Oregon Public Utility Commission Safety & Reliability Section J.R. Gonzalez, P.E., Manager Jerry Murray, Sr. Utility Analyst Gary Putnam, Utility Analyst.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Subcontractor Electrical Safety & NFPA 70E
Advertisements

Elements of an Effective Safety and Health Program
Fixed price contract: A contract that provides a price for each procurement item obtained under the contract.
SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENTS The Technical Contract Within the Master Agreement.
SOP Melody Lin, Ph.D. Deputy Director, Office for Human Research Protections Director, International Activities Santiago, Chile August.
Notices of Violation, Orders to Cease Operation and Consent Orders.
Montana Safe Digging Law 2014 Joint Engineers Conference Thu - Nov :00am-11:30am.
Potential Pattern of Violations Dennis Cotton Assistant District Manager Technical Division October 12, 2011.
Nearly 50 American workers are injured every minute of the 40-hour work week and almost 17 die each day (OSHA) In 2003: 111 million workers at 7 million.
1 OSHA FEDERAL OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT (OSHA) OF 1970 George Mason University College of Nursing and Health Science Regulatory Requirements.
1 CXS490 Federal Regulations FAQ. Why do the Federal Halocarbon Regulations, 2003 exist? The Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone.
Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act Final Rule Joseph Baressi June 3, 2009.
Accident Investigation
Tenant Package Coldwell Banker Pioneer Real Estate Property Management Division Sunnymead Blvd. Moreno Valley, Ca off (951) fax (951)
SB 490 Amendments to the Kansas Underground Utility Damage Prevention Act Effective January 1, 2003.
Effective Workplace Safety Inspections OFFICE OF RISK MANAGEMENT LOSS PREVENTION UNIT.
Health and safety at work
ESSENTIAL SAFETY MEARURES IN BUILDINGS PRESENTED BY: BRUCE HOWIE.
Controlling Risk by Managing Change Jessica Blaydes & Gary Fobare Honeywell Aerospace 2013 Region IX Workshop.
OH&S Management System
Oregon Public Utility Commission Safety and Reliability Section Jerry Murray, Manager Bob Sipler, Utility Analyst What is an “Attachment”? … that’s easy!
Incident Reporting Procedure
Federalwide Assurance Presentation for IRB Members.
■ This Training Module is designed to educate Management on FMCSA Compliance Review (CR).
In pressing for prompt passage of workplace safety and health legislation, New Jersey Senator Harrison A. Williams Jr. said, –"The knowledge that the.
Pre Incident Planning and Related Loss Reduction Strategies
Commissioning of Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems Presented by: Charles Kilfoil Bechtel National Waste Treatment Plant Richland WA.
Customer Service Enforcement After AB 2987 John Risk Communications Support Group, Inc. (c) 2006 John Risk Communications Support Group, Inc. (c) 2006.
Public Hearing August 30, 2014 Drive-Way Ordinance Please Sign in…
Construction and Demolition Inert Processing Operations Compliance First: Evaluation of Solid Waste Facilities’ State Standards Training Provided By: California.
Section 54’s 54.Inspector’s power to deal with dangerous conditions – (1) if an inspector has reason to believe that any occurrence, practice or condition.
Environmental Health and Safety (EH&S) Supplier Awareness Training ISR Systems Danbury, CT 2011.
1. Objectives  Describe the responsibilities and procedures for reporting and investigating ◦ incidents / near-miss incidents ◦ spills, releases, ◦ injuries,
Kathy Alexander, Ph.D. Technical Specialist Water Availability Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
The OSH Act, Standards, & Liabilities
SUMMARY OF INFORMAL COMMENTS Temporary Waiver of Terms Regulations May 2006.
May 16, 2007 Board of Directors Texas Regional Entity Division Update Sam R. Jones ERCOT President & CEO.
2010 Florida Building Code: I nterpretation P rocess O verview.
Procedures for Dealing with Safety or Health Concerns.
OREGON JOINT USE ASSOCIATION PRIORITIZATION OF REPAIRS.
PUC Joint-Use Dispute Resolution Process Oregon Public Utility Commission Safety & Reliability Section.
1 Roadmap to Timely Access Compliance Kristene Mapile, Staff Counsel Crystal McElroy, Staff Counsel Division of Licensing Department of Managed Health.
IAEC Reliability Webinar Presented by: Regi Goodale and Ethan Hohenadel December 11,
M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION Energy Optimization Plans 2011 Biennial Review Pre-Filing Update Rob Ozar, Manager Energy Optimization Section March.
1 SAFETY SAFETY Introduction & Overview INSY 3020 SPRING 2005.
New York State Education Department Charter School Office Initial Statement January 2013.
OSHA – What to Expect When You’re Inspected (Following Federal Guidelines)
San Marino Unified School District Contracts Presentation Presented by: Wesley Lee, Budget Analyst October 28, 2015.
Introduction to OSHA (Part 1)
OSHA Guidelines for Employers to Reduce Motor Vehicle Crashes
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
OSHA Office of Training and Education 1 Hazard Communication.
Gasunie is one of the biggest gas infrastructure companies in Europe. Within the company, we give safety the highest priority; it forms the basis of our.
Conservation Development and Planning Department Code Compliance Flow Chart for County Code (Zoning & Land Use) Violations COMPLAINT RESEARCH AND PRIORITIZE.
NAPA COUNTY Conservation Development and Planning Department Code Compliance Flow Chart Building Code Violations 1 COMPLAINT Written complaint (form, letter,
Emergency Preparedness. Proposed Emergency Preparedness Rules NFR/LMC §19.326(a) deleted and moved to § for Emergency Preparedness Rules Places.
Legal Rights and Responsibilities of Employers, Supervisors and Employees Lesson 2.
OH&S Management System
Application of Northern Virginia Electric Cooperative PUE
Incident Reporting And Investigation Program
Cross Connection Survey Training
Energy Control (Lockout/Tagout)
OH&S Management System
Introduction to OSHA (Part 1)
Incident Reporting And Investigation Program
General Requirements of NFPA 101
Lesson 2 Legal Rights and Responsibilities
County Wide Safety Program
Initial Licensure Process, Survey Types & Licensure Action
Presentation transcript:

