Shenandoah National Park: Critical Load/Target Load Case Study WESTAR November 2005 Tamara Blett- National Park Service Photo credit: University of Virginia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Framework for the Ecological Assessment of Impacted Sediments at Mining Sites in Region 7 By Jason Gunter (R7 Life Scientist) and.
Advertisements

National Park Service Critical Loads:
History of Critical Loads meetings – how have we gotten to this point? Andrzej Bytnerowicz 1, Rich Fisher 2 and Al Riebau 3 USDA Forest Service 1 Pacific.
Riverside CL meeting, Feb , 2005 Canadian accomplishments on Critical Load Mapping Forests Rock Ouimet, MRNFP, QC Paul A. Arp, UNB, N.B. Shaun Watmough,
WGE 29th session, September Brit Lisa Skjelkvåle ITEM 4 Common Workplan items ICP Waters ECE/EB.AIR/WG.1/2010/6.
Effects of Watershed Acidification on Soil Water and Stream Water Chemistry.
Lesson 3 ODOT Analysis & Assessment. Analysis & Assessment Learning Outcomes As part of a small group, apply the two- part analysis by generating exposure-
9th April 2014Kari Austnes1 Critical limits for acidification of surface waters vs boundary values in the Water Framework Directive (WFD) – a Norwegian.
Tonnie Cummings National Park Service, Pacific West Region National Tribal Forum on Air Quality May 14, 2014.
Environmental risk assessment of chemicals Paul Howe Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, UK.
FLAG Deposition Subgroup Report Ellen Porter Air Quality Branch U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Critical Load Development for Nitrogen and Sulfur Deposition Elizabeth Waddell Air Resources Specialist Pacific West Region
“Acid” in the Atmosphere Pollution and Impact on Ecosystems.
Maintaining healthy watersheds in the Chesapeake LGAC meeting December 4, 2014 Mark Bryer The Nature Conservancy Chair, Healthy Watershed Goal Team.
Rocky Mountain National Park National Park Service Mission The National Park Service preserves unimpaired the natural and cultural resources and values.
Acid Deposition Lake Barkevatn in Norway used to have healthy stocks of trout and perch. As a result of acid rain, the trout stock died out in the mid-1970s.
Acid Deposition—Ch 17.
Water Quality.
Acid Rain.
Jenna graham April,27th,2015 Global Geo 12 (B)
Organisms and the Environment Chapter Five: Ecosystems 5.1 Ecosystems, Energy, and Nutrients 5.2 Food Chains and Food Webs 5.3 Ecosystems- A Natural.
Contents I.History of Hubbard Brook II.Watershed Concept III.Discovery of Acid Rain IV.Long-term Monitoring V.Ecosystem Recovery.
WESTAR Workshop November 2005 Understanding the Critical Loads Approach.
BY: SAM WALLER Acid Precipitation. What Is Acid Precipitation? Acid precipitation is a phrase used to describe any form of precipitation (rain, snow,
Contents I.Ecosystem Recovery II.Calcium Experiment III.Introduction to Soils IV.Calcium Experiment Results.
Using Critical Loads to Protect Canadian Ecosystems from Damage due to Acid Deposition Kerri Timoffee* Environment Canada Transboundary Air Issues Branch,
Non-pollutant ecosystem stress impacts on defining a critical load Or why long-term critical loads estimates are likely too high Steven McNulty USDA Forest.
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
Coastal development impacts on biological communities in the Chesapeake Bay Examples from the Atlantic Slope Consortium R
Acid Deposition
Potential Risk of Acidification in South Asia Kevin Hicks Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI)
Acid Rain By: Hessa Boodai. Causes It causes 3 different things 1- Cars 2- Factories 3- Pollution.
Bellringer. Acid precipitation is precipitation, such as rain, sleet, or snow, that contains a high concentration of acids, often because of the pollution.
Session 853 Extending Organizational Capacity & Capability to Evaluate Federal Environmental Research Programs Research Contributions to Outcomes & Accountability.
Focus on the Headwaters The Shenandoah Watershed Study / The Virginia Trout Stream Sensitivity Study Rick Webb Department of Environmental Sciences University.
Critical Loads and Target Loads: Tools for Assessing, Evaluating and Protecting Natural Resources Ellen Porter Deborah Potter, Ph.D. National Park Service.
Environmental Science: Toward a Sustainable Future Richard T. Wright Atmospheric Pollution PPT by Clark E. Adams Chapter 21.
Contents Ecosystem Changes Chemical Recovery Biological Recovery Future Changes.
Empirical determination of N critical loads for alpine vegetation William D. Bowman, Julia L. Gartner, Keri Holland, and Magdalena Wiedermann Department.
Geologic controls on the chemical stream water response to atmospheric pollution (acid and Hg deposition) in Shenandoah National Park Ami Riscassi Drew.
Potential Risk of Acidification in South Asia Kevin Hicks and Johan Kuylenstierna SEI
FLAG, Policy Overview 15 December 1999 Presenter - Bruce Bayle USDA/Forest Service.
Air Pollution What controls the level? –Amount of pollutants entering the air. –Amount of space into which the pollutants are dispersed. –Mechanisms that.
U S Environmental Protection Agency
Introduction Acid deposition (AD) from air pollution is a chronic stress on forest ecosystems in the northeast and mid-Atlantic regions of the U. S. The.
JEG DM: common work items Targets & ex post analysis Robustness Links with biodiversity Trends in selected modeled/measured parameters.
Ecological Perspectives on Critical Loads - Linkages between Emissions, Deposition and Biogeochemical Cycles J. N. Galloway Multi-Agency Critical Loads.
Calculate, map and used of critical loads and exceedances for acidity and nitrogen in Europe Professor Harald Sverdrup Chemical Engineering, Lund University,
Impact of declining atmospheric deposition on forest soil solution chemistry in Flanders, Belgium Arne Verstraeten 15 th Meeting of the ICP Forests Expert.
Relationships Among Stressors, Forests, and Aquatic Systems *As Number and Severity of Stressors Increase, The Impacts to Forests and Associated Aquatic.
WGE September 20111Brit Lisa Skjelkvåle Trends in precipitation chemistry, surface water chemistry and aquatic biota in acidified areas in Europe.
Air Pollution The build up of harmful substances in the air to unhealthy levels causes air pollution. A pollutant that is put directly into the air by.
Declining atmospheric deposition impacts forest soil solution chemistry in Flanders, Belgium Arne Verstraeten 15 th Meeting of the ICP Forests Expert Panel.
Soil contamination Proposed EEA/ETC contribution to the working group on Soil Contamination European Topic Centre on Terrestrial Environment SESSION 2.
By: eman elkomy Br.khaled
Acid Deposition What is Acid Deposition? Primary pollutants such as sulfur dioxide (SO 2 )from factories and nitrogen oxides (NO x ) from.
Acid Rain.
Why does acid precipitation form, and why is it such a serious problem?
Rose Flores University of Houston – Downtown Biology 1312.
Water Pollution Indicators of the Mekong Delta Grade 7 Science Saigon South International School Week Without Walls 2010.
Integrated Nutrient Management (Nutrient Management Plan ) A Series of Lecture By Mr. Allah Dad Khan.
Table 1. Linkages between emissions of SO2 and NOx and important environmental issues From: Acidic Deposition in the Northeastern.
ICP waters; use of data from EMEP …and some results Brit Lisa Skjelkvåle and Heleen de Wit Norwegian Institute for Water Research.
Acid Deposition.
Environmental Chemistry
Acid Precipitation.
Air Resources Division – National Park Service
Acid Rain.
Acid Rain.
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Presentation transcript:

