The sole responsibility for the content of this presentation lies with the Clean Fleets project. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TRAILBLAZER IEE/09/802/SI (from ) Date: TRAILBLAZER 1 Project Overview Donald Chalker Transport & Travel Research.
Advertisements

JAMA Comments on EU CO 2 strategy at Public Hearing Hiroki Ota Director General JAMA Europe 11 July 2007.
International Telecommunication Union ITU Green Standards Week, Rome, Italy, September 5 – 9, 2011 ICT in Organizations Current Status of the ITU-T SG5.
1 French Incentives for Clean and Energy Efficient Vehicles Deployment Willy Bréda, Advanced vehicules project manager Ministry of Ecology, Sustainable.
Main elements in a possible revision of the Energy Taxation Directive Informal meeting with stakeholders, 15 July 2009 European Commission, DG Taxation.
Helping Clients Become Savvy Shoppers. Ronald Montoya, Consumer Advice Editor B.A. in Journalism from California State University, Northridge Worked at.
DG Environment Life Cycle Costing (LCC) Methodologies for GPP Barbara Morton 08 April 2010 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Focusing on Life Cycle Cost (LCC) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in GPP Green Public Procurement (GPP) - Lead the change National Conference George Jadoun,
The sole responsibility for the content of this presentation lies with the Clean Fleets project. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European.
The sole responsibility for the content of this presentation lies with the Clean Fleets project. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European.
1 3.1 Light bulbs As an illustration, let’s have a closer look at light bulbs. The following video will illustrate to you all the LCA steps detailed until.
1 eBRIDGE: empowering e-fleets for business and private purposes in cities The sole responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors.
Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world Carbon Footprinting: Methodological Approaches, Challenges & Opportunities Simon Aumônier.
Road charging and vehicle taxation - the EU perspective
The sole responsibility for the content of this presentation lies with the Clean Fleets project. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European.
Quantifying Impacts of Transport- Related CO 2 Abatement Policies Roundtable on Transport - Related Climate Change Problems OECD Environment Directorate.
DEEP – Dissemination of Energy Efficiency Measures in the Public Building Sector (EC DG TREN, ) LIFE CYCLE COSTING A Tool for Energy Efficient.
How to use the DEEP LeCCATo Life Cycle Costing Tool DEEP Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tool How to use the tool The DEEP Toolkit. TOOL 2.b.Life Cycle Cost Analysis.
GET SUPPORT IN GREENING YOUR VEHICLE FLEET IEE Contract number: IEE/11/907/SI Project duration: 1/9/ /8/2015 Date of slides: June 2013.
UNLEASH MICROHYDRO POTENTIAL IN EUROPE. Renewable Energy Sources Transforming Our Regions (RESTOR) Hydro is a project is co-financed by the European Commission.
Expressing Environmental Impact in Monetary Units - Environmental Accounting/Costing Approaches.
Peter Defranceschi ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability An Introduction European Commission GPP Training Toolkit.
Caitlin Michele Ambesi & Matthew Otto Burchhardt.
Leeds Low Emission Vehicle Exhibition and Conference Graham Belgum (FirstGroup) and Ian Downie (Volvo Bus UK) 7 th October 2010.
Is Lithium the New Oil? The Future of Electric Cars John Hiam. Hatch.
Bus and coach transport for greening mobility Contribution to the European Bus and Coach Forum 2011 Huib van Essen, 20 October 2011.
Sustainable Procurement & Life Cycle Analysis Heather Pearce 9 th February 2010.
Alternative Fuel Readiness Plan for San Mateo County Overview of AFRP Presented to RMCP Meeting January 21, 2015.
The Green Cockpit Decision support for realising sustainable public transport Significant B.V. EMTA 19 april 2013 Paul van Hooff Koen Idzenga.
Quiz 1: Road Transport Case Study Evidence A – Fuel taxation, international experience 1. Why should ‘reducing traffic’ be an aim of government, separate.
Alternative Fuel Study A nalysis, R ecommendations, VTOD T oday Dave Bird September 21, 2009.
Reserve Study A Short and Long Term Budgetary Planning Vehicle
Clean Vehicles Possibilities and Barriers Jonas Ericson City of Stockholm Environment & Health department
„The sole responsibility for the content of this presentation lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Union.
Pricing policies for reducing CO 2 emissions from transport Huib van Essen Manager Transport CE Delft.
RUSICH ANDREA, DANIELIS ROMEO DEAMS – UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE RIUNIONE FINALE Un Electric Car Club per il Friuli Venezia Giulia
Life Cycle Assessment of Biofuels Paolo Masoni ENEA – LCA & Ecodesign Lab (ACS PROT – INN) Rome, th January.
The TIDE impact assessment methodology TIDE Final Conference Barcelona, September 2015 Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy Oliver.
CUTEC GEMIS-Training Bangkok, March 2012 Dipl.-Ing., M.sc.agr. Werner Siemers.
The sole responsibility for the content of this presentation lies with the Clean Fleets project. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European.
Assessment of Benefits Change title? John Paterson (Sheffield, 17 th September) web:
Assessment Criteria for the Acceptability of Cycle and Testing Procedure Informal working document DTP Subgroup LabProcICE slide 1 Assessment Criteria.
Clean Vehicles Possibilities and Barriers Jonas Ericson City of Stockholm Environment & Health department
The sole responsibility for the content of this presentation lies with the Clean Fleets project. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European.
New EU Directive Clean Procurement – Buses Updated September 2014.
Freight in the City Delivering Cost and Emission Savings in Urban Logistics Steve Carroll - Cenex Senior Technical Specialist.
Scania – Sustainable Urban Transport – April 2008
THE CLEAN FLEETS PROJECT SIMON CLEMENT CLEAN FLEETS PROJECT CO-ORDINATOR ICLEI – LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FOR SUSTAINABILITY.
SMARTSET Sustainable MARketdriven Terminal Solutions for Efficient freight Transport Contract Nr: IEE/12/714/SI Duration:
TNO Science & Industry GRPE – informal meeting EFV WG (Bonn, 30 October 2008) Concept for an Environmentally Friendly Vehicle (EFV) (Examples) Gerben Passier.
Jordy van Meerkerk, Gusta Renes & Geert Ridder (University of Southern California) 1 Greening the Dutch car fleet The role of the differentiated sales.
The Environmental car that packs a punch! Presented by Ishtiaq Rahman Lexus GS450 H Link to the presentation.
2012 International Fleet Barometer Local report UK.
Fleet Manager. Features Features Explained The fleet manager module allows fleet companies to do the following Store and manage vehicle related information.
Hybrid Electric Vehicles
Transportation.
> ETC Barcelona > Christoph Schimeczek • Effectiveness of [
Total Life-Cycle Cost Analysis of Conventional & Alternative Fueled Vehicles Mario W. Cardullo, P.E. Virginia Tech-NVGC.
Total Cost of Ownership: Considerations
Freight in the City Delivering Cost and Emission Savings in Urban Logistics Steve Carroll - Cenex Senior Technical Specialist.
Bus and coach transport for greening mobility
Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning
Beyond the sticker price
CMGT 380 Green Building Practices and LEED Certification
VPPC SNO-c116a Session WP5-R
European and Economic Social Committee
TOOLBOX TALKS Introduce yourself and the talk
Optiresource – Daimler‘s „Well-to-Wheel“- Optimizer
GPP Training toolkit 1. Green Public Procurement (GPP) – An Introduction Module aims: To present the strategic role of GPP for public authorities – demonstrating.
GPP Training toolkit 7.9. Road Transport
Presentation transcript:

The sole responsibility for the content of this presentation lies with the Clean Fleets project. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Union. Neither the EACI nor the European Commission are responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. MODULE 4: LIFE CYCLE COSTING & PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS OF THE CVD

4.1: LIFE CYCLE COSTING (LCC): INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

LIFE CYCLE COSTING (LCC) Also known as.....  Whole Life Costing (WLC)  Sometimes means the same as LCC... ...but it can also be considered to be broader in scope  Is most commonly used in the UK...  …for our purposes it is best avoided

LIFE CYCLE COSTING (LCC) Also known as.....  Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)  NOT the same as LCC!  = Assessment of lifetime environmental impacts of a product or activity (not necessarily monetised)

LIFE CYCLE COSTING (LCC) Also known as.....  Operational Lifetime Costs (OLC)  NOT the same – but can be part of overall LCC  = Monetised environmental costs  We will look at this next....

LIFE CYCLE COSTING (LCC) Also known as.....  Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)  The same as LCC for our purposes  = The total costs associated with buying or leasing a product, from beginning to end.

LIFE CYCLE COSTING What does LCC/TCO cover?  Acquisition costs (purchase price & delivery)  Installation (product/ associated infrastructure)  Operating costs (including fuel/ energy use)  Maintenance and repair costs  Taxes and fees (especially important when comparing alternative fuel/ technology types)  Disposal costs/ resale value

LIFE CYCLE COSTING Discussion  Any further (vehicle related) LCC aspects?  Let’s look back  Although the concept of using LCC is fairly obvious, there are often occasions when it is not used by procurers to calculate costs... Why?  How would we encourage procurers to take LCC into account?

4.2: OPERATIONAL LIFETIME COSTS (OLC)

OPERATIONAL LIFETIME COSTS The third methodology of the CVD  It monetises energy consumption, CO 2 and pollutant emissions (PM, NMHC, NO x )  Key point – its just ONE option, you don’t have to use it!  It is prescriptive – you must calculate it exactly as laid out by the CVD  To be used correctly it should not be converted into points/ used as part of a weighting that is separate from the financial costs - It calculates a monetary value which should be added to the financial costs of the purchase.

