Coregistration and Normalisation By Lieke de Boer & Julie Guerin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FIL SPM Course 2010 Spatial Preprocessing
Advertisements

A Growing Trend Larger and more complex models are being produced to explain brain imaging data. Bigger and better computers allow more powerful models.
SPM5 Segmentation. A Growing Trend Larger and more complex models are being produced to explain brain imaging data. Bigger and better computers allow.
Image Registration John Ashburner
WMH Replacement and Image Warping Evan Fletcher. Purpose of method Use warping to compile statistical profiles of WMH distributions Use warping to compile.
VBM Voxel-based morphometry
Overview fMRI time-series Statistical Parametric Map Smoothing kernel
Buttons in SPM5 Carolyn McGettigan & Alice Grogan Methods for Dummies 5 th April 2006.
Realignment – Motion Correction (gif from FMRIB at Oxford)
Concepts of SPM data analysis Marieke Schölvinck.
Gordon Wright & Marie de Guzman 15 December 2010 Co-registration & Spatial Normalisation.
Coregistration and Spatial Normalization Nov 14th
Co-registration and Spatial Normalisation Nazanin Derakshan Eddy Davelaar School of Psychology, Birkbeck University of London.
Introduction to Functional and Anatomical Brain MRI Research Dr. Henk Cremers Dr. Sarah Keedy 1.
Basics of fMRI Preprocessing Douglas N. Greve
OverviewOverview Motion correction Smoothing kernel Spatial normalisation Standard template fMRI time-series Statistical Parametric Map General Linear.
SPM5 Tutorial, Part 1 fMRI preprocessing Tiffany Elliott May
Preprocessing: Coregistration and Spatial Normalisation Cassy Fiford and Demis Kia Methods for Dummies 2014 With thanks to Gabriel Ziegler.
SPM5- Methods for Dummies 2007 P. Schwingenschuh
Pre-processing in fMRI: Realigning and unwarping
Spatial Preprocessing
Realigning and Unwarping MfD
Realigning and Unwarping MfD
JOAQUÍN NAVAJAS SARAH BUCK 2014 fMRI data pre-processing Methods for Dummies Realigning and unwarping.
Zurich SPM Course 2011 Spatial Preprocessing Ged Ridgway With thanks to John Ashburner and the FIL Methods Group.
07/01/15 MfD 2014 Xin You Tai & Misun Kim
Spatial preprocessing of fMRI data Methods & models for fMRI data analysis 25 February 2009 Klaas Enno Stephan Laboratory for Social and Neural Systrems.
Spatial preprocessing of fMRI data
Multiple comparison correction Methods & models for fMRI data analysis 29 October 2008 Klaas Enno Stephan Branco Weiss Laboratory (BWL) Institute for Empirical.
SPM+fMRI. K space K Space Mechanism of BOLD Functional MRI Brain activity Oxygen consumptionCerebral blood flow Oxyhemoglobin Deoxyhemoglobin Magnetic.
Preprocessing II: Between Subjects John Ashburner Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, 12 Queen Square, London, UK.
Haskins fMRI Workshop Part I: Data Acquisition & Preprocessing.
Voxel-Based Morphometry John Ashburner Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, 12 Queen Square, London, UK.
FMRI Preprocessing John Ashburner. Contents *Preliminaries *Rigid-Body and Affine Transformations *Optimisation and Objective Functions *Transformations.
FIL SPM Course May 2011 Spatial preprocessing Ged Ridgway With thanks to John Ashburner and the FIL Methods Group.
Voxel Based Morphometry
Co-registration and Spatial Normalisation
MNTP Trainee: Georgina Vinyes Junque, Chi Hun Kim Prof. James T. Becker Cyrus Raji, Leonid Teverovskiy, and Robert Tamburo.
Preprocessing of FMRI Data fMRI Graduate Course October 23, 2002.
DTU Medical Visionday May 27, 2009 Generative models for automated brain MRI segmentation Koen Van Leemput Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical.
Signal, Noise and Preprocessing
SENSOR LEVEL ANALYSIS AND SOURCE LOCALISATION in M/EEG METHODS FOR DUMMIES Mrudul Bhatt & Wenjun Bai.
Coregistration and Spatial Normalisation
Spatial Processing Chris Rorden Spatial Registration Interpolation
Coregistration and Spatial Normalization Jan 11th
Spatial Preprocessing Ged Ridgway, FMRIB/FIL With thanks to John Ashburner and the FIL Methods Group.
Voxel-based morphometry The methods and the interpretation (SPM based) Harma Meffert Methodology meeting 14 april 2009.
Statistical Parametric Mapping Lecture 11 - Chapter 13 Head motion and correction Textbook: Functional MRI an introduction to methods, Peter Jezzard, Paul.
Spatial Smoothing and Multiple Comparisons Correction for Dummies Alexa Morcom, Matthew Brett Acknowledgements.
Image Registration John Ashburner
SPM Pre-Processing Oli Gearing + Jack Kelly Methods for Dummies
Methods for Dummies Second level Analysis (for fMRI) Chris Hardy, Alex Fellows Expert: Guillaume Flandin.
1 st level analysis: Design matrix, contrasts, and inference Stephane De Brito & Fiona McNabe.
MfD Co-registration and Normalisation in SPM
Spatial processing of FMRI data And why you may care.
Preprocessing In SPM Yingying Wang 7/15/2014 Tuesday
Group Averaging of fMRI Data
Zurich SPM Course 2012 Spatial Preprocessing
Spatial Preprocessing John Ashburner
fMRI Preprocessing John Ashburner
Zurich SPM Course 2011 Spatial Preprocessing
Keith Worsley Keith Worsley
Computational Neuroanatomy for Dummies
Image Preprocessing for Idiots
Spatial Preprocessing
From buttons to code Eamonn Walsh & Domenica Bueti
Image Registration John Ashburner
Preprocessing: Coregistration and Spatial Normalisation
Anatomical Measures John Ashburner
Mixture Models with Adaptive Spatial Priors
Presentation transcript:

