Max-Planck-Institut für molekulare Genetik Workshop „Systems Biology“ Berlin, 02.03.2006 Robustness and Entropy of Biological Networks Thomas Manke Max.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Statistical Mechanics and Evolutionary Theory
Advertisements

Complex Networks: Complex Networks: Structures and Dynamics Changsong Zhou AGNLD, Institute für Physik Universität Potsdam.
Complex Networks for Representation and Characterization of Images For CS790g Project Bingdong Li 9/23/2009.
Network biology Wang Jie Shanghai Institutes of Biological Sciences.
The multi-layered organization of information in living systems
CSE Fall. Summary Goal: infer models of transcriptional regulation with annotated molecular interaction graphs The attributes in the model.
Darwinian Genomics Csaba Pal Biological Research Center Szeged, Hungary.
VL Netzwerke, WS 2007/08 Edda Klipp 1 Max Planck Institute Molecular Genetics Humboldt University Berlin Theoretical Biophysics Networks in Metabolism.
Lecture #1 Introduction.
Weighted networks: analysis, modeling A. Barrat, LPT, Université Paris-Sud, France M. Barthélemy (CEA, France) R. Pastor-Satorras (Barcelona, Spain) A.
Overview of Markov chains David Gleich Purdue University Network & Matrix Computations Computer Science 15 Sept 2011.
Functionality & Speciation in Boolean Networks
A Real-life Application of Barabasi’s Scale-Free Power-Law Presentation for ENGS 112 Doug Madory Wed, 1 JUN 05 Fri, 27 MAY 05.
Introduction to Nonextensive Statistical Mechanics A. Rodríguez August 26th, 2009 Dpto. Matemática Aplicada y Estadística. UPM Grupo Interdisciplinar de.
Introduction to PageRank Algorithm and Programming Assignment 1 CSC4170 Web Intelligence and Social Computing Tutorial 4 Tutor: Tom Chao Zhou
Maximum Entropy, Maximum Entropy Production and their Application to Physics and Biology Roderick C. Dewar Research School of Biological Sciences The Australian.
Network Statistics Gesine Reinert. Yeast protein interactions.
Regulatory networks 10/29/07. Definition of a module Module here has broader meanings than before. A functional module is a discrete entity whose function.
Modularity in Biological networks.  Hypothesis: Biological function are carried by discrete functional modules.  Hartwell, L.-H., Hopfield, J. J., Leibler,
Modelling Stochastic Dynamics in Complex Biological Networks Andrea Rocco Department of Statistics University of Oxford (21 February 2006) COMPLEX ADAPTIVE.
Global topological properties of biological networks.
Systems Biology Biological Sequence Analysis
Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein- protein interaction network Han, et al
Systems Biology Biological Sequence Analysis
Triangulation of network metaphors The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences Iina Hellsten & Andrea Scharnhorst Networked Research and Digital.
Comparative Expression Moran Yassour +=. Goal Build a multi-species gene-coexpression network Find functions of unknown genes Discover how the genes.
Basic Definitions Positive Matrix: 5.Non-negative Matrix:
Interaction Networks in Biology: Interface between Physics and Biology, Shekhar C. Mande, August 24, 2009 Interaction Networks in Biology: Interface between.
Systematic Analysis of Interactome: A New Trend in Bioinformatics KOCSEA Technical Symposium 2010 Young-Rae Cho, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of.
Large-scale organization of metabolic networks Jeong et al. CS 466 Saurabh Sinha.
Optimization Based Modeling of Social Network Yong-Yeol Ahn, Hawoong Jeong.
Paper in “Evolution and Development” The Evolution of Signaling Pathways In Animal Development Andr é Pires-daSilva & Ralf J. Sommer Nature Reviews Genetics,
Soon-Hyung Yook, Sungmin Lee, Yup Kim Kyung Hee University NSPCS 08 Unified centrality measure of complex networks.
Genetic network inference: from co-expression clustering to reverse engineering Patrik D’haeseleer,Shoudan Liang and Roland Somogyi.
The importance of enzymes and their occurrences: from the perspective of a network W.C. Liu 1, W.H. Lin 1, S.T. Yang 1, F. Jordan 2 and A.J. Davis 3, M.J.
ANALYZING PROTEIN NETWORK ROBUSTNESS USING GRAPH SPECTRUM Jingchun Chen The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio Institute.
Network Biology Presentation by: Ansuman sahoo 10th semester
Sobre la Complejidad de la evolucion de mapas reducionistas desordenados 1. Instituto Balseiro, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Centro Atomico Bariloche,
Clustering of protein networks: Graph theory and terminology Scale-free architecture Modularity Robustness Reading: Barabasi and Oltvai 2004, Milo et al.
Weighted networks: analysis, modeling A. Barrat, LPT, Université Paris-Sud, France M. Barthélemy (CEA, France) R. Pastor-Satorras (Barcelona, Spain) A.
Conceptual Modelling and Hypothesis Formation Research Methods CPE 401 / 6002 / 6003 Professor Will Zimmerman.
Emergence of Scaling and Assortative Mixing by Altruism Li Ping The Hong Kong PolyU
AP Biology 2013 Study of Life Themes & Concepts Based on work by Foglia, Goldberg.
Soon-Hyung Yook, Sungmin Lee, Yup Kim Kyung Hee University NSPCS 08 Unified centrality measure of complex networks: a dynamical approach to a topological.
Graph Evolution: A Computational Approach Olaf Sporns, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405
Systems Biology ___ Toward System-level Understanding of Biological Systems Hou-Haifeng.
Spectral Analysis based on the Adjacency Matrix of Network Data Leting Wu Fall 2009.
Workshop on Optimization in Complex Networks, CNLS, LANL (19-22 June 2006) Application of replica method to scale-free networks: Spectral density and spin-glass.
Dynamical Fluctuations & Entropy Production Principles Karel Netočný Institute of Physics AS CR Seminar, 6 March 2007.
Genome Biology and Biotechnology The next frontier: Systems biology Prof. M. Zabeau Department of Plant Systems Biology Flanders Interuniversity Institute.
341- INTRODUCTION TO BIOINFORMATICS Overview of the Course Material 1.
Beyond Onsager-Machlup Theory of Fluctuations
Biological Networks. Can a biologist fix a radio? Lazebnik, Cancer Cell, 2002.
STATIC ANALYSIS OF UNCERTAIN STRUCTURES USING INTERVAL EIGENVALUE DECOMPOSITION Mehdi Modares Tufts University Robert L. Mullen Case Western Reserve University.
Network Science K. Borner A.Vespignani S. Wasserman.
1 Lesson 12 Networks / Systems Biology. 2 Systems biology  Not only understanding components! 1.System structures: the network of gene interactions and.
Thermodynamics, fluctuations, and response for systems out of equilibrium Shin-ichi Sasa (University of Tokyo) 2007/11/05 in collaboration with T.S. Komatsu,
Response network emerging from simple perturbation Seung-Woo Son Complex System and Statistical Physics Lab., Dept. Physics, KAIST, Daejeon , Korea.
Algorithms and Computational Biology Lab, Department of Computer Science and & Information Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taiwan Network Biology.
1. SELECTION OF THE KEY GENE SET 2. BIOLOGICAL NETWORK SELECTION
Biological networks CS 5263 Bioinformatics.
Information-Theoretical Analysis of the Topological Entanglement Entropy and Multipartite correlations Kohtaro Kato (The University of Tokyo) based on.
Entropy and Thermodynamic 2nd laws : New Perspective
Introduction to Biology
Self transforming to power law topology for overlay networks.
Building and Analyzing Genome-Wide Gene Disruption Networks
Ilan Ben-Bassat Omri Weinstein
Modelling Structure and Function in Complex Networks
Anastasia Baryshnikova  Cell Systems 
Revisiting Entropy Production Principles
Presentation transcript:

Max-Planck-Institut für molekulare Genetik Workshop „Systems Biology“ Berlin, Robustness and Entropy of Biological Networks Thomas Manke Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin

Max-Planck-Institut für molekulare Genetik Workshop „Systems Biology“ March 2-3, 2006Thomas Manke Outline Cellular Resilience steady states and perturbation experiments A thermodynamic framework a fluctuation theorem (role of microscopic uncertainty) Network Entropy network data and pathway diversity a global network characterisation Applications f rom structure to function: predicting essential proteins

Max-Planck-Institut für molekulare Genetik Workshop „Systems Biology“ March 2-3, 2006Thomas Manke Cellular Robustness Empirical observation: Reproducible phenotype Cells are resilient against molecular perturbations  maintenance of (non-equilibrium) steady state picture from Forsburg lab, USC

Max-Planck-Institut für molekulare Genetik Workshop „Systems Biology“ March 2-3, 2006Thomas Manke Perturbation Experiments Knockouts in yeast: (Winzeler,1999) only few essential proteins !  resilience of steady state

Max-Planck-Institut für molekulare Genetik Workshop „Systems Biology“ March 2-3, 2006Thomas Manke Understanding robustness Dynamical analysis: increasing data on molecular species and processes microscopic description: x(t+1) = f( x(t), p) Topological analysis: qualitative data on molecular relations: network structure determines key properties. An emerging dogma: STRUCTURE  DYNAMICS  FUNCTION

Max-Planck-Institut für molekulare Genetik Workshop „Systems Biology“ March 2-3, 2006Thomas Manke A thermodynamic approach Key idea: macroscopic properties follow simple rules, despite our ignorance about microscopic complexity Key tool: Statistical mechanics (Gibbs-Boltzmann): Entropy links microscopic and macroscopic world Key result: Microscopic uncertainties  macroscopic resilience