OLC – FUEL CONSUMPTION. Vehicle type Fuel consumpti on (l/100km) Fuel consump tion (l/km) Fuel conversion factor (MJ/l) Fuel consumpti on (MJ/km) Cost per unit of energy (€/MJ) Cost per km (€) Lifetime fuel consumption cost (200,000 km) (€) Diesel3,90,039361,4040,020750, ,30 Petrol4,70,047321,5040,020750, ,35 Electric 17,3 (kWh) 0,1733,60,62280,020750, ,93 Hybrid3,80,038321,2160,020750, ,01 CNG7,7 (Nm 3 )0,077332,5410,020750, ,42 Ethanol7,10,071211,4910,020750, ,40

OPERATIONAL LIFETIME COSTS – CO 2 Vehicle type CO 2 emission s (g/km) CO 2 emissions (kg/km) Cost (€/kg CO 2) Lifetime CO 2 emissions cost (200,000 km) (€) Diesel1020,1020,03612 Petrol1090,1090,03654 Electric000,030 Hybrid870,0870,03522 CNG1380,1380,03828 Ethanol1160,1160,03696.

OPERATIONAL LIFETIME COSTS - NO X Vehicle type NO x emission s (g/km) Cost (€/g NO x ) Lifetime NO x emissions cost (200,000 km) (€) Diesel0,12250, ,80 Petrol0,04160,004436,61 Electric00,00440,00 Hybrid0,00330,00442,90 CNG0,0430,004437,84 Ethanol0,0120,004410,56

OPERATIONAL LIFETIME COSTS - NMHC Vehicle type NMHC emissions (g/km) Cost (€/g NMHC) Lifetime NMHC emissions cost (200,000 km) (€) Diesel00,0010 Petrol0,05520,00111,04 Electric00,0010 Hybrid0,02510,0015,02 CNG00,0010 Ethanol0,05640,00111,28

OPERATIONAL LIFETIME COSTS - PM Vehicle type PM emissions (g/km) Cost (€/g PM) Lifetime PM emissions cost (200,000 km) (€) Diesel0, ,0870,1914 Petrol0, ,0870,29232 Electric00,0870 Hybrid00,0870 CNG00,0870 Ethanol0, ,0870,04524

OPERATIONAL LIFETIME COSTS - OVERVIEW Vehicle type Lifetime costs (€) Total OLC (€) Fuel consumption CO 2 emissions NO x emissions NMHC emissions Particulate emissions Diesel5.827, ,8000, ,29 Petrol6.242, ,6111,0400, ,29 Electric2.584, Hybrid5.047,015222,905, ,93 CNG10.546, , ,26 Ethanol6.188, ,5611,2800, ,28

NOTES ON OPTION 3: UNDERSTANDING THE DETAIL

STICKY BITS  Procurers are dissuaded from using option 3 as part of their procurement exercises due to the following:  The (perceived) level of complexity  Some believe it doesn’t value local air pollutants high enough  Difficulty in getting the relevant information (especially for HDVs)

STICKY BITS Commonly cited issues with the use of methodology 3 include:  Giving energy consumption a relatively high weighting  Counting CO 2 emissions as well as energy consumption  Giving a relatively low value to local pollutant emissions

STICKY BITS Commonly cited issues with the use of methodology 3 include:  Well to wheel (WTW) emissions are not taken into account  Additional measures must therefore be used as part of the procurement process in order to take into account WTW emissions – however the values and method itself stipulated under the CVD must remain the same

CONCLUSIONS  Option 3 of the CVD is perceived to be complex but the options under the CVD do offer a great deal of flexibility to procurers  It requires key environmental factors to be taken into account by procurers, helping to raise the bar & stimulate the clean vehicle market  Help is at hand! If you have any specific queries on the CVD, other aspects of clean vehicle procurement or require assistance with tendering – do not hesitate to contact the Clean Fleets Helpdesk for free advice!

4.3: THE CLEAN FLEETS LCC TOOL

THE CLEAN FLEETS LCC TOOL What is it?

THE CLEAN FLEETS LCC TOOL What is it?  An Excel spreadsheet... ...which aims to make life easier for procurers who wish to buy clean, energy efficient vehicles... ...by including a series of pre-set formulas... ...and the facility to change certain parameters... ...used to determine LCC associated with cars & vans.. ...including operational lifetime costs (OLC) prescribed by the CVD

THE CLEAN FLEETS LCC TOOL What does it take into account?  Acquisition (buying or leasing vehicles or batteries)  Maintenance (Cost for servicing or Service agreement)  Taxes and other costs (Tax, insurance & other charges)  OLC environmental costs (CO 2, pollutants, energy use)  Remnant value  Infrastructure costs

THE CLEAN FLEETS LCC TOOL Questions to bear in mind when testing it  Would there be any issues with collecting reliable data for the tool?  Which, if any, aspects are not taken into account correctly?  Which are not taken into account at all?  How useful is the Clean Fleets LCC Tool?  Which improvements could be made?.Let’s have a look!

THE CLEAN FLEETS TOOL  Can be a useful way of calculating life cycle costs including operational lifetime costs (OLC) as one of the options prescribed be the CVD  Any LCC tool is only as reliable as the data used to complete it  Feedback is welcomed!