Coregistration and Normalisation By Lieke de Boer & Julie Guerin

Presentation Overview Recap: Steps of Preprocessing Coregistration Normalisation Smoothing Summary SPM Guidelines

Steps of Preprocessing MNI str fct str MNI fct str 2 MNI is a blurry version of 3 1.Realign & Unwarp 2.Coregister 3.Normalise 4.Smooth Raw data (fct) Raw data (str) MNI fct

CoregistrationNormalisation & Smoothing

Recap: 1. Realignment Aligning all fMRI scans to reference scan –Linear transformations (translations and rotations) fct str fct MNI fct Translation Rotation

Recap: 1. Unwarping Non-linear transformations Adjusts for deformations in magnetic field

2. Coregistration Cross modal (structural/functional) realignment to the same native space. Within-subjects Structural (high resolution) Functional (low resolution) MNI fct str

Coregistration: Step 1 Registration –Similar to realignment –Fitting source image (T1 structural) to reference image (T2 functional) Translation Rotation

Coregistration: Step 2 Reslicing/Interpolation Estimating what value of intensity each voxel represents in a functional image. Structural (high resolution; 1mm 3 ) ≠ Functional (low resolution; 3mm 3 ) –Reslicing estimates the intensity of surrounding voxels in functional scan so that functional voxels correspond with structural voxels.

Coregistration: Step 2 (Continued) Methods of Interpolation: Nearest Neighbour Linear Interpolation B-Spline Interpolation (Higher-Order Interpolation) zczc ?

intensity # voxels intensity Coregistration: Forming a Joint Histogram T2* (functional) histogramT1 (structural) histogram Registered Joint Histogram UN-Registered Joint Histogram

3. Normalisation Coregistered images  Standardised space fctstr MNI Talairach AtlasMNI Template

Why Normalise? Statistical power Group analyses Generalise findings/Representative Cross-study comparisons (standard coordinate system) ≠

Normalisation Aligning and warping to standardised space Template fitting: –Right/Left –Anterior/Posterior –Superior/Inferior GOAL: voxel to voxel correspondence between brains of many subjects

Normalisation: Optimisation Difficulties Aim: to find an identical fit between the subjects’ brain and the template brain. Reality: difficult to match brains when size/shape are so different –not structurally or functionally homologous –maximise similarity within reasonable limits/expectations.

Normalisation: Affine Transformation Linear Transformations Translations across axes Rotations around axes Scaling and zooming axes Shearing or skewing, i.e. angle changes between pairs of axes

Normalisation: Refine with Warping Applies non-linear warping to images to match template. Apply deformations/displacements to move voxels from original location to template location in multiple dimensions Affine RegistrationNon-linear Registration

Normalisation: Risk of Overfitting Warping is completely flexible and can therefore introduce unrealistic deformations = overfitting. Non-linear registration using regularisation. Non-linear registration without regularisation.

Normalisation: Regularisation Rather have less good match: compromise between reasonably good match & realistic deformation –Uses Bayesian framework: probability function of determining appropriate warp amounts. Regularisation sets limits to warp parameters, and ensures voxels stay close to their neighbours.

Normalisation: Segmentation Different scanners, noise, artifacts, magnetic field properties, etc. prevent data from being uniformly and predictably adjusted to template.

Segmentation Tissue Probability Maps (TPM) from standard space help predict tissue differentiation in subjects. Segmentation helps correctly identify which tissue type the voxels of interest belong to.

Normalisation: Generative Model Each tissue type has Gaussian probability density function for intensity. Goal is to get the best estimate of tissue probabilities. Generative Model (Bayesian) – fitting a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) to the joint histogram

4. Gaussian Smoothing Smoothing: adjusts for any residual differences and alignment errors. –Reduces signal to noise ratio. –Better spatial overlap –Better normally distributes data; enables statistical analyses How: Convolution calculates a weighted average of neighbouring voxels -- each voxel gets replaced by a weighted average of itself and its neighbours.

Keep In Mind: fMRI analyses are not precise and are based on multiple data adjustments that ultimately alter the raw data substantially. However, relatively reliable and robust inferences can be made when sample sizes are large enough, and when appropriate statistical analyses are performed.

Summary MNI str fct str MNI fct str MNI 4 4 is a blurry version of 3 fct 1. Realign & Unwarp 2. Coregister 3. Normalise & 4. Smooth

SPM

Tissue probability maps = 3 files: white matter, grey matter, CSF (Default) Masking image = exclude regions from spatial normalization (e.g. lesion) Data = Structural file (batched, for all subjects) Parameter File = Click ‘Dependency’ (bottom right of same window) Images to Write = Co- registered functionals (same as in previous slide)

SPM

References (Ged Ridgway’s preprocessing lecture) SPM videos: SPM Homepage: Suz Prejawa MfD Resources

And thanks to Ged!