Preprocessing: Coregistration and Spatial Normalisation Cassy Fiford and Demis Kia Methods for Dummies 2014 With thanks to Gabriel Ziegler.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FIL SPM Course 2010 Spatial Preprocessing
Advertisements

VBM Susie Henley and Stefan Klöppel Based on slides by John Ashburner
A Growing Trend Larger and more complex models are being produced to explain brain imaging data. Bigger and better computers allow more powerful models.
SPM5 Segmentation. A Growing Trend Larger and more complex models are being produced to explain brain imaging data. Bigger and better computers allow.
Image Registration John Ashburner
VBM Voxel-based morphometry
Overview fMRI time-series Statistical Parametric Map Smoothing kernel
Realignment – Motion Correction (gif from FMRIB at Oxford)
Concepts of SPM data analysis Marieke Schölvinck.
Gordon Wright & Marie de Guzman 15 December 2010 Co-registration & Spatial Normalisation.
Coregistration and Spatial Normalization Nov 14th
Co-registration and Spatial Normalisation Nazanin Derakshan Eddy Davelaar School of Psychology, Birkbeck University of London.
Introduction to Functional and Anatomical Brain MRI Research Dr. Henk Cremers Dr. Sarah Keedy 1.
Basics of fMRI Preprocessing Douglas N. Greve
OverviewOverview Motion correction Smoothing kernel Spatial normalisation Standard template fMRI time-series Statistical Parametric Map General Linear.
SPM5 Tutorial, Part 1 fMRI preprocessing Tiffany Elliott May
Coregistration and Normalisation By Lieke de Boer & Julie Guerin.
Pre-processing in fMRI: Realigning and unwarping
Spatial Preprocessing
Realigning and Unwarping MfD
JOAQUÍN NAVAJAS SARAH BUCK 2014 fMRI data pre-processing Methods for Dummies Realigning and unwarping.
Multiple testing Justin Chumbley Laboratory for Social and Neural Systems Research Institute for Empirical Research in Economics University of Zurich With.
Zurich SPM Course 2011 Spatial Preprocessing Ged Ridgway With thanks to John Ashburner and the FIL Methods Group.
07/01/15 MfD 2014 Xin You Tai & Misun Kim
Spatial preprocessing of fMRI data Methods & models for fMRI data analysis 25 February 2009 Klaas Enno Stephan Laboratory for Social and Neural Systrems.
Spatial preprocessing of fMRI data
Multiple comparison correction Methods & models for fMRI data analysis 29 October 2008 Klaas Enno Stephan Branco Weiss Laboratory (BWL) Institute for Empirical.
SPM+fMRI. K space K Space Mechanism of BOLD Functional MRI Brain activity Oxygen consumptionCerebral blood flow Oxyhemoglobin Deoxyhemoglobin Magnetic.
Preprocessing II: Between Subjects John Ashburner Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, 12 Queen Square, London, UK.
Voxel-Based Morphometry John Ashburner Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, 12 Queen Square, London, UK.
FMRI Preprocessing John Ashburner. Contents *Preliminaries *Rigid-Body and Affine Transformations *Optimisation and Objective Functions *Transformations.
FIL SPM Course May 2011 Spatial preprocessing Ged Ridgway With thanks to John Ashburner and the FIL Methods Group.
Voxel Based Morphometry
Co-registration and Spatial Normalisation
MNTP Trainee: Georgina Vinyes Junque, Chi Hun Kim Prof. James T. Becker Cyrus Raji, Leonid Teverovskiy, and Robert Tamburo.
Preprocessing of FMRI Data fMRI Graduate Course October 23, 2002.
DTU Medical Visionday May 27, 2009 Generative models for automated brain MRI segmentation Koen Van Leemput Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical.
Signal, Noise and Preprocessing
SENSOR LEVEL ANALYSIS AND SOURCE LOCALISATION in M/EEG METHODS FOR DUMMIES Mrudul Bhatt & Wenjun Bai.
1 Hands-On Data Analysis Kate Pirog Revill and Chris Rorden Data from safety training –9 subjects –Finger-tapping task (12s tapping, 12s rest) –188 scans.
Coregistration and Spatial Normalisation
Coregistration and Spatial Normalization Jan 11th
Spatial Preprocessing Ged Ridgway, FMRIB/FIL With thanks to John Ashburner and the FIL Methods Group.
Voxel-based morphometry The methods and the interpretation (SPM based) Harma Meffert Methodology meeting 14 april 2009.
Statistical Parametric Mapping Lecture 11 - Chapter 13 Head motion and correction Textbook: Functional MRI an introduction to methods, Peter Jezzard, Paul.
Spatial Smoothing and Multiple Comparisons Correction for Dummies Alexa Morcom, Matthew Brett Acknowledgements.
Image Registration John Ashburner
SPM Pre-Processing Oli Gearing + Jack Kelly Methods for Dummies
Methods for Dummies Second level Analysis (for fMRI) Chris Hardy, Alex Fellows Expert: Guillaume Flandin.
Preprocessing: Realigning and Unwarping Methods for Dummies, 2015/16 Sujatha Krishnan-Barman Filip Gesiarz.
1 st level analysis: Design matrix, contrasts, and inference Stephane De Brito & Fiona McNabe.
MfD Co-registration and Normalisation in SPM
Spatial processing of FMRI data And why you may care.
Ki-Chang Kwak. Average Brain Templates Used for Registration.
Preprocessing In SPM Yingying Wang 7/15/2014 Tuesday
Group Averaging of fMRI Data
Zurich SPM Course 2012 Spatial Preprocessing
Spatial Preprocessing John Ashburner
fMRI Preprocessing John Ashburner
Zurich SPM Course 2011 Spatial Preprocessing
Keith Worsley Keith Worsley
Computational Neuroanatomy for Dummies
Image Preprocessing for Idiots
Spatial Preprocessing
From buttons to code Eamonn Walsh & Domenica Bueti
Image Registration John Ashburner
Preprocessing: Coregistration and Spatial Normalisation
FMRI Image Analysis SPM.
M/EEG Statistical Analysis & Source Localization
Anatomical Measures John Ashburner
Presentation transcript:

Preprocessing: Coregistration and Spatial Normalisation Cassy Fiford and Demis Kia Methods for Dummies 2014 With thanks to Gabriel Ziegler

1. Preprocessing Recap 2. Coregistration 3. Spatial Normalisation 4. Smoothing 5. SPM help

Preprocessing Recap: Realignment Motion Correction Within subjects Aligning to a template fct fMRI fct fMRI

Preprocessing Recap: Unwarping Adjusts for changes in field strength Non linear

Preprocessing Final Steps: Coregistration Matching modalities in individual subjects Normalisation Matching images to a template (e.g. MNI) across subjects Smoothing Adjusts for residual differences and alignment errors fct strMRI fMRI MNI fMRI

Preprocessing Final Steps: Coregistration Matching modalities in individual subjects Normalisation Matching images to a template (e.g. MNI) across subjects Smoothing Adjusts for residual differences and alignment errors fct strMRI fMRI MNI fMRI

Coregistration Intermodal –Link anatomical information of functional images (few seconds) with a structural image (few minutes) Intrasubject Why? –Superior anatomical localisation –More precise spatial normalisation Mean functional Image (source) Anatomical Image (reference) Coregister

Coregistration Cannot rely on simply using intensity difference Identifying individual landmarks too labour intensive

Seek to measure shared information Quantify how well one image predicts the other Two-step process i.Registration (Fitting source image with reference image) ii.Interpolation Estimates the intensity of surrounding voxels in functional image  correspond with structural voxels

i.Registration Fitting source image (functional) with reference image (structural)

i.Interpolation Estimates the intensity of surrounding voxels in functional image  correspond with structural voxels

Interpolation Methods include: i.Nearest neighbour ii.Linear interpolation iii.B-spline interpolation (higher order) Same as nearest neighbour and linear in degrees of 0 and 1

Plotting intensities

Forming a joint histogram

Registered joint histogram Misregistered joint histogram

Normalisation: Motivation Motivation: A shared space is required to enable us to compare subjects. Aim: Voxel to voxel correspondence between the brains of subjects

Why normalise?

