Student Induction Student Representation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Student Involvement Madrid October 2006 Norman Sharp, Director, QAA Scotland Duncan Cockburn, Senior Development Officer, sparqs.
Advertisements

What Students Want – Needs and Expectations Professor Shirley Pearce Vice-Chancellor Thursday 12 th May 2011.
Directorate of Human Resources Embedding graduate attributes within the curriculum Rhona Sharpe, OCSLD Liz Turner, APQO.
Quality and Standards Framework – Collaborative Provision December 2008 Janet Pearce, University Quality Officer.
Towards an Inclusive Culture: Engaging Students in Institutional Enhancement Dr Helen May Senior Adviser Higher Education Academy.
QAA-HEA Education for Sustainable Development Guidance Document Consultation 5 November 2013, Birmingham Professor James Longhurst Assistant Vice Chancellor.
An introduction to the LiFE Index Sustainability and Social Responsibility Index.
Defining Student Engagement Caroline Heaton Dr Helen Kay Student Experience Team, QESS Learning and Teaching Conference 11th July 2012.
Strategies for Employer Engagement
Sharing Good Practice in Quality
Effective Principles for Student Engagement: Chapter B5 and how to use it Karl Hobley - Student Engagement Coordinator, QAA Partnership for Wales conference,
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY Operational Guidance for Franchise Delivery Quality Assurance Services.
What are Course Reps?  Students who represent their fellow students to the University  A Communication link with the University Who has.
Course Rep Conference 2014 Quality Street!. Today’s session: We will cover:  What do we mean by Quality Assurance?  Who are the Quality Assurance Agency?
UELSU reps conference Student Engagement: What does is mean for you?
Annual Monitoring and Review & Mutual Review Quality Assurance Services.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
QUALITY IN TEACHING & LEARNING – WHAT WORKS Anthony McClaran Chief Executive, QAA Tuesday 22 May 2012 HEPI Conference ( Higher Education Policy Institute)
A MEMBER OF THE RUSSELL GROUP PGR PERIODIC REVIEW Sara Crowley
Benchmarks and Benchmarking in the UK - Lessons Learned Catherine Connor Quality Enhancement Unit London Metropolitan University.
Cheating, Plagiarism and Unfair Practice Franchise Delivery Quality Assurance Services.
Developing a Strategy for Technology Enhanced Learning at UEL.
Learning and Teaching at The University of Bradford.
Inclusive Learning and Teaching at Swansea University The Higher Education Academy’s ‘Inclusive Curricula’ Project.
Introduction to sparqs Hannah Clarke sparqs Development Advisor Heeding the Student Voice at universities Friday 15 th May 2015.
Enhancing student learning through assessment: a school-wide approach Christine O'Leary, Centre for Promoting Learner Autonomy Sheffield Business School.
The Principles of Student Engagement Ellie Russell, Student Engagement Partnership Manager.
International Conference on Enhancement and Innovation in Higher Education Crowne Plaza Hotel, Glasgow 9-11 June 2015 Welcome.
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
Involving Students Effectively In Quality Assurance Nik Heerens Head of sparqs.
1 Collaborative Provision and External Examining Nicola Clarke Centre for Academic Standards and Quality Enhancement (CASQE)
Student Representation September 2013 Professor Patricia Price PVC: Student Experience and Academic Standards Cardiff University.
The link between staff development and student engagement The Robert Gordon University Thursday 4 February 2010 sparqs Student Engagement Series.
Institutional Led Review Training. Course Objectives By the end of the course you will:  Be able to explain the purpose of an Institution-Led Review.
International Conference on Enhancement and Innovation in Higher Education Crowne Plaza Hotel, Glasgow 9-11 June 2015 Welcome.
Welcome The changing face of quality assurance Hilary Placito (Director of Quality and Academic Support) January 2013.
Quality Assurance. Identified Benefits that the Core Skills Programme is expected to Deliver 1.Increased efficiency in the delivery of Core Skills Training.
Quality Assurance – European Standards and Guidelines.
A MEMBER OF THE RUSSELL GROUP PGR PERIODIC REVIEW Sara Crowley
Learning and Teaching Forum Higher Education Review - Update 31 May, 2016Gwendolen Bradshaw1.
Heriot-Watt University: Perspectives on International Development Ruth Moir, Director of International Development.
Learning & Teaching Priorities DLT Away Day September 2009 Kath Hodgson.
Enhancing Cohort Identity in Legal Education
Centre for Higher Education Practice Student Engagement Students as Partners Roisín Curran, Professional Development Manager, Staff Development Stuart.
So what are they really thinking? Our attempts to hear the student voice in Malaysia and Hong Kong Julie Barnaby and Garry Carr – Leeds Beckett University.
Hearing Voices: Listening to Students' Views in Collaborative Partnerships Ian Willcock – February 2016.
Academic Support: the student perspective Kate Little Senior Project Officer National Union of Students.
@sparqs_scotland Developing a culture of engagement and Partnership Eve Lewis Director Student Engagement in University decision making – towards a more.
Student engagement in quality: an introduction for staff
External Examining Induction Event for new Examiners February 2017
Professor Sally Varnham (UTS)
International Practice Scotland
Academic Support Tuition project Phase 2
Quality Assurance and Enhancement at The University of Edinburgh
Quality and Standards An introduction.
External Examiners Briefing Session Wednesday 12th April 2017
Partnership Forum 2017 Partner Institution Survey 2016 :
The UK Quality Code and Chapter B9
Student QEP Workshop Developing Student Engagement in Quality Assurance and Enhancement Student/Staff Strategic Analysis Session Eve Lewis Director.
Responsibilities and engagement of an external examiner
Staff Feedback Forum 3pm-5pm, 22 March 2017
Partnership Forum 2018 Partner Institution Survey 2016/17
External Examiner Briefing Session
“NStEP and NCI’s role within it”
Student engagement in QA in Scotland
External Examiners Briefing Session Friday 14th December 2018
An Introduction to LiFE
Personal Academic Tutoring
Reading Paper discussion – Week 4
Presentation transcript:

Student Induction Student Representation LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY Student Induction Student Representation Quality Assurance Services This podcast (if for a recording)/ development (if face-to-face) session will outline University expectations in relation to student induction and will look at what we mean by student representation. We recognise that you are likely to be very familiar with developing and delivering induction programmes, nonetheless, as a franchise partner we would expect any induction programme to incorporate a ‘Leedsbeckettness’; to ensure students are aware of their entitlements as a Leeds Beckett student, relevant regulations that determine how to succeed on a Leeds Beckett course and the opportunities available to them to fulfil their role as a learning partner.

Context “We want to put students at the heart of everything we do at QAA, to help you to be active participants in shaping your own education. For us, student engagement is about giving all students the opportunity and encouragement to get involved in quality assurance and the enhancement of higher education”. Quality Assurance Agency “Putting students at the centre of our activities and providing a flexible and relevant curriculum with excellent teaching and learning”, Theme 1, The Strategic Plan 1. Across the UK higher education sector, there is increasing importance placed on the role of the student, whereby students are seen as ‘learning partners’, benefiting from the opportunity to shape their own educational experience through engaging with quality assurance and enhancement processes. 2. The University’s Strategic Plan details our vision and values. It sets out our intentions for the next few years and defines a number of time bound KPIs against which we can measure our performance. Students are at the heart of all activity here at Leeds Beckett as described in the first theme of the University’s Strategic Plan: ‘Putting students at the centre of our activities and providing a flexible and relevant curriculum with excellent teaching and learning.’ This statement applies as much to our collaborative students as it does to students based onsite. 3. Student induction and student representation are key enabling mechanisms, ensuring students have the opportunity to get involved, to feedback, to direct their own learning experiences.

Focus of development session Students Induction Entitlements Engagement Representation We will focus on four key themes: Student Induction Student Entitlements Student Representation Student Engagement

Student Induction To welcome students to the institution and to assist the transition of students into higher education or onto the next level of study Partner responsible for devising student induction programme University support through the Link Tutor / Franchise Coordinator We will begin with looking in more detail at student induction: The overarching purpose of a student induction programme is, ‘ to welcome students to the institution and to assist the transition into higher education or onto the next level of higher education study’. In the context of a franchise arrangement, the partner is responsible for planning and delivering the induction programme. Although an expectation of the Franchise Framework is that the University will support, as a minimum the first induction cycle of induction programmes. This may be remotely but equally the University acknowledges that students enjoy meeting UK based teaching staff. Moreover, a visit to support the student induction programme could be combined with other activity for example, the delivery of staff development.

What do students want? Opportunity to make friends Pre-induction information Learning involved – will they cope? Benefit of the course Flexible induction programme to fit around other commitments i.e. family, jobs Research undertaken by Nottingham Trent University / University of Bradford Research undertaken by other UK HEIs suggests an induction programme should include and consider the following 5 elements: N.B Read all five first and then go back and expand on each one. 1. The Opportunity to make friends In order to facilitate this you could arrange activities such as social networking, icebreakers, small group work and off campus trips. It is worth bearing in mind that an interactive approach rather than lecture format may be the most beneficial. 2. Useful Pre-induction information For example, pre-entry activities involving preparatory learning, early distribution of reading lists, accurate timetables 3. Information about the learning involved – reassurance that they will cope You could have discussions about differences between learning activities that students may be used to and the approach to learning in UK higher education and provide opportunities for students to sample some learning activities, participate in group activities, campus tours, appointment of course reps and their role in providing feedback about the course learning activities. 4. Information about how the course will benefit their future Provide information about graduate employment, graduation, skill developments and the wider benefits of the programme 5. Designed to be a flexible programme induction programme to meet the diverse needs of students Students should be provided with a clear timetable sent in advance, when devising the timetable consider the timings – arrange activities in solid blocks of time to fit around other activities

University expectations of induction Course Handbook Student Entitlements Academic Principles and Regulations Course content and structure Support available Relationship to the University Student Charter (if applicable) Full list available in Operational Guidance for Franchise Delivery Leeds Beckett also has certain expectations about what should be included in a student induction programme. The Course Handbook should be disseminated (and also made available via the partner VLE). The Handbook should be produced using the University template, contextualised to the collaborative setting. The final version will need to be approved by the Link Tutor and submitted to the University (normally by 31 August prior to induction, for September cohorts). The University will hold a definitive version. The induction provides an opportunity to discuss in detail what students can expect from their course, the institution. Indicator 5 of Part C of the UK Quality Code: entitled ‘Information about higher education’ requires that, ‘higher education providers set out what they expect of current students and what current students can expect of the higher education provider.’ The induction programme should provide students with the necessary information about the University’s Academic Principles and Regulations, particularly those relating to Section C: Assessment, Mitigation, Unfair Practice. Students should be made aware of where they can access further information about the regulations. An induction programme will focus on the course content and structure, the teaching and learning methods and what is expected of students. Students should leave an induction session knowing where to go for support, this might include pastoral and welfare support as well as academic guidance. Students will probably want to know what their relationship is to the University and what they can expect from the University. It is important that students understand that they do not have access to the University’s Virtual Learning Environment and that the partner is responsible for the delivery of the course and the provision of appropriate support. Leeds Beckett has its own Student Charter. Your institution may have something similar or may be looking to develop its own. This list is by no means exhaustive; a full list is available in the Operational Guidance for Franchise Delivery.

Student entitlements Induction Feedback Personal tutor External input into course development Clear information about assessment and expectations around feedback Clear information about the course and support available Full list of student entitlements available in Course Handbook template Student Entitlements for collaborative students - a full list is available in the Course Handbook/ (Don’t go through each one but pick on a few key issues, VLE, feedback, clarity of information and support) As a student registered on a Leeds Beckett University programme you are entitled to: Opportunities for on-going feedback on your work and progress towards your assessments in every year of your course.   Participate in a course induction, which will be provided at the beginning of each year of your course. A meeting with your personal tutor once per semester. [All new and first year students will be invited to a meeting with their personal tutor within four weeks of the start of their studies]. A course that has been informed in its development by external stakeholders (e.g. employers, professional bodies). Participate in Personal Development Planning within the context of your course. (Faculty: remove this entitlement for non-refocused courses). Have the opportunity to engage in embedded activities within your course which develop and enhance your graduate employability and lifelong learning. (Faculty: remove this entitlement for non-refocused courses) Receive clear dates at the beginning of each module about your assessment, submission dates, when and how you receive formative feedback on assessment during every module, and how you will receive feedback on marked assessments within the 4 week feedback period. Receive clear and easy to understand information about your course and the services available to you. Be engaged, via your course student representative, in your course review, evaluation and development processes. Normally be given your course timetable no later than four weeks before the beginning of each semester. .

Start of the academic journey Clear expectations Explicit requirements Support during first year Flexible assessment and regular feedback Student success A robust induction programme sets the tone for how students can expect to be supported throughout their academic journey. (University of Bradford) What students appear to want from an induction programme is broadly what they want as a student, in that: A student’s success is dependant on: the provision of clear explicit information about what we expect of them; on-going support, particularly in the first year of study; flexible assessment and regular and robust feedback. It is worth noting that in line with University guidance, students should expect feedback on assessed work within 4 weeks of the date of assessment. Feedback should contain qualitative comments as well as a mark and should enable a student to reflect on their learning and progress accordingly. In the context of franchise, assessment is set by the University but partners do have the opportunity to contextualise assessment tasks to the relevant setting. It is the responsibility of the Link Tutor and the Course Leader to ensure contextualisation does take place as and when necessary. There are materials and resources available to Associate staff on the DEAP module which is housed on the VLE. How as an institution, you engage students in the learning journey is critical to their success.

