MEGA Electric Utility Tariff Measures For Large Industrial Customers James A. Ault, President Michigan Electric & Gas Association 110 W. Michigan Avenue,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 The Potential For Implementing Demand Response Programs In Illinois Rick Voytas Manager, Corporate Analysis Ameren Services May 12, 2006.
Advertisements

Oklahoma Gas and Electric APSC Workshop on Electricity Demand Response and Advanced Metering for Integrated Utilities Demand Response & Automated Metering.
1 July 15, 2007Alcoa Energy Regulatory Affairs NARUC / FERC Demand Response Collaborative Perspectives of a Large End Use Participant of NYISO Programs.
Monetizing Energy Saving Opportunities CBC Energy Group LLC 2011 Commercial and Industrial Energy Solutions.
1 Presentation to the Wisconsin Industrial Energy Group (WIEG) T. Graham Edwards President & CEO August 9, 2007.
University of Pittsburgh School of Law 2013 Energy Law and Policy Institute Eric Matheson Energy Advisor to PAPUC Commissioner James H. Cawley August 2,
Electrical Engineering Fundamentals for Non-EEs; © B. Rauf
Enhancing Interruptible Rates Through MISO Demand Response: WIEG Annual Meeting June 19, 2008 Presented by: Kavita Maini, Principal KM Energy Consulting,
Loads Acting as a Resource Relationships with QSEs and LSEs
Connecticut’s Energy Future Removing Barriers to Promote Energy Sustainability: Public Policy and Financing December 2, 2004 Legislative Office Building.
November 2001 CHRISTENSENASSOCIATES RTP as a Demand Response Program – How Much Load Response Can You Expect? Peak Load Management Alliance Fall Conference.
Non-Utility Costs in Utility Bills M. Sarafolean J. Kaman Iowa Industrial Energy Group Meeting April 9, 2013.
COMPETITIVE ELECTRICITY MARKETS March 15, PA Customer Choice Legislation  Distribution service remains regulated by PAPUC.  Transmission service.
GDS Associates, Inc. 1 Virginia Energy Efficiency and Conservation Savings Potential Presented by Richard F. Spellman Vice President GDS Associates, Inc.
Demand Side Management The Natural Purview of Utilities The Customer Viewpoint Rates on the Rise in a Rough Economy - Responding to New Realities Marketing.
Renewable Energy: Legal and Policy Issues Frank Prager Vice President, Environmental Policy Xcel Energy November 20, 2009 Frank Prager Vice President,
© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC October 17, 2013 Robert A. Weishaar, Jr. ON SITE ENERGY – INTERPLAY WITH PJM DEMAND RESPONSE PROGRAMS Harrisburg, PA.
SMART METERING SOLUTIONS TO SHAPE OUR ENERGY FUTURE Empowering the Customer Experience Marketing Executives Conference Cranwell Resort Lenox, Massachusetts.
Solar Energy Services: Delivering Cost Effective Solar Power March 18, 2004 Claire Broido SunEdison, LLC (443) 226.
1 Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008.
Why is WPL filing a rate case?  Last Base Case Rates were set January, 2007  Cost of our utility investments must be reflected in prices our customers.
Overview of Distributed Generation Applications June 16, 2003 Harrisburg, PA Joel Bluestein Energy and Environmental Analysis, Inc.
ERCOT Demand Side Working Group Mary Anne Brelinsky Eagle Energy Partners.
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. Existing Demand Response Programs Kurt Castleberry Director, Operating Committee Support May 24, 2007.
1 WPL Regulatory Update Scott R. Smith Director, Regulatory Affairs.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Strategic Planning for DSM in a Community-owned Utility Presented by Shu-Sun Kwan & Ed Arguello Colorado Springs Utilities 2005 APPA Engineering & Operations.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SERVICES SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON Leading the Way in Electricity | Business Customer Division 1 For External Use Economic Development.
1 Presentation to: SWEDE Conference Austin, TX May 2, 2013 Tom Weaver, PE Historical Voltage Range VVO Range “A” Service “A”
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
Discussion Forum 2004 APPA National Conference June 19 – 23, 2004 Seattle, Washington Issues for Green Power Programs Designing Marketing and Pricing.
Demand Response: Next Steps OPSI Annual Meeting October 1, 2012 Howard J. Haas.
Industrial Energy Engineering C4S March 27, 2008.
Partnering for the Future WIEG Meeting September 16, 2010.
Chicago Advanced Energy Demand Response & CSP Evolution Kellen Bollettino Comverge Inc. 10/23/14.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
Distributed Solar Generation: Value and Pricing Austin Electricity Conference April 9, 2015 Ashley Brown Executive Director, Harvard Electricity Policy.
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
©2005 PJM 1 APEx The Mature PJM Market Kenneth W. Laughlin PJM October 31, 2005 Orlando, FL.
IWWG Annual Conference Wind Management at MISO July 22, 2011.
1 Demand Response A 28 Year History of Demand Response Programs for the Electric Cooperatives of Arkansas by Forest Kessinger Manager, Rates and Forecasting.
DR issues in California discussed last year in March Historical DR in California: some background issues –Twenty years of programs/tariffs I/C and AC cycling.
Retail Rates Update WIEG Board Meeting May 6, 2010 WIEG Board Meeting May 6, 2010 Presented by: Kavita Maini, Principal KM Energy Consulting, LLC.
Reallocating Distribution Upgrade Costs for Farm Digester Projects by Ed Cubero, Sam Harms, Sam Shannon University of Wisconsin-Madison.
OPSI Annual Meeting October 13, Session 6 Reliability Pricing Model: Are Further Changes Necessary? Reluctantly…yes But States should also be.
MODULE 7 WHO IS OUR COMPETITION?. WHAT IS SUPPLIER COMPETITION? OTHER SUPPLIERS In a deregulated market, fair competition is important! This means IGS.
An Overview of Demand Response in California July 2011.
Demand Response
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
Incentives and Rate Designs for Efficiency and Demand Response Drs. Steven D. Braithwait & Laurence D. Kirsch CA Energy Consulting DRRC/CEC Workshop January.
New Incentives for Pursuing Demand Response Scott Strauss and Sean Flynn Spiegel & McDiarmid APPA Legal Seminar San Francisco – November 2004.
OPSI Annual Meeting October 8 th Should all capacity resources be paid the same? -Demand Response operational deployment.
Utility Benefits of Demand Response Trevor Lauer DTE Energy Marketing Executive Conference Coeur d’Alene, Idaho.
The Duke Save-A-Watt Proposal: An Economist’s Look James A. Polito, Ph.D. Director, Economic and Regulatory Analysis Indiana Office of Utility Consumer.
PJM©2014www.pjm.com State of Demand Response Stu Bresler Vice President- Market Operations PJM Interconnection 10 th OPSI Annual Meeting October 13, 2014.
AES NewEnergy To The Institute For Regulatory Policy Studies May 18, 2000 By David L. Townley.
Market Failures Chapter 7 Sections 2 and 3 Economic Solutions to Global Warming.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
1 A Conversation about MISO Paul Spicer November 8, 2007.
Smart Grid Tariff Changes
SMECO Demand Response filing
Wind Management at MISO
Time of Use Rates: A Practical Option – If Done Well
Mass Market Demand Solutions in PJM
Affordable Energy Production from Renewable Fuel
The Future of Demand Response in New England
Distributed Solar Generation: Value and Pricing
Electricity Demand Response and Advanced Metering for Integrated Utilities Arkansas Public Service Commission Lonni Dieck AEP May 24, 2007.
Presentation transcript:

MEGA Electric Utility Tariff Measures For Large Industrial Customers James A. Ault, President Michigan Electric & Gas Association 110 W. Michigan Avenue, Suite 375 Lansing, MI

MEGA Board of Directors

Basic Industrial Tariff Offerings Time of Use / Peak – Off Peak Interruptible Service (Curtailment) Capacity Buyback / Demand Response Market Pricing Options Economic Development Rider Load Retention Contract Special Contracts

Industrial Tariff Business Issues Utility in position of offering favorable options to certain customers vs others Industrial processes limit ability of customer to use interruptible rates Customer concern with impact of interruptions on work in progress Legal and regulatory limits on cross subsidies (e.g. Michigan cost of service law – 2008)

Alpena Power Company Large Industrial Service tariff Alternate Energy Manufacturing Service Facility closed 6 or more months Hemlock variety targeted special contract Special Power Contracts Allowed per Tariff MPSC approval required

Indiana Michigan Power (AEP) Contract Service Interruptible Power CS-IRP No MI customers Buy through option at market prices Demand Response Service DRS – Indiana DRS-1 PJM emergencies DRS-2 curtailment at market price DRS-3 ancillary markets – few takers Economic Development Rider EDR Customer who qualifies given reduced billing demand 10 new jobs demonstrated (Indiana) Not presently effective in Michigan (cross subsidy issues)

Xcel Energy (NSP – Wisconsin) Large Industrial Service MI-1 Peak Controlled Time of Day MPC- 1 Experimental Market-Based and Real Time Pricing CMP-1; RTP-1 (Wisconsin)

Wisconsin Public Service Cp-1M Large Industrial Service Cp-I2M Interruptible Rider (emergency or economic) Cp-ND Next Day 1 year term Pricing for critical (5 days/yr), peak (100), mid-economy (100) and economy (200)pe OPE Online Power Exchange Customer load reduction offers RTMP Real Time Market Pricing (Wisconsin) Non-firm LMP + MISO + $10 mWh

We Energies General Primary – Time of Use Cp-1 General Primary – Interruptible Cp-2 General Primary – Curtailable Cp-3 Experimental Dollars for Power DFP Credits for load reduction Experimental Power Market Incentives PMI Market prices for curtailment

Upper Peninsula Power Company Large Industrial Rate Cp-U Capacity Buyback Rider Cp-1B Interruptible Rider Cp-I Real Time Market Pricing RTMP

Wisconsin Contract Service Tariff CST Wis. Stat Requires a market compensation option for interruptions Also contract market pricing options Allow customers to gain market benefits subject to market risks PSCW must determine there is no harm to either utility shareholders or other customers