INT’L TRADE LAW BASIC GATT PILLARS I Prof David K. Linnan USC LAW # 665 Unit Four.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presentation on the Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures By Shashank Priya, Director, Department of Commerce.
Advertisements

WORLD TRADE ORGANISATION: AN OVERVIEW. BACKGROUND Great Depression, Protectionism and the Consequences Bretton Woods Institutions GATT 1947 and Failure.
1 “Introduction to EU Trade Policy” – July 2008 How We Make Trade Policy n Contents n Part I: EU Trade Powers n Part II: The evolving scope of Trade Policy.
Free Trade vs Fair Trade Winners and Losers. Why trade? Specialization and economies of scale in production lead to greater quantity of production in.
International and Regional Agreements Affecting Trade.
INT’L TRADE LAW: DOHA & SERVICES LIBERALIZATION Prof David K. Linnan USC LAW # 665 Unit Ten.
1 UNCTAD/Yeditepe Üniversitesi/IDRC Competition Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements (Istanbul, 31 July - 01 August 2006) by Philippe Brusick Head,
Univ. - Prof. Dr. Werner Meng, Europa Institut, Saarland University, Germany 1 WTO Law - Exceptions.
1 GATT Law and the World Trade Organization: Basic Principles Chapter 9 © 2005 West Legal Studies in Business/Thomson Learning.
INT’L TRADE LAW BASIC GATT PILLARS III Prof David K. Linnan USC LAW # 665 Unit Six.
European Union and China Bilateral Trade Relations: An Analysis
Workshop for Custom Committee, Almaty, Kazakhstan
Exception to rules on free trade Need to strike a balance between free trade and other values. Member can justify measures incompatible with WTO Agreements.
Importance of Intellectual Property Central issue in multilateral trade relations –Need for organization to see that there are intellectual property procedures.
Presented by: Prof. Wieslaw “Wes” Czyzowicz Ph. D. Szkola Glowna Handlowa w Warszawie HARMONIZATION OF THE POLISH CUSTOMS LAW WITH THE EUROPEAN UNION.
Ukrainian Reform Club’s International conference "CUSTOMS REFORM AND POLITICAL WILL", Kiev, March 17, 2011 Prof. Wieslaw „Wes” Czyżowicz, Ph.D. Former.
INT’L TRADE LAW BASIC GATT PILLARS IV Prof David K. Linnan USC LAW # 665 Unit Eight.
INT’L TRADE LAW INTRODUCTION Prof David K. Linnan USC LAW # 665 Unit One.
Support for the Modernisation of the Mongolian Standardisation system – EuropeAid/134305/C/SER/MN Training on standardisation Support to the Modernisation.
From GATT to WTO GATT 1947 –ITO failed WTO Most Favored Nation Treatment Article I General Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment 1. With respect to customs.
Strategic Trade Policy in Context: Canada- Caricom The Global Trading System and Trade Agreements International Law and Domestic Law Multilateral, regional.
INT’L TRADE LAW BASIC GATT PILLARS II Prof David K. Linnan USC LAW # 665 Unit Five.
1 Overview of the Doha Work Programme Implications for the Developing Countries Commercial Diplomacy Programme UNCTADWWW.UNCTAD.ORG/COMMDIP December 2001.
INT’L TRADE LAW BASIC GATT PILLARS: EXCEPTIONS Prof David K. Linnan USC LAW # 665 Unit Eight.
Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO
INT’L TRADE LAW: DOHA DECLARATION & AGRICULTURAL TRADE Prof David K. Linnan USC LAW # 665 Unit Nine.
International Trade Regulation Oxicorp Case - P. 6.1 Victor H. Bouganim WCL, American University.
Understanding the WTO. Chapter 1 BASICS §1 What is the World Trade Organization? Simply put: the World Trade Organization (WTO) deals with the rules of.
Subsidies No clear rules and no prohibition in GATT 1947 (notification and negotiation about limiting subsidies). Tokyo Round Subsidies Code. Revision.
Trade in Goods Gilles Leblanc Canada-India Trade Simulation June 20-24, 2011.
AG -1 © WTO – OMC 2012 The WTO Agreement on Agriculture Serafino Marchese, Chief, Training and Capacity Building Section WTO Institute for Training and.
Chapter 06 International and Comparative Law Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
- Existing Multilateral Disciplines on Trade in Services First agreement of multilateral and legally-enforceable rules aimed at the liberalisation of trade.
INT’L TRADE LAW BASIC GATT PILLARS IV CONT’D Prof David K. Linnan USC LAW # 665 Unit Nine.
CUTS Institute for Regulation & Competition Strengthening Skills on Commercial and Economic Diplomacy Training Programme for Civil Servants and Executives(CDS.05)
Some important Globalization terms…. Globalization… A trend whereby local, provincial or national activities become global. There are different kinds.
General Agreements on Tariffs and Trade Major Provisions of GATT: 1.Tariff: GATT obligates each country to accord nondiscriminatory, most favored nation.
Basic economic freedoms. 1. Free movement of goods The Community shall be based upon a customs union which shall cover all trade in goods and which shall.
1 CHAPTER VI BUSINESS- GOVERNMENT TRADE RELATIONS INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS.
Victor H. Bouganim WCL, American University
Economic Environment of Business International Trade. GATT and the WTO.
Quantitative restrictions: article XI GATT General prohibition: a cornerstone of the GATT system. The prohibition applies to imports and exports. Broad.
INT’L TRADE LAW BASIC GATT PILLARS: EXCEPTIONS Prof David K. Linnan USC LAW # 665 Unit Ten.
INT’L TRADE LAW BASIC GATT PILLARS I Prof David K. Linnan USC LAW # 665 Unit Three.
International Economic Order: Implications for Globalization Tain-Jy Chen Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research.
Trade, Environment and the WTO UNECA Workshop on Trade and Environment Dakar, Senegal June 2006 Benjamin Simmons Economics and Trade Branch Division.
1 M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 29 – Customs union Bilateral screening:
” “ International Trade Law WTO (Lecture 12) Prof.ssa M.E. de Leeuw, Ph.D., Dr., Università di Ferrara.
INT’L TRADE LAW BASIC GATT PILLARS II Prof David K. Linnan USC LAW # 665 Unit Four.
Unit 7 International Law of Treaties
MGT601 SME MANAGEMENT. Lesson 39 Word Trade Organization (WTO.
Exception to rules on free trade
International Economics
New Customs Legislation of the Eurasian Economic Union
INT’L TRADE LAW BASIC GATT PILLARS IV CONT’D
Cross-National Cooperation and Agreements
Cross-National Cooperation and Agreements
Department Of Commerce
By Karwan dana Ishik university
Historical development
Workshop of the Confederation of Nepalese Industries (CNI)
Customs duties (I) No prohibition.
Internal (single) market
Trade - WTO.
Comparison of Obligations in U. S
PROPOSED ARCHITECTURE OF SPECIAL SAFEGUARDS MECHANISMS
INTERNAL MARKET.
The WTO-GATT Agreement 1994
Workshop of the Confederation of Nepalese Industries (CNI)
Trade.
Presentation transcript:

INT’L TRADE LAW BASIC GATT PILLARS I Prof David K. Linnan USC LAW # 665 Unit Four

GATT PILLARS FOUR PILLARS Idea of four pillars within GATT/WTO system: 1.Most Favored Nations 2.National Treatment 3.Trade Liberalization (negotiated tariff reductions in trade rounds) 4.Non-Tariff Barriers & “Fair Trade” CONSIDER WTO VIDEO AS PRINCIPLES ACROSS DIFFERENT AGREEMENTS, IDEA ALMOST OF CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLES

GATT AS CONST I LOOK AT ARTICLES I & II, WALK THROUGH THE GATT LIKE WOULD US CONST GATT 1947 AGREEMENT IMost Favored Nations IISchedules of Concessions (tariff reductions) IIINational Treatment (internal taxation & regs)

GATT AS CONST II LOOK AT ARTICLES I & II, WALK THROUGH THE GATT LIKE WOULD US CONST (CONTD) GATT 1947 AGREEMENT IVMovies VFreedom of Transit VIAntidumping & Counterveiling Duties

GATT AS CONST III LOOK AT ARTICLES I & II, WALK THROUGH THE GATT LIKE WOULD US CONST (CONTD) GATT 1947 AGREEMENT VIICustoms Valuation VIIIImport/Export Fees IXMarks of Origin

GATT AS CONST IV LOOK AT ARTICLES I & II, WALK THROUGH THE GATT LIKE WOULD US CONST (CONTD) GATT 1947 AGREEMENT XTrade Regulation Publication (clear laws) XIElimination of Quantitative Restrictions (tariffication) XIIBalance of Payments & Safeguard Provisions

GATT AS CONST V LOOK AT ARTICLES I & II, WALK THROUGH THE GATT LIKE WOULD US CONST (CONTD) GATT 1947 AGREEMENT XIIINon-Discrim Admin of Quant restrictions XIVNon-Discrim Exceptions (mostly monetary basis) XVIMF Exchange Arrangements XVISubsidies

GATT AS CONST VI LOOK AT ARTICLES I & II, WALK THROUGH THE GATT LIKE WOULD US CONST (CONTD) GATT 1947 AGREEMENT XVIIState Trading Enterprises XVIIILDCs & deviation XIXEmergency Surge Protection

GATT AS CONST VII LOOK AT ARTICLES I & II, WALK THROUGH THE GATT LIKE WOULD US CONST (CONTD) GATT 1947 AGREEMENT XXExceptions a. Public Morals b.protecting human, animal or plant life/health c.import/export gold d.intellectual property protection e.Prison Labor Goods f.National Treasures of artistic, historic or archaeological value g.Exhaustible Natural Resources h.Commodities agreements i.Local Market Materials j.Material Shortages

GATT AS CONST VIII LOOK AT ARTICLES I & II, WALK THROUGH THE GATT LIKE WOULD US CONST (CONTD) GATT 1947 AGREEMENT XXINational Security XXIIGood Faith Negotiation/Consultation XXIIINullification or impairment XXIVCustoms Unions & FTAs

MFN BACK TO ARTICLE I GATT 1947 AGREEMENT

TARIFF ISSUES I TARIFF BINDINGS (STATE LEVEL) Later we talk about tariffs at enterprise level as customs, here we talk about govt schedule level of tariff negotiations: Problems: 1. Since there are different kinds of tariffs possible, can the govt negotiate under GATT/WTO one variety of tariff bindings, but then switch their tariff system and be in compliance still (US-Argentina proceedings re textiles & footwear)? 2. How to deal with the general problem that tariff schedules are negotiated by category rather than individual product, but then on a product level what do you do about disagreements whether individual products are placed in correct categories (bearing in mind that certain newer products present special problems, since when the categories were negotiated in 1960s the newer products had not yet been invented (US-EU proceedings re LAN as computer versus telecommunications products)?

TARIFF ISSUES II TARIFF BINDINGS (STATE LEVEL)(Cont’d) Note at state level the references to the Vienna Convention on treaties for technical rules for interpreting GATT/WTO as int’l agreement: 1. Normal rule is go with plain meaning of text, purpose of the treaty (in context) 2. In cases of ambiguity, can refer to treaty negotiations, etc. (legislative history equivalents) US LAWYERS NOTE THAT TREATY INTERPRETATION RULES DIVERGE FROM OUR LEGISLATIVE INTERPRETATION RULES, FOLLOWING INSTEAD CIVIL LAW PRACTICE