Oregon Public Utility Commission Safety & Reliability Section J.R. Gonzalez, P.E., Manager Jerry Murray, Sr. Utility Analyst Gary Putnam, Utility Analyst John Wallace, Utility Analyst Electric and Communications Program Oregon Public Utility Commission Safety & Reliability Section J.R. Gonzalez, P.E., Manager Jerry Murray, Sr. Utility Analyst Gary Putnam, Utility Analyst John Wallace, Utility Analyst

2 Current Review for Compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules Chapter 860 Division 24 Rule: Every operator shall construct, operate, and maintain electrical supply and communication lines in compliance with the standards prescribed by the 2007 Edition of the National Electrical Safety Code approved June 16, 2006, by the American National Standards Institute. Oregon Public Utility Commission Staff currently do field reviews of areas where power supply operators have performed a detailed inspection of their facilities for the purposes of validating the accuracy of the operators inspection program. Subsequently staff prepares a written report identifying violations of the NESC that were observed during the inspection with specific time frames for corrections. Communication companies attaching to the poles identified by the power supply company with NESC violations will also be cited with specific time frames specified for corrections.

Ten Most Common NESC Violations

Ten Most Common NESC Violations by Year

6 Inspection of Electric Supply and Communication Facilities Rule: ) An operator of electric supply facilities or an operator of communication facilities must: (a) Construct, operate, and maintain its facilities in compliance with the Commission Safety Rules; and (b) Conduct detailed inspections of its overhead facilities to identify violations of the Commission Safety Rules.

7 Inspection of Electric Supply and Communication Facilities (continued) Rule: (A) The maximum interval between detailed inspections is ten years, with a recommended inspection rate of ten percent of overhead facilities per year. During the fifth year of the inspection cycle, the operator must: (i) Report to the Commission that 50 percent or more of its total facilities have been inspected pursuant to this rule; or (ii) Report to the Commission that less than 50 percent of its total facilities have been inspected pursuant to this rule and provide a plan for Commission approval to inspect the remaining percentage within the next five years. The Commission may modify the plan or impose conditions to ensure sufficient inspection for safety purposes.

8 Inspection of Electric Supply and Communication Facilities (continued) Rule: (B) Detailed inspections include, but are not limited to, visual checks or practical tests of all facilities, to the extent required to identify violations of Commission Safety Rules. Where facilities are exposed to extraordinary conditions or when an operator has demonstrated a pattern of non-compliance with Commission Safety Rules, the Commission may require a shorter interval between inspections. (c) Conduct detailed facility inspections of its underground facilities on a ten-year maximum cycle, with a recommended inspection rate of 10 percent of underground facilities per year. (d) Maintain adequate written records of policies, plans and schedules to show that inspections and corrections are being carried out in compliance with this rule and OAR Each operator must make these records available to the Commission upon its request.

