THE NATURE OF EXPERTISE: KNOWLEDGE OR SEARCH? Ekaterina Vasyukova PSYCHOLOGY DEPARTMENT, MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY, Moscow, RUSSIA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pat Langley Arizona State University and Institute for the Study of Learning and Expertise Expertise, Transfer, and Innovation in.
Advertisements

Modelling with expert systems. Expert systems Modelling with expert systems Coaching modelling with expert systems Advantages and limitations of modelling.
Chapter Five The Cognitive Approach II: Memory, Imagery, and Problem Solving.
Understanding Depth 0f knowledge
Constructing Hypotheses
Dr Jim Briggs Masterliness Not got an MSc myself; BA DPhil; been teaching masters students for 18 years.
Solving Non-Intuitive Problems in E&M Adam Erickson, Research Advisor: Mano Singham Department of Physics, Case Western Reserve University ABSTRACT We.
Presentation Outline Experts and Novices Learning and Transfer Children and Learning Common Themes.
Introduction to Research Methodology
COGNITIVE VIEWS OF LEARNING Information processing is a cognitive theory that examines the way knowledge enters and is stored in and retrieved from memory.
Mathematics Reform The Implications of Problem Solving in Middle School Mathematics.
Inquiry: A Framework for Learning Pam Berger Director, SWBOCES School Library System.
Skill Learning and Expertise. Anderson’s ACT Theory General theory of learning and problem solving Anderson (e.g., 1983, 1990, 1993, 1996) –Adaptive Control.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Meaningful Learning in an Information Age
From the gym window most Sundays – I observe?. Deliberate Practice Colvin (2008) noted that exceptional performers, were not necessarily the most talented.
Expertise and creativity What makes experts different than novices? –Usually, we talk about mental tasks (e.g., playing chess, being an accountant) Possible.
Cognitive Psychology, 2 nd Ed. Chapter 9 Learning Concepts and Skills.
University of Delaware Introduction to Assessment Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education Contributions by Sue Groh and Hal White.
TEACHING INFORMATIVE WRITING FROM SOURCES Chapter 6 Best Practices in Writing Instruction George E Newell Jennifer VanDerHeide Melissa Wilson.
What is Mathematical Literacy?. MATHEMATICAL LITERACY “The ability to read, listen, think creatively, and communicate about problem situations, mathematical.
Mental Skills Project LTA Senior Coach Course. Mental skills project consists of a presentation that has to be delivered during module 6 of the course.
Reasoning Abilities Slide #1 김 민 경 Reasoning Abilities David F. Lohman Psychological & Quantitative Foundations College of Education University.
Steve Williams DESE Fine Arts Consultant Presented at: Missouri Music Educators Association January 30,
1 Lesson 1 Introduction to Social Psychology and Some Research Methods.
9/03 1 © Hayne, Smith and Vijayasarathy (2005) Shared Information and Virtual Surfaces Stephen C. Hayne Cap Smith Leo Vijayasarathy Colorado State University.
Nicole Paulson CCSSO Webinar March 21, 2012 Transition to the Common Core State Standards in Elementary Math.
Chapter 11 Helping Students Construct Usable Knowledge.
Math rigor facilitating student understanding through process goals
SLB /04/07 Thinking and Communicating “The Spiritual Life is Thinking!” (R.B. Thieme, Jr.)
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Quick Glance At ACTASPIRE Math
Psychology: memory. Overview An understanding of human memory is critical to an appreciation of how users will store and use relevant information when.
Week 2: Community Health Nursing Role Dimensions.
Educational Psychology and the Learning of Science Bloom’s Taxonomy Involvement in Science Activities.
WELNS 670: Wellness Research Design Chapter 5: Planning Your Research Design.
Problem-Based Learning. Process of PBL Students confront a problem. In groups, students organize prior knowledge and attempt to identify the nature of.
Cognitive Development: Information Processing Theories -- Chapter 7 Attention Memory (to be covered in class) Thinking Metacognition.
Why is Research Important?. Basic Research Pure science or research Research for the sake of finding new information and expanding the knowledge base.
Chapter Five The Cognitive Approach II: Memory, Imagery, and Problem Solving.
1 The Theoretical Framework. A theoretical framework is similar to the frame of the house. Just as the foundation supports a house, a theoretical framework.
Project quality management. Introduction Project quality management includes the process required to ensure that the project satisfies the needs for which.
Sociocultural Approach David, Michael, Rachel And Hiu.
CHAPTER 2 Research Methods in Industrial/Organizational Psychology
Selected Responses How deep does the question dig?????
By Benjamin Newman.  Define “Cognitive Rigor” or “Cognitive Demand”  Understand the role (DOK) Depth of Knowledge plays with regards to teaching with.
M= Math in STEM College and Career Ready- Conference Summer, 2015.
Major Science Project Process A blueprint for experiment success.
EDU 3201 Lg Def Lr/GM/UPM/ Supporting Students with Learning Disabilities: An Introduction to Process- Oriented Instruction.
Lecture №1 Role of science in modern society. Role of science in modern society.
Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice
Jeanne Ormrod Eighth Edition © 2014, 2011, 2008, 2006, 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Educational Psychology Developing Learners.
Search Engine Optimization © HiTech Institute. All rights reserved. Slide 1 Click to edit Master title style What is Business Analysis Body of Knowledge?
Research Word has a broad spectrum of meanings –“Research this topic on ….” –“Years of research has produced a new ….”
GENERAL METHODS AND TECHNIQUES OF TEACHING
Complex Cognitive Processes
PSYA4- research methods Section C. Validating new knowledge The role of peer review the assessment of scientific work by others who are experts in the.
The Scientific Method. Scientifically Solving a Problem Observe Define a Problem Review the Literature Observe some More Develop a Theoretical Framework.
Model-Facilitated Learning Overview Gordon Graber 2008.
Formulation of hypothesis and testing
Constructing hypotheses & research design
Myers’ PSYCHOLOGY (5th Ed)
Concrete, Representational, Abstract
Innovative measures in teaching
CHAPTER 2 Research Methods in Industrial/Organizational Psychology
Concrete, Representational, Abstract
GENERAL METHODS AND TECHNIQUES OF TEACHING
Myers’ EXPLORING PSYCHOLOGY (6th Ed)
CONSTRUCTIVISM Submitted To: Ma’am Misbah Yasmeen BPGCW (Air University)
Presentation transcript:

THE NATURE OF EXPERTISE: KNOWLEDGE OR SEARCH? Ekaterina Vasyukova PSYCHOLOGY DEPARTMENT, MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY, Moscow, RUSSIA

Introduction Comparison of peculiarities of knowledge and cognitive processes between experts and novices – one of the important directions of cognitive studies from 80-s of XX century (Velichkovsky, 2006). The goal of these efforts – creation of expert systems of using knowledge in certain field for recommendations and problem-solving. Chess has historically been the primary domain for psychological studies of human expertise. Among the advantages of chess as a research domain is international rating system that enables precise comparisons of skill between players.

Studies of the expertise’ nature Chess The nature of expertise comes to: functions and contents of memory (De Groot, 1946; 1965; Gobet & Simon, 1996; 2000; Ericsson & Kintsch, 1995) perceptual advantage of experts (Reingold, Charness, Pomplun & Stampe, 2001; Reingold, Charness, Schultetus & Stampe, 2001) reduced nonverbal search activity as a result of effective action of mechanisms of anticipation and transfer by chess master in a comparison with chess-player of the third grade (Tikhomirov, 1969; 1984) processes of active search, change and more successful interpretation of material (Holding, 1979)

Studies of the expertise’ nature Chess research has been useful in characterizing the trade-offs seen between memory, perception and problem-solving performance (Gobet & Charness, 2006).

Studies of the expertise’ nature Other domains Key characteristics of experts: not only the greater volume of knowledge, but sensibility to relevant characteristics of situation, flexibility, skill to examine several alternative interpretations and moderate abstract conceptual representations that alleviate the conclusion by analogy and transfer of decision from one subject field to other (see Velichkovsky, 2006).

Studies of the expertise’ nature Development of expertise goes at once on several levels of organisation – from perseptual automatisms to metacognition strategies

Research question What is the nature of expertise? unilateral accent on knowledge (memory) or search (thinking) trade-off or correlation between knowledge and search

Our hypotheses: the nature of expertise is connected not only with one level of proceeding of cognitive processes (inferior or high; verbal or nonverbal); this complicated nature of expertise is displayed in transfer’ mechanism, more effective by experts

Background Oleg Tikhomirov’s sense theory of thinking (Tikhomirov, 1969; 1984): The process of problem-solving is a formation, development and difficult interaction of operational sense structures of different types and levels (verbalized and unverbalized operational senses, VOS and UOS). Operational sense designates individual mental reflection of the object, which stems from the different research actions undertaken by the subject and which changes as the same task is being tackled. Sense structures determine selectivity and direction of research activity. The sense’s transfer is a major source of enhancing selectivity of research activity in the problem-solving process. UOS’ transfer is the main factor of the search’s reduction. UOS and VOS are transferred from one situation to another in different degree (an hypothesis: greater VOS’capacity for being transferred)

The goal of our research to investigate the process of verbalised operational senses’ transfer from one situation to another.

The task of the research to reveal VOS’characteristics in the process of the best move’s selection in connected and unconnected chess positions by chess-players of different qualification and age.

Subjects 44 tournament-rated chess-players of different age (from 16 to 80) and chess skill (from a-second-grade to international grandmaster). They were divided on 4 equal groups. Each group includes chess-players with ELO > 2000 (+ / - 40 years old) and < 2000 (+ / - 40 years old).

Materials 4 sets of middle game chess positions (each group received own set of two positions). Set A and B are a case of connected positions (accordingly A1 and A2; B1 and B2), where the second position is a continuation of the first position after one move for every side. Sets C and D included unconnected positions (accordingly B1 and A2; A1 and B2) audio cassette recorder

Procedure elicited concurrent “think-aloud” verbal reports from individual participants while they attempted to select the best move for each position 5 - minute time limit per position all verbal reports were transcribed and converted into problem behavior graphs (Newell and Simon, 1972). the time to solution (sec.) was recorded

Indices of principal VOS’ characteristics Volume of the conscious orientation zone: number of unique base moves (moves-candidates); number of unique other moves (non-base moves); number of episodes (variants); number of terminal nodes (variants and subvariants); number of null moves (vague moves); they appear when chess player examines the plan only for one side without indication of answers of rival, which prove indeterminate;

Indices of principal VOS’ characteristics Structure: number of repeated base moves; number of repeated other moves; Depth: maximum depth; mean depth; branchiness (the relation of number of terminal nodes to number of episodes); Understanding’ degree (or consciousness’ degree): number of evaluations; number of evaluations of vagueness of positions after their transformation.

additional indices of VOS’ volume and structure number of researched (called) elements; number of researches (calls); mean number of researches of one element; maximum number of one element’s researches; number of significant elements (researched more often, than one element on an average); number of sense substances (elements, researched more often, than one significant element on an average).

RESULTS Time to solution Interaction of set x skill

Average meaning of additional VOS’ indices in subgroups of the most skilled chess players Set Positio n N number of called elements mean number of calls of one element max. number of calls of one element % of significant elements in general number of elements % of sense substances in general number of elements A A A CA B B B DB

Results VOS’ transfer from one situation to another, connected with it, depends on position, skill and age of subject. These factors determine the fact of transfer and its form. Different forms of transfer are associated with change of definite indices of VOS’ volume, structure and depth in connected position.

Transformation of elements’ system in connected position by the most skilled chess-players % of elementsPosition A2 (set A) Position B2 (set B) preserved4447 rejected5653 added2614

Transformation of elements’ system in connected position by the less skilled chess-players % of elementsPosition A2 (set A) Position B2 (set B) preserved7964 rejected2136 added5262

Results The important consequence of transfer is operating in specific situation with a ready-made set of elements (the formation of such a system can be traced to earlier activity). This system is only transformed through excluding a number of elements and including some new elements.

Results The level of this transformation depends on anticipation of real changes of situation and subject probability of these anticipations. It is minimal when the real changes not only are anticipated, but predictions are considered as high probable.

Anticipation of real changes of situation PositionThe most skilled chess- players (%) The less skilled chess-players (%) A1 (set A)750 B1 (set B)50

Results For the most skilled chess players, who anticipated the real changes of the situation, VOS’ transfer may be connected with use and transformation of both earlier accepted anticipations, associated with a sense of action, and earlier rejected anticipations. Their depth (for both types of anticipations) and subject probability (for earlier rejected anticipations) rise.

Conclusion VOS’ transfer is more presented by skilled chess-players. They demonstrate the decrease in the number of called elements and rise of percentage of sense substances, decrease of time to solution in a connected position. It reflects the rise of research’ selectivity there.

Conclusion VOS’ transfer, giving the direction of the search, is connected with use and transformation of results of previous verbal search. VOS’ transfer is active. So expertise’ nature is complex. It’s connected with both knowledge and thinking. The problem of VOS’ transfer is closely associated with the problem of correlation between knowledge and thinking.

Conclusion Our conception of the phenomenon of VOS’ transfer is in conformity with the ideas of a number of psychologists (Dunker, Bartlett, Neisser) about the role of the past experience in cognition. By this ideas the past (past experience) transforms, isn’t simply repeated.

Acknowledgements Thanks to the Russian Foundation for Humanities for supporting this research (grant № z)