e-IMCI: Improving Pediatric Health Care in Low-Income Countries University of Washington Brian DeRenzi Quals Talk November 19, 2007
e-IMCI Project PDA-based decision support for clinicians at the point of care Increase quality of care delivered Result Significantly increased adherence to medical protocol without substantially increasing patient visit time Contribution Adapted code base to implement the protocol for pediatric health care Ran two-month field study in rural Tanzania to pilot the system and determine how it can help
Outline Motivation Introduction Background on Project Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) e-IMCI Field Study Results Future work Acknowledgements
Motivation This year almost 10 million children will die before reaching the age of 5 Most live in low-income countries 10% of infants die during their first year, compared to 0.5% in wealthy countries Almost 2/3 could be saved by the correct application of affordable interventions
Motivation Every 6 seconds a child dies unnecessarily
Introduction UNICEF, WHO and others develop medical protocols e.g. Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) Clinical guidelines for busy facilities Easy to use for lowly-trained health workers
Introduction - IMCI Originally developed in 1992 Adopted by over 80 countries worldwide Children 0-5 years old Common illness Cough Diarrhea Fever Ear Pain Malnutrition Eacer
IMCI
IMCI Barriers Expense of training ($1150 -$1450) Not sufficient supervision Chart booklet Takes a long time to use Natural tendency to be less rigorous Social pressure Result - not often followed in health clinics
Related Work Automating procedural tasks Using mobile devices can help under high workloads Harvard University Program on AIDs (HUPA) Project Designing medical protocol in South Africa Decision support in India TRACNet, OpenMRS, IHRDC study Gary Marsden Computable protocols GLIF Artificial Intelligence Expert systems, Probabilistic systems
e-IMCI Put IMCI protocol on PDA Guide health workers step-by-step Potential benefits Better adherence to protocol Easier and faster than book Data collection is a by-product of care Can handle more complex protocols Interface with other devices and EMR Reduce training time and cost Strong supervision
How the project started and how I got involved. Background
D-Tree International Medical algorithms on mobile devices Help over-burdened health workers Gather data from the field Work with governments to implement sustainable programs HUPA project
HUPA Project Started in Cape Town HIV screening algorithm Counselors can quickly determine if patient needs to see doctor Huge shortage of doctors 29.1% national HIV prevalence 1 Less than 1% in US 1
South Africa Worked with Right To Care Non-profit at Helen Joseph Hospital Second site for HUPA project Gained experience with the HUPA code Delivered PDAs, established workflow Introduced to health facilities and field work
South Africa
Tanzania Worked with IHRDC Met with the Tanzanian government and other NGOs
Integrated Management of Childhood Illness. IMCI
IMCI Example
Electronic delivery of IMCI. e-IMCI
e-IMCI Interface
e-IMCI Implemented subset of IMCI protocol for pilot study Contains cough, diarrhea, fever and ear pain questions and treatment First visit, ages 2 weeks to 5 years
Real clinicians. Real patients. Real world. Field Study
Mtwara, Tanzania Worked with IHRDC in Mtwara, Tanzania Southern Tanzania Rural Subsistence farming Fishing Piloted e-IMCI at a dispensary
Study Design Started with five clinicians Four clinicians completed study Goals: Discover usability issues Discover if e-IMCI increases adherence Determine how e-IMCI affects patient visit
IMCI Protocol Use Ideal case Follow paper chart booklet for every patient between 0-5 years of age “Current practice” Treat patients from memory, occasionally referencing the chart booklet e-IMCI trials Treat patients using the e-IMCI software system