9 Inspection of Electric Supply and Communication Facilities (continued) Rule: (2) Each operator of electric supply facilities must: (a) Designate an annual geographic area to be inspected pursuant to subsection (1)(b) of this rule within its service territory; (b) Provide timely notice of the designation of the annual geographic area to all owners and occupants. The annual coverage areas for the entire program must be made available in advance and in sufficient detail to allow all operators with facilities in that service territory to plan needed inspection and correction tasks. Unless the parties otherwise agree, operators must be notified of any changes to the established annual geographic area designation no later than 12 months before the start of the next year's inspection; and

10 Inspection of Electric Supply and Communication Facilities (continued) Rule: (c) Perform routine safety patrols of overhead electric supply lines and accessible facilities for hazards to the public. The maximum interval between safety patrols is two years, with a recommended rate of 50 percent of lines and facilities per year. (d) Inspect electric supply stations on a 45 day maximum schedule.

11 Prioritization of Repairs by Operators of Electric Supply Facilities and Operators of Communication Facilities Rule: (1) A violation of the Commission Safety Rules that poses an imminent danger to life or property must be repaired, disconnected, or isolated by the operator immediately after discovery. (2) Except as otherwise provided by this rule, the operator must correct violations of Commission Safety Rules no later than two years after discovery.

12 Prioritization of Repairs by Operators of Electric Supply Facilities and Operators of Communication Facilities (continued) Rule: (3) An operator may elect to defer correction of violations of the Commission Safety Rules that pose little or no foreseeable risk of danger to life or property to correction during the next major work activity. (a) In no event shall a deferral under this section extend for more than ten years after discovery. (b) The operator must develop a plan detailing how it will remedy each such violation. c) If more than one operator is affected by the deferral, all affected operators must agree to the plan. If any affected operators do not agree to the plan, the correction of violation(s) may not be deferred.

13 Prioritization of Repairs by Operators of Electric Supply Facilities and Operators of Communication Facilities (continued) Rule: (4) For good cause shown, or where equivalent safety can be achieved, unless otherwise prohibited by law, the Commission may for a specific installation waive the requirements of OAR

14 Proposed record keeping for deferring a Commission Safety Rule beyond 2 years If an operator other than the pole owner is not directly involved in the proposed violation deferral they only need to sign off on the proposed plan. They would not be required to maintain the plan of correction and signed approval forms until violation is corrected. This statement applies to the following scenarios.

15 Scenario #1: Pole owner violation on pole owner's pole with no joint use attachment 1. Pole owner would develop a plan of correction and maintain plan of correction until violation is corrected, not to exceed ten years from discovery.

16 Scenario #2: Violation affecting electric supply operator (pole owner) and licensee 1. Operator causing violation would develop a plan detailing how it will remedy each violation. 2. Present plan to all affected operators on pole for review. 3. If any affected operators do not agree to the plan, the violation may not be deferred. 4. If all operators are in agreement obtain written approval from all affected parties. 5. Pole owner and affected parties creating violation will maintain plan of correction and signed approval forms until violation is corrected, not to exceed ten years from discovery.

17 Scenario #3: Violation affecting electric supply licensee and communication operator (pole owner) 1. Operator causing violation would develop a plan detailing how it will remedy each violation. 2. Present plan to all affected operators on pole for review. 3. If any affected operators do not agree to the plan, the violation may not be deferred. 4. If all operators are in agreement obtain written approval from all affected parties. 5. Pole owner and affected parties creating violation will maintain plan of correction and signed approval forms until violation is corrected, not to exceed ten years from discovery.

18 Scenario #4: Violation affecting communication licensees only (electric supply operator is pole owner) 1. Operator causing violation would develop a plan detailing how it will remedy each violation. 2. Present plan to all affected operators on pole for review. 3. If any affected operators do not agree to the plan, the violation may not be deferred. 4. If all operators are in agreement obtain written approval from all affected parties. 5. Pole owner and affected parties creating violation will maintain plan of correction and signed approval forms until violation is corrected, not to exceed ten years from discovery.

