Disability Statistics at NCHS: An Update

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2/8/2014 Measuring Disability and Monitoring the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities… … the work of the Washington Group on Disability.
Advertisements

Health and Functional Status of Working Age People with Disabilities in the United States Gerry E. Hendershot Consultant on Disability and Health Statistics.
The Washington Group Extended Set for Functioning: A Review Julie D. Weeks, Ph.D. National Center for Health Statistics, USA Washington Group on Disability.
R3: Relation of Sociodemographics and Local Characteristics to IL Difficulty Team: Andrew J. Houtenville, Ph.D., and Vidya Sundar, Ph.D. (UNH) Research.
1 ESCAP/WHO Pilot Study Overview Wei Liu Statistics Division, ESCAP Sixth Meeting of the Washington Group on Disability Statistics, Kampala,
Short Set Update Barbara M. Altman Disability Statistics Consultant To NCHS.
The Definition and Measurement of Disability
Using the ICF as a Framework for Washington Group Measures Barbara M. Altman Jennifer Madans Elizabeth Rasch National Center for Health Statistics.
Cornell University Institute for Policy Research A Review of Disability Data for the Institutional Population of Working Age Peiyun.
The rich multivariate data of the National Center for Health Statistics’ National Health Interview Survey Jane F. Gentleman, Ph.D., Director Division of.
The Effort to Develop Disability Questions for the Current Population Survey Terence M. McMenamin U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics October 5, 2006.
Measuring Disability in a Survey or Census Context: Parallel Work Advancing the Field Barbara M. Altman, Ph.D. Disability Statistics Consultant.
1. 2 Andrew J. Houtenville, Ph.D. Employment and Disability Institute School of Industrial and Labor Relations Cornell University Ithaca, New York The.
Disability Data in the American Community Survey Presentation for the 2006 State-of-the-Science Conference - The Future of Disability Statistics: What.
1. 2 Andrew J. Houtenville, Ph.D. Employment and Disability Institute School of Industrial and Labor Relations Cornell University Ithaca, New York 2006.
Exploring the Washington Group Data from the 2011 U.S. National Health Interview Survey Julie D. Weeks, Ph.D. National Center for Health Statistics, USA.
LIMITATIONS AND EXAMPLES Measuring Disability in Children.
Jennifer Madans Associate Director for Science
Census survey 2008 Zohar Chessakov Welfare Statistics CBS Workshop on the Survey of People With Disabilities 9-11/03/2010.
Measuring Disability in Canadian Questionnaires: A First Look Sally Kader Health Statistics Division Statistics Canada.
General Disability Measures Used in Developed Countries: Question Characteristics Beth Rasch representing the collaborative work of the UN, ISTAT, and.
Building a disability database to monitor the implementation of UNCRPD in your country Adele D. Furrie Council of Canadians with Disabilities CANADA
8/16/2015 Comparison of Short Set Disability Measures: Mitchell Loeb National Center for Health Statistics/ Washington Group on Disability Statistics 1WG-11.
Knowledge for Equity Conference November 13, 2012 U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services National Institute.
Country Report on the Pre Test to Improve Disability Measurement Statistics Sri Lanka 2009 (UNESCAP /WG supported)
Disability, Education, Literacy Proficiencies, and Labor Market Success Neeta P. Fogg Center for Labor Market Studies Northeastern University.
Disability measurement and statistics - the state of the notion Marguerite Schneider UNECA/LCD conference on UNCRDP, May Addis Ababa Marguerite Schneider.
HHS Data Enhancements to Monitor Implementation and Impact of Health Reform Jim Scanlon Deputy Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation.
NCPEDP Study on Disability Question in Population Census of India 2011 Prepared by DEOC.
September 19-20, 2005 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Internationally Comparable General Disability Measures Barbara M. Altman National Center for Health Statistics.
SPECA Workshop on Disability Statistics, Dec 13-15, 2006 The Definition and Measurement of Disability: The Work of the Washington Group Jennifer Madans.
VR Summit September 8, 2014 Louisville, KY American Community Survey Resources and Technical Assistance Lewis E. Kraus, MPH, MCP Center on Disability at.
September 151 Screening for Disability Washington Group on Disability Statistics.
Report on the Budapest Initiative* *Joint UNECE/WHO/Eurostat Task Force on Measurement of Health Status Jennifer H. Madans National Center for Health Statistics,
…from Census to Survey: a framework for the development of extended question sets for use on surveys Mitch Loeb USA Washington Group on Disability Statistics.
October 151 Measuring Disability in Censuses and Household Surveys Mitchell Loeb National Center for Health Statistics, USA for the Washington Group on.
Disability Statistics: Census 2000 Long-Form and the American Community Survey Presenter: Andrew J. Houtenville, Ph.D. Rehabilitation Research and Training.
HHS Data Standards for Race, Ethnicity, Sex, Primary Language and Disability Status Rashida Dorsey, PhD, MPH Department of Health and Human Services Office.
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment WG 5 Rio September 2005 Marijke de Kleijn1 Washington Group on Disability Statistics: extended.
10/13/2015 Monitoring the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities… … and the work of the Washington Group on Disability Statistics Mitchell.
Measuring Disability Prevalence Daniel Mont, HDNSP Disability and Development Team June 6, 2007.
Measuring Disability in school-aged children: Findings from the National Health Interview Survey PH Pastor, CA Reuben, ME Loeb NCHS Washington,
Minimizing Differences through Cross-Agency Development of Measures Julie D. Weeks, Ph.D. National Center for Health Statistics 2012 FCSM Statistical Policy.
The Definition and Measurement of Disability: The Work of the Washington Group (continued) Daniel Mont Disability and Development Group The World Bank.
Proposed Purpose of an Internationally Comparable General Disability Measure Jennifer H. Madans, Barbara M. Altman, Elizabeth K. Rasch – NCHS Malin Synneborn,
Presentation on Field tests Margie Schneider Dan Mont 6 th Meeting of the Washington Group Kampala, Uganda 10 – 13 th October 2006.
Comments on the ‘Proposed content of census questions for international use’ Xingyan Wen Ros Madden Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
Trends in Functional Status and Disability among the Elderly Ellen Kramarow Jennifer Akerblom NCHS Data Users Conference July 2004 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH.
Review of the development of the extended question set on functioning: Mitchell Loeb (U.S.A.) National Center for Health Statistics/ Washington Group on.
SPECA Meeting, Paris, June 16, 2006 Activities Related to Health and Disability Statistics in the UNECE Region and Globally Jennifer H. Madans for the.
Healthy People 2010 Focus Area 6: Disability and Secondary Conditions Progress Review – January 15, 2003.
1 Disabilities: Census Vs. Administrative Sources Zohar Chessakov and Carole Feldmann Census and Demography Department Central Bureau of Statistics, Jerusalem,
1 Task Force on Health Expectancies National Disability Survey and Sport and Physical Exercise Module Gerry Brady Central Statistics Office, Ireland Luxembourg.
Analyses of extended set questions using the U.S. National Health Interview Survey Mitchell Loeb / Jennifer Madans National Center for Health Statistics/
REPORT ON UGANDA PILOT STUDY by Ms. Pamela Kakande Senior Statistician Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS)
… the work of the Washington Group on Disability Statistics Jennifer H. Madans National Center for Health Statistics, USA for the Washington Group on Disability.
Analyses of extended set questions using the U.S. National Health Interview Survey Mitchell Loeb / Jennifer Madans (with Julie Weeks, Laurie Pratt & Nazik.
Disability in a Labor Market and Higher Education Context Paul E. Harrington Center for Labor Market Studies Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts.
Review of the development the extended question set on functioning: An update on revisions since the 10 th meeting, and a discussion of next steps Jennifer.
MOROCCAN EXPERIENCE ON DISABILITY STATISTICS THE KINGDOM OF MOROCCO HIGH COMMISSION OF PLANNING BY ZINEB EL OUAZZANI TOUAHAMI Statistician Engineer Directorate.
Discussion and Approval of Guidelines for analyzing WG extended set data Jennifer Madans National Center for Health Statistics/ Washington Group on Disability.
Mental Health Data Available from the 2007 National Survey of Children’s Health Stephen J. Blumberg, Ph.D. Kathleen S. O’Connor, M.P.H. Presented at the.
WG/UNICEF Child functioning module: Preliminary results from Samoa & Supporting documentation Mitchell Loeb National Center for Health Statistics/ Washington.
Washington Group on Disability Statistics (WG16)
Issues in Disability Measurement: A Comparison of Survey Methods
Disability Statistics at NCHS: A Changing Landscape
Towards improved measures of disability for development indicators
Comparing Estimates from the ACS and WG Question Sets
Internationally Comparable General Disability Measures
for disability data collection in Viet Nam
Presentation transcript:

Disability Statistics at NCHS: An Update Julie D. Weeks, Ph.D. National Center for Health Statistics Annual Compendium of Disability Statistics Release Capitol Visitor Center, Washington, DC November 2, 2011

A number of ongoing disability-related activities… ACA Section 4302 meetings Health, U.S. content Healthy People 2020 work groups Washington Group on Disability Statistics National Health Interview Survey content Future directions for measurement and research

ACA Section 4302 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Mandates the collection of data on disability status Requires a standard disability measure Acknowledges disability as a demographic ACA Disability Subcommittee: NCHS member Recommended the 6-question ACS measure as the minimum standard Current status: DHHS solicited public comments on draft standards 10/31/2011: Secretary announced final standards The Affordable Care Act requires new standards for the collection and reporting: - of health and health care information - on race, ethnicity, sex, primary language, and of course disability status - mandates the collection of data on “disability status for applicants, recipients, or participants” - by “any federally conducted or supported health care or public health program, activity or survey. Perhaps the most important impact of the ACA will be the expectation that disability be used as a demographic in reporting. Subcommittees were formed to address each of the reporting areas: - the disability subcommittee recommended the 6-question ACS measure, however - important to note that the message was clear from the subcommittee that this measure is a MINIMAL measure. - acknowledged within committee that while the ACS measure should be used as a starting point, - additional measures are needed to better identify: - mental health, speech, learning or developmental limitations - as well as some neurological limitations, for example traumatic brain injury. June 30, 2011 – August 1, 2011: - Federal Register notice published at the end of June 2011, - with a deadline for comments on the recommended draft standards by August 1, 2011. Just two days ago: -the secretary made final those recommended standards. Other Federal Surveys with ACS: - Aside from the ACS, the ACS disability measure has now been added to a number of other Federal data collections efforts: - CPS, NHIS, Crime Victimization Survey - Also being considered for inclusion in surveys administered by Ded, HUD and DOT.

Health, U.S. and Healthy People Historically, used “limitation of activity due to a chronic condition” In 2009, moved to Basic Actions Difficulties and Complex Activity Limitation (disability measures consistent with current disability models and legislation) Disability used as a demographic in 20+ tables (pain, SRH, alcohol use, no usual source of care, health care visits, insurance, etc.) HP Change in Operational Definition: Include in the core of all applicable Healthy People 2020 population data systems a standardized set of questions that identify “people with disabilities.” Adopted ACS as the standard measure of disability for 2020 work HP Objectives tables have disability as a demographic Where possible ACS set used Health, U.S. is NCHS’ annual report to the Secretary on trends in: - health, health care utilization and financing and many other health statistics. Those statistics are presented in numerous tables, and where disability has been included in the past: - the measure has historically been “limitation of activity due to a chronic condition” In 2009, the move away from this measure occurred: - to keep up with a changing conceptualization of what we should be measuring wrt disability - Basic Actions Disability and Complex Activity Limitations measures are now being used instead. [more on BAD and CAL later] - as of the 2011 edition, now we have over 20 tables in Health, U.S. Also occurring at the same time, HealthyPeople (the Department’s 10-year national objectives for improving health) - was re-vamping it’s measures for disability. In December 2010, HealthyPeople 2020 was launched with one important change in operational definition: - to include disability as a demographic in all objectives, and - to used the ACS measure as that standard. HP2020 has approximately 95 tables where disability is reported as a demographic. - where the data collection instrument allows, the ACS set is the measure used.

Washington Group: Purpose Purpose: The promotion and coordination of international cooperation in the area of health statistics by focusing on disability measures suitable for censuses and national surveys which will provide basic necessary disability information throughout the world. Measures must be developed within the framework of a model, culturally comparable, and accepted for use across many countries. Short Set Measure (6 questions): Adopted in 2006 (Uganda meeting) Approx 20 countries planning to/using the SS in census Extended Set Measure (additional functional domains): Adopted in 2010 (Luxembourg meeting) Added to 2010 NHIS The fourth major disability-related activity occurring at NCHS is the Washington Group on Disability Statistics. The Washington Group is a United Nation’s City Group mandated to develop comparable measures for disability. Participation includes: - representatives from over 60 countries, National Statistical Offices, - international organizations and NGOs, as well as some DPOs. NCHS acts as the secretariat of this international group. The WG first developed a short set of disability questions – there are 6 – - that have been tested, adopted by the UN and now are being included in plans for Censuses around the world. Note similarities to ACS requirements: short, broad measure capturing as many persons at risk for participation restrictions. Note differences: to follow. Once the short set was adopted, work commenced on creating a much longer set of questions that countries could use on their health surveys where space and time was less an issue. This longer set also expanded the measure to include: a) increasingly complex activities and b) more domains of functioning.

Possible Domains and Activities Mobility Walking Climbing stairs Bending or stooping Reaching or lifting Using hands Sensory Seeing Hearing Communicating Understanding Speaking Cognitive functions Learning Remembering Making decisions Concentrating Emotional functioning Interpersonal interactions Psychological well-being Other Affect Pain Fatigue Self care

WG Disability Short Set 1-5. How much difficulty do you have: seeing even if wearing glasses? hearing even if using a hearing aid? remembering or concentrating? walking or climbing stairs? with self-care, such as washing all over or dressing? 6. Because of a physical, mental or health condition, how much difficulty do you have communicating, for example understanding or being understood by others? a) No, no difficulty c) Yes – a lot of difficulty b) Yes – some difficulty d) Cannot do at all Here are the questions in the short set. They are intended to cast a wide net and to be very simple questions– like “how much difficulty do you have seeing even if wearing glasses--- and there are 6 questions for 6 disability domains: vision, hearing, cognition, mobility, self-care and communication. Note similarities to ACS requirements: - short, broad measure - capturing as many persons at risk for participation restrictions. - domains of functioning: - same: vision, hearing, cognition, movement, self-care - diff: WG has communication, ACS has independent living or an IADL measure “doing errands alone such as doctor office or shopping” Note differences: - rather than “do you have serious difficulty”, “how much difficulty” - rather than “yes/no”, a response set which allows for a range of functional difficulty.

National Health Interview Survey Disability Content Basic Actions Difficulties Movement Sensory Emotional Cognitive Complex Activity Limitations Social and leisure activities Perceived ability to work Maintaining independence, including self care and HH chores American Community Survey Set Washington Group Short Set Washington Group Extended Set Upper body movement Learning Affect (anxiety & depression) Pain Fatigue Participation & QOL Measures The National Health Interview Survey is, of course, the Department’s longest ongoing, national survey of health.   It also has one of the richest disability-related measures content. Basic Actions Difficulties represent the primary building blocks of functioning that are necessary for maintaining independence and participating in social role activities. 1. Movement difficulties: Walking Standing Bending or kneeling Reaching overhead Using hands & fingers 2. Sensory difficulties: Vision and hearing 3. Emotional difficulties: In particular, feelings that interfere with accomplishing daily activities 4. Cognitive difficulties: Specifically, remembering or experiencing confusion Complex Activity Limitations describe limitations or restrictions in the ability to participate fully in social role activities such as working or maintaining a household. 1. Social Activity Limitation: Attending movies or sporting events Visiting with friends Pursuing hobbies or engaging in leisure time activities 2. Work Limitation: Limitation in the kind or amount of work Inability to work at a job or business 3. Self-Care Limitation: ADLs (self-care activities) IADLs (shopping, cooking and taking care of bills) ACS Washington Group Short Set Washington Group Extended Set – which expands the functional domains to include: 1. Upper body 2. Learning 3. Affect 4. Pain 5. Fatigue The latest experimental content includes measures of participation and quality of life.

Location of NHIS Disability Questions: ACS and WG 2008 (4th quarter) -2009 FDB: ACS questions – ½ sample “person” and ½ “family” style 2010 FDB: ACS questions – “person” style QOL: WG questions, plus some quality of life / participation measures 2011 CDB: ACS questions ADB: ACS questions AFD: WG questions, plus some quality of life / participation measures Many of the NHIS disability measures have been part of the survey for quite some time: Activity and Work Limitation ADLs IADLs Basic Actions Difficulties Complex Activity Limitations The ACS and Washington Group content are relatively new. More importantly, these measures have been added a) as quickly as possible b) in a carefully orchestrated manner to allow for specific methodological analysis.

What Are We Learning About Disability Questions from the NHIS? 2008 (4th quarter) -2009 FDB: ACS questions – ½ sample “person” and ½ “family” style Do disability estimates vary by administration style? How? Do NHIS estimates vary from the ACS and CPS? How? 2010 FDB: ACS questions – “person” style QOL: WG questions, plus some quality of life / participation measures Do different question sets yield varying estimates of disability? How? How does participation vary by disability status? 2011 CDB and ADB: ACS questions AFD: WG questions , plus some quality of life / participation measures How do disability estimates vary when asked in the family section vs. the sample adult/child sections? How do extended questions on disability operate in a national survey?

Prevalence of Disability by Survey: 2009 Disability Item Ages NHIS CPS ASEC† (%) Family- Style Person-Style ACS Vision difficulty 1+ 1.7 2.1 2.4 2.2 Hearing difficulty 3.1 3.9 4.1 3.4 Mobility difficulty 5+ 6.9 6.6 7.2 Cognitive difficulty 3.5 4.7 4.8 Self-care difficulty 2.0 1.8 2.6 Independent living diff 15+ 4.0 5.1 5.4 Any disability 11.6 12.0 13.1 12.1 The first research from the NHIS using the ACS content focused on several questions: Do disability estimates vary by administration style? How? Do NHIS estimates vary from the ACS and CPS? How? Orientation to table: A. Components of disability corresponding to the 6 questions, and “any” disability (any “yes” across the 6). B. Surveys across the top - 1. CPS Annual Social and Economic Supplement 2. CPS data are for the 16+ population Results A. Any disability 1. NHIS person > ACS / NHIS family > CPS 2. effect of 16+ would increase prevalence in the NHIS and ACS – a greater difference B. Mode 1. person > family 2. similarity between ACS (person) and NHIS (family) C. Component parts – mobility and independence higher †NOTE: CPS data are for population 16 years and over.

* CPS and ACS cover persons 16-64; NHIS covers persons 18-64. From this same paper: * CPS and ACS cover persons 16-64; NHIS covers persons 18-64.

Where Does the ACS Fit In? Basic Action Measures 31.7% Another example of ongoing analyses: Do different question sets yield varying estimates of disability? How? In particular, how does the ACS measure compare to the Basic Actions and Complex Activity Limitation measures? For example, the BAD measure identifies 31.7% of the population. Source: NCHS, 2010 NHIS, ages 18+

Where Does the ACS Fit In? Basic Action Measures 31.7% Complex Activity Limitation 15.3% Whereas, CAL identifies 15.3% of the population. One would expect this given that CAL are a much more severe measure of disability. Yet, almost 11% of the population has a CAL and is not identified by the BAD measure. Finding out who these people are is part of the ongoing research agenda. Measurement error, of course, may be part of the answer. However, we expect that the difference is due to functional difficulties people have that ARE NOT captured by the basic Actions measures such as learning, communications and some of the very domains of functioning that the WG extended set captures. 10.8% Non-Overlap Source: NCHS, 2010 NHIS, ages 18+

Where Does the ACS Fit In? ACS Questions 19.7% Basic Action Measures 31.7% Complex Activity Limitation 15.3% How do the ACS questions fit in with BAD and CAL? The measure captures fewer people than Basic Actions (as expected) but more people than the CAL measure (also as one would expect) An additional 9% of the population has at least one ACS difficulty, but does not report a BAD or CAL. 9.0% Non-Overlap 10.8% Non-Overlap Source: NCHS, 2010 NHIS, ages 18+

Relationship of ACS to Basic Action and Complex Activity Measures Of course, there is a great deal of interest in the kinds of functioning problems picked up by the ACS measure. Moreover, who is not identified by the measure is equally important. Source: NCHS, 2010 NHIS Sample Adult File, Ages 18+

Next Steps in Disability Measurement Incorporating disability measures in more national surveys. Which standard should be adopted – ACS or WG? Adding other functioning domains that are not currently included, for example learning and mental health. Development of measures of participation (other than work). Development of measures of the environment. Conduct longitudinal surveys. Conduct disability supplements on single-policy issues.

Thank you! Questions?

The ACS Disability Measures For sample persons 1 year of age and older: 1. Is this person deaf or does he/she have serious difficulty hearing? 2. Is this person blind or does he/she have serious difficulty seeing? For sample persons 5 years of age and older: 3. Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, does this person have serious difficulty concentrating, remembering or making decisions? 4. Does this person have serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs? 5. Does this person have difficulty dressing or bathing? For sample persons 15 years of age and older: 6. Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, does this person have difficulty doing errands alone such as visiting a doctor’s office or shopping? Response Categories: 1. Yes 2. No

Equalization of Opportunities Employed (%) Seeks to identify all those at greater risk than the general population for limitations in participation. Disability used as a demographic.