Max-Planck-Institut für molekulare Genetik Workshop „Systems Biology“ March 2-3, 2006Thomas Manke Fluctuation theorems Equilibrium: Kubo 1950 The return rate to equilibrium state (dissipation) is determined by correlation functions (fluctuations) at equilibrium Ergodic systems at steady-state: Demetrius et al Changes in robustness are positively correlated with changes in dynamical entropy “robustness” = return rate to steady state

Max-Planck-Institut für molekulare Genetik Workshop „Systems Biology“ March 2-3, 2006Thomas Manke Quantifying microscopic uncertainty Network characterisation  characterisation of dynamical process Consider stochastic process Network relational data

Max-Planck-Institut für molekulare Genetik Workshop „Systems Biology“ March 2-3, 2006Thomas Manke Network entropy The stationary distribution  i is defined as: P =  Entropy Definition (Kolmogorov-Sinai invariant) H(P) = -  i  i  j p ij log p ij = average uncertainty about future state = pathway diversity

Max-Planck-Institut für molekulare Genetik Workshop „Systems Biology“ March 2-3, 2006Thomas Manke Network Entropy and structural observables circularrandom scale-freestar H=2.0 H=2.3 H=2.9H=4.0 L=12.9 L=3.5 L=3.0L=2.0 Entropy is correlated with many other properties: Distances, degree distribution, degree-degree correlations …

Max-Planck-Institut für molekulare Genetik Workshop „Systems Biology“ March 2-3, 2006Thomas Manke Network Entropy and Robustness same number of nodes/edges different wiring schemes  different entropy Observation: Topological resilience increases with entropy ! Network entropy = proxy for resilience against random perturbations L.Demetrius, T.Manke; Physica A 346 (2005). L. Demetrius,V. Gundlach, G. Ochs; Theor. Biol. 65 (2004)

Max-Planck-Institut für molekulare Genetik Workshop „Systems Biology“ March 2-3, 2006Thomas Manke From Structure to Function An application: protein interaction network (C.elegans) global network characterisation  characterisation of individual proteins ? only 10% show lethal phenotype Hypothesis: Proteins with higher contributions to topological robustness are preferentially lethal (cf. Structure  Function paradigm)

Max-Planck-Institut für molekulare Genetik Workshop „Systems Biology“ March 2-3, 2006Thomas Manke Entropic ranking and essential proteins Entropy decomposition H =  i  i H i Proposal: rank nodes according to their value of  i H i (and not by local connectivity !) Ranked list of N proteins: Entropy rank1234N-1N Lethality index Systematically check whether the top k nodes show an enriched amount of lethal proteins

Max-Planck-Institut für molekulare Genetik Workshop „Systems Biology“ March 2-3, 2006Thomas Manke

Max-Planck-Institut für molekulare Genetik Workshop „Systems Biology“ March 2-3, 2006Thomas Manke Systematic checks … false positives/negatives … compartmental bias … similar for yeast … proteins with high contribution to network resilience are preferentially essential !

Max-Planck-Institut für molekulare Genetik Workshop „Systems Biology“ March 2-3, 2006Thomas Manke Skipped Which Stochastic Process ?  from variational principle Network selection & evolution  Demetrius & Manke, 2003 Correlation with structural observables  emerge as effective correlates of entropy  can go beyond

Max-Planck-Institut für molekulare Genetik Workshop „Systems Biology“ March 2-3, 2006Thomas Manke Summary Cellular Resilience Structure  Dynamics  Function Thermodynamic approach Network Entropy global network characterization measure of pathway diversity correlates with structural resilience Functional Analysis entropy correlates with lethality

Max-Planck-Institut für molekulare Genetik Workshop „Systems Biology“ March 2-3, 2006Thomas Manke Thank you ! Collaborators: Lloyd Demetrius Martin Vingron Funding: EU-grant “TEMBLOR” QLRI-CT National Genome Research Network (NGFN)

Max-Planck-Institut für molekulare Genetik Workshop „Systems Biology“ March 2-3, 2006Thomas Manke Processes on Networks Consider a simple random walk on a network defined by adjacency matrix A = (a ij ) permissble processes P = (p ij ): a ij = 0 p ij = 0  j p ij = 1 Network characterisation  characterisation of dynamical process

Max-Planck-Institut für molekulare Genetik Workshop „Systems Biology“ March 2-3, 2006Thomas Manke A variational principle log = sup {-  ij  i p ij log p ij +  ij  i a ij log p ij } P Perron-Frobenius eigenvalue (topological invariant) corresponding eigenvector v i is strictly positive for irreducible matrices a ij (strongly connected graphs) for Boolean matrices:  entropy maximisation

Max-Planck-Institut für molekulare Genetik Workshop „Systems Biology“ March 2-3, 2006Thomas Manke A unique process... p ij = a ij v j / v i Arnold, Gundlach, Demetrius; Ann. Prob. (2004) :  p ij satisfies the variational principle uniquely !  non-equilibrium extension of Gibbs principle  “Gibbs distribution” Network Entropy = KS-entropy of this process