What is student engagement? The UK Quality Code for Higher Education B5: Improving the motivation of students to engage in learning and to learn independently The participation of students in quality enhancement and quality assurance processes, resulting in the improvement of their educational experience Let’s move onto the third topic of the session: student engagement. QAA states that the term student engagement encompasses two areas: Improving the motivation of students to engage in learning and to learn independently The participation of students in quality enhancement and quality assurance processes, resulting in the improvement of their educational experience Both are underpinned by a desire / will to ensure student success.

Expectation of B5 “Higher education providers take deliberative steps to engage all students, individually and collectively, as partners in the assurance and enhancement of their educational experience” Representation of the student view through formal mechanisms Opportunity to be involved in quality enhancement and assurance The Quality Code, Chapter B5, Indicator7, QAA Indicator 7 of Chapter B5 encourages institutions to take deliberative steps to engage students both individually and collectively, to allow them to fulfil the role of learning partner. Student representation mechanisms provide a structured route to engaging students in quality assurance and enhancement. (You might not wish to add in the following statement depending on the audience). Since the last audit by the QAA of the University’s management of its collaborative provision, steps have been taken to ensure the consistency of student representation across all partners. This includes working more closely with the University’s Student Union to clarify student entitlements and support how student representatives and trained and supported. (CPA action plan, 2011)

Mechanisms for involving students: what might these include? We are going to pause for a few minutes and ask you to consider thinking about / noting down ways in which students might be engaged / involved?

Student engagement Mechanisms for involving students: Questionnaires, e.g., end of module / year Student representative structures Research activities – focus groups Student membership of committees Student consultation events Student involvement in new projects Student dialogue with decision makers Online discussion forums Formal quality processes, e.g., annual monitoring and review, mutual review, periodic programme review

Course reps Sustained strategy of student involvement Importance of the feedback loop One per level per course, nominated by students Improve quality Create a culture of student engagement One of the key enabling mechanisms in engaging the study body is the course representation strategy. Here at Leeds Beckett we would expect one student rep per level of each course. Course reps are fundamental to a sustained strategy of student involvement, whereby student views are collated and presented both formally and informally. It is equally important that institutions demonstrate how they have dealt with student feedback either by making changes or by explaining why changes cannot be made. The collation of feedback becomes meaningless if an institution is unable to evidence how they close (what has come to be known as) ‘the feedback loop’. Course reps have the capacity to improve quality through representing the student voice, informing monitoring and review processes and through playing an active part in how decisions are made to change, adapt and shape a course and the overall student experience. The effective appointment of course reps engenders a culture of student engagement – thus meeting external expectations (QAA) and those of Leeds Beckett

What do course reps need? Access to training and on-going support Regular access to senior staff Mutual sharing of information Information about mechanisms to collate feedback from students Involvement in decision making Ensure students feel rewarded for involvement Being a course rep is a positive and useful experience for a student, however it isn’t always any easy task and an effective course rep structure will ensure course reps are well supported, briefed and aware of their role. The key issues should be considered in the context of supporting student reps: Reps should be provided with a training and development programme – SU Online – open it out to collaborative partners Regular access to senior staff for their own support and informal liaison Mutual sharing of information – ensuring the feedback loop is closed Involvement in committee structure – attendance at AMR meetings Recognising the role they play, ensuring students feel valued and can articulate the part they have played, for example, enable them to recognise enhanced employability skills, CV experience

Additional resources Leeds Beckett Student Union National Union of Students / Higher Education Academy Student Engagement Toolkit Centre for Learning and Teaching Operational Guidance for Franchise Delivery To conclude, you can find additional resources at the following links: Leeds Beckett SU, National Union of Students, CLT and within the Operational Guidance for Franchise Delivery. Furthermore, we have a web page on student induction where you may access: This presentation Previous induction presentations Example induction programmes Exercises that you may want to use at induction including ice breakers A generic presentation that you can adapt with the support of the Link Tutor for your induction programmes. You will be familiar with developing and delivering induction programme, nonetheless, as your franchise partner we would expect any induction programme to incorporate a ‘LeedsBeckettness’; to ensure students are aware of their entitlements as a Leeds Beckett student, relevant regulations that determine how they succeed on a Leeds Beckett course and the opportunities available to them to fulfil their role as a learning partner.

Questions collaborations@leedsbeckett.ac.uk Thank you for listening to / attending this session. If you have any questions, please contact the Collaborations and Partnerships Group on collaborations@leedsbeckett.ac.uk