19 Scenario #5: Violation affecting communication operators only (communication operator is pole owner) 1. Operator causing violation would develop a plan detailing how it will remedy each violation. 2. Present plan to all affected operators on pole for review. 3. If any affected operators do not agree to the plan, the violation may not be deferred. 4. If all operators are in agreement obtain written approval from all affected parties. 5. Pole owner and affected parties creating violation will maintain plan of correction and signed approval forms until violation is corrected, not to exceed ten years from discovery.

20 Minimum Vegetation Clearance Requirements Rule: (2) The requirements in this rule provide the minimum standards for conductor clearances from vegetation to provide safety for the public and utility workers, reasonable service continuity, and fire prevention. Each operator of electric supply facilities must have a vegetation management program and keep appropriate records to ensure that timely trimming is accomplished to keep the designated minimum clearances. These records must be made available to the Commission upon request.

21 Incident Reports Rule: (1) As used in this rule: (a) "Serious injury to person" means, in the case of an employee, an injury which results in hospitalization. In the case of a non-employee, "serious injury" means any contact with an energized high-voltage line, or any incident which results in hospitalization. Treatment in an emergency room is not hospitalization.

22 Incident Reports (continued) Rule: (A) Damage to operator and non-operator property exceeding $100,000; or (B) In the case of a gas operator, damage to property exceeding $5,000; or (C) In the case of an electricity service supplier (ESS) as defined in OAR , damage to ESS and non-ESS property exceeding $100,000 or failure of ESS facilities that causes or contributes to a loss of energy to consumers; or (D) Damage to property which causes a loss of service to over 500 customers (50 customers in the case of a gas operator) for over two hours (five hours for an electric operator serving less than 15,000 customers) except for electric service loss that is restricted to a single feeder line and results in an outage of less than four hours.

23 Incident Reports (continued) Rule: (2) Except as provided in section (5) of this rule, every reporting operator must give immediate notice by telephone, by facsimile, by electronic mail, or personally to the Commission, of incidents attended by loss of life or limb, or serious injury to person or property, occurring in Oregon upon the premises of or directly or indirectly arising from or connected with the maintenance or operation of a facility. (3) Except as provided in section (5) of this rule, every reporting operator must, in addition to the notice given in section (2) of this rule for an incident described in section (2), report in writing to the Commission within 20 days of the occurrence. In the case of injuries to employees, a copy of the incident report form that is submitted to Oregon OSHA, Department of Consumer and Business Services, for reporting incident injuries, will normally suffice for a written report. In the case of a gas operator, copies of incident or leak reports submitted under 49 CFR Part 191 will normally suffice. (4) An incident report filed by a public or telecommunications utility in accordance with ORS cannot be used as evidence in any action for damages in any suit or action arising out of any matter mentioned in the report. (5) A Peoples Utility District (PUD) is exempt from this rule if the PUD agrees, by signing an agreement, to comply voluntarily with the filing requirements set forth in sections (2) and (3).

24 Oregon Public Utility Commission Safety & Reliability Section 550 Capitol St NE, Ste 215 Salem OR Contacts: Commission Web Page J.R. Gonzalez, P.E., Manager (503) Jerry Murray, Sr. Utility Analyst (503) Gary Putnam, Utility Analyst (503) John Wallace, Utility Analyst (503)

John Wallace, Utility Analyst (503) Jerry Murray, Sr. Utility Analyst (503) Gary Putnam, Utility Analyst (503) J.R. Gonzalez, P.E., Manager (503) Oregon Public Utility Commission Safety & Reliability Section 550 Capitol St NE, Ste 215 Salem OR Contacts: Commission Web Page

John Wallace, Utility Analyst (503) Jerry Murray, Sr. Utility Analyst (503) Gary Putnam, Utility Analyst (503) J.R. Gonzalez, P.E., Manager (503) Oregon Public Utility Commission Safety & Reliability Section 550 Capitol St NE, Ste 215 Salem OR Contacts: Commission Web Page Contacts : Commission Web Page Oregon Public Utility Commission Safety & Reliability Section 550 Capitol St NE, Ste 215 Salem OR J.R. Gonzalez, P.E., Manager (503) Jerry Murray, Sr. Utility Analyst (503) Gary Putnam, Utility Analyst (503) John Wallace, Utility Analyst (503)

27 J.R. Gonzalez, P.E., Manager (503) Jerry Murray, Sr. Utility Analyst (503) Gary Putnam, Utility Analyst (503) John Wallace, Utility Analyst (503) Oregon Public Utility Commission Safety & Reliability Section 550 Capitol St NE, Ste 215 Salem OR Commission Web Page Contacts: