Yield, Protein, and Quality Response to Planting Date, Variety, and Late N. B.D. Brown. University of Idaho. Introduction Higher market prices for the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Research Methodology Statistics Maha Omair Teaching Assistant Department of Statistics, College of science King Saud University.
Advertisements

Do In and Post-Season Plant-Based Measurements Predict Corn Performance and/ or Residual Soil Nitrate? Patrick J. Forrestal, R. Kratochvil, J.J Meisinger.
The impact of late applications of N-fertilizer on the grain protein of wheat in the Mediterranean climatic region of Western Australia Jairo A Palta Bill.
Late Season Nitrogen Enhanced Wheat Protein as Affected by Late Season Moisture. B. D. Brown. University of Idaho Introduction High protein premiums and.
Responses of Sweet Cherry Productivity and Soil Quality to Alternate Groundcover and Irrigation Systems Xinhua Yin 1, Xiaolan Huang 1, and Lynn Long 2.
INTRODUCTION Figure 1: Seedling germination success by planting technique plus rainfall amount and date at the Poolesville location during fall BC.
Ethan Wyatt Plant and Soil Sciences Oklahoma State University.
Producing “New” Small Grain Crops in the Mid-Atlantic Wade Thomason.
Phenotypic Structure of Grain Size and Shape Variation in M5 mutant lines of spring wheat Kenzhebayeva Saule, Kazakh National University named after al-Farabi,
California experiment bins Left: August 16 – 1 st bin. 46 cm depth on right. Right: September 10 harvest date – 61 cm depth on left. Introduction: Some.
Slow Release Nitrogen for Furrow Irrigated Wheat Brad Brown Extension Soil and Crop Management Specialist 2010 Idaho Nutrient Management Conference Shoshone,
Wheat Protein Enhancement with N Intervention: Why the Concern? B.D. Brown and N.W. Christensen.
“Managing Applied Nitrogen on Winter Canola in the Pacific Northwest” Idaho Oil Seed Conference February 12, 2009 Moscow, Idaho Don Wysocki, Tom Chastain,
Irrigation and Nitrogen Management Systems for Enhancing Hard Spring Wheat Protein J. Stark, E. Souza, B. Brown, and J. Windes University of Idaho.
Triticale For P Removal Brad Brown University of Idaho 2008 Idaho Nutrient Management Conference.
Performance of Small-Fruited Pumpkin Cultivars in Maine David T. Handley*, Mark G. Hutton and Gregory J. Koller, University of Maine Cooperative Extension.
Effects of Late Nitrogen Application on Hard Spring Wheats Russ Karow 1, Ernie Marx 1, Doug Engle 2, Gary Hareland 3 and Jennifer Kling 1 1 Oregon State.
CATO ANALYTICS, LLC WITH FUNDING FROM THE NEW YORK FARM VIABILITY INSTITUTE. ESTABLISHING ENERGY SORGHUM AS A PROFITABLE CASH CROP IN NEW YORK STATE.
The Nitrogen Requirement and Use Efficiency of Sweet Sorghum Produced in Central Oklahoma. D. Brian Arnall, Chad B. Godsey, Danielle Bellmer, Ray Huhnke.
Corn and Soybean Production as Affected by Rotational Tillage Systems Jeffrey A. Vetsch* and Gyles W. Randall, Univ. of Minnesota, Southern Research and.
Evaluation of the Effects of Plastic Mulches - Red, Black, Olive and Control, on the Growth and Yield of Tomato A. A. James, J. A. Sawtelle, and R. W.
1 CANOPY REFLECTANCE (HRWW AND HRSW) IN SOUTH DAKOTA ECONOMIC OPTIMUM NITROGEN RATE FOR HRSW IN SOUTH DAKOTA Nitrogen Use Efficiency Meeting Cheryl Reese*,
Wheat losses attributed to PM can reach 40% by affecting grain fill, root growth, and reducing test weights 1,2,3. At expected yield losses greater than.
SCC-33 National Variety Testing Meeting New Orleans – February 8-10, 2012 Rick Mascagni LSU AgCenter St. Joseph, LA.
The Effects of Topdressing Organic Nitrogen on Hard Red Winter Wheat - Year 2 Name: Erica Cummings Date: March 15, 2012 Title: Crops and Soils Technician.
Rate and Duration of Seed Component Accumulation in Water Stressed Soybeans José L. Rotundo & Mark Westgate Iowa State University, 1301 Agronomy Hall,
1 Texas Liquid Fertilizer Sorghum TLF Commitment to you Increase yields Lower Costs Help solve those production problems that limit profitability.
Chapter 5. Crop Production Thomas J. Basden, West Virginia University, A.O. Abaye, Virginia Tech, and Richard W. Taylor, University of Delaware Mid-Atlantic.
So far... We have been estimating differences caused by application of various treatments, and determining the probability that an observed difference.
WP2. Adaptability and Productivity Field Trials Results from the fourth growing period and comparison of the results recorded from the years 2003, 2004.
Acknowledgements This study was performed with financial support of EEA grant EEZ08AP-27 and European Social Fund co-financed project 2009/0218/1DP/ /09/APIA/VIAA/099.
Baking Quality Response to Late Season N with Variable Moisture During Grain Fill. K. O’Brien, B. Brown, and R. Gibson. University of Idaho Introduction.
Determining the Most Effective Growth Stage in Corn Production for Spectral Prediction of Grain Yield and Nitrogen Response Department of Plant and Soil.
Mandana Tayefe, Ebrahim Amiri, and Azin Nasrollah Zade
Root biomass and grain yield of Pavon 76 wheat and its Near isogenic Lines in Organic and Synthetic Fertilizer Systems Ruth Kaggwa-Asiimwe 1, Mario Gutierrez-Rodriguez.
Optimizing Nitrogen and Irrigation Timing for Corn Fertigation Applications Using Remote Sensing Ray Asebedo, David Mengel, and Randall Nelson Kansas State.
NITROGEN FERTIGATION OF SUBSURFACE DRIP IRRIGATED BERMUDAGRASS M.A. Maurer* 1, J.A. Moken 2 and J.L. Young 1 1 Department of Agriculture, Stephen F. Austin.
Development of Vegetation Indices as Economic Thresholds for Control of Defoliating Insects of Soybean James BoardVijay MakaRandy PriceDina KnightMatthew.
Mixture of Saline and Non-Saline Irrigation Water Influences Growth and Yield of Lettuce Cultivars under Greenhouse Conditions A. A. Alsadon, M. A. Wahb-allah,
Figure 3. Concentration of NO3 N in soil water at 1.5 m depth. Evaluation of Best Management Practices on N Dynamics for a North China Plain C. Hu 1, J.A.
Introduction Higher market prices relative to the predominant soft white class has increased grower interest in the production of hard red spring wheat.
2015 HRS and Durum Crops Outlook
After successful completion of this Module, you have learned to: Recognize the importance of downy mildew of pearl millet. Describe the symptoms of downy.
Course:Grain Quality Module 2: Seed to Seed Quality Lesson 1 :How do operations of a farm affect quality? SEED TO SEED CYCLE.
Group 10.  Grasses and grass-like plants  Forbaceous plants  Weeds  Browse  Leaves and twigs of woody plants  Fruits of woody plants.
Introduction Efficient use of nitrogen is becoming important due to increasing N fertilizer prices and the growing concerns about NO 3 - contamination.
Dick Auld Calvin Trostle Plant & Soil Sciences Extension Agronomist
LATE SEASON N APPLICATIONS FOR IRRIGATED HARD RED WHEAT PROTEIN ENHANCEMENT. S.E. Petrie*, Oregon State Univ, B.D. Brown, Univ. of Idaho. Introduction.
NextEnd IRRIGATION SCHEDULING AND TECHNIQUES IN POTATO.
Effect of Preplant/Early Irrigation, Nitrogen and Population Rate on Winter Wheat Grain Yield Plant and Soil Sciences Department, Oklahoma State University,
NFOA for Wheat and Corn. Yield Potential Definitions INSEYIn Season Estimated Yield = NDVI (Feekes 4 to 6)/days from planting to sensing (days.
Introduction Water quality concerns have led to adoption of Idaho regulations that require livestock producers to manage animal wastes as never before.
Corn Plant Population Research ®, ™, SM Trademarks and service marks of DuPont, Pioneer or their respective owners. © 2015, PHII Pioneer ® brand products.
Rich Koenig WA State University Phosphorus source effects on dryland winter wheat in eastern Washington Final report.
IRRIGATION SCHEDULING AND TECHNIQUES IN POTATO NextEnd.
Phosphorus Fertilization Reduced Hessian Fly Infestation of Spring Wheat S. E. Petrie and K. E. Rhinhart Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon.
Where do Enhanced Efficiency Nitrogen Fertilizers and Split N Applications Fit? Cynthia Grant and Alan Moulin AAFC - Brandon Research Centre Nicolas Tremblay.
Corn Plant Population Research
NDVI Active Sensors in Sugarbeet Production for In-Season and Whole Rotation Nitrogen Management.
Carbon Cycling in Perennial Biofuel Management Systems
Topsoil Depth at the Centralia Site
Wheat: Harvest and Review of Steps for Good Wheat Management
1Dept. of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, AL
Dhurba Neupane1, Juan Solomon2 and Jay Davison3
Fertilizer Decisions Trial Nutrient Responses
G. V. Johnson and W. R. Raun Dept. Plant & Soil Sciences
E.V. Lukina, K.W. Freeman,K.J. Wynn, W.E. Thomason, G.V. Johnson,
Lodging immediately after July 4, 2007 storm.
Understanding Multi-Environment Trials
Evaluating “Ultra-Early” Corn Hybrids
Presentation transcript:

Yield, Protein, and Quality Response to Planting Date, Variety, and Late N. B.D. Brown. University of Idaho. Introduction Higher market prices for the hard red spring class relative to the soft white class have increased grower interest in the production of hard red spring (HRS). There is also potential for hard white spring. Less HRS wheat is currently grown in SW Idaho in part because of concerns about the management required for producing wheat with acceptable protein. Planting dates have significant impact on wheat production and quality. Delayed spring plantings typically reduce wheat yield. In contrast, yields of late fall (dormant) seedings of spring wheat have exceeded those of early spring planted spring wheat in southern Idaho. Varieties also differ in yield and protein. Discounts for low protein need to be avoided or minimized to maximize the returns for the HRS class. Increasing late season available N is frequently used to enhance grain protein of irrigated hard red spring and winter wheat. The protein response to late season applied N is not uniform in all production areas. The higher the yield the more difficult it may be to raise protein at harvest to levels that enable growers to avoid low protein discounts. This could be particularly true for late fall planted spring wheat that is more productive than the same spring wheat traditionally planted in early or late spring. Protein enhanced with late season N has been questioned for its quality. Specifically, there apparently is concern that NIR measured protein increases from late season N are not associated with baking quality improvements. Information is needed on the hard spring wheat protein and quality response to late season N as affected by planting date and variety in order to guide SW Idaho growers on late season N management decisions. Objective The objective was to evaluate the effects of wide ranging planting dates and varieties on the yield, protein, and quality response to late season applied N. Methods A three year field study was conducted on a Greenleaf silt loam (fine-silty, mixed, superactive, mesic, xeric calciargids) at the University of Idaho Parma Research and Extension Center to measure the yield, protein, and quality response of three hard spring varieties (Vandal and WPB 936 hard reds, and ID377S hard white) grown under wide ranging planting dates (late fall, early spring, and late spring), with four late season urea N rates (0, 28, 56, and 84 kg ha -1 ) applied dry at heading and incorporated with about 25mm of sprinkler irrigation. Factorial treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block with four replications. Planting dates ranged from Nov for the late fall planting, 7-15 March for the early spring planting, and April for the late spring planting. Fertilizer N as urea was applied uniformly over the entire experiment to support yields of 8.1 Mg ha -1 according to the UI Fertilizer Guide for Spring Wheat. This urea N (177, 190, and 106 kg N ha-1 for 1999, 2000, and 2001 seasons respectively) was topdressed each year to the entire experiment when the early spring planting was emerging (dates ranged from March). Timing corresponded to the tillering stage for the late fall planting and preceded the late spring planting by 15 to 19 days. This N was dependent on rainfall for incorporation and significant rain in one event in any year exceeding 5mm did not occur prior to the first irrigation on 23 April (1999), 24 April (2000), or 19 April (2001). The trial was irrigated each year with sprinklers. Nitrogen was the only limiting nutrient based on fall soil tests. Yield was measured with a small plot combine from 9.3m 2. NIR protein (12% moisture corrected) was measured on subsamples of harvested grain. Baking quality measures included flour protein (Fpro), flour yield (Fyd), Mixograph peak time (Mpk), height (Mht), tolerance (Mto), absorbance (Mab), bake or loaf volume (Bvo), and Bvo/Fpro ratio (R). Baking quality results were available for only the first two seasons. Baking quality was determined using AACC method No B at the University of Idaho Aberdeen Wheat Quality Laboratory. Bake volume was determined using rape seed displacement. Protein and baking quality was determined at the University of Idaho Aberdeen Wheat Quality Laboratory. Treatment effects were evaluated with ANOVA options in SAS 8.0. Results Yields in excess of the 8.1 Mg ha -1 target were achieved in each year for the late fall planting. The 2000 season was especially productive (Fig. 1). Late fall planting dates were the highest yielding in two of three years and late spring plantings were invariably the lowest. Variety performance depended on the planting date (Fig.1.) Vandal was as high yielding as WPB 936 in two of three years when late fall planted but Vandal was less well adapted to either early spring or late spring plantings as compared to the others. Vandal is relatively late maturing compared to the others. WPB 936 was the highest yielding spring planted variety in two of three years. Late season N at the 84 kg ha -1 rate increased lodging in 1999 and reduced yield. There was a similar reduced yield trend with high late season N in other years but the effect was non-significant. Protein was invariably affected by planting dates (Fig. 2). Protein was highest with late fall plantings in the first two years and lowest in the late spring planting. In contrast, the late fall planting was lowest in protein in the 2001 season and protein for the late spring planting was highest. It is not clear why planting date effects on protein were inconsistent between years. It also is not clear why the more productive late fall plantings were highest in protein in two of the three years. Vandal in all seasons was the highest in protein and the hard white ID377s was lowest. There were no planting date by variety interactions for protein. Late season N increased protein in all years (Fig. 2). The increase with late N was linear in 1999 and quadratic in 2000 and The protein increase with the highest late N rate averaged 1.1% in 1999, 1.2% in 2000 and 1.6% in 2001 when averaged across planting dates and varieties. Although planting dates and varieties significantly affected protein they did not affect the protein increase with late season N. Averaged across planting dates, Vandal was the only variety that consistently produced 14% or higher protein with the highest late season N rate. Although late season N was essential in this study for increasing protein to 14%, variety selection was also critical. Not all varieties were capable of producing 14%protein wheat despite high rates of late season N. WPB 936 is the most popular HRS variety grown in the western Idaho and far eastern Oregon production area. Frustration with low protein discounts may in part be due to the use of this and similar varieties. Baking quality as represented by bake volume was influenced by both varieties and planting dates. Bake volume was always lowest with the hard white spring ID377s (Fig. 3). Vandal and WPB 936 were comparable in bake volume although Vandal averaged somewhat higher at some N levels. Planting dates also affected bake volume. Bake volume for the late fall planting was higher than the bake volume for the late spring planting in both 1999 and The early spring bake volume was comparable to the late fall bake volume in 1999 but lower than late fall bake volume in Despite significant variety and planting date effects on bake volume, there was no significant interaction of planting dates or varieties in the bake volume response to late season N. Bake volume increased with late season N in both 1999 and The bake volume response to late season N was linear in 1999 and either linear or quadratic in Bake volume was greater in 2000 than in The bake volume to protein ratio provides a rough indication of protein quality in the two years. Despite reports and concerns that late season N enhanced protein may not result in increased protein quality, the calculated ratios here suggest otherwise. We found the bake volume to protein ratio to be stable over a considerable range of late season applied N (Fig. 4), applications that resulted in protein increases ranging from 1.1 to 1.2%protein when averaged across planting dates and varieties. Varieties affected all baking quality parameters as expected given the mix of hard white and reds. Within the hard reds, Vandal had higher Fpro, Mpk, and Bvo than WPB 936. Late fall plantings resulted in higher Fyd, Mht, Mab, and Bvo than early or late spring plantings. Late season N increased Fpro, Mpk, Mht, Mab, Bvo, and reduced Mto in both years (Fig. 5). Baking quality was better in 2000 than Summary This study demonstrates the challenge of producing both high yields and high protein hard red spring wheat under irrigation. Relatively high rates of late N were essential for achieving 14% protein or avoiding low protein discounts. Protein was consistently enhanced with late season N. Both varieties and planting dates affected yield and protein, but neither affected the protein response to late season N. Despite previous reports or concerns about limited baking quality improvements with late N enhanced NIR protein, this study suggests that late season N increased not only NIR protein but was also responsible for associated improvements in baking quality as reflected by greater Fpro, Mpk, Mht, Mab, and ultimately Bvo. Figure 2. Irrigated hard spring wheat protein response to late season N as affected by planting dates and varieties in each year of the study. Parma, Figure 3. Hard spring wheat bake volume response to late season N as affected by planting dates and varieties in 1999 and Figure 4. Bake Volume to protein ratio for the 1999 and 2000 seasons as affected by late season applied N. Figure 1. Irrigated hard spring wheat yield as affected by variety and planting date. Parma Figure 5. Flour protein, and mixograph peak, height, tolerance and absorption as affected by late season N in the 1999 and 2000 seasons.