Shenandoah National Park: Critical Load/Target Load Case Study WESTAR November 2005 Tamara Blett- National Park Service Photo credit: University of Virginia

Focus on: 1.Use of ecosystem and deposition data in critical loads development for aquatic ecosystems 2. Selection of critical loads and target loads from modeling outputs 3. Why land health goals are needed before each critical load or target load is developed Shenandoah National Park: Critical Load/Target Load Case Study

No such thing as a “generic” critical load for a park or wilderness area…. A CL is the loading at which SOMETHING happens in an ecosystem. Defining which SOMETHING is relevant to the FLM area is a critical part of CL development … Load (kg/ ha /yr) Changes in soil productivity Aquatic plant species shifts from fertilization Episodic acidification Chronic acidification Forest dieback

Shenandoah National Park: Critical Load/Target Load Case Study Critical load: The quantitative estimate of an exposure to one or more pollutants below which significant harmful effects on specified sensitive elements of the environment do not occur according to present knowledge.”

WESTAR FRAMEWORK WORKGROUP QUESTION: What are the AQRVs that should be addressed and what are the criteria for addressing them? 1.N & S acidification effects to aquatic ecosystems (via water chemistry thresholds) 2.N & S acidification effects on forest ecosystems (via soil chemistry thresholds) 3.N fertilization effects on aquatic and terrestrial plant and animal species (via species shifts) Simulation modeling Field data and experiments 3 types of critical loads development efforts:

Which AQRVs to use in CL development? FLMs have the responsibility to identify our AQRVs and develop strategies to protect them FLMs will protect most sensitive resources from unacceptable change FLMs will base critical loads on best available science and revise and update as appropriate

Current Deposition Loadings: Shenandoah National Park has long experienced high deposition loadings. Sulfur deposition (rather than N) is the primary cause of acidification of park soils and waters. Shenandoah National Park: Use of Ecosystem and Deposition Data in CL Development

Stream chemistry sampling tells us which aquatic plants and animals can grow, survive, reproduce… and which cannot Photo credit: University of Virginia

Pre-1900, all Shenandoah streams had ANC>50 ueq/l (levels that sustain healthy aquatic biota) In a 1992 survey, about half of the most sensitive streams had ANC<0, with lethal effects on brook trout probable The rest had ANC between 0-20, with sub-lethal or lethal effects possible. Modeling suggests that most sensitive streams in the park have lost up to 4 fish species Park streams are highly impacted by deposition:

Aquatic ecosystems Desired goals: healthy biota (invertebrates, fish, aquatic plants, etc.) Measurement endpoints: ANC, pH, base cations, Al –ANC of ueq/l considered acid-sensitive but capable of supporting healthy biota –ANC < 50 ueq/l sensitive to acidification; potential effects to biota –ANC < 20 ueq/l: episodically acidic, sub-lethal or lethal effects on biota –ANC < 0 ueq/l: chronically acidic, lethal effects on many biota FLM selects desired endpoints and effects WESTAR FRAMEWORK WORKGROUP QUESTION: Are there simple endpoints (like visibility thresholds) that can be used to assess effects?

loss of acid sensitive species* Loss of additional fish / invertebrates* *Baker et al small decrease in species richness* metals soluble free ionic form Toxic! Extremely Acid Sensitive* Acidified* Acid Sensitive* Less soil buffering capacity More soil buffering capacity Healthy!

Deposition accumulates in soils over time: Soils soak up pollutants like a sponge over time Excess sulfur accumulates in soils, acidic conditions develop, which then strip beneficial nutrients from the soils and weaken plants Acidic compounds “use up” the buffering ability of soils and surface waters.

Development of Critical load or Target load Critical load: “The quantitative estimate of an exposure to one or more pollutants below which significant harmful effects on specified sensitive elements of the environment do not occur according to present knowledge.” (Nilsson and Grennfelt 1988) Significant harmful effects from deposition have been documented in Shenandoah streams BUT they are above the critical load… and we don’t know the loading at which they first began……

Target load: The level of exposure to one or more pollutants that results in an acceptable level of resource protection; may be based on political, economic, or temporal considerations. Now the more relevant question is: what loading is desired to achieve to meet ecosystem goals?

Load (kg/ ha /yr) Changes in soil & water chemistry Healthy aquatic biota Episodic acidification Chronic acidification Critical loads are defined for specific indicators and effects. >50ueq/L <20 ueq/L <0 ueq/L Surface Water Effects Thresholds Used to Develop Critical & Target Loads

Water quality data used in modeling CL/TL 14 streams in Shenandoah have sufficient water chemistry data for calibrating the MAGIC* model. Streams were routinely sampled for 12 yrs as part of the SHEN Watershed Study and the Virginia Trout Stream Sensitivity Study. Of the 14 streams, only 5 were on very sensitive (siliciclastic) bedrock; the remainder were relatively insensitive. *Modeling for Acidification of Groundwater In Catchments

Interim Target Current Deposition reduction Glide path Deposition (kg/ha/yr) Time Set interim target Establish glide path Re-evaluate periodically Re-evaluate; adjust Natural

Developing Interim Target Loads FLM sets management goal: “restore healthy ecosystems (ANC=50) to Shenandoah NP” Scientists may/may not be able to determine the actual CL (the deposition loading at which Shenandoah ecosystems became unhealthy in the past) Target loads to achieve ANC of 50 in 50 years ranges from 0-4 kgS/ha/yr (depending on individual stream). Models (MAGIC and others) used to determine how deposition reductions could improve stream chemistry conditions Deposition in Shenandoah is now ~10 kg S/ha/yr. States (w/FLM involvement) develop Interim Target Loads to set improvement goals over time (similar to a glide path for visibility improvement).

Not acidic (Suitable for brook trout) Chronically Acidic (Unsuitable for brook trout) Shenandoah researchers project that streams will continue to acidify in the future due to S and N deposition, even with projected reductions in SO 2 emissions.

So…. May need longer time frames for recovery when developing target loads AND May need to consider more stringent emissions reductions if ecosystem goals are to be met to protect parks for “future generations” Eastern US sites are worse off… there is still time to avoid major ecosystem damage in the west if deposition levels are reduced.

Conclusions 1.Need good ecosystem data as model inputs to develop critical loads/target loads modeling estimates 2. Critical loads may be difficult to determine where already exceeded (unless we know when they were first exceeded and what the deposition was in that time and place) 3. Target loads can be established via modeling for areas where CL have been exceeded 4. Defining ecosystem health and recovery goals is crucial before using modeled critical load or target load outputs.