Why normalise cont… Increases statistical power Group analysis Generalisability Allows cross study comparisons

Normalisation Native Space  Standard Space TalairachMontreal Neurological Insitute (MNI) Space SPM uses MNI space!

Normalisation: Procedure 1.Affine registration 12 dof 1.Translations across axes (3 dof) 2.Rotations around axes (3 dof) 3.Scaling or Zooming (3 dof) 4.Shearing or Skewing (3 dof) A good start…

Normalisation- Warping Applies non linear deformations/ displacements from original location to template location Very Flexible 1000s of dof Affine RegistrationNon-linear Registration

Normalisation- Overfitting Flexibility of warping can lead to unrealistic results Regularisation applies constraints Non-linear registration using regularisation. Non-linear registration without regularisation.

Normalisation- Compromise We need to look at measures of similarity: Mean squared difference Squared difference between parameter and expected outcome The ‘best’ parameters may be unrealistic Important to use regularisation, to ensure a realistic outcome is found.

Unified Segmentation MRI imperfections increase the difficulty of normalisation. Noise artefacts Intensity inhomogeneity, bias field Differences in sequences Partial Volume

Unified Segmentation- TPMs Segmenting subject images before normalising facilitates the normalisation process Tissue Probability Maps- Standard space structural estimates of the location of GM and WM. Based on multiple previous segmentations

+ Tissue Probability Maps Gaussian Mixture Models Take each voxel and look at both it’s intensity and prior spatial knowledge, to make normalisation an easier problem to solve.

Normalising segmented tissue maps to a template a much easier issue to solve than just matching image to template Helps resolve MRI issues Bias correction included to combat intensity inhomogeneity Unified Segmentation

Smoothing Blurs over residual anatomical differences and registration errors Why? Suppresses noise signal reinforced and noise averaged out Superior special overlap Data becomes more normally distributed Increases sensitivity to effects of similar scale to kernel VS

Smoothing How? Weighted averaging of neighbouring voxels  Each voxel replaced by the weighted average of itself and its neighbours

Smoothing: disadvantages Reduction of spatial resolution of the data Edge Artifacts Merging Extinction Mislocalization of activation peaks

Keep in mind Multiple data adjustments are made during fMRI analysis, and these alter the raw data considerably  Therefore, large sample sizes and appropriate statistical analyses are required for reliable and robust inferences

Summary Coregistration links functional data with a structural image  Intrasubject Normalisation links images from one subject to standardised space  Intersubject Smoothing blurs over any residual errors and anatomical differences

SPM spm fmri (to open) Ensure you have the correct version! (SPM 12) newest update October 2014 If in doubt start by pressing ‘Batch’ All these tools can be found under Batch  SPM  Spatial Any images you input make sure are in the correct order (e.g. all prefixed by unique subject identifier, as SPM can’t order your data for you) Save your batch files so you can retrace your steps Ensure you have good file structure; SPM spews out tons of files….

SPM Reference image- (mean functional DEP image) that is assumed to remain stationary while source is moved to match it. Source- structural MRI Unless stated use defaults

SPM- Coregistration Output Very important to check your images- it automatically loads these up for you!

SPM- Segment 1 Data- use your structural image. If using multiple inputs (e.g. T1 and PD weighted image) then ensure all are entered in in the same order. Tissue 1=GM Tissue 2=WM Tissue 3=CSF Save Bias Corrected. TBC next slide

SPM- Segment 2 Scroll down Data- Forward deformation fields needed for MNI normalisation

SPM Use these forward deformations during the normalisation process. Images to write= co- registered functionals

SPM Smooth your normalised images Choose your kernel width here

References TPM Ged’s Lecture SPM Homepage Mfd Resources 2013

THANK YOU Gabriel