Effects of Mode and Order of Administration on Generic HRQOL Scores? Ron D. Hays, Seong Eun Kim, Karen Spritzer, and Honghu Liu UCLA 1:00-2:00 pm.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Survey Methodology Nonresponse EPID 626 Lecture 6.
Advertisements

How does PROMIS compare to other HRQOL measures? Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. UCLA, Los Angeles, CA Symposium 1077: Measurement Tools to Enhance Health- Related.
Development and initial validation of the ‘Bristol Impact of Hypermobility’ (BIoH) questionnaire ST Palmer a, F Cramp a, R Lewis b, G Gould c, E Clark.
Effects of electroconvulsive therapy for depression on health related quality of life Adam Kavanagh.
1 5/21/2015 Cigarette Smoking and Health-Related Quality of Life in Medicare Beneficiaries Ron D. Hays ISOQOL October 13, 2007.
Effect of Physician Asthma Education on Health Care Utilization of Children at Different Income Levels Randall Brown, Noreen Clark, Niko Kaciroti, Molly.
Cross-Cultural Use of Measurements: Development of the Chinese SF-36 Health Survey Xinhua S. Ren, Ph.D. Boston University School of Public Health, Boston,
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence January–February 2010.
Quality of Life in Oporto and South of Douro Region – Comparison of EQ-5D and SF-36 Introdução à Medicina Turma 6 – 2006/2007.
Quality Control Barbara Weberman MT(ASCP) Oakland County Health Division Laboratory Supervisor.
Ilana F. Gareen, Ph.D. Brown University Center for Statistical Sciences
1 8/14/2015 Evaluating the Significance of Health-Related Quality of Life Change in Individual Patients Ron Hays October 8, 2004 UCLA GIM/HSR.
1 Health-Related Quality of Life Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. - UCLA Department of Medicine: Division of General Internal Medicine.
Economic evaluation of health programmes Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health Class no. 11: Cost-utility analysis – Part 4.
Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. Use of Preference-Based Health-Related Quality of Life Measures in Cost-Effectiveness Studies (HLT POL 239B) February.
The Life Story of Ron Hays UCLA GIM/HSR Introduction to Fellows August 7, 2009 ~ 12:42 pm.
Measuring Health Outcomes
The influence of excessive computer usage on physical activity Thamar Chochua Tamar Japaridze Sofia Skliarenko.
Is the Minimally Important Difference Really 0.50 of a Standard Deviation? Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. June 18, 2004.
Introduction Theoretical Perspectives Research.  Sampling : Identifying the appropriate population of people to be studied.  Random Sample : Each member.
Association of Health Plan’s HEDIS Performance with Outcomes of Enrollees with Diabetes Sarah Hudson Scholle, MPH, DrPH April 9, 2008.
University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.
Ron D. Hays August 7, 2015 (12:24-12:32pm) Powerpoint file posted at: Health Services Research.
Quality of Life in People with and at Risk for Type 2 Diabetes: Findings from the Study to Help Improve Early Evaluation and Management of Risk Factors.
Responding to Reviews of Submitted Manuscripts Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. UCLA GIM & HSR March 2, 2015 HPM 214, Los Angeles, CA.
1 10/11/2015 Cigarette Smoking and Health-Related Quality of Life in Medicare Beneficiaries Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. UCLA GIM/HSR October 5, 2007 (12-1pm)
1 10/12/2015 Health-Related Quality of Life Assessment Health-Related Quality of Life Assessment Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. November 27, 2002 (8:30-9:30.
1 Assessing the Minimally Important Difference in Health-Related Quality of Life Scores Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. UCLA Department of Medicine October 25, 2006,
Joint Dermatologic and Ophthalmic Drugs & Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee February 26 & 27, Overview Isotretinoin Pregnancy Exposures:
Education War Era Cardiac Surgery Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) in Adult Survivors after the Fontan Operations James K. Kirklin, MD Manisha Kukreja,
Another Perspective on PRO Content in Clinical Practice Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. University of California, Los Angeles June 25, 2007.
Development of Physical and Mental Health Summary Scores from PROMIS Global Items Ron D. Hays ( ) UCLA Department of Medicine
Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life
Overview of Health-Related Quality of Life Measures May 22, 2014 (1:00 – 2:00 PDT) Kaiser Methods Webinar Series 1 Ron D.Hays, Ph.D.
Assessing Mental Health Among Latino Consumers of Mental Health Services Susan V. Eisen, PhD, Mariana Gerena, PhD, Gayatri Ranganathan, MS, Pradipta Seal.
Health-Related Quality of Life Preference Measures for Vision Studies Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. UCLA GIM & HSR June 10, 2009 (2:30-4:00 pm) Irvine, CA.
Ron D. Hays August 9, 2013 (12:00-12:07pm) Powerpoint file posted at:
Research.  Random Sample : Each member of the population has an equal chance of being included in the sample.  Problem of Refusal (or nonresponse) :
1 Session 6 Minimally Important Differences Dave Cella Dennis Revicki Jeff Sloan David Feeny Ron Hays.
Item Response Theory (IRT) Models for Questionnaire Evaluation: Response to Reeve Ron D. Hays October 22, 2009, ~3:45-4:05pm
Evaluating Self-Report Data Using Psychometric Methods Ron D. Hays, PhD February 6, 2008 (3:30-6:30pm) HS 249F.
Assessing Patient Satisfaction Ron D. Hays UCLA Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research RAND Health Program AUA Foundation Summer.
EQ-5D and SF-36 Quality of Life Measures in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Comparisons with RA, Non-Inflammatory Disorders (NIRD), and Fibromyalgia (FM)
The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Effect of Diabetes Education During Retinal Ophthalmology Visits on Diabetes Control (Protocol M) 11.
Evaluating Self-Report Data Using Psychometric Methods Ron D. Hays, PhD February 8, 2006 (3:00-6:00pm) HS 249F.
Ceiling (and floor) Effects Ron D. Hays and David Feeny 10:20-10:45 am March 21.
Approaches for Estimating Minimally Important Differences Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. January 12, 2004 (8:50-9:10am) Minimal Clinically Important Differences in.
Can patients be satisfied to death? What was Joshua J. Fenton thinking? Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. July 21, 2015 UCLA Center for Maximizing Outcomes and Research.
Highlights of Current Research Ron Hays UCLA GIM/HSR Introduction to Fellows August 10, 2007 ~ 12:19 pm.
School of Nursing Health Literacy Among Informal Caregivers of Persons With Memory Loss Judith A. Erlen, PhD, RN, FAAN; Jennifer H. Lingler, PhD, RN; Lisa.
Considerations in Comparing Groups of People with PROs Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. UCLA Department of Medicine May 6, 2008, 3:45-5:00pm ISPOR, Toronto, Canada.
Panelists: Vijit Chinburapa, PhD, CPHQ, HSAG Judy Ng, PhD, NCQA Lewis Kazis, ScD, Boston University Sean Creighton, MSc, CMS Nancy Kenly, MPA, CMS Galina.
Patient-Reported Physical Functioning Ron D. Hays November 27, 2012 (11:15-11:30) UCLA Department of Medicine MCID for Orthopaedic Devices Silver Springs,
Estimating Minimally Important Differences on PROMIS Domain Scores Ron D. Hays UCLA Department of Medicine/Division of General Internal Medicine & Health.
Measures of Health-Related Quality-of-Life Background presentation for IOM Committee on Women’s Health Research May 7, 2009 Dennis.
Date of download: 6/3/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators and Quality.
Effects of the General Economy On Mental Health Outcome Measures September 2006 to August 2011 Tim Santoni, M.A. Systems Evaluation Center, Division of.
Test-Retest Reliability of the Work Disability Functional Assessment Battery (WD-FAB) Dr. Leighton Chan, MD, MPH Chief, Rehabilitation Medicine Department.
Table 1. Characteristics of generic HRQOL assessments in adult physical activity research Peter D. Hart et al. Systematic Review of Health-Related Quality.
Joseph A. Sclafani MD1,2, Kevin Liang PhD 2, Choll W Kim MD,PhD1
Quality of Medical Care Received by Individuals with Mental Illnesses
PROMIS-29 V2.0 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scores Ron D. Hays
UCLA Department of Medicine
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health
Patient-reported outcomes: proportion of patients with clinically meaningful improvements in (A) SF-36 PCS and MCS at Week 52 and Week 104*†‡ and (B) HAQ-DI.
Impact of Mode and Order of Administration on Generic HRQOL Scores
Estimating Minimally Important Differences (MIDs)
Evaluating the Significance of Individual Change
UCLA Department of Medicine
Patient-reported Outcome Measures
Presentation transcript:

Effects of Mode and Order of Administration on Generic HRQOL Scores? Ron D. Hays, Seong Eun Kim, Karen Spritzer, and Honghu Liu UCLA 1:00-2:00 pm

Health Measurement in Patients Tracking Clinical Outcomes Study Self-administration (mail) of HRQOL measures at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-baseline. –SF-36v2 TM, QWB, EQ-5D, HUI Telephone interview at 6 months post- baseline Participants randomized to order of mail/phone administration at 6 months

Analysis Differences in days between survey dates  -133 to 54 days (mail – phone)  57% were within 3 weeks 318 patients at 6 months: – 92 heart failure –226 cataract surgery Random intercept model (PROC Mixed), controlling for gender, age, race, education, and site (UCSD, UCLA, Wisconsin by heart failure and cataract).

Means by Mode and Order Mail after phone Mail before phone Phone before mail Phone after mail MCS51 c 53 b,c 53 b 56 a PCS39 c 41 b,c 41 a,b 43 a 6-D69 c 71 b,c 73 a,b 76 a QWB58 a,b 61 a 57 b 60 a,b EQ-VAS69 c 74 b 72 b 76 a EQ-5D77 c 80 b,c 81 b 85 a HUI-278 b 82 a,b 79 b 85 a HUI-367 c 73 b 71 b 82 a

Later order of administration in telephone interview is significantly related to: - More positive HRQOL reports for EQ-5D (VA and U.S. preference score) and SF-36 (6D, PCS, MCS) - More negative for QWB-SA Project 1

Max. Differences by HRQOL Measure DifferenceSD MCS510 PCS412 6-D714 QWB214 EQ-Vas719 EQ-5D817 HUI-2818 HUI-31525

Test-Retest Reliability Estimates HRQOL MeasureIntraclass Correlation MCS0.63 PCS D0.74 QWB0.60 EQ-VAS0.79 EQ-5D0.72 HUI HUI-30.68

Correlations among HRQOL Measures MCPC6DQWVA5DH2H3 MC PC D QW VA D H H MailontopphoneonleftN =250

Results The most positive generic HRQOL scores tend to be obtained when the measures are administered by phone after a mail administration whereas the least positive scores occur by mail after a phone administration. Effect sizes range from small to moderate

Conclusions No doubt that these are differences that are beyond minimally important Caution is needed when comparing HRQOL estimates if mode or order of administration varies