Study Design Started with some pre- trials to fix major bugs Semi-structured interview of all clinicians Observed 24 “current practice” IMCI sessions 27 e-IMCI sessions Exit interview for each clinician
Study Design Real Patients, not actors Used same data collection forms for current practice and e- IMCI Pairwise design Basic pilot, no randomization
Trials per Clinician Number of “current practice” trials55554 Number of e-IMCI trials Clinician
Numbers, reactions and lessons. Results
Adherence Measured adherence using 23 items IMCI asks the practitioner to perform e-IMCI significantly improved adherence to the IMCI protocol p < 0.01
Adherence: The Numbers InvestigationCurrent Practice Adherence e-IMCI Adherence p-value Vomiting66.7% (n=24)85.7% (n=28)- Chest Indrawing 75% (n=20)94.4% (n=18)- Blood in Stool71.4% (n=7)100% (n=3)- Measles in Last 3 Months 55.6% (n=9)95.2% (n=21)<0.05 Tender Ear0% (n=1)100% (n=5)- All61% (n=299)84.7% (n=359)< 0.01
Adherence: Advice Numbers Clinical Officer Current Practice Adherence e-IMCI Advice Adherence p-value 120% (n=15)76.9% (n=39)< % (n=15)66.7% (n=18)< % (n=15)100% (n=12) % (n=21)- All56.9% (n=72)77.4% (n=84)< 0.01
Timing Clinical Officer Average Length of Current Practice Patient Visit (minutes) Average Length of e- IMCI Patient Visit (minutes) 95% Confidence Interval of e-IMCI Minus Current Practice 116 (n=5)13 (n=13)-2.1 to 7.9 † 36 (n=5)8 (n=6)-5.5 to 1.0 † 47 (n=5)9 (n=4)-5.7 to 4.7 † 519 (n=4)14 (n=4)-2.1 to 13.1 † Total10 (n=24)11 (n=27)-2.4 to 2.4 ‡ † unpaired t-test, ‡ paired t-test of 18 trials No substantial increase in patient visit time
Clinician Reaction Unanimously cited e-IMCI as easier to use and faster than following the chart booklet
Clinician Reaction Wanted to use the system for Care Treatment Clinic Liked being able to review answers to questions Asked to be in future studies “Sometimes since I have experience [with IMCI] I will skip things, but with the PDA I can’t skip.” Would “use a combination” of current practice and the e-IMCI software and would never need to refer to the book
Lessons Learned Limitations Question Grouping Threshold Problem Requirements Flexibility Incorrect IMCI otitis externa Local Preference Antibiotic Lab use
Conclusion e-IMCI significantly improves adherence to IMCI protocol Does not substantially lengthen the patient visit time Positive reaction from clinicians, but room for improvement Large number of interesting enhancements for the future
Where we’re going. Future Work
e-IMCI for Training Current training lasts days Costs $ $1450 per person Using e-IMCI to train, could reduce time and cost No need to train the protocol as in-depth Tutored mode
User-Driven Model “Expert” mode Allow users to decide what investigations to perform Flexibility will encourage long-term use Merge with current system-driven approach to ensure correct care
Deploying Protocols Interfaces for tutor, guided and expert modes Automatically generate interfaces for different platforms Maintain consistent look and feel
Community Outreach Take e-IMCI outside of the health facility Travel village-to-village to collect health census information and deliver care
Acknowledgments Neal Lesh, Marc Mitchell, Gaetano Borriello, Tapan Parikh, Clayton Sims, Werner Maokola, Mwajuma Chemba, Yuna Hamisi, David Schellenberg, Kate Wolf, Victoria DeMenil, D-Tree International, Dimagi Inc., the Ifakara Health Research & Development Centre, the Ministry of Health in Tanzania and the clinicians in Mtwara for their support and contribution to this work.
Questions
Just in case. Extra Slides
The vision. Introduction
What others have done. Related Work
IMCI in Tanzania Adapted and adopted by Tanzania in 1996 National policy Main component is a medical protocol followed by health workers at the point of care
Pre-Grad School Volunteered with American Red Cross after Hurricane Katrina Volunteered with International Service Learning to deliver medical supplies in rural Tanzania
Introduction Digitize protocol to make it easier to use