were decided to be confined to ATLAS and CMS

Ring: Dipole + Quadrupole Magnets 5m long (35 cm) 2 slim + light for installation BINP & CERN prototypes 736 magnets 1.2 m long

LINAC - Ring Baseline Parameters [Designs, Real photon option, ERL] Sources [Positrons, Polarisation] Rf Design Injection and Dump Beam-beam effects Lattice/Optics and Impedance Vacuum, Beam Pipe Integration and Layout Interaction Region Magnets Cryogenics Workpackages as formulated in 2008, now in the draft CDR 1056 cavities 66 cryo modules per linac 721 MHz, 19 MV/m CW Similar to SPL, ESS, XFEL, ILC, eRHIC, Jlab 21 MW rf Cryo 29 MW for 37W/m heat load Magnets in the 2 * 3 arcs: m long dipoles per arc m long quadrupoles per arc IP2 Linac (racetrack) inside the LHC for access at CERN Territory U=U(LHC)/3=9km

60 GeV Energy Recovery Linac CERN 1CERN 2 Jlab BNL Two 10 GeV energy recovery Linacs, 3 returns, 720 MHz cavities

CDR draft LINAC 60 GeV ERL

CDR draft

Design Parameters electron beamRRLRLR *) e- energy at IP[GeV] luminosity [10 32 cm -2 s -1 ] polarization [%]4090 bunch population [10 9 ] e- bunch length [mm]100.3 bunch interval [ns]25 50 transv. emit.  x,y [mm] 0.58, rms IP beam size  x,y [  m] 30, 1677 e- IP beta funct.  * x,y [m] 0.18, full crossing angle [mrad]100 geometric reduction H hg repetition rate [Hz]--10 beam pulse length [ms]--5 ER efficiency-94%- average current [mA] tot. wall plug power[MW]100 proton beamRRLR bunch pop. [10 11 ]1.7 *) 1.7 tr.emit.  x,y [  m] 3.75 spot size  x,y [  m] 30, 167  * x,y [m] 1.8, bunch spacing [ns]25 RR= Ring – Ring LR =Linac –Ring Parameters from Draft CDR Ring: with 1 o as baseline : L/2 Linac: clearing gap: L*2/3 LHC “ultimate” p beam used *) : 1.7 probably conservative Design also for D and A (L eN = cm -2 s -1 ) *) pulsed, but high energy ERL not impossible

LS3 --- HL LHC LHeC Tentative Time Schedule

title