1 Air Quality Impact Analysis and Other PSD Requirements Donald Law U.S. EPA Region 8.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Source Review NSR Reforms Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality Air Quality Council Presented by Matt Paque, Attorney, ODEQ - AQD April 20,
Advertisements

New Source Review (NSR) Program Basics
Richard (Rick) Goertz, P. E
Doug Solomon, U.S. EPA OAQPS 2014 National Air Quality Conference Durham, NC February 12, 2014.
Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards Review Process and Status Tom Moore WESTAR Council Meeting September 29, 2010 Portland, OR.
Planning Permission Process and Procedures
EPA PM2.5 Modeling Guidance for Attainment Demonstrations Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS February 20, 2007.
Overview of the Tribal New Source Review (NSR) Rule U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) Research.
How Ozone is Regulated under the Clean Air Act Darcy J. Anderson AZ Dept. of Environmental Quality.
Criteria Pollutants Criteria pollutants selected because they are ubiquitous, have multiple sources, and "may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public.
September 12, SW Colorado PSD Increment Study Southwest Colorado Nitrogen Dioxide ( NO 2 ) Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Increment.
Part of NSR Program Applicable to Major Sources in Areas Attaining the NAAQS Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Program.
Ozone Regulation under the Clean Air Act Darcy J. Anderson AZ Dept. of Environmental Quality.
| Philadelphia | Atlanta | Houston | Washington DC SO 2 Data Requirements Rule – A Proactive Compliance Approach Mark Wenclawiak, CCM |
Oil and Gas Workgroup Summary October 21-23, 2009 Denver.
What is the purpose of the Class I Redesignation Guidance? Provides guidance for tribes who are considering redesignating their areas as Class I areas.
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
EPA’s DRAFT SIP and MODELING GUIDANCE Ian Cohen EPA Region 1 December 8, 2011.
New Source Review (NSR) Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD): Refinement of Increment Modeling Procedures Proposal Jessica Montañez.
Clean Air Act and New Source Review Permits EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park NC March
ANPR: Transition to New or Revised PM NAAQS WESTAR Business Meeting March 2006.
Development of 24-Hour 2006 PM 2.5 Designations Guidance NTAA National Tribal Air Quality Forum Barbara Driscoll EPA, OAQPS April 17, 2007.
Best Available Retrofit Technology Rule - Colorado David R. Ouimette Colorado Air Pollution Control Division.
Regulatory Requirements For Modeling. Air Quality Model Estimates Developing Air Pollution Control Plans Assessment of Environmental Impacts Projecting.
Designations for 24-Hour PM2.5 NAAQS: Overview and Guidance Amy Vasu PM2.5 Workshop June 20-21, 2007.
Title V Operating Permits: A Compliance and Enforcement Tool Candace Carraway US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
The National Environmental Policy Act and Oil and Gas Development in Region 8 WESTAR Oil and Gas Conference October 22, 2008.
Final Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule Briefing for NTAA EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards April 17, 2007.
Jessica Montanez Environmental Protection Agency NEW SOURCE REVIEW (NSR) PROGRAM.
FLAG, Policy Overview 15 December 1999 Presenter - Bruce Bayle USDA/Forest Service.
WESTAR 2003 Fall Technical Conference on PSD Increment Tracking & Cumulative Effects Modeling Seattle, Washington Conducting Class I Area Increment Analyses.
PSD/Nonattainment Review You can do this! Marc Sturdivant Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental Trade Fair 2015.
Life After Class I Natalene Cummings Air Program Director Forest County Potawatomi NTF 2011.
1 Modeling Under PSD Air quality models (screening and refined) are used in various ways under the PSD program. Step 1: Significant Impact Analysis –Use.
Permitting and National Ambient Air Quality Standards Changes Rick Goertz, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced.
Effects Analysis and Comparison. Objectives Accurately determine which impacts need to be evaluated in the land use plan. Develop a matrix comparing the.
Current State Issues in Title V Permitting Matthew A. Paque Environmental Attorney Supervisor Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality Office of General.
Carrie Paige – EPA Region 6, Dallas David Cole – EPA OAQPS, RTP, NC Introduction to Air Permits Introduction to Air Permits.
Class I Overview EPA Class I determination. Basics regarding how Class I works. Importance of Tribal Class I status. EPA’s Handling of Michigan’s objections.
Class I Air Quality Related Values Kevin J. Finto Hunton & Williams APPA Energy and Air Quality Task Force Washington, D.C. March 10, 2005.
PSD Permitting Process Nancy Mayer EPA OAQPS. 2 Topics Find technical resources for permit review Describe how permits are constructed Describe what to.
How Tribes Can Influence State Title V Permits Virgil Frazier Southern Ute Indian Tribe Virgil Frazier Southern Ute Indian Tribe.
NSR—Minor New Source Review Darrel Harmon U.S. EPA Office of Air and Radiation.
Resource Management Planning Air Quality Brock LeBaron Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality
GRIC Case Study Permit Review Dan Blair, Compliance and Enforcement Mgr. Gila River Indian Community (GRIC) Department of Environmental Quality.
WESTAR 2003 Fall Technical Conference Introduction to Class I Area Impact Analyses September 16, 2003 John Bunyak National Park Service.
TAS and TIP Swinomish Tribe and the Incremental Approach.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter; Proposed Rule January 17, 2006.
Nonattainment New Source Review (NA NSR) Program Raj Rao US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards ,
N EW Y ORK S TATE D EPARTMENT OF E NVIRONMENTAL C ONSERVATION Short Term Ambient Air Quality Standards and The Effect on Permitting Margaret Valis NESCAUM,
Miscellaneous Stuff William Harnett WESTAR Spring Meeting April 3, 2007.
Regulatory background How these standards could impact the permitting process How is compliance with the standards assessed.
PSD/Nonattainment Applicability Arturo J. Garza Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental Trade Fair 2016.
New Ozone NAAQS Impacts: What Happens Next with a Lower O3 Standard? Nonattainment Designation and Industry’s Opportunity to Participate New Ozone NAAQS.
Developing a Tribal Implementation Plan
New Source Review (NSR) Program Basics
Environmental Protection Agency
Clean Air Act Glossary.
WESTAR Increment Recommendations
Draft Modeling Protocol for PM2.5
Clean Air Act (CAA) Purpose
Overview of New Source Review (NSR)
Major New Source Review (NSR) Part 2
PSD Issues in PM2.5 Transition Proposal
Designations for Indian Country
John Bunyak National Park Service
Proposal to Revise the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particle Pollution WESTAR Meeting March 2006.
PM2.5 NSR and Designations
Status of the PM NAAQS Review
Uinta Basin General Conformity
Presentation transcript:

1 Air Quality Impact Analysis and Other PSD Requirements Donald Law U.S. EPA Region 8

2 Main requirements 1.Install Best Available Control Technology (BACT) 2.Perform air quality analysis to assess impacts on air quality 3.Perform Class I Area analysis to assess impacts on national parks and wilderness areas or other Class I Areas 4.Perform additional impacts analysis 5.Provide opportunities for public involvement Review: PSD Program Requirements

3 Pollutant-specific analysis that involves An assessment of existing air quality and Modeling estimate of ambient concentrations from proposed project and future growth associated with project Purpose is to determine if new plus existing emissions will cause or contribute to a violation of a NAAQS and/or PSD increment Air Quality Impact Analysis (AQIA)

4 A new source or modification cannot cause or contribute to significant deterioration of air quality in attainment areas Maximum amount of deterioration allowed is called an increment Increments exist for 3 pollutants (PM, PM10 and PM2.5; SO 2 and NO 2 ) Various averaging periods (annual, 1-hour) 3 area classifications (Class I, Class II, Class III) AQIA for Increment Compliance PM2.5 Increments by Area Classification (  g/m 3 ) NAAQS (  g/m 3 ) Averaging PeriodClass IClass IIClass III Annual hr291835

5 Change in air quality measured against a certain baseline Not all sources consume increment Two important concepts Baseline area All portions of attainment area in which PSD applicant proposes to locate and/or would have significant ambient impact (i.e. higher than Significant Impact Level) Limited to intrastate areas: baseline areas not triggered across state lines Baseline date When increment consumption starts, pollutant specific AQIA for Increment Compliance (cont.)

6 Baseline Date(s) - when increment consumption starts, pollutant specific AQIA for Increment Compliance (cont.) Major Source Baseline Date Minor Source Baseline Date SO 2 and PM - Jan. 6, 1975 NO 2 - Feb. 8, 1988 Date of first complete permit application for a major source or major modification when actual emission changes from all sources affect the available increment when actual emissions associated with construction at a major source affect increment Start

7 A new source or modification cannot cause or contribute to a violation of any NAAQS in any area Compliance with any NAAQS is based on proposed source and all other sources in baseline area No baseline dates exist Analysis requirements similar to increment analysis NAAQS analysis is independent from increment analysis AQIA for NAAQS Compliance

8 Compliance determined by using air quality models Preliminary analysis (significant impact analysis) Screening approach Representative meteorology Only proposed source or modification emissions Refined receptor grids Full impact analysis (cumulative impact analysis) Refined model Representative meteorology All applicable increment affecting sources More refined receptor grids (smaller grid spacing) AQIA Steps

9 Evaluation of NAAQS, Class I increments and Air Quality Related Values (AQRVs) when a major source’s emissions may affect a Class I area Class I Area – areas reserved for special air quality protection, usually national parks and wilderness areas Class I Areas have stringent increments AQRVs – feature or property of a Class I Area that may be affected by a change in air quality (such as scenic, cultural, physical, biological, ecological, or recreational resources Generally for sources within 100 km of Class I area, not always Federal Land Manager (FLM) must be notified of potential impacts on Federal Class I Areas Determines data and analyses needed Class I Area Impact Analysis

10 Map of Class I Areas

11 Role of FLM: evaluates a source’s projected impact on AQRVs, makes recommendations to permitting agency FLM may recommend that permit application be denied if FLM determines a source will adversely impact AQRV’s, even where applicable increments are not exceeded FLM may suggest permit conditions FLM definition of adverse impact: an impact that Diminishes area’s national significance Impairs structure or functioning of ecosystems, or Impairs quality of visitor experience Class I Area Impact Analysis (cont.)

12 AQRVPotential Air Pollution-Caused Changes Flora and faunaGrowth, mortality, reproduction, diversity, visible injury, succession, productivity, abundance WaterTotal alkalinity, metals concentration, pH, anion and cation concentration, dissolved oxygen VisibilityContrast, visual range, coloration Cultural-archeological and paleontological Decomposition rate Odor Examples of AQRV’s for Class I Area Impact Analysis and Potential Air Pollution-Caused Changes

13 State or Indian governing body is responsible Can define AQRV’s at own discretion Establishes criteria for determining an adverse impact on AQRV’s EPA may be asked to resolve permit disputes Managing Air Quality and Protecting AQRV’s in non-federal Class I areas

14 Assesses potential effects of increased air, ground and water pollution from proposed source and associated growth on: Soils and vegetation Visibility Pollutant-specific Performed within impact area of proposed source Additional Impact Analysis

15 Criteria for evaluating completeness and adequacy of applicant’s analyses Whether applicant has presented a clear and accurate portrait of soils, vegetation, and visibility in proposed impacted area Whether applicant has provided adequate documentation of potential emissions impacts on soils, vegetation, and visibility Whether data and conclusions are presented in a logical manner understandable by the affected community and interested public Additional Impacts Analysis (cont.)

16 CAA section 165(a)(2) provides that a PSD permit cannot be issued unless there is an opportunity for a public hearing at which the public can appear and provide comment on the proposed source, including “alternatives thereto” and “other appropriate considerations.” CAA allows EPA to consider environmental justice issues in issuing PSD permits Public Involvement

17 If your tribe has satisfied requirements for TAS for purposes of CAA sections 126(a) and (b), your tribe is entitled to 60-days notice prior to PSD source’s construction, and your tribe may petition EPA Administrator for a finding that the transported emissions from a proposed PSD source would contribute to nonattainment or interfere with maintenance of NAAQS in area covered by your TIP Technical Support Document (TSD), generally including responses to comments, may also be available with final permit Public Involvement (cont.)

18 To obtain a PSD permit, an applicant must Apply best available air control technology (BACT) Conduct an ambient air quality analysis to demonstrate that its new emissions would not cause or contribute to a violation of the NAAQS and/or PSD increment Analyze whether its proposed emissions increases would impair visibility or adversely affect soils or vegetation Not adversely impact a Class I Area Public and tribes may comment on impacts of the proposed project, including environmental